School Committee - January 31, 2024
School Committee, 1/31/24 - Meeting Summary
Date: 1/31/2024
Type: School Committee
Generated: September 13, 2025 at 07:05 PM
AI Model: Perplexity
-
Meeting Metadata
- Date & time: January 31, 2024; time not explicitly stated
- Location / format: Remote meeting conducted via Zoom; broadcast live and recorded by Sharon TV
- Attendees (School Committee Members): Avi (Chair), Alan, Julie, Jeremy, Georgeann, Adam, Dan
- Student representative not present or no participation recorded
- Director of Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion (Hannah Trivedi) attended and spoke
- Other administrative staff included (names not fully specified)
-
Agenda Overview
- Public comments (excluded from summary as per instructions)
- School Year 2024-2025 Calendar Discussion
- School Handbook – Program of Studies 2024-2025 Discussion and Vote (specifically double override language)
- Budget Review deferred to next meeting
-
Major Discussions
Topic: 2024-2025 School Year Calendar Discussion
What triggered the discussion: Presentation by calendar subcommittee chair Julie Rowe following survey results and community interest; review of cultural/religious holiday recognition and impact on school year length
Key points debated:
- Strong community interest (two-thirds survey respondents) in adding more cultural holidays to the calendar including Diwali, Lunar New Year, and Eid al-Fitr
- Strong support for maintaining first day of Rosh Hashanah off; disagreement about removing second day of Rosh Hashanah due to its importance to Jewish community
- Consideration of extending school year possibly into late June due to added holidays and snow days
- Discussion of balancing representation of diverse cultures with maintaining instructional time and avoiding late school year end dates
- Proposals to add cultural holidays and offset calendar length by half days before Thanksgiving, Good Friday early release, or other adjustments
- Concerns about productivity of late June school days due to weather, attendance, and academic focus
- Emphasis on the need for clarity on principles or criteria governing choice of days off, including attendance patterns and community representation
- Views on inclusion and community representation emphasized alongside pragmatic calendar constraints
- Input from multiple community members, including Jewish, Muslim, Indian, and Christian families supporting added holidays and inclusion without subtracting existing holidays
- DEI director participated emphasizing community diversity, inclusion importance, and challenges of balancing calendar days with instructional requirements and contract negotiations with teachers union
- Committee members highlighted Sharon’s unique recognition of second day of Rosh Hashanah and the aspiration to be welcoming to all communities
Member Contributions & Stances: - Avi (Chair): Moderated, expressed appreciation for diverse community input
- Alan: No explicit contribution recorded for this topic
- Julie (Calendar Subcommittee Chair): Presented survey data, absence data, calendar options, explained challenges and community preferences, favored transparent discussion
- Jeremy (referred in transcript as “Wen”): Asked clarifying questions about productivity of days late in school year and half days, supported inclusion of holidays, suggested looking at calendar compression like other districts
- Georgeann: Advocated for adding holidays with appropriate compensation by half days, favored removing the second day of Rosh Hashanah, and emphasized continuing dialogue with community
- Adam: Concerned about removing the second day of Rosh Hashanah due to significant observance within Sharon’s Jewish community, supported adding days, shared community feedback
- Dan: Emphasized that Sharon’s unique demographics require special consideration, supported adding rather than subtracting days, and urged clear application of principles to avoid offense
- Alan (possibly referenced as “Shauna” in transcript due to ambiguity, but no clear contribution recorded here)
Areas of Agreement/Disagreement: - Agreement: Need to add cultural holidays beyond current calendar; importance of representing diverse community traditions; need to balance calendar length and instructional time; desire for clear principles guiding decisions
- Disagreement: Whether to remove the second day of Rosh Hashanah — some support for removal, others strongly oppose to maintain tradition and community inclusivity
Key Quotes: - “If there’s a way to put all five holidays [back] on the calendar, I’d vote for that right now.” — Avi (from related context in source [1])
- “I think that this was a really beautiful conversation… only folks advocating for removal were members of the community whose holiday that is.” — Avi (Chair)
- “…we’re not going to be investing ourselves in new content for kids in those June dates… it’s really a question of what is happening on the day, as opposed to whether or not your head’s in the game.” — Veronica
- “…I would hope that we would engage with our interfaith coalition… not just certain religions.” — Georgeann Lewis
- “…the more days that we insert … those half days are not nearly as productive.” — Judy Krause
Outcome / Next steps: - No final decision; continued community outreach encouraged including letters
- Understanding that calendar must be negotiated with the teachers union (STA)
- Recognition that calendar vote occurs annually; next decisions and adjustments expected
- Budget discussion deferred to next meeting; calendar ongoing discussion
Topic: School Handbook – Program of Studies 2024-2025 (Course Override Policy)
What triggered the discussion: Review of new language regarding double overrides prohibiting them outright in course selection process
Key points debated:
- Concern that strict prohibition on double overrides is too inflexible and could negatively impact advanced/gifted students wishing to accelerate
- Discussion about balancing educator workload vs. student needs for academic flexibility
- Proposal to soften language from “not permitted” to “generally not permitted” or include exceptions
- Some members advocated for removal of the restrictive paragraph entirely, citing existing override processes as sufficient
- Consensus that encouragement of advanced students is important and policy language should reflect that without creating discouraging rigid barriers
Member Contributions & Stances: - Avi (Chair): Expressed alignment with need for flexibility in policy language, supported reworking language or removing restrictive paragraph
- Alan: No clear contribution on this topic
- Julie: Supported language flexibility, emphasized importance of advanced students being accommodated
- Jeremy (Wen): Raised concerns about inflexible language, agreed with need for student consideration
- Georgeann: Called for reconsidering the paragraph; emphasized student encouragement
- Adam: Supported a softened language approach reflecting “rarely permitted” rather than absolute prohibition
- Dan: Agreed with need to support advanced students and flexibility
Areas of Agreement/Disagreement: - Agreement: Current language too rigid; need to encourage advanced students and allow exceptions
- Disagreement: Some viewed softening language sufficient, others preferred removal of paragraph
Key Quotes: - “The word that you used that I really liked there was kind of language that discourages.” — Alan
- “I think… these policies are our policies, and then they are considered when there is an exception, we’re reasonable human beings.” — Alan
- “…we hold these seats for a reason… I couldn’t vote yes on something that would leave any student feeling blocked.” — Dan
Outcome / Next steps: - Motion made and seconded to approve program of studies pending removal or rewording of the restrictive paragraph
- Motion carried unanimously 7-0
- Administration to rework language to allow flexibility and encourage advanced students
- Further discussion anticipated in October
- Votes
Vote 1: Program of Studies Approval (with revised language on double overrides)
- Motion: Approve program of studies pending removal or rewording of rigid language on double overrides
- Result: Passed 7-0
- Roll-call:
- Avi — Yes
- Alan — Yes
- Julie — Yes
- Jeremy (Wen) — Yes
- Georgeann — Yes
- Adam — Yes
- Dan — Yes
Vote 2: Motion to Adjourn
- Result: Passed 7-0
- Roll-call:
- Avi — Yes
- Alan — Yes
- Julie — Yes
- Jeremy (Wen) — Yes
- Georgeann — Yes
- Adam — Yes
- Dan — Yes
- Presentations Without Discussion
- Calendar Subcommittee Presentation by Julie Rowe covering survey results, absence data, calendar options, and implications for 2024-25 school year
- Director of Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion (Hannah Trivedi) spoke briefly offering context on DEI involvement in calendar discussions
- Action Items & Follow-Ups
- Administration to revise program of studies language on double overrides to allow flexibility and encourage advanced students before final approval
- School Committee to continue outreach and receive community input on 2024-25 calendar options
- Additional budget meeting scheduled for next Wednesday to review operating budget and fees (no date given in transcript)
- Open Questions / Items Deferred
- Final decisions on 2024-25 school calendar, including which cultural holidays to officially add and potential calendar length trade-offs, deferred pending further community input and negotiation with STA
- Budget review deferred to next meeting to receive governor’s budget details and address questions
- Appendices (Optional)
- Acronyms: STA (Sharon Teachers Association), DEI (Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion)
- Referenced Documents: Program of Studies 2024-25, Calendar survey data (not attached in transcript)
This summary captures the detailed discussion about the 2024-25 school calendar, including community and committee member input on holiday recognition and calendar structure, as well as the debate about the program of studies’ course override language, reflecting a focus on inclusivity and academic flexibility. The meeting also planned budget discussions for a future date.
Document Metadata
- Original Transcript Length: 78,429 characters
- Summary Word Count: 1,479 words
- Compression Ratio: 7.6:1
- Transcript File:
School-Committee_1-31-2024_ffbf57d0.wav
Transcript and Video
All right.
This meeting will be conducted remotely over Zoom.
