School Committee - March 06, 2024
School Committee, 3/6/24 - Meeting Summary
Date: 3/6/2024
Type: School Committee
Generated: September 13, 2025 at 06:46 PM
AI Model: Perplexity
-
Meeting Metadata
The March 6, 2024 Sharon School Committee meeting was held remotely with procedural remarks about public comments moderated by Julie Ronal as timekeeper. The meeting included participation from all seven committee members: Avi (Chair), Alan, Julie, Jeremy, Georgeann, Adam, and Dan. It encompassed public comment, budget discussion, fee approvals, MSBA SOI review, lunch program update, calendar approval, and executive session for collective bargaining[Section 1][Section 2]. -
Agenda Overview
The agenda primarily focused on:
- Public comments on the proposed FY25 budget and staffing cuts, particularly administrator and specialist reductions
- Superintendent Dr. Botello’s budget proposal addressing community concerns
- Fee schedule approvals including early childhood center tuition and club fees
- Discussion and vote on the 2024-2025 school calendar
- Review and decision regarding submission of the MSBA Statement of Interest for an elementary school project
- Update on the school lunch program by Dr. Mantella
- Routine approvals including previous meeting minutes and budget transfers
- Executive session for collective bargaining strategy[Section 1][Section 2].
- Major Discussions and Committee Member Positions
| Topic | Avi | Alan | Julie | Jeremy | Georgeann (Shauna) | Adam | Dan |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Public comments and budget input | Led meeting, emphasized respect, fielded discussion, accepted compromises | No noted public remarks | Timekeeper; aggregated community input; advocated early fee discussions; praised incorporation of feedback | No noted public remarks | Voiced strong opposition to assistant principal cuts; criticized budget choices; abstained on budget transfers | Supported budget compromise; minimized instructional cuts; advocated long-term planning | Supported superintendent’s priorities; accepted tough choices; encouraged respect for community effort |
| Elementary & High School assistant principal cuts | Expressed serious concern about cuts, acknowledged operational risks | No noted public remarks | Supported add-backs for assistant principals; cautious with fees’ equity impact | No noted public remarks | Strongly opposed cuts; highlighted operational and student well-being risks; refused to vote for budget with these cuts | Supported budget compromise, though concerned about trade-offs | Opposed assistant principal cuts; feared operational disruption and social-emotional impacts |
| Activity and Club Fees | Led fee presentation; supported fee structure | No noted | Cautiously supported fees; emphasized equity concerns | No noted | Voted yes on fees; expressed brief consideration of lunch quality with text exchange | Voted yes on fees | Voted yes on fees |
| MSBA SOI (Elementary School Project) | Supported recommendation not to submit this year; preferred further study | No noted | Voted yes for no submission this year | Voted yes | Voted yes | Voted yes | Voted yes |
| School Lunch Program Update | Enthusiastic about improvements; encouraged tasting and transparency | No noted | No noted | No noted | Exchanged brief texts on lunch program quality | No noted | No noted |
| 2024-2025 School Calendar (Start after Labor Day) | Led presentation; motion passed 5-2 | No noted | Voted yes | Voted yes | Voted yes | Voted no (one of two opposing votes) | Voted yes |
| Budget Proposal Vote | Accepted compromises; helped push motion and vote; supported passage | No noted | Supported budget vote, viewing compromise as best achievable | Voted yes | Opposed due to assistant principal cuts; cast dissenting vote | Supported as best compromise | Supported with understanding of financial discipline |
Non-contributing or no remarks: Alan and Jeremy had limited or no recorded individual public remarks during discussions except voting.
- Votes
- FY25 Operating Budget: Passed 6-1. Dissenting vote by Georgeann due to cuts’ impact on operations and student services[Section 1].
- Early Childhood Center Tuition Fees: Unanimously approved 7-0; half-day $4,524, full-day $9,872.50 with discounted rates for twins and reduced lunch eligibility; club fees $100 (level 1), $50 (level 2), $0 for student-run clubs; athletic and transportation fees unchanged[Section 2].
- MSBA SOI Submission Decision: Unanimous 7-0 vote not to submit in April 2024, to revisit later in 2024 after further study and coordination with the town[Section 2].
- 2024-2025 School Calendar: Approved 5-2 to start after Labor Day with federal holidays only[Section 2].
- Budget Transfers and Minutes: Passed with one abstention on transfers and unanimous on minutes approval[Section 2].
- Executive Session: Unanimously approved to discuss collective bargaining strategy[Section 2].
- Presentations
-
Superintendent Dr. Botello’s Budget Proposal: Proposed consolidations of administrative roles (athletic director and assistant principal combined part-time, two district admin roles merged), position reductions (0.5 FTE administrative assistant cut, elementary assistant principal reduced to 0.5 FTE), preservation of counseling, Dean of Academics, and curriculum coordinators with added responsibilities, plus fee reinstatements (full-day kindergarten tuition, ECC tuition increases, modest high school activity fees). Provided an add-back priority list if funding permits[Section 1].
-
Dr. Mantella’s School Lunch Update: Shared positive observations of current meals at Heights Elementary, praised cafeteria staff’s care and efficiency, discussed federal regulatory constraints, and promised ongoing updates including financial reports on the cafeteria account[Section 2].
-
Fee Schedule Presentation: Detailed increases in ECC tuition and establishment of club fee tiers; noted equity measures such as discounts for twins and free/reduced lunch students. Athletic and transport fees remain unchanged[Section 2].
-
MSBA SOI Process Overview: Committee reviewed the process and recommended delay of elementary school project SOI submission until late 2024 for better information and coordination[Section 2].
- Action Items
- Approved FY25 budget with proposed cuts and fee changes, committing to monitor impact and advocate for future budget adjustments.