Attendance by board and commission members will be remote.
Remote attendance shall count towards a quorum.
The meeting will be broadcast live and recorded by Sharon TV. If you elect to enable your webcam, your image and background may be broadcast with or without sound. First up on our agenda, as always, is public comments as part of our community updates.
I do just want to throw it out there as a recommendation or a request.
I certainly can't control or tell people what they can use public comments for.
I do just want people to note that there is a public comment period after we begin to discuss the calendar.
That's intentional.
We do want to hear feedback from the public regarding the calendar.
There's some substantive change that's being discussed around the calendar.
And so there's an opportunity for the public to speak.
I just want folks to be aware that for public comment, I just don't want it to become repetitive and get used in sort of two places.
All right.
That being said, is there anybody who wants to keep time or should I keep it?
All right, Judy.
Two minutes per speaker, please.
Try to keep with it or just keep to that time limit.
Other than that, do as you please.
First up, I see Judy Crosby. I'm hitting ask to unmute.
I don't know why it's not being cooperative.
Not sure what's going on here. I'm hitting ask to unmute. I'm hitting ask to unmute. I'm hitting ask to unmute. I'm hitting ask to unmute.
Do you want me to try to hit it, Avi? Yeah, can you try? I've tried three times.
If you could try again.
If you could try.
No.
Not working?
No.
All right, let me go to Mira Belinki. We'll come back to Judy Crosby.
I'm hitting ask to unmute.
Oh, there we go.
We can't hear you. It shows as...
How about now? Now we can.
Fantastic.
Thank you.
So I'm here to talk about the curriculum.
I requested the sex ed curriculum from middle school.
Parents have actually been having trouble getting it. I brought this up at the previous school committee meeting.
I have not got a complete curriculum yet.
And it's a little bit troubling because already in the little bit that I've seen, there's a lot of content which really ought to be re-evaluated.
And it would be good to have more than a set of eyes on it. So just an example. So this is from one of the slides.
And it basically takes the gender identity view that sex is separate from gender.
And yet, strangely enough, it talks about boys having nocturnal emissions, which it defines as ejaculation of semen.
And then goes on in the next line to say that this could happen to either sex.
So is sex or gender the same thing or not?
I think it's something that the school should decide and try to be consistent on.
And another thing, same slide show.
So kids are watching a video where it advocates for teen boys to have unrestricted access to the girls' locker room because if that's what makes them feel authentic, then go for it, boys.
Now, I know Massachusetts law does allow this, but should the school be advocating for this as good policy?
And should this be brought up as something as fact or as something that students could debate?
Because the way it's done in the class now, this is a fact. Boys should go into the girls' locker room.
Now, eighth grade curriculum.
It talks about responsible decision-making.
So eighth grade is for 13 and 14-year-old.
And here's the slide.
Responsible decision-making is that 13 and 14-year-olds should practice safer sex.
I'd like to remind you that the age of consent in Massachusetts is 16.
And if we have 13 and 14-year-olds practicing any kind of sex... Sorry, Ms. Blinky.
It's two minutes, so just finish your sentence.
All right. Last thing.
Another slide saying that you should be practicing safer sex with multiple partners.
That's under prevention.
At 13.
Thank you. Thank you.
All right. Judy Krause, we're going to try this again.
Thank you. It also wasn't letting me turn my camera on. I was on my iPad. So I don't know what that was about.
But I wanted to ask for a follow-up.
And I don't know if maybe add an agenda item to an upcoming meeting.
At the end of fiscal year 23, there was $1,219,000, just about, sitting in the cafeteria revolving account.
There was clear discussion in October about improvements that were going to be made in food service and a spend-down plan.
What was said at a joint meeting when you presented to FinCom that, oh, everybody had that issue. The audit clearly concluded everyone did not have that issue and that most schools are spending about 85% of their budget on, like, food and service.
And Sharon was spending, like, 40%. So clear corrective action was needed.
There was substantial discussion in October.
I think now that we're heading into February, it's worth monitoring so you don't wind up in the same situation at the end of the year. And I'm raising it now because fees are on the budget discussion for tonight.
And you do charge some lunch fees for staff and also for kids buying snacks and things.
So I do think it's relevant.
But I would love, as a community member, to have an update and ensure we're spending that money down and getting the kids the right things.
Thanks.
All right.
Seeing no further hands, I would throw it to our Secretary for Correspondence.
My understanding is we don't have correspondence tonight.
Do we have a student rep here?
If so, please raise your hand.
I don't believe that we have a student rep present.
And so, Dr. Patel, I believe you don't have general updates tonight, correct?
No, I'm going to hold those for the next meeting.
Absolutely. All right.
So then we will move to discussion items.
The first discussion item being our school year 2024-2025 calendar discussion and options.
I will throw that over to our calendar subcommittee chair, Julie Rowe.
Thank you, Avi.
And Shane, are you able?
Are you there?
Yes. Are you able? Okay, great. Thank you. Thank you very much.
So I just want to frame this to get started to the community.
I'm very excited. A lot of people seem like they're very interested in the topic.
So we would like to discuss this in public.
We've met to talk about it in terms of like negotiation with the STA, but we really felt that it was important to be very transparent.
So we have not made any decisions or otherwise settled anything.
So this is not a settled issue.
And so that is why we are welcoming community comment.
If you don't get a chance to talk tonight, we would love to see your letter.
Prefer to see a letter rather than on Facebook, but I'll be watching Facebook too.
So overall, the calendar subcommittee was commissioned last year because we received a petition asking to add a cultural holiday, cultural slash religious holiday to the calendar.
And we felt at the time it was really important for us to evaluate this sort of as a whole and not just kind of do one thing at a time. So we established the calendar subcommittee.
So we wanted to understand our community's preferences as well as balance the diversity of Sharon with the fact that we are trying to maintain continuity, optimize learning time, and so forth.
So to date, there has been a survey that was sent to the school community.
There were 858 unique responses, which I think is a phenomenal number and showed a lot of interest in this. In addition, I also analyzed the absence data.
Thank you, Jane, for getting that for the past year because I wanted to see if there were any patterns in absences.
As I said, we had an executive session to discuss strategy for negotiating with the STA regarding this issue.
And now it is a member of now it's on the agenda.
So we're going to share some of the key results. We're going to provide some options that we came up with.
And again, nothing is subtle.
This will be an opportunity for the school committee to share their opinions in public on different options being considered.
And most importantly, we would like to hear your feedback to inform our next steps as we move to several options that we will then propose to the STA for final approval.
So the survey.
We found by a two to one margin that the respondents wanted to add more holidays to the current calendar, despite the impact it may have on the last day of school date in June. So they said they would rather have a longer school year with more holidays than a shorter school year with fewer holidays.
So that was pretty clear.
We also I also looked at the absence data and to see if there was any pattern about like, is there a particular day where there's a lot of absences for a particular holiday? And as you might imagine, the days of the highest absenteeism occur occur before one of the vacation weeks or a three day weekend.
From what we could ascertain, there did not seem to be particularly low attendance on the holidays. So if you look at the graph that I'm showing.
Oops, can we go back?
Thanks.
Sorry.
Okay. So the chart that's here, this is the people who this is this is the holidays that people found to be most important.
So in the first box, you can see the highest amount of people were interested in having Yom Kippur and the first day of Rosh Hashanah off.
Then sort of in the next bucket, the second day of Rosh Hashanah, as well as Diwali and Good Friday. So there was support like about half, roughly, or a little less, a little more than half support for that compared to Yom Kippur and Rosh Hashanah.
There was support for Lunar New Year.
There was support for Eid.
And then there are, you know, there's other, many other holidays that our community celebrates, but not sort of a critical mass. So we picked this apart and we generally overall feel it's appropriate to recognize cultural religious holidays of importance to large groups in our town.
I think people need to understand that Sharon's tradition of giving Yom Kippur and Rosh Hashanah days one and two off is because those were, because the rules had been, if you expect low attendance on a particular day, then that day would not count for school.
So we, so I guess it was decided many decades ago that these were appropriate days to take off.
Now it is a little more loose.
My understanding of the law is a little looser.
So you can sort of acknowledge important cultural holidays.
So as a result of this feeling, two thirds of the survey respondents said they preferred more holidays.
So one option to consider is to recognize Diwali, Lunar, New Year, and Eid al-Fatera.
And I apologize if I'm mispronouncing anything.
With a day off from school.
Um, we also saw that the first support for the first day of Rosh Hashanah is strong and the support for the second day is somewhat less strong.
So, um, at least for the next school year, it might be a good idea because it falls Rosh Hashanah is on a Thursday. The second day is on a Friday.
That might be, um, a good day to take off, but we're open.
Um, and the proposed holidays caused the school year to extend well into late June.