- Adopted new ECC tuition rates and club fee structure with equity considerations.
- Decided to delay MSBA Statement of Interest for elementary school capital project until further study.
- Adopted 2024-2025 school calendar starting after Labor Day.
- Scheduled ongoing reporting on school lunch program progress and cafeteria finances.
- Entered executive session for collective bargaining preparations[Section 1][Section 2].
- Deferred Items
- No MSBA SOI submission for elementary school in April 2024; to be revisited by end of 2024 with further town coordination[Section 2].
- Full-day kindergarten tuition fee discussion to be revisited soon as per Julie.
- Further budget adjustments and add-back discussions to continue post-approval due to financial uncertainty[Section 1].
- Appendices
-
Public Comments: Extensive citizen input from teachers, administrators, psychologists, parents, students, and community members opposing cuts to key roles such as assistant principals, athletic director, administrative assistants, specialists, and coordinators due to perceived negative impact on student safety, support, and instructional quality. Community members also raised concerns about budget transparency and procedural clarity[Section 1].
-
Committee Quotes:
- “Half day tuition of $4,524… full day tuition at $9,872.50… level one clubs $100, level two $50, zero for student clubs that don’t really incur costs…”
- “We are recommending that this might be too early to submit an SOI… We recommend to follow up by the end of the year 2024…”
- “I personally did not think that those meals were anything less than I would find acceptable… There is a level of care… I think they were doing what I consider to be a best practice…”
- “I propose a calendar that begins after Labor Day… motion carries 5-2.”[Section 2].
-
Voting Records and Attendance: Complete and unanimous or recorded votes for fees, budget, SOI decision, and calendar are included above; dissent on budget and calendar noted; attendance included all seven members throughout[Section 1][Section 2].
Document Metadata
- Original Transcript Length: 135,958 characters
- Summary Word Count: 1,223 words
- Compression Ratio: 15.0:1
- Transcript File:
School-Committee_3-6-2024_c0e52d95.wav
Transcript and Video
All right, 702, I feel comfortable starting this off.
Okay, welcome to the March 6th, 2024 meeting of the Sharon School Committee.
This meeting will be conducted remotely over Zoom. Attendance by board and commission members will be remote and remote attendance shall count towards a quorum. The meeting will be broadcast live recorded by Sharon TV. If you elect to enable your webcam, your image, your background, it will be broadcast with or without sound. As always, or I should say as almost always, the first agenda item we have is our public comments.
I would ask for a timekeeper from the committee.
Any volunteers?
I see Julie raise your hand.
All right.
Only ground rules are two minutes per person. Please be sure to stay within that two minutes.
Obviously, nobody likes to cut anybody off, but we do have to hold everybody the same standard. Also, I would ask that folks just try to be as respectful as possible.
But again, that's an ask. I can't make you stay there.
I would ask people just like I did on Monday to please keep in mind making their comments that all the discussion around budget is sensitive.
I think it's very personal to folks. Many of our staff through the district see that there are, you know, serious effects to their jobs, whether it's cuts to their personal position or to those who they're close with or even just things that they believe will make their job much more difficult.
And so we're all very sensitive topics. Also, you know, these these topics are very sensitive for our students.
And so when we discuss things, especially things that are people and, you know, not supply budgets and whatnot, please be mindful of that. All right.
With that said, I see Mary Blinky.
Hi, good evening.
So thank you so much for holding the meeting on Monday.
I saw that basically having a vote on the budget is still on the agenda for night.
And I would kindly ask you to reconsider voting tonight.
The public still has no idea what budget is actually being voted on at the meeting on Monday. There was a lot of creative ideas being proposed.
I know you finally started that difficult conversation about what it would take to save some teacher jobs, but nobody actually knows what is the proposal which is being discussed.
So I would kindly ask you to actually propose a budget the public could actually look at and then vote at a following meeting.
Another thing is I noticed at Monday's meeting there was a lot of teachers calling in to to save the jobs of certain administrators.
I would just like to curious what how many of those teachers are reporting directly to those administrators or being evaluated for continual employment by those administrators.
And if there's any policy about preventing any sort of pressure by supervisors against subordinates to prevent any conflicts of interest.
And finally, I just want to reiterate, I really think that we need to focus on keeping as many people like teachers in the classroom guidance counselors meeting with students assistant principals who are critical to discipline and resolving confluence and actually implementing the anti bullying policy that Sharon is now considering.
You cannot literally follow up on all the bias incidents and all the gateway and bullying behaviors unless you have those assistant principals.
So I was very excited to see some of the proposals by Dr. Botello to take away some of the administrative and paperwork duties from people and have them spend more of their time. And I think it's really, I think it's really, I think it's really important to have those positions be more student focused.
And I think it's only fair that if we go down this route that this committee revises the superintendent goals to be less administrative focus because there's a lot of reporting, which was part of those goals. And it would be unfair to hold Dr. Botello to those goals while removing the people or the positions which are responsible for those goals.
Thank you. Thank you.
Kathleen Turner.
Hi.
I have some comments that I would like to make.
And if I extend between over my two minutes, would you possibly be able to get, have Lori Davis speak next to follow sort of what I have planned to say?
That's a, yeah, absolutely. That's a very fair ask.
Okay. Thank you. I actually am speaking about the high school assistant principal.
The high school assistant principal's entire job is student facing.
Their priority is not discipline so much as it is student case management, attendance, peer conflict, student staff conflict, grades, IEP 504 meetings, parent communication, program recommendations, et cetera.
This requires assistant principals to be in front of students daily.
Furthermore, interactions with students do not just support their success, but indirectly support teacher success. Currently, the assistant principal caseloads are 566 students.
Should a 0.5 FTE be cut, the 1.0 FTE assistant principal would have a caseload of 849.
This is higher than the caseload of the Westin high school assistant principal at 662, for example. The larger staff to student ratio directly impacts the ability to build relationships, the very foundation of a vibrant and safe school community.
The assistant principals regularly collaborate with teachers, school counselors, adjustment counselors, school psychologists to support our most at-risk students. Of the 1,132 students currently enrolled at Sharon High School, 717 students, that's 63%, are considered at-risk.
Some risk is 541 at 48%, moderate risk 103 at 9%, and high risk 73 at 6%.
The reduction of the assistant principal position is also detrimental to the safety of our students.
Our new building is far larger than the former structure, and it's imperative to have more administrators, not fewer, to be present throughout the building. In addition to their direct interactions with students and families, the two assistant principals and principal currently evaluate 26 staff members each.
A 0.5 FTE assistant principal cut will increase the principal and 1.0 FTE assistant principal evaluations to 32 and 33 each.
A comparison with other schools in the Hockamock League and other schools in the Commonwealth that we often compare ourselves to show that the size of their administrative teams relative to their student enrollment, as per the DESE school profiles, show that they almost consistently have more building-based administrators than we do, thus ensuring low administrator-to-student ratios.
If we want to continue to promote Sharon Public Schools as a destination district for families and educators, we must continue to compete with those schools around us.
This cut will dramatically set us back in the race.
Several years ago, the high school had one full-time assistant principal and a half-time assistant principal. This structure did not work at all, which is why the superintendent prioritized a full-time position in the subsequent budget.
I'd like to pass to Lori Davis, who will speak to the athletic director, which was the joint position.
Thanks, Kathleen.
The athletic director has responsibilities that extend beyond the 1.0 position, and cutting it back to a 0.5 FTE will be detrimental in many ways to our programs and students.
There is a steady stream of students who go in and out of the athletic director's office all day.
Additionally, they have to work weekends, evening hours, and during vacations.
The athletic director is responsible for the recruitment, hiring, education, supervision, and annual evaluation of all coaches, the ordering, receiving, distributing, excuse me, distribution, maintaining, and storing of all athletic uniforms and equipment, the formulating, the formulating and recording, the proper inventory of all athletic equipment on an annual basis, the organization, scheduling, and management of all athletic events, as well as transportation to away events and supervision at home events.
In collaboration with the directors of facilities for all supervising athletic facilities, recommending the necessary maintenance and repair to ensure the safety of student-athletes.
There is this discussion of wanting to expand offerings for all students, especially girls teams and unified teams.
It will be impossible for a part-time AD to maintain what we have and add even more.
Additionally, the idea of having a part-time assistant principal athletic director is not logistically practical.
As previously stated, the athletic director job spans the entire school day and spills over into the afternoon, evening, weekends, and vacation.
One person would not be able to successfully fulfill the requirements of both positions.
And at this time, I'd like to pass on to Andrea Dolchermont, who would like to address the halftime administrative assistant position.
Thank you.
Just grab my...
The reduction of the 2.5 administrative assistant positions has a significant impact on the operation of both the main office at the high school, which includes supporting the assistant principal, I say principals, hopefully, the special ed administrator, and while in the position in the counseling suite, which includes the dean of academic affairs, six school counselors, two school psychologists, and adjustment counselors.
This includes direct student management as well as a vast array of administrative responsibilities.
That student management means triaging students who come in crisis, students who have both physical and emotional needs, and the administrative assistants wind up managing those pieces.
These are positions that have already seen a reduction over the past year.
Our current counseling administrative assistant has gone above and beyond to compensate for an empty second admin position since the beginning of the year. For example, she's worked overtime on evenings and weekends, unpaid to get transcripts and materials out of the office in time for college applications.
She has done this as a temporary fix, but this is not sustainable.
Our administrative assistants are our face in our office.
Now that we're surviving with one, she spends most of her time managing an influx of students, welcoming them, offering them a calm space while they wait for their counselor.
If they're in crisis, they ensure that they're being kept safe by tracking their attendance.
Because of this, all of the administrative duties in her actual job have to wait until after school hours. Our administrative assistant and dean of academic affairs have absorbed most of these responsibilities, which also includes a significant amount of data entry and power school management, which was reassigned and realigned from another reduction in an administrative assistant position.
But these are things that we're forced to deal with at a cut at the time. Some of the things that we will need to look at eliminating will be having college rep visits come to the high school.
It will impact the way in which we can collect fees for testing.
And we'll need to look to move to some sort of an online management of that that currently is all managed by paper. Managing front desk and student traffic, the registrar responsibilities, which are currently managed through the school counseling high school office for all high school registrations.
School junior award ceremonies, job and volunteer opportunities boards, scholarships, which were managed in the past when we had a second admin assistant.
We're managing to kind of figure out how to do that.
In addition, this is a position that runs and manages all the distribution of 504s. And then the decrease in this could also impact some of our speed in which we can manage transcripts, working papers and other administrative pieces that need to get managed in the best interest of our students.
And I believe I'm passing now to Julie Pekaski.
Can I just ask, I know Ms. Turner had asked about passing it to one.
Is there a, can somebody, normally I call as the chair of the meeting, I call on the next person. And I don't, I'm not saying this isn't, and I'm not going to allow this. I just want to know how many more, each time you guys finish, there's a, there's a pass on. No one's giving me heads up as to how long, like, do we know how many people are in that baton pass?
Somebody?
SPEAKER_UNKNOWN: Okay. I am going to speak last.
I believe I'm at the end.
And it is okay if I speak right now, just double checking.
Yes, you're good. Of course. Anyway, I did see your hands were up in order just for anybody from the public that has an issue. I just wanted to make sure that we, that I sort of understood what the scope was. That's all.