Um, and so these, I think everybody understands that the farther we go into June, the less optimal it is for learning.
So, um, we're, if we want to think about days that we could sort of add back, one option could be changing the day before Thanksgiving to an early release day, which means that no longer would be a full day. It would be a half day. Um, as you might imagine, this is very, um, dependent on a given year's, uh, holiday, like where they fall during the week. So, uh, currently Yom Kippur does not impact any school days, but another year it might.
Um, and again, some of the holidays we were considering adding this year may not, may, may fall on a weekend next year. Um, and another, you know, some may say, what about December 23rd?
Um, this year we have, uh, Christmas is on a Wednesday.
So, uh, the 23rd, having a half day on the 23rd, um, does not seem like a good idea.
Um, I think many people feel that that would not really be a productive day of school.
So when we might think about having a half day on, um, the 23rd or another day, it is, uh, in other words, what I'm saying is the 23rd, having the 23rd off this year is a function of the calendar, but in other years, the 23rd might not be off.
And then that would also contribute to fewer days in June. Finally, um, as we said, it's, it's important to end as early as possible in June.
Um, and we have some other constraints.
So school should not start earlier than the week before Labor Day. This is, um, you know, the, uh, this decision we've reached with the, uh, Sharon teachers.
Um, and I said about the 23rd and we can't change school vacation weeks because those are aligned with other towns.
Um, and we shouldn't alter them because I think it would wreak a lot of havoc on teacher schedules and we cannot change federal holidays.
So one day that we could consider, um, also doing a half day would be an early release on good Friday.
So if we added three days onto the calendar for 24, 25, um, the, the earliest it would end would be Wednesday, June 18th.
And if we had all five snow days, it would be June 23rd.
Did I have that?
Do I have that right? That's if we don't take. No, no, no, no, no. It's not to do with the snow days. The range is June 18th through Monday, June 23rd.
It depends on whether or not you take all those other half days.
Oh, okay.
That's right. Because so, so just to finish.
So you have to, the snow days would be a five additional days to those dates.
Right?
So it could, the last day of school could be June 23rd.
But if that year we have five school days, that would extend like into the next week. Is that correct?
That's correct.
I think that would almost go to the 30th of June, actually.
Yeah, it would, it would go pretty far. Cause I think the weekend that would cross the weekend. So it would definitely be pretty far if not June 30th.
Um, I think that is the end of the presentation.
Um, uh, is that, is that right?
That's the end of the presentation, right? Okay.
So, um, I will give it back to Avi.
Would you like to moderate the discussion?
Uh, that is, yes, I will.
Um, thank you.
Great presentation, Julie. I appreciate you, um, explaining all that.
Um, all right.
Is there any conversation at the table?
Anybody have any views they'd like to share?
I see Wem's hand first.
Hmm.
Uh, I have lots of views, but I have, um, initially I have kind of a question for administration.
When we talk about days that are sort of unproductive, right? Like pushing later into June. Um, what exactly are the reasons for that? Right. Is it just sort of assumed that the last week of June, everyone's headed looking towards summer vacation? Is it, are there logistical issues?
Is it sort of, is it like the heat in the buildings?
I mean, I don't think there's like an arbitrary June date where all of our brains just like disappear, right?
I think that if we were to push the school year later, I'm not advocating that we do, but if we were to do that, then, then can I assume that the week that the week that our brains are like not concentrated on education?
Does that also get pushed back a week?
You know what I'm saying? Or even like half days.
If we say that half days are not very effective for education, is that, I mean, by virtue of what, right? If we're cramming the half day, turning a half day into like eight, 20 minute periods, I could see that being maybe less productive.
If we're just taking a half day where we're only doing, say, four classes that day, and there's still full periods, I don't see a reason why half days shouldn't be productive.
So I guess the question is, when we talk about the efficacy of certain school days, what are we talking about, really?
I think when we're talking about the end of the year, I think it's a combination of, you know, it's partly the weather and the opportunities for heat during that time.
It's also, I think it's our kind of currently our internal clocks, you know, our seasonal clocks are as we get further and further into June with the heat. You know, and as we're, you know, getting a longer, longer school year, then we're accustomed, those days tend to be less productive.
I mean, that's what we're, you know, we'd obviously be doing everything we can to try to adjust those clocks.
But that's the reality of what we see in those last, as far as half days.
Yeah, some half days can be very productive.
I think half days that fall, you know, before a long weekend or before a break, with the combination of higher absenteeism on those days.
And, you know, kind of anticipation for those times, those tend to be less productive.
I think weather is something we can't control, but I think internal clocks can be tweaked, right?
I mean, that's a matter of practice. Yes, and I don't think it's that.
I think it's a pretty, it would take some time to really make that shift.
I don't think we're the only district that experiences that. And it's a pretty strong kind of, it's a school cultural thing that goes beyond sharing, but we would certainly do our best.
Sure.
SPEAKER_UNKNOWN: Okay. When you said you had a lot of thoughts, I didn't, I don't want to cut you off at that one.
Feel free.
No, it's okay. I'll wait. I want to hear what other people have to say too.
Okay.
Shauna.
Thank you. So I was the, one of the people who moved last year, unknowing kind of policy procedure as to how to add Diwali.
And then it ended up being a moot point for this year because Diwali happened to fall on a, on the weekend.
But nonetheless, I'm glad that we've created the subcommittee that Julie and Wen really dove in and looked at all of the data.
Julie, thank you.
Much appreciated.
Um, I do want to note that I found it kind of interesting and something I didn't consider, um, until last time, Avi, when you had said that the calendar and like, I kind of digested it was that the calendar is voted every year.
So just because we're doing it right now and looking at this, that, um, whoever's at the table kind of in May of this year in terms of like newly elected school committee and the board next year will, um, vote on that. So I think that was an important, um, fact that I didn't really think about, um, in terms of holidays, I would like to see us move towards, um, adding half days to compensate.
And say for, um, some of the new additions so that it would almost cancel each other out.
So if we were to add a half day, um, for, uh, Thanksgiving, then we could add a half day, say, uh, we could add Diwali as like an even exchange and looking to see where we can do that in our current schedule more so that our proposed schedule is more representative of the community.
Um, I also would be in favor of, um, taking away the second day of Rosh Hashanah.
Um, and I know, um, I've spoken to several members of the community and I think we've had some great dialogue amongst ourselves, differing dialogue, which is great. Um, but, um, that is something that I think I would be in support of and, and people, um, that I've spoken to in the community would be, uh, supporting, supportive of, um, in exchange for other, um, kind of cultural represent, cultural and religious representations.
Um, so that's kind of where I have, where I sit right now, um, and kind of similar to when I want to see where the conversation goes and, and add some more thought to it later.
Thank you.
Thank you.
Adam. Adam.
Thank you, Avi. So, um, I, I'm also kind of appreciative of the, uh, need and desire to kind of represent additional cultures within the calendar.
Um, and I know in, in some of our conversations around the table, um, I tried to, to kind of gauge the difference that we saw in the, um, in the survey information between kind of differences in the first and second day. Um, and I, I, I, I, I, I, I had a lot of concern expressed about removing the second day. Um, I had the opportunity to talk to a lot of people and, and I actually shot, I got slightly different feedback.
I, I had a lot of concern expressed about removing the second day.
Um, I think outside of, um, kind of the, you know, maybe less observant communities, um, for those who don't know, kind of differences in observance across different, um, kind of areas of Judaism.
Um, but, um, you know, that, that within Sharon, we actually do have a fairly observant community.
Um, and that's true both, uh, on the reform side where many reform synagogues don't hold services, um, but Sharon's does.
Um, it's one of the, the few that does, um, the conservative synagogue, um, I spoke to, and they actually have good numbers because they track attendance.
Um, you know, and they see only a very small, um, decrease in attendance between first and second day.
Um, and I think I also undercounted in, in my assessment, um, people who are unaffiliated, but attend services at Chabad, either, um, Chabad of Sharon or Canton.
Um, and having reached out to those communities also found actually a large number of, of people who would be affected, who would have otherwise maybe not been counted, um, as we assess kind of practices within the community.
So I think there would actually be a, a, quite a large number of people, um, who are, are either absent or otherwise impacted by removal of the second day. So, um, I support, um, adding days, um, and finding areas to, uh, trade where possible.
Um, but also maintaining both days of Roshana.
Thank you, Adam. Julie. Thank you, Avi.
I just wanted to, um, just three things that I wanted to say very quickly.
Um, the first is I would actually be interested in hearing from the community about Good Friday.
Um, because, um, I know that, you know, Catholics go to church on Good Friday afternoon.
I don't know, um, if this is something a lot of people are concerned about or like to do, but, um, um, to me, I, I felt that worship practices have changed in my humble knowledge, but, um, I'd still be interested to hear, um, if that, if I'm wrong.
Um, the second is that I want the community to also know we did, um, consider a federal holiday schedule.
And, um, we, if there was a lot of support for a federal holiday schedule, we would end something like June 12th, I think it was calculated.
Um, however, we would still have to address the fact that there would be several days of school with significant absences and those days might not count.
So, which is the original reason, like I said, at the beginning of the presentation.
Um, finally, I just wanted to, um, you know, make a note that, um, if, when the final, uh, document is posted, there's a, a table with what other districts do. Um, Easton follows only the federal holiday schedule.
Sharon is the only school that has day two of Rosh Hashanah.
Hopkinton gives a day for Diwali Lunar New Year and Eid al-Fitr.
Again, I'm sorry if I said that wrong, depending on the year.
Um, Brookline does a, like, it has like these categories.
And so it's like, this holiday is, is off. This holiday is, um, important, but we're not giving it off, but there shouldn't be tests. And they have different like categories like that. Um, and most school districts actually do have early release instead of a full day off, um, the day before Thanksgiving.
Um, so I was just wanted to add that information to the discussion.
Thanks, Julie.
Veronica.
Thanks, Avi. I want to thank Julie and Wen and the calendar committee for doing all this work because it was pretty intensive. And, um, I think that for me, I understand that our role as school committee members is to really look hard at what we know to be the possibility that we will have a high, a level of absences amongst students and our, um, staff people.
Right. And so the productive days of school are those dates that we know will have people coming to school.
Um, so rather than calling things out as, you know, dependent on what we understand to be important dates for folks, I think that we know that there are lots of members of our community of different cultural, um, and religious, uh, groups that would be observe observant.
But I wonder if a good question for the community is if we held school on those days, would you go, would you send your child to school? Would you work? Because I think, I feel like my role as a school committee member is really to understand that.
Right. So that's my first, that's a subtle difference, uh, in whether you observe a thing or whether you would send your child to school on that day, if school were held. So to Julie's, uh, former point just now, if you are an observant person for Good Friday, is that something that can happen after school and your child could go to school on that day because your observance is later in the day. So it's really not so much about, do you observe it, but would school impact, having school that day impact you? Um, I just want to say from the historic perspective on the, on the end of the year, what I understood from years of asking these questions, and, and I should present the caveat that I'm in favor of adding holidays that we have historically not had in the calendar because over the course of the 12 years I've been on and off the committee, there have been a lot of groups that have petitioned school committee to add days. And we haven't had, I don't think a critical mass of folks up until this moment that have really made those questions, ones that we want to now say, Hey, we're at a point, I think inflection point in our community where these things are in, uh, enough members of our community are desirous of this change.
So we, I've heard over the years, a lot of, uh, requests that have kind of gone on, uh, unanswered to an extent.
So I'm excited that we're at this point of, of opening this conversation, but I'm really mindful of this idea that in June, what we're not doing right in those June dates, from what I understand from administration is adding new content.
So it's not so much that it isn't a productive day from the standpoint of our kids enjoying a social interaction or a step up day or something that is a community building.
All of those things are valuable things that happen at school and they can be productive and beautiful days, but we're not going to be investing ourselves in new content for kids in those June dates, particularly.
Right. So that's why the value of say June, you know, 20th is not maybe as valuable as April 20th.
Right. So it's really a question of, um, what is happening on the day, as opposed to whether or not your head's in the game for what is going to be planned for that day. Right. So field day is going to be fun on June 20th, but you're not holding field day on April 20th. Right. Um, so I understand that as a school committee member, again, I really want to try to capitalize on the dates between labor day and Memorial day. So that's why I'm curious from the standpoint of our community and getting feedback from, from our community about really studying your family practice to determine on the dates that you would otherwise consider to be your dates of observation.
If school were held, would you send your child to school?
Right. That's a subtle question, but that's really where I land because I don't want to make a decision that feels like we're not going to have a productive school day, obviously, and, and trample on people's, um, uh, family practice and traditions.
Obviously we have to be mindful of all those things, but that's where it comes down for me.
Thanks. Thanks for having me.
Um, when do you want to go and then I'll go or do you want to? Sure. Yeah. I just have a couple of things that they're kind of random.
Um, I had a member of the community ask about, so in the presentation, I don't, I don't know if people had time to look at it, but, you know, Julie had put together all of these dates, um, against other districts. I had someone ask specifically about native, uh, public schools and act in Boxborough.
Uh, they kind of follow the same trend. They have one day for Rosh Hashanah.
Uh, they aren't school, they, uh, have a day off for good Friday.
They have half a day before Thanksgiving.
So there are sort of these trends across all other districts, both regionally, um, you know, sort of in our periphery and also ones that may have similar makeups where that is considered, we are kind of the outlier. Um, and then as I'm looking at the absence data, uh, Julie's right.
Again, the, the big spikes are the ones that are before, you know, major holidays.
Otherwise, regardless of the holiday being celebrated or whatever is happening that day, the average is actually quite consistent across the board.
So I think, you know, when we talk about, you know, which days are high days of absence, none of these days are days of high absence.
You know, for this district across the board, it's really only the ones before like Thanksgiving and Christmas.
Um, so I think that's something to note as well. And I, lastly, I think, you know, Veronica was talking about sort of the question of, would you send your kid to school?
I think that's something that we didn't capture in the survey.
That's, you know, my mea culpa.
The survey was imperfect.
The data we have is imperfect, you know, but I think that question is also tricky because you may be asking certain cultures that don't have, um, that have a different way, have a different relationship with choices, uh, when it comes to education versus something else. Cultures that are immigrant cultures that are acclimating to society.
Um, the way that they will approach that problem and hear that question is perhaps different.
So that's just, so I think that question itself is also tricky.
And I'm done.
SPEAKER_UNKNOWN: All right. Um, Julie, is it cool if I go and then take you or?
Okay. Um, so when I think her answer there at the end was something that I'd wanted to touch on with that. I think we have to separate, not just we, this table, but I think the community has to separate two different things that we're, we're trying to do with the calendar, both of which I think are really important.
One is practicality.
Um, so for example, I would prefer the day before Thanksgiving be an off day. Every year I drive to Buffalo with my family.
For me, that's an important day off, but my wife teaches in a district where that's a half day and so we've had to, we've had to sort of work around that.
And to me, I wouldn't personally, um, dig in.
Um, and I would hope that members of our community would understand if that's, if that's a learning loss day, that's going to be in June. That's a day I think that we can, we can agree to put as a half day and understand that there's a benefit educationally at the end of the year.
And then separately from the practicality, we're also trying to look at our calendar and is it representative of our community and is it most importantly, and I think this is something this group at this table does very well. And I'm proud to be a part of you all for this is it's not necessarily a representative in the sense of numbers, um, and you know, response data, but more importantly is every kid in our district, every family in our district feeling like they're welcomed here because of our, uh, districts acceptance and celebration of who they are and how they came to be here and why they belong here. And so for me, I agree with when that the question of whether or not people wouldn't come to school isn't particularly relevant.
I think different people make those choices for different reasons.
Um, I do think that adding these holidays is important.
I think, you know, in particular, the three holidays that were highlighted in the presentation, Julie put, um, I think Diwali, we've certainly heard a lot over the last few years from our community that, that there's a feeling that not recognizing Diwali with an off day is, uh, feeling hurtful to members of our community.
I think Lunar New Year, I think Eid, I think these are communities, uh, within our community and part of our community and part of the fabric of our community that, that have expressed a need to be recognized.
For me, I do want to say that I think that removing the second day of Rosh Hashanah, which I don't think should be off the table. I think it's worthy of discussion.
Personally, for me, I struggle with representation and the idea of recognizing others at the, at the, to the detriment of members of our community.
So for me, I'm in favor of adding and not subtracting.
Um, I would be remiss if I didn't, and this is why I think like the rest of you, I want to have this conversation with our community because I think I would be remiss if I didn't transparently share that I spoke with a rabbi who I respect tremendously, who's much more observant than I am. And he did share with me that he thinks that there is a difference between removing a date, a Jewish holiday, because of a shift in demographic versus the Jewish community saying, Hey, look, there's three holidays we recognize historically here.
And if it's, if it benefits another community, I think the second day of Rosh Hashanah is up for grabs. Um, you know, he told me he thinks that being part of a community means doing things like that. And so I respected his view quite a bit on that. And I did want to share that, that he had said that to me.
Um, in closing, I would just say that I, it feels to me like when I hear things like there's no other district that takes the second day of Rosh Hashanah off to me, that's, that's something that I value about this community as a Jewish person that grew up here. Um, yeah, that's something unique about Sharon.
And so that's why Sharon has always felt uniquely welcoming, uh, to the Jewish community.