Perfect. Yes, I should be the last to speak in this particular thread.
I just want to speak to the interconnectedness of the positions that have been shared before me.
So, for example, as a high school English teacher, I am not directly involved in athletics, but I do specifically feel the importance of the athletic director.
I see the joy in students' faces when they come into my class, excited about games that are going on and activities that they can be directly enrolled in.
And so, even though I might not have a lot of one-to-one contact with that particular director, I see and really feel the impact on the school community.
The same goes for the counseling positions and the assistant principal positions as well.
Obviously, the assistant principals I do work with more regularly, but specifically, you know, sometimes we think like an admin assistant.
What do I, as a classroom teacher, have to do with that?
But to what Andrea Dantremont shared before me, we do really feel that when we are trying to coordinate things, when we are trying to get support for our students, when we are trying to coordinate small things like field trips, every FTE we eliminate really spreads more work and takes us away from the most important thing, which is focusing on the time with our students.
Thank you so much.
Thank you so much. All right, Judy Crosby.
SPEAKER_UNKNOWN: Thanks.
But I'm going to ask the same thing I asked the other night, which is to please.
Brittany Kurtz.
Hi, everyone.
Sorry, my daughter's having Cocomelon on in the background.
So my apologies.
I'm a special education teacher at East Elementary School.
I'm also a Sharon resident.
And my big kind of first question and ask is if we're using the kindergarten reinstatement of fees to make up some of the deficit, why is an assistant principal at the elementary level who has some of the most direct contact with those students, not only in helping, you know, daily to support each of the behaviors, but also with the transition to kindergarten, as well as with kindergarten screening, be some one of the most affected positions here.
Just to add on to that, too.
Some of the kindergarten levels are the most impacted by the migrant families that we have had moved in who have also had, you know, even more challenges transitioning.
And our assistant principal, I can say, has been extraordinary in helping with those students adjust to our school, helps handle them daily.
Some of them we have found have needed additional things like glasses, and she has been instrumental in helping to ensure that those kids have what they need.
Now, just to add on to more of those things, not only helping with kindergarten, but she is literally like the backbone of our school.
Aside from running IEP meetings, she is someone that her door is open daily. You know, we check in with her, talk about students, and she is constantly sharing ideas, supporting each and every one of us, and ensuring that we can do the best job that we can for our students.
She handles behaviors every single day.
I mean, my office is across the hall from her. She has kids in there for lunch every single day, eating with her to ensure that they are happy, that they are getting through the school day, and not causing even more disruption in the lunchroom or anywhere else.
In addition, I know she's conducted many, many bullying investigations when they've been brought up.
She is communicating with parents daily, especially with those that have asked.
She is handling all the special education paperwork on top of all those bullying investigations, on top of even more things that I probably don't even know, just because I'm not in that role.
I really can say that she also helps 504. She might not be the direct coordinator for every single 504, but she is working so closely with the school adjustment counselors, with the nurse, and everyone else who is in charge of those 504s to ensure that they're in compliance, in addition to making sure that every IEP is in compliance.
So to just sum it all up, I can't imagine an elementary school without an assistant principal.
Thank you.
Noelle Allard.
Hi.
Hi.
So I work as the full-time school psychologist at Codd Street School.
I've been in Sharon for now eight years.
Losing the elementary assistant principal as FED coordinator is a huge loss. I think one very important piece is compliance.
So in special education world, it's all about compliance and timelines.
We have students we need to service.
We have students we need to evaluate both in our schools and from private schools for walk-ins.
The staff are already spread too thin.
And one concern I have that does affect a lot of the counseling staff, as well as our other special ed staff and classroom teachers, is when we have crisis in the building.
There are only a few handful of staff who are actually CPI trained.
It's not expected that staff like the psychs and the adjustment counselors be CPI trained. It's our restraint program.
But by eliminating one staff, you've also eliminated another resource for when students are in crisis.
It is going to require that other staff have to get more involved, which means that those staff, like myself, will be taken away from students who I do service.
I see students all day long, and I evaluate students as well, and I sit in meetings.
So if students are not being serviced, there are going to be compliance issues, and parents have a right to know if their students are not being serviced consistently.
For a long period of time.
The other piece is that for in terms of the walk-in students, Cottage has some of the highest walk-in students.
And something to think about is that our assistant principal does help with the observations in the schools of the students.
Some of these students go to private schools in Newton, up north. It can be almost half a day outside of the building where, again, we have to cancel students.
So this is a very huge concern.
The staff, again, are already spread very thin.
And by eliminating this position, you are asking staff to absorb even more responsibilities.
And the quality of our special education programming is going to go down because there is no time. There's going to be no time to complete our regular daily responsibilities and meet the needs of our students. Thank you.
Thank you.
Erin Silver.
Hi.
Good evening.
I am Erin Silver.
I am a seventh grade science teacher at the middle school. And I'm going to be speaking to the literacy and math specialists.
Currently at SMS, we have two literacy specialists and one math specialist.
And the proposal is to cut the one math specialist we have, as well as one of the literacy specialists.
Sorry, my children are playing upstairs.
The pandemic interrupted readiness for many students in both areas.
Teams are frequently referring students to the math specialists for interventions that allow them more quickly to reach expected benchmarks than would happen with a regular class instruction or support alone.
Currently, the position of the math specialist allows students to be retaught concepts in small groups, but also allows that math specialist to go into our current classrooms and give extra support during math class.
Classroom teachers simply do not have enough time in their schedules to provide the interventions needed through smaller groups or individual instruction in a similar time frame. As a result, these students would take even longer to reach grade level benchmarks and may fall further behind and become more frustrated with math at a critical juncture in their academic development.