And for the same reason, I want Sharon to be uniquely welcoming to other communities.
And so I think we should recognize other people's holidays as well. I just would ask that we don't do it to the detriment of a community who's always felt welcome here.
Julie, did you still want to speak?
Nope.
Um, are there any members of administration who'd like to chime in before I go to the public?
No, I think, I think I'm, I'm very interested in what the public has to say. So I'm going to hold.
It's a great political answer.
No, I'm just kidding. That's a great answer in general. I love it. All right. I see Judy Crosby.
Oh, Judy, your hand is kind of raised and then come down. I'm going to hope that the glitch are okay. I'm going to ask to unmute and hope it works. Is there a time limit?
Time limit?
Yeah. Let's same rules apply.
Let's try to keep it to two minutes.
All right.
Judy Crosby. I saw you first, even though I think in my order now, you're not first, but you are. So let's. Thanks.
So, Mike, I have a few comments.
One, I would really have liked, and maybe we will still hear from our new director of diversity, equity, and inclusion on this discussion.
This feels like kind of an obvious place where Ms. Trevede should have been included from the outset of her time with the district.
And I'm hoping that that has happened.
Or if not, it is going to happen before decisions are made.
Secondly, I wanted to make folks aware, as you're talking about, well, if we give this day and then we can just add a half day before Thanksgiving.
Please remember our high school students who take high stakes AP testing.
Those tests are all administered on the same date nationwide in May.
So to answer some of the questions of, well, why are days in June less valuable?
Any day that kids in any of those advanced classes, which this town values incredibly highly miss between the start of school and the administration of that test puts them at a disadvantage compared to their peers in other areas of the country.
Let's remember the Midwest, the South, and the West all start much earlier than us.
Generally sometime between the end of July and a couple weeks before we start.
So, and they don't observe all of these holidays.
So those kids are getting a lot more instruction.
Our teachers are awesome and they try and fit in all of the content, but it is a race.
And the more days that we insert, and this is, you know, and I support the idea of recognizing all cultures, but the more days we insert and then we go, well, we'll just do a half day on this day to make it up.
You need to remember those half days are not nearly as productive.
It's less time in class.
And so there are impacts on specific kids and specifically those high achieving AP classes that y'all care so deeply about and spend so much energy on. Thank you, Ms. Crosby. Your time's up. Hi, I'm Wendy MacArthur.
I'm a parent to a middle schooler in a high school, and I also work in the Hopkinton School District. Talking about adding a half day here before vacation week really speaks to me both as an educator and a parent.
You are requiring teachers to come in for a half day that they're expecting to have off.
I believe by the rules, they are not allowed to take those days off. So you're adding less of a holiday for them.
The half days that you're adding before breaks, no learning is being done.
Those are days that kids watch Charlie Brown Christmas or Charlie Brown Halloween or, you know, all of those fun things. Those are the days that people do anything. So no learning is done on those half days. We are one of the later school districts that actually open.
And so I'm curious why the thought hasn't been to start school a week earlier, because I think the inclusion of these holidays are an extremely important thing for our district, seeing that we are so diverse and we want to make everybody feel heard.
But adding half days, I do not think is the way to go here. I would like to suggest maybe you look at starting the school year a week earlier.
Thank you.
Yes, my name is Jeff Mahoney.
I'm actually a school assistant over at Heights Elementary and just wanted to put my two cents in regarding being outside and inside at the school.
Regarding recess, we go by state law for temperatures.
So if it's a certain temperature, it's too cold to go outside, then we're inside.
We have lots of heat in the school.
Lots of rooms are really hot and a lot of rooms are cool, which is fine during the wintertime.
But my concern is if we go past the days where it's too hot, where we, in hindsight, couldn't be outside.
And if the building is too hot inside and let's just say not a snow day, but a heat day, what if a day is canceled because it is just too hot to go to school?
Is that day at the end of the year?
Is that going to be another day that needs to be added?
So that was, I see you shaking your head, Julie, but it just, that's something I just want to make, you know, aware as, you know, school assistants that we deal with recess and lunches, is it going to be too hot in the cafeteria and outside for the kids to enjoy that time?
So that's just a comment I have.
Thank you. Thank you.
I was muted.
I appreciate you lending that perspective.
All right. Next up, Dan Newman.
Hi, I have a specific point and then I have a general point.
My specific point is I heard some extrapolation during the discussion about other districts to Sharon.
I hope that during the decision making, you'll consider that the demographics of Sharon are different from other districts and how those demographics differ. So something like the second day of Rosh Hashanah, you can look at other districts and say, well, they have, they don't have, they do have school during those days and it doesn't seem to have a lot of absences.
But Sharon has one of the highest Jewish populations, just for example.
So please just be wary of those kinds of considerations where making extrapolations from district to district.
By the way, totally supportive of adding more days rather than subtracting and recognizing days that have significance to other cultures.
The general point is I heard kind of a mishmash of all different kinds of considerations during the discussion.
I hope when the committee approaches this, we can think in terms of principles.
Maybe you could share with the community what specific principles you are thinking about and apply some rules rather than just treating everything as a one-off.
Because I think that's more likely that groups won't feel offended and read into decisions when you are clear with them what the criteria are.
Like, is it attendance?
Is it, you know, popularity based on the survey you've done? Please just share with the community what the rules you're applying are. And I think that'll go a long way. Thank you. Thank you.
Next up, I will call on you because your last name is not shown.
Just please tell us your first and last name before going into your point.
I see Yablon.
Hi.
Sorry.
It's Dahlia Yablon.
It's just our family Zoom account.
No, we don't apologize.
Just a formality.
Yeah, yeah. Sorry about that. I just want, I wanted to thank the committee for all their time and putting together what I think is a really creative and appropriate compromise to add a few more days to reflect the diversity of culture in the school.
And, you know, maybe switch some days to half days. I just wanted to try and put in a plug and ask for support for that second day of Rosh Hashanah.
I have four kids in the school district.
Two have recently graduated.
Two are still in high school. And one of the unique things about sharing is how incredibly welcoming it has been to Jewish families like ours that do observe not only both days of Rosh Hashanah and Yom Kippur, but they're actually 10 days later in the calendar that our kids all end up taking off. And especially for the high schoolers and especially for the high school days off is incredibly onerous.
Every day counts.
And it makes a huge difference to families like ours to get that second day of Rosh Hashanah off. It's just that much less of a burden, that much less of a stress on the kids and the families.
It means a lot.
So just would really appreciate it. And I hope it can be kept together.
Like I think I've heard the theme, adding days, not subtracting days.
Subtracting days sends kind of an icky message.
But adding days, I think it's great.
So thank you for your time.
Thank you. All right, next up, I see Khaled Aisa.
Aisa?
Yes, hi, this is Khaled.
Well, I'd like to thank the school committee for the work being done into this.
A couple issues to say.
First, I support adding more days, particularly that we've been in other school districts before that strictly was adherent to the federal school holidays.
So as a Muslim family, when we moved to Sharon, I mean, you definitely hear the kids feel that, okay, we moved to Sharon, we get the federal holidays.
But in addition, we get the, as a, there is a definitely larger Jewish community in the town.
There are multiple Jewish holidays that are being recognized in the school. So that's definitely makes a big difference for the Muslim kids to feel that their holidays are recognized.
Especially that we're not sticking with the federal holidays as our way of addressing which days will be off. Second, I think the same point like Dan Newman mentioned is to kind of be, have kind of clear methodology, which days decided.
At the end, is it based on how many kids will be absent?
Further, versus the survey that was collected, versus trying to address a certain day from each culture back, religious background.
And so that's what we're doing. SPEAKER_UNKNOWN: Thank you. Thank you. Thanks.
Next up, I see Haala Mustafa.
Hi, everyone.
I think the decision is very clear, looking at the dynamic today from the speeches.
Our Jewish neighbors, they feel that it will be very hard for them to take one of the days off for the history, for the numbers, for the convenience.
So I think to be fair, it's all or none, right? So if some population is going to have two days off, then at least the other population would at least have one holiday acknowledged.
That's fair enough for everyone to be feeling like acknowledged and respected.
And again, for the convenience, it is hard also for our population.
When you have a big holiday that we have to align with everything, cancel things, catch up with what's going on in the school.
So I would, again, like I think it makes very sense listening to all the dynamic today is to adding, not subtracting.
And definitely adding.
Thank you.
Next up, I see Georgian Lewis.
Dan Lewis.
Hi, just a pair on the previous speakers.
I would ask that the school committee before asserting any religious practices, groups, days off, any changes that I would hope that we would engage with our interfaith coalition, which is pretty strong in this community and not just certain religions.
I know it's been mentioned repeatedly.
We've had lots of discussion with the Jewish community, which I realize is very big here, but we also have a Catholic community, Muslim community and lots of interfaith things going on in town and a huge interfaith coalition.
So I hope that they would have a big part in this discussion before any changes are made to the school community.
Thank you. Next up, we've got Ikra Javeed.
I just want to say thank you to the school committee for considering adding the three holidays, which I'm in favor of. And, you know, as a Muslim, it's very important that our kids feel part of the community.
And, you know, when I grew up, we didn't have Eid off as a school holiday.
And knowing the person I am, I would never take the day off because I would feel like, you know, I'm missing out on something that's being taught in school. So if we're given that day off, then our kids feel more welcome.
And just to tell everyone how we celebrate Eid, you know, it starts in the morning, we have a prayer in the morning. So, you know, it's not something that we celebrate later in the day. So definitely having the early part of the day off would make a lot of sense for us. Thank you. Thank you so much.
I see Ahmed Mohammed.
Yeah, thank you for recognizing me.
Yeah.
So as I think religious holidays are very important to the people of this community.
And as a Muslim, I would like my children to have memories of our religious holiday and to know the importance of the importance of observing these holidays.
And I recall actually, like a few years ago, we had actually like people observing the holiday and they have to rush to the high school because they still have a test, which I think is not fair. So I am supportive of adding more holidays.
I don't really want to take holidays from any part of the community.
But also, I would also like the school to recognize the importance of this holidays for people who doesn't have the representation of these holidays.
Thank you so much. SPEAKER_UNKNOWN: Phil King. Hi, thank you for recognizing me.
I think one of the things you discussed in your slides, you talked about absences, but that's students.
Unfortunately, you can run school without students.
You can't run school without teachers.
We're having a huge issue throughout the state finding substitute teachers.
Has anybody looked at the number of absences we have in staff and our ability to fill the classrooms?
Because we've talked about during COVID and essentially calling school daycare and we have lots of families with young children.
When we cancel school, we're putting on parents, the ability to find coverage for their kids because we don't get the day off most parents these holidays. And furthermore, we're running into camp.
I've had to miss the last day of school growing up in order to leave for camp. So when we push into June, we're running into camp schedules.
We have camp Everwood that has a ninth week that goes until late August. So if we start school any earlier, we're potentially conflicting with the camps in this town as well. So I mean, a huge part of why we give days off is because we don't have enough staff, but I've never seen any slides here to take into consideration how many staff call out on these days.
Thank you.
I see you, Rebecca Heng.
Yes. Hi. Yeah. First, I want to thank you for the school community that all the effort to include these three holidays, cultural holidays to recognize our identity.
And I just want to add on one thing, just agree.
Some people suggest that I think we can add, but not to subtract.
So that won't make other people feel like, I mean, bad. And also that for my person, my personality, I'm a Christian.
So I really appreciate that when the school has a good Friday off, so my kids and I, we can do some family devotions at home in the morning.
And I also know some families from our church would also do that as well. So I really appreciate that if the good Friday was still be kept as a day off. And so that's what I, yeah, my opinion.
Thank you. Thank you so much for sharing.
All right.
Seeing no more hands from the community.
Oh, I see Ahmed.
Ahmed Mohammed.
Sorry. I couldn't tell at first if it was raising your hand a second time. Ahmed.
Yes. Yeah.
Yeah.
I was just one more thing actually for Muslim holidays, because they're not aligned with the calendar every year the same. So if you consider it, make sure actually from year to year to check actually how they align was like, for example, like Aida al-Adha this year is going to be in the summer, but maybe another year is going to be during school. So.
Thank you so much.
Thank you. Hala.
Hala Mustafa.
Thank you, Avi. I just want to add also that I'm a physician, married to a physician.
So academics is big, big thing in the family.
So I'm very aware about what the consequences of adding more days off.
But honestly, the good effect, I'm psychiatrist as well. So I think the good effect that's going to happen to the children being acknowledged at their school for their major holidays is going to affect their personality is going to affect their self esteem way more than what they can miss in this academic days. And the compensation that we can do to compensate the academics they miss is very daunting.
There are way a lot of ways and tools and people.
Sorry, I'm so sorry about the baby.
To compensate for the academics they miss things.
But it's hard to compensate again for the self esteem for the identity that they would be missing, listening to experience.
And she's another physician also. And she said, like, you know, all my life in America, I've never had a culture, a religious day that was acknowledged.
And as a type A personality student, she wouldn't even miss it. She would go and go to the school and not celebrate her main holiday all her life to be able to master and type A students.
So I think until now, being here as a mother, talking in the school committee, I don't think that that affected her positively growing up. So we're making the present now that's going to be a history for our students in the future. So if we can change it, I think let's acknowledge it and let's change it. So, again, I'm voting for adding, not subtracting.
Thank you so much, Allah. Like, you know, back to our Jewish neighbors and take one day from them. I don't think that they would feel good about this at all. So let's add, please.
All right. Thank you so much, Allah. Thanks, Avi. Lisa Klein.
Okay.
Hi, everybody.
So I'm totally 100%, 110% in favor of adding the three days over the 20 years of living in Sharon.
I've often wondered why we didn't have more representation of all of the cultures that were here. So I'm thrilled to see that. With that said, I think equity is probably one of the most important components that I think of as I hear people say, taking away, giving in, you know, half days, etc. I think we have, yes, we have a large Jewish population.
But also, there needs to be a balance.
So, to the comment I think, Avi, you made earlier, if we had to give away a day in order to make the whole community feel included, and that they are being represented, to me, that represents equity.
So, I have, I think there are pros and cons of how we can manage all of that. And I think everybody's going to have to hear your, like somebody said, the rules that go along with making that decision.
But ultimately, I think the ultimate goal is to make everyone feel included and to have some representation and equity across all of our community members. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you so much. Rebecca, if you could just state your last name, then you're off to the races.
Hi, Rebecca Cork. Thank you very much, guys, for addressing this topic. I think it's really important to our community, and I feel grateful to live in a town that is supportive of a diverse population.
Our family really values having the second day of Rosh Hashanah off, and there are other days that we take off for other Jewish holidays.
So, I can certainly appreciate why people in other religions would value and want to have days off for their religion, and I support that. And I support the school committee's efforts to add days, though I realize that that has its own complications and nobody wants more days of school. But I think to support the inclusion and diversity in our town is very important.
Thank you. Cindy Wu.
Cindy Wu.
Cindy Wu. Yes, hi. Thank you for organizing the meeting.
I fully support adding the days to the calendar.
My kids are already in college, but I just remember that the days, every year I have to put them out, so then I can bring them to Chinatown because they have the New Year's celebrations to celebrate the Chinese New Year. So I just like to see the kids that are still in school, sharing school that have the ability to go to the Chinatown on that day, particular lunar day, and celebrate their culture.
Thank you so much. Thank you so much for that perspective.
Next up, Reshma Keene.
Not sure why this isn't working for me here. SPEAKER_UNKNOWN: I didn't ask to unmute. Can you hear me? Yep, now we can hear you.
All right.
I can speak on behalf of the Indian families here.
And what I wanted to say is that most Indian families do not want their kids to fall behind in terms of education.
And therefore, you may not see as much of an absenteeism in school on Diwali, even though the celebrations in the families start in the morning.
Most parents like myself, my husband and I, we take day off to celebrate, but we do send our kids to school so that they are not missing any learning.
But I also think that they should learn their culture and the festivities at home, which should be a part of their learning.
They shouldn't have to choose between school or learning one's culture.
And so I fully support adding those days.
And I very much support Hala's comments that she had mentioned to learn one's identity.
I think that's very, very much important.
So I just wanted to show support to everything that has been said so far. Thank you. Thank you so much. Next up, Judith Weter.
Hi, thanks for recognizing me. So I agree with a lot of the comments that I've heard so far. It's a very interesting proposal.
I love the diversity of this town.
It's actually one of the things I really loved when we came here was that I knew that we were going to be in a really interesting place that was filled with lots of different people from lots of different backgrounds.
The challenge that we're running into, though, is how do we balance this out? You know, we're talking about adding more days, which I think it's great that we want to add more representation.
I'm a bit concerned about then that means pushing deeper into June, which can be problematic or pushing up deeper into August, which the STA might not want to do. And so I think the point that I have is not so much I'm in favor of this, I want that, but more I really want to hear what our director of diversity, equity, inclusion and belonging has to say. And I really want to hear what the STA has to say, because those are points of view and perspectives that I think I don't see represented here just yet. And they're really important to me. Thanks.
So just to explain process, the STA negotiates the calendar, they approve and vote the calendar.
So you won't hear the STA's. I mean, it's nice to hear individual folks. Like I think we had a school personnel speak, but in general, that that's just not how the process works.
All right. Are there not seeing no further hands from the public?