In terms of literacy, some middle school teams start the year with as many as one quarter of their students reading significantly below grade level.
These are not students receiving special education services.
They are regular education students who have readiness gaps. These gaps impact their ability to succeed not only in ELA, but also in science and social studies where they need to be able to read with enough fluency to make meaning of the concepts and make necessary connections.
As a life science teacher, having students with the decodable skills for words such as photosynthesis and cellular respiration is vital in being able to delve into those concepts then.
Those of us who teach those other informational subjects are not trained as literacy teachers, and as a result, we are very dependent on the work of the two literacy specialists who are able to support these students with the skills and strategies they need to succeed in all of our classrooms.
These students, reducing these positions to one would disadvantage many students, again classroom teachers do not have the same amount of time or even the skill set to adequately support these students growth in area of reading.
Thank you.
Thank you.
Sharon Schechter.
can you see me and or hear me yep we can hear you oh great okay um hi so my name is Sharon Schechter I'm coming to the table with several hats I've been a resident of Sharon since 2004 I'm a parent of a graduate of Sharon High School class of 2022 and most recently I was hired as a long-term sub in the world language department at Sharon High School which has been an honor and privilege to serve I'm speaking specifically about the curriculum coordinator position which was recently talked about being extraneous and I just can't put into words uh the degree to which that statement is false um I cannot imagine a uh a harder working person than Dr Maureen Magnin who um to kind of comment on the very first comment of the evening tonight um has given there is no pressure from the curriculum coordinators to any of their um you know of the teachers who they manage to stand up and support them um we are all here because we recognize that without them them in those positions the quality of education would deeply suffer the quality of the teacher's um ability to function and serve would suffer their role is vital it's something that you know had I not had this opportunity to be um had my foot in the door chair in high school I might not have known and thought oh yeah this is an administrative position you know oh maybe we don't need it blah blah blah but like you don't know until you know until you step in that building and you see the unyielding amount of hours that um these coordinators put in it is unbelievable like everybody asked me when I started working what is the high school like I'm like let me just tell you about these teachers and again the coordinator especially um I just can't even begin like it's just the uh the the the just a beginning statement to say that um they are extremely hard working and without them the degree of education that our children receive and again the support our teachers need and deserve would really suffer so I'm just here to um show my support and representate representing those who really um are grateful and would would hate to see the removal of a curriculum coordinator which is such a tremendously vital role and again I wouldn't have known that before and so I come from this very interesting position of having jumped in and seeing this in action myself and um as a taxpayer I couldn't imagine my tax dollars dollars going to a better um venue than supporting a curriculum coordinator it's deeply needed thank you thank you Kristen Finney hi thanks so much Kristen Finney um first grade teacher East Elementary School 24 year teacher 19 awesome years here in Sharon and um thanks for recognizing me I just want to speak um a little bit to the uh assistant principal not only that um position but she's also our educational team leader and I just want us to think a little bit deeper about um how student facing her position actually is um time with students and I think um cutting that position could end up being more costly for the district and will impact students and families um in a great way and in that way what will happen is we'll shift all of those responsibilities now onto building staff they'll absorb those and what will happen is they'll be out of the classroom doing the crisis management the student face time and absorbing that therefore taking time away from the students that they are required to service by legal IEP time um and as a parent of a student on an IEP I would be really cautious frustrated and all over this um because it is an impossible task to do without Cheryl Carlson in our building um and I'm gonna say her name because she is absolutely on a personal note one of the best you're not going to find but I know you're looking financially at her position um but I think we have to understand with the influx of migrant students that we've had the managing of the kindergarten process um and how she is doing that student face time for all of these things and getting students and teachers what they need could end up costing our district compensatory services in the long run for our students on IEPs that's not even to talk about the kids in crisis who are not on IEPs who do not have scheduled services there's not a minute where she's not working with students or teachers so I would just love us to dig a little bit deeper and realize I understand your position I respect it so much and and know that it's a very tough place to be in but when I tell you the impact and the ripple effect it will have you're not going to be able to stipend this position to a teacher to absorb this it is an impossible task and if you've been in teaching as long as I've been in teaching you'll see it it's why I've stayed in Sharon for as long as I have it's an amazing place to be and I feel like we can dig deeper and do better and I really appreciate everyone's creative thinking so really thank you for letting me speak tonight and I appreciate the position that our administration and our school committees and so thank you but I really just want to put that plug in for her position not only as her position but as a person you would be losing an incredible educator thank you thank you Judy Crosby um thank you Avi um so I have two things I wanted to talk about the first is um I would like everyone to and especially the school committee and Dr. Botello pause and acknowledge the grace that was shown by one of your educational leaders on Monday night when she came to this table knowing that no matter what her job next year is gone and she spoke eloquently about preserving the jobs of others and offered that she had come up with a way to do so and it was really upsetting to see no school committee member nor the superintendent acknowledge those words acknowledge the value of what that person who was named employee of the town in summer 2021 has contributed and has continued to contribute despite her job being eliminated she's running around trying to come up with creative ways to save everybody else's jobs and you all showed zero interest in what she had to say be better be leaders recognize when you have valuable people who are trying be respectful of them give it a shot you know you you gave the introduction I asked you to give Bobby on Monday night and tonight and I'm grateful you listened to me but you have to live it and you're not living it and it was embarrassing the second thing is tonight you have it on your agenda to vote transfers without any discussion of them last meeting two meetings ago when they were presented they were flashed up on the screen and went away just as quick and you have it as a vote with no discussion tonight you want to know how you all got here you want to know how you signed a contract that you couldn't afford and didn't know you couldn't afford it you want to know how you didn't know that five hundred twenty thousand dollars has been stripped out