Are there any more comments at the table? Are there any members of admin that want to speak? I have a thought I'll share.
I do see a student whose hand is raised.
Guys, we can't have the comments gone forever all night. I mean, I guess we could just but I but I also don't want to ignore a student who raised their hand. So I am going to take this student in the other hand that was raised and we'll cut it off there. I see no McKee Steeves.
Oh, hand down now. Is that a comment?
Raise your hand if you if you'd still like to speak.
Right.
Seeing no hand.
I still will.
Oh, the hand is up.
Go ahead.
Hi.
I'm sorry.
You're coming through choppy.
All right.
Unfortunately, we're not able to hear you here.
All right, you know, I see your hand. Let me just get through these. I'll recognize these two members of the public. So I see Neshaba and I'm just going to ask you to say your last name. I'm calling you. I see Molly towards you and then we'll hear from Hina and then we'll and then we'll go on.
All right.
Trying to ask you to unmute.
One more try.
All right. Unfortunately, that's not working. Let's see. Molly towardsman is working. Molly. Hi. Thank you for having me speak.
I would vote for federal holidays only.
But if we were to add, I would be in favor of adding those three holidays and taking away the second day of Rosh Hashanah.
I think times have changed in Sharon a lot. I think the first day of Rosh Hashanah is observed by many Jewish people.
I'm Jewish.
But I just think the second day is not observed by a lot of the public school demographic.
Thank you.
Thanks.
All right.
Now we'll hear from him.
Okay. Hi. So because for those of you who don't know me, my name is Hannah Trivedi and I am the new director of DEI. I know it was asked on whether or not I've had conversations about the calendar and I've been in all the administrative meetings and central administration when the calendars have been discussed.
I have been involved in these conversations.
And so I did want to speak a little bit. I agree with what many have said about the addition of three holidays and our community being so diverse and being able to identify your, be able to celebrate your culture within your school system, especially since we have other, you know, if we were, if we were a district that only had federal holidays, it would be different, but we don't. We have other holidays that we have other holidays that we have infused within our calendar.
And as everyone's mentioned, we are quite a diverse population.
So, you know, we've had those conversations.
I think the challenges, as many have said is how do we, by adding the three cultural holidays, how do we then manage 180 days? And, and I think that is, that is a far, that's, that's a different conversation.
So, and I think that's the hard part. I think everyone, many people are in favor of adding, but then their concern is, okay, if we add, what does that mean for June? What does it mean for August? What does it mean for half days? And I think that's, you know, a far more, like a conversation that's going to also, and, and Avi, you know this better than I do. I don't know what, I don't know what the STA contract says. I don't know when they can start. I don't know, you know. But I, I, I agree with what many say when we're talking about inclusion.
You know, having those holidays that represent students that have never had the opportunity to be represented in the past is extremely valuable.
And I agree with Hala. It's far more valuable than what learning loss they would have from missing a day. And I agree with other parents that talk about, you know, academically, I, I, I, I, if there is something going, I also, I know that Brookline does this. If we do decide to have school or half days on holidays that families traditionally would take off for religious observance.
You know, I like Brookline's system where you don't have exams.
You don't have projects due that day. You don't have any major things due in consideration for those families that are observant.
So they can keep their students home from school without feeling the negative impact of participating in their, you know, and, and participating in their cultural and religious activities.
So I think that there are some, you know, nuances to it, but I also think that like, I think it's, it's not a, like a, yes, this, this, and this, because I think you're going to have, Julie and every, the school committee and administration is going to have to look at the calendar again and say, okay, well, where, where can we make sure we don't have kids going to school until the end of June?
Thank you.
Appreciate hearing from your perspective, for sure.
Anybody else from the table want to weigh in or should we move to the next item?
It looks like we're moving to the next item. The only thing I will say in closing, I just, oh, you guys love to do that to me. It's like, everybody wants to be last.
So it's all right.
This is important stuff, Julie. And then when?
No, I'm just butterfingers.
I'm butterfingers on my laptop because I'm not using my keyboard.
That's like trying to find the right place to push. I just want to thank everybody for their very thoughtful comments.
And I can, I can tell from the comments that people are sort of saying the thing.
I think that all of the school committee members have been saying, like, just it's, it's, it's a really tough one to figure out a way to make this all work together.
So I do hope that we, you know, get more letters that, you know, people should feel free to elaborate upon.
Certainly we can do more outreach as well among the different, you know, religions in town to see what they think. And I just want to say, I really appreciated this conversation.
Thanks, Julie.
Wen?
Yes, just a couple of notes in response to some things that were said. We actually do start at the same time as most other districts.
Actually, we are ahead of some of them by quite a few days. And actually, they all end around the same time.
You know, actually, Lexington takes half days off every Friday.
Can you imagine?
I don't know how they do it. So, I mean, maybe we have to look at the academic calendar as well. If they can take every Friday as a half day and still start and end when we do and take extra holidays, there may be some way of compressing our calendar as well.
And I know that Sharon does try very hard to not have tests and major assignments due on a lot of holidays.
There's a whole calendar that's, you know, that's available for the staff.
We can certainly double back on that and see if to make sure that that's happening.
And I think, you know, what we've been hearing is, as we said, very reflective of the conversations that we've had. At the end of the day, this is something we have to negotiate as part of a contract.
And, you know, if I think if there were no other considerations, then we would simply add the days on. But there are other considerations.
And so, and I appreciate that everyone can understand those other factors and those nuances.
But I do want to thank everyone for their contribution and their comments.
It's been very, very helpful.
Thank you.
All right. Before we move on, I'll echo those sentiments.
And I'll just say that I was sitting on this one for a while.
I wanted to point out, like, Bill Hayton always said this thing where he would point to something and go, that's what makes Sharon Sharon.
And I want to say to me, like, one of the most important things that we saw here tonight and what makes Sharon Sharon is a lot of members of various different backgrounds and communities within our community stating how important representation for them and their family was while also stating that they didn't want to take anything away from anyone else. And it is not ironic, but I think it shows you a lot about what our community believes in, that the only folks who we heard from who were really advocating for the removal were members of the community whose holiday that is. And so I think that this was a really beautiful conversation.
I think everybody really gave us very fair input, respectful input of each other's cultures, not really selfish views, looking just out for themselves, but really for our community as a whole. And so I think we all appreciate that. Thank you very much.
Next up, we are going to table our operating budget review and fees, and we're actually going to be adding a meeting and setting out an agenda, adding a meeting for next Wednesday to focus specifically on the budget.
We had some conversations with the town, just received the governor's budget.
There's just a few things that we just want to make sure we have honest and accurate answers on, and we'd love to present that next Wednesday.
So I'm going to table that, which brings us to our...
Am I looking at an old version?
I don't see...
I'm looking at the amended agenda for tonight.
Is there not program of studies on here?
Nope. So moving on. It's under a vote.
It's under a vote.
I apologize.
Yeah. So moving on to decision items, we need to vote to approve the minutes of January 17th, which we don't have.
So we're going to table that as well. And then we're going to vote to approve the SHS program of studies for 2024, 2025.
So is there any discussion about that before we would want to move to a vote?
Shauna?
I forget, and please forgive me because we're in the process of changing systems at the school that I teach at. And so we're doing a lot of coursework and moving courses from one system to another.
Did we see the new course descriptions for the new financial literacy and financial mathematics courses that we were just awarded that grant for? I know we talked about them, but I don't know if we saw.
Bob Palmer?
Well, those descriptions are in the program of studies that was shared with you a couple of weeks ago. Okay, it was already in there. Okay, my apologies.
Thank you.
You're good.
All right, when?
Yes, so I brought this up at the last meeting just to confirm that the language about double overrides was the finalized proposal, where it says that double overrides are not going to be permitted and that skipping course will not be honored.
I have a real difficult time with this kind of inflexible language.
I think that the situations in which a double override is required may be very few and far between, but certainly that will happen.
And I don't feel comfortable essentially clipping the wings of a student who would, where would it be appropriate to have a double override?
I know that there are a lot of factors that go into the override procedure, you know, whether that's the student's well-being, staffing, scheduling.
I know that there is an issue with, you know, families who maybe accelerate their students, and it may not be the most appropriate thing.
I know it is a very complicated matter.
I do think that a student who is looking for a double override isn't just testing the waters.
I think you don't do that unless you have absolute confidence that this is where you belong and what you want to shoot for. And I really don't feel comfortable prohibiting that entirely.
And, you know, in such a definitive way.
Thanks, Wyn.
I raised my hand here to make sure I could keep my place here, but I just, I want to say I view it the same way that Wynne does.
For me, I just struggle with, as Wynne eloquently put it, the inflexibility.
I think that there is merit to why educators would say no.
Or, you know, say no makes it sound flippant.
Why that would not be permitted on an individual basis, maybe the majority basis.
But I really struggle with the idea of creating such an inflexible practice and policy.
And in particular, I will say that I think that in this district, one thing that we hear a lot of, and I know administration has shared that they value this voice and that they care quite a bit about finding solutions for our advanced kids.
I think every student in our district matters tremendously, no matter where they are academically.
You know, and that's obviously not, that's not something that's permanent.
We have students that struggle in certain areas and are super advanced in other areas. We have students that struggle at times and then advanced.
And so to me, the idea that students, no matter how hard they work, no matter what course they're on sort of in their life, or that we would create such an inflexible way for them to get what they need, that's not something that I could vote yes on personally.
So I think I just wanted to also say that I feel the same way that WEN does there, and I would want to see that changed.
Go ahead, Adam.
Yeah, thank you. So I'm recalling from when this was originally presented to us that it was described that this wasn't a change in practice, that generally speaking, those were not allowed.
And so it seems like there is consensus among the committee and kind of administration on kind of what the normal practice should be.
And so I'm wondering if there's just softening of the language that we can do, I don't want to say on the fly, I don't want to wordsmith on the fly, but something to say effectively that they are generally not permitted or rarely permitted, and please speak to, please consult with your advisor or something of that nature.
It sounds like we're not fundamentally misaligned.
It's just a question of language.
So I would be supportive of clarifying.
Sure. So, Adam, I think that's an elegant solution. I do just want to say I think we may be fundamentally out of alignment in the sense that, for me, I'm weighing the practical situation that our educators face.
I don't want – I understand – I can imagine a world in which lots of people ask for something that they may or may not be qualified for, and that creates an extraordinary amount of work for our educators unduly.
So I agree with you, softening language perhaps, but I do want to be clear that I am out of alignment in the sense that I think we should be at every turn considering every student, and I do believe that at times our advanced students are not being considered.
I think when you even propose language like that, you are in fact sitting down and turning a blind eye to a student that exists in our district.
And I think the idea of even saying something that discourages students within our schools from going forward on something that we all, I think, believe we should be accommodating.
And again, why we can't, I totally get. I totally get why it is an arduous process to constantly accommodate that.
That being said, if there is a student in our district or a thousand students in our district who are reaching for two rungs above and really feeling like they can reach it and can prove that they can reach it, I would personally philosophically believe that we need to process for that.
And I know that that might sound like we're asking for a lot, but it feels to me like we hold these seats for a reason and there's a benefit to them.
And this is sort of the one place where we're able to, there's a reason we have to vote it.
And to me, I'd say I couldn't vote yes on something that would leave any student in our district feeling like the path towards their future is blocked.
Go ahead, Al. Yeah, so I think that the word that you used that I really liked there was kind of language that discourages.
And I think I certainly feel this way.
And I think we've heard this sense from the committee before that we want to encourage kind of wherever possible students to strive to do more. So I think I'm completely in alignment with what you're saying, both in terms of the philosophical approach and how we can use language in our policies in the program of studies to encourage to the greatest extent possible kind of students who do want to challenge themselves in that way.
So I agree.
I would love to find language that can kind of bridge that gap, kind of understanding that this is not normal practice or I don't want to say traditional practice, but that we can also remove roadblocks from students who do want to kind of push for more.
Thank you.
Thanks, Avi.
So I think you all kind of stated that elegantly.
I have a thing about sort of not stating what's already been said, especially when it's been stated so eloquently, but for the purposes of just giving a majority of this body's perspective, I'll be the fourth member to co-sign what you all just said. And hopefully that can be clarity back to members of administration to go back and take another look at that language.
Thank you. That's valid.
Lynn? Yeah, I mean, I will say that I'm not entirely sure what the purpose of that paragraph really serves, right?
The course override section already has a procedure.
It states it very clearly what the procedure is. It doesn't explicitly say whether it's a single override or double override or whatever it is. I think in the process of that discussion for that unique student, that can be hashed out between all the parties that are relevant.
I don't see the need for this paragraph at all because I think it does.
It really does sort of discourage anyone from thinking beyond.
So that would be my proposal, not to tweak the language, but simply to remove that section.
SPEAKER_UNKNOWN: Right. I agree with that. I also would add that if we tweaked any language or rewrote a section, it could say something like, in extraordinary circumstances or in circumstances where, because we should be encouraging those rare cases of advanced students and brilliance and people reaching higher, not discouraging it. I think we have extraordinary students.
We have lots of them, right? Maybe we have 3,500 of them.
And they should all, in every case, be encouraged to move forward to the things that they're great at while they continue to work through the things that they're not great at.
And again, I think I'm speaking.
I think everybody's on that.
Mr. Palmer, is there a willingness or flexibility in reworking that here so that we can vote this? Or is this something we should revisit?
Again, we're going to agenda a meeting. I think I misspoke. I think it was Thursday of next week we're going to do it, but we'll sort that out offline.
My concern is that we're not thinking about student mental health in all of this, and we're legislating the exceptions.
These policies are our policies, and then they are considered, when there is an exception, we're reasonable human beings who are able to weigh that and make an exception when it's warranted.
So then let me ask, and to be clear, I'm argumentative by nature, so I don't mean any will here, but I want to push you on that.
First of all, I think we are considering student mental health. I think there's two sides of that same coin, right? So I would argue if I wanted to make the same accusation, which I don't, I would argue I don't think you're considering student mental health.
I don't think you're considering that there are students out there that feel in this drastic, by the way we hear from these students, Mr. Palmer, who feel stagnant, who feel like we're not pushing them, who feel like we are creating roadblocks between them and how high they want to reach. But I'm not asking you to consider that. I would only say that there is another side of that coin.
What I would ask you to consider is that this table, this committee, right, has an authority, right?
So the authority that we're granted is the ability to vote this.
If we're to vote policies that there is no flexibility within, with the idea that don't worry, you're going to be flexible, then what's the point of bringing us something to vote, right?
So rework your language in a way that somehow leaves flexibility to it. I read that, and I didn't believe that it left open any flexibility.
So I actually would push back that the idea that we should vote something, knowing full well that, like, while we've created this absolute line in the sand, per your language and our vote, of course they're going to bend that line in the sand.
And I'll push back even further and tell you that's not the narrative that we hear from the public.
The public does not tell us that those lines are bending in the sand. They tell us that for gifted students and advanced students in this district who try hard, there are roadblocks put up at every turn.
That is, and I'm not saying I've seen it personally.
I'm not in the room, right? But I am going to say that those students matter.
And if we have any authority to help them, here seems like the appropriate place to do that. Is this something we should revisit?
It feels like, I mean, to be clear, you put it out for registration, right?
I mean, it went out for registration the day before we voted anyway.
So I don't know, like, we can vote this tonight if we can rework it here, or you can rework it and come back to this table. But it is out for registration. Yeah, I'm not interested in coming back, honestly.
I mean, you know, I don't have the time.
The students don't have the time for that.
And so, and frankly, 110 pages of the 111 are acceptable to the committee.
And, you know, so if the committee wants to vote to approve this without that paragraph, then the district will be well served.
But I do think that next October, we need to have further conversation around this. Because, you know, we met in October to avoid this situation, to talk just about the curriculum in January.
And I thought that we had sort of moved past that and were in a curriculum-focused meeting the last time that we met. And I felt like when it had expressed this view then, I'd had hopes that it would be taken into consideration and might be presented to us differently.
It isn't.
And so here we are now.
I'd entertain a motion to approve pending the change to that link or the removal of that paragraph.
So moved.
Second.
Second.
All right.
Veronica.
Yes.
Fresnel.
Yes.
Adam.
Yes.
Julie.
Yes.
Donna.
Yes.
When.
Yes.
And I'm a yes. Motion carries 7-0. Thank you so much for your time, Mr. Palmer.
Next up, do I have any announcements or updates?
Nope.
Hearing none, I would entertain a motion to adjourn.
So moved.
Second.
Second. Second.
All right. Shauna.
Yes.
Yes. Yes.
When.
SPEAKER_UNKNOWN: Yes. Julie.
Yes.
Adam.
Yes.
Veronica.
Yes. Yes.
Verse.
Yes.
No. Yes. Yes.
Motion carries 7-0.
Have a terrific night, everybody. Yes.
SPEAKER_UNKNOWN: Yes. SPEAKER_UNKNOWN: Yes. SPEAKER_UNKNOWN: Yes. SPEAKER_UNKNOWN: Yes. SPEAKER_UNKNOWN: Yes. SPEAKER_UNKNOWN: Yes. SPEAKER_UNKNOWN: Yes. SPEAKER_UNKNOWN: Yes. SPEAKER_UNKNOWN: Yes. SPEAKER_UNKNOWN: Yes.