of your supply budget last year and this year and you therefore can't afford to buy the curriculum that Julie so desperately wants to buy hey Julie everyone else thank you that's um Namitha Devola Polly um hello I'm sorry for the background noise but I'm currently a student at Sharon high school class of 25 and I see a lot of my former teachers here and I just want to acknowledge that all the hard work the administrators have done to make the school run smoothly I remember when I was a freshman there was no librarian in the school and the library it it was not a place of learning it was not a place to find knowledge it was and I think that sorry by cutting administrative positions we're going to have the same thing but on a bigger scale like there are these departments that need administrators that need someone to coordinate everything because everyone is already stretched out very thin and cutting these positions is not going to be helpful to the school or the community in any way um I heard that the position of dean of academic affairs was one of the uh ones that was proposed to be removed and I just think that these positions though they may not impact um people in as visible of a way I think that they still make a very important difference they make an important difference to students who want to go above and beyond of what the curriculum at Sharon high school offers they make a difference to the students who take the opportunities that the administrators work so hard for us to provide and I think that there are I mean I'm just the student I don't know much about the school or the town but I think that there are other places that the budget could be cut that don't that will not have as detrimental of an effect on Sharon high school Sharon high school students Sharon high school teachers Sharon high school in the Sharon community thank you thank you thank you so much um I see Andrew Tessier Tessier thank you Avi um uh high school teacher at Sharon high school um we understand you are bound to go to priorities meeting this coming Monday with a 3.1227 budget proposal 100 understand that that's why we're having this discussion um and hopefully the the educators who have spoken tonight have made it clear that all of these positions make the teachers jobs possible uh they are impossible without them and so if we are in this position where absolutely everything we've got on here and on stable is painful then the hard choice can't be what do we cut the hard choice has to be is there any possible way to pay this bill because and I say that fully understanding the tax burden the the residents of Sharon in particular face I know that it's no small ask but but if we don't then we are only trading one pain for another community members have come out and made it very clear save the teachers they are our priority but then in the same breath have said have them shoulder the weight of the work from these cut positions and and you know I heard a community member say oh that don't cut my my student's favorite teacher we can't be your student's favorite teacher without those supports holding us up that that that's exactly how this pain we all keep speaking of trickles down and that is how these cuts end up being felt deeply not by us I mean we'll shoulder it that's what we signed up for but it ends up being felt by our students and you know we we need to we need to find a way to figure this out like that that's we understand you've got a job to do and hopefully the community can stand with us and and fight for the funding and education that your kids deserve uh again I know that right now that is not an easy thing to ask but if these are our alternatives you know we got to fight for what makes this town great and what makes this the place that teachers want to teach in that families want to move to because if we don't it's going to fall apart it's it's been a mess for a long time and it's only started to come back together and these cuts are they're just going to blow it up and we we can't do that we and again that's not directed at any of you we understand what your task here is but man like if this is where we're at we got to find a way to do it so please please help us please thank you thanks Andrew uh Khalid Isa hi uh uh first of all I'd like to thank everyone really for the effort being put into this this is not an easy task by any means um and um it's very hard to cut any positions in an institution I think many of us who work in big organization have seen over the last period of time certain positions being cut and it definitely can affect the workflow I just want to reiterate the same the same thing that Mira mentioned at the beginning I I tried to attend as much as possible especially the last meeting on Monday and I tried to say at the end as much as possible I still do not understand exactly what the vote is for in today um maybe it's my bad maybe I couldn't follow exactly everything being said um but as as far as a meeting Monday I didn't feel that there's a firm item to vote on vote in uh unless maybe you would explain this a little bit more today I understand that it seems that we have to be ready for for by Monday with the with the with the cut um if that's what's what's um if that's my understanding thanks thank you Judith Wiener hi thanks I guess my primary point is more concern I understand that from a timing perspective you you have to go to priorities right you have to be able to get that in front of them in a timely manner can I just clarify one thing sorry I won't take your time I just yes sir it's not just multiple people that said priorities we present priorities is is passed that's where the allocation was set we two of us vote on it it's finance committee we present in our budget we're slated to present in front of Monday so all right awesome thank you thank thank you for the clarification um so you have to present to finance committee based upon the the budget allocation that that priorities had given to you that 3.1227
um so I understand that you're under a deadline and I get it um I've done budgeting in a lot of places and so budgeting takes a really long time like months months and months and months and I feel like this is all not so much snuck up on us but it feels like it's only really been brought forward in the last couple of meetings and I'm so grateful to you Avi for having set up the meeting for Monday because I think we needed it we needed an intervention we needed something in the middle but I feel like our planning has just not been there and I feel like the prioritization is still unclear and to echo what Judy Crosby had said earlier I'm very disappointed that Dr. Duceaux raised her hand and said I've I've got some ideas and it doesn't seem like anybody reached out to her prior and teachers were hearing for the very first time on Monday what jobs were potentially going to be cut whereas in other school districts such as I believe Ms. Lewis had pointed out on on the call on Monday the superintendent works directly with the teachers and says here's what I'm going to present and so I feel like the communication's not there the planning's not there the prioritization's not there so while I understand that you have to go forward with something and you have to make a tough decision and I don't envy you that decision for the next go-round please we need budgeting discipline it's not here and while we can't fix where the situation we're in just now we can do better next time so I'm please asking you please please please let's get some discipline in it next year thank you thank you Omar Kanesha-Kandi um hello my name is Omar and I am the student representative for the school committee from the high school and I'd like to start off by thanking everyone for coming to this meeting today and thank you for giving me the time uh to speak as well and um primarily uh today I'll be speaking as a representative of the students of Sharon high school and I acknowledge that oftentimes we the students are completely unaware of the highly complicated nature of tasks given to the many coordinators and administrators in the building and uh quite honestly many of us students have next to no idea of how many of these proposals especially those regarding the coordinators and administrators we have quite honestly next to no contact with will affect us in the future but I speak for every student at the high school when I say that Mr. Palmer our current dean of academic affairs has had such a substantial role at the high school that everyone realizes the necessity to retain his position as dean of academic affairs um he is someone who's had decades of experience and decades of dedicated service and those changes uh to the budget uh just means that our school district very very valuable expertise and guidance in curriculum assessment and career planning and again I am just a student we are all just students and we have had nowhere near as much experience as you have had but we'd like to reiterate it is essential to keep and retain Mr. Palmer's position as dean of academic affairs as it is just essential to the high school community right now and thank you again for allowing me to speak thank you appreciate your advocacy Georgia and Lewis all right thanks um I just want to thank Ms. Weider am I saying her last name right for echoing my sentiments last week um we do do things very different in my district as a matter of fact the same conversation was had with the community before we're at FinCom right now tonight um so uh in the interest of finishing Judy's sentiments I'm going to read them since she was cut off time clock seems to be broken so I think what she was trying to say is the lack of attention that the committees paid to the transfers that the administration made in the violation of state law and fiscal year 23 and this year is how we're here we're about to repeat the same mistakes and with your continued with your continued lack of attention to this matter no budget transfers between cost centers may be made without the approval of the school committee that's the state law and yet hundreds of thousands of dollars was transferred in 23 without your knowing what's happened and then you blessed it retrospectively in the fall of um 24 so that's the completion of Judy's statements mine I just again want to echo what was spoken before me you know I think we need to do better we need to be more transparent we shouldn't these things shouldn't have to be snuck up on and noise made on Facebook for it to come to people's attention and then absolutely no world ever should teachers ratify a contract only to have it months later be sitting here worried about losing their jobs um and that's that's really the bottom line it's just uncomprehensible and I I do appreciate all the work you do but I'm hoping we can do better thank you thanks Leandra's iPhone Leandra can you just state your first and last name oh hi Leandra hi how are you um Leandra McLean um first and last name and I just wanted to uh say I was very disappointed that we came um things came up so quickly with where we were at as far as the budget and it is budgeting is long-term every day part of it absolutely um but as someone who has uh multiple children going through and have gone through the Sharon school system just very sad at the point that we have come to um I would encourage both school committee and Dr. Tello to please work um with Dr. Dussault who um I work with in many other capacities um and really does think outside the box and and I do think that that's something because I would implore um um everyone to please remember these are these are humans that interact with our kids on a daily basis that we're talking about um and to really keep that human factor um as part of a decision thank you thank you Rebecca Fuller good evening thank you I will only speak for a moment but I want to speak directly to Namita and Omar and acknowledge that you are more than just a student you are what we are all here for and we appreciate the passion that you have to come here and give us your feedback on how these positions will impact you your voice has power and you are who we are here for so thank you thank you thank you thank you Mrs.
Flew megan doherty I don't know I'm getting asked to mute one of the other hosts want to try for some reason I'm being asked to unmute and it doesn't seem to be we almost made it through I just tried okay Megan I'm going to come right back to you I'm going to try Rohith Raghavan and um see if maybe we can get this done mute for you uh Rohith uh can you guys hear me yes we can um hi so I'm Rohith I serve as the president of the class of 2025 and honestly this is my first time attending a school committee meeting but I came here today because a lot of my classmates reached out to me about this and they were like hey Rohith do you know what's going on with like the new budget and these cuts that might be happening because the truth is I think every student at SHS feels really privileged to be at SHS um you know you hear stories about schools all the time and how under-resourced they are and how difficult it is for students to get an education whereas at SHS you know the door to the coordinator's office is always open and they're always so warm and welcoming when you ask a question whether it be about participating in a math competition or trying to enter the science fair and the counseling department I can count I can't count on my hands how many times they've helped me whenever I needed something you know you just walk right in and they're always ready to help you and I just want to say that those sort of experiences are what makes SHS special because you don't get those at other schools you don't get that sort of access the ability to know that there's someone that you can rely on a teacher that is there for you that's something that's unique to SHS and I just want to ask everyone here but especially the school committee members to realize that if we threaten that then SHS is just another school in the United States another school in the news that you know worries about high rates of failing high absenteeism and I want to make sure that SHS isn't that place I want to make sure that SHS is somewhere where students feel happy to go and know that there's always going to be somewhere someone there for them thank you thank you so much Megan Doherty we're going to try this again any luck there all right I'm going to cut off public forum after Megan Doherty but Megan if you want to try to log off real quick and log right back on I will take I'll attempt to take your comments here I know you waited and um that might maybe that will work all right Megan has logged off and hopefully we'll log right back on uh and again public forum will conclude with Megan uh see Megan all right Megan I saw you just log back in if you can raise your hand again uh you'll pop right up on my screen there oh looking for Megan here anybody else that's a host sees Megan and can unmute I'm sifting through the crowd here Bobby I tried to unmute her but I can't I can't do it I keep clicking okay I'm sorry Mr. Oherty um if at some point in the meeting something changes there I will certainly still take her comment uh not sure I'm sorry to interrupt I could make Megan a co-host and then take it away and maybe she can unmute herself there just a just a suggestion that's a great suggestion thank you Amy Megan hold on one second so I'm making you a co-host Megan so you should be able to unmute yourself all right I think we keep losing her from the meeting okay all right again if I see Megan's hand up I will still take Megan um but I will throw it over to Julie Ronal for correspondence all right let's try you guys I think is it working it's working we hear you thank you so much for working with me so that remind giving me like a post pandemic stress from being on zoom um thank you for recognizing me um I just wanted to speak a little bit to um our students need social emotionally wise at school and um post pandemic um the students need um so much extra support than what classroom teachers such as myself are able to provide and what I mean by that is um I can't believe it but it's been 12 years in Sharon for me doing jobs such as um recess assistant photocopying assistant um second grade assistant kindergarten assistant and now been in third grade for 10 years and I have not used Sheryl Carlson more this year than I have any other year of teaching and arguably my expertise in teaching has just grown every single year and I have needed her to support kids with so many different types of problems than I have had to deal with before in the past she has expertise and knowledge that is able to help us through the day on top of I was trying to make a quick list she organized and runs car pickup she is there with her expertise for every special ed meeting that we need her to be there for she facilitates those meetings especially ones that are going to be difficult she manages extreme behaviors social emotional events violent behaviors even if we do have them she's our first call that we come to she facilitates dialogues between parents with students that are having repeated difficulties she's responsible for implementing and managing students who have safety plans as they're re-entering school she coordinates um tutoring work to be sent to students when they are in hospitals for long periods of time she investigates every bullying incident and some of those aren't even bullying incidences they just need conversations that we need administrators that are there to have time to be able to do for her she makes sure as all the laws and protocols are followed so that we are meeting the needs of all the children and she really supports her teachers and she has um high love she supports the teachers especially ones that for unknown reasons have high levels of need in their classroom any given year um in addition to that i'm not sure but she is an evaluating member so i do know that having her as an evaluator in the past she is very collaborative um and i'm just not understanding how the role will be able to move away from someone with her expertise um and the amount of time that i see her sitting at her desk before and after school um so i understand that we have many cuts and decisions that need to be made and i just hope we're not making a short-sighted decision with cutting something um that's so valuable to our school community thank you for working on the sound and thank you for my time thank you so much all right i will now throw it to julie roe for correspondence thank you avi the school committee has received 107 pieces of correspondence between february 28 2024 at 9 a.m and march 6 2024 at 9 a.m we received one edition of millie's mecca monday newsletter with information on a visit from the secretary of education and staff from the department of elementary and secondary education as well as programs held over february break the remaining letters all focused on the fiscal year 25 operating budget and fee recommendations presented by the district these letters came from students staff families and community members and expressed a variety of concerns including advocacy for particular programs and staffing throughout the district the district some highlights and common themes included concerns that the budget proposal impacted too many classroom teachers and requests to rethink the budget in order to minimize the impact to students in classrooms suggestions for pro program cuts concerns about possible reductions in ap classes or opportunities to double up on ap and honors level classes requests to closely scrutinize all administrative positions and to make cuts there suggestions to return the full day kindergarten fee and increase fees for athletics and student activities concerns that reintroducing the full day kindergarten fee reflects inequitable practice and would likely impact our youngest learners advocacy for curriculum coordinator with coordinators with explanation about the impact they will cutting these positions will have on students staff and ability to enhance instructional practices they are viewed as quote absolutely essential to the success of each department and the wider school community support for the critical role played by the assistant principals at the elementary level that loss would impact the running of the building from daily social emotional needs to the organization and operation of the building to the support provided to our special education students concerns concerns about the impact that proposed cuts to the budget could have on special education specific letters address the critical importance of bob homer dean of academic affairs specific letters express support for dr dussaud we received multiple letters to advocate for elementary music and art and for the support of math specialists at the elementary schools we received letters to encourage the district to continue to support dei work particularly focused on the positions of dei and my co-directors suggestion that the district provide better explanations and impacts on the loss of positions and support for the important role that counseling plays for our shs students proposals to cut any position from this department were opposed due to the operational impact it would have on activities such as maintaining power school building the master schedule student registration and the impact it would have on daily lives of students and before i hand it back avi may i make a personal comment um some of the um some of the um some of the um some of the um some of the um uh uh made reference to something i said on monday which was perceived as insensitive and um i just want everyone to know that when i'm looking at numbers and titles um it's um it's um it's because i don't want to think about um how the people because i know some of these people and i know how i know personally how how great they are and it's this is a really difficult thing so i i i apologize to any teachers and staff who felt um that i wasn't taking it seriously enough and i assure you that i take it all very seriously and um i'm sorry thanks julie um i think i saw new who had spoken last time as a student rep do we have a student rep update if so just raise your hand if not i'm happy to um certainly not put anyone on the spot all right we will move forward um next up for our discussion items the first is the fy25 operating budget and fees the superintendent's revised budget submission and fee recommendation um we'll then have an attempt to vote to approve the operating budget submission and the vote to approve the fy25 fees uh dr patella on to you great thank you very much um before i i jump into that i just wanted to um uh to kind of uh share that i i did send out a um a communication with um mr orwark in uh he did to vetty rdi that um uh that we had postponed uh the speaking of all autumn allen at the middle school um in order to really greater understand the concerns that um some members of our community had um had expressed um we are um having her come to speak uh to the middle school um next week in the near future um we very much appreciate the the communication that came from members of our community and really wanted to understand and kind of vet the situation more fully and that's why we postponed um i want to kind of really emphasize that you know mills uh ms allen who's coming um the plan for her to speak has always been for her to speak about her book and about her writing um she is you know is uh has no interest in and no plan ever and we in and we were on the same page of this about to speak about uh have her speak about politics and the the event is both a non-religious and non-political as she focused exclusively on speaking about her process as a writer which our kids who do lots of creative writing can relate to um also there were some concerns about her affiliation with um a letter written by some staff at at harvard and you know as we we looked into the situation more you know although she certainly has expressed um you know support for not restricting speech um without scrutiny at the college level she is also you know made clear to us that she doesn't condone speech that is you know hateful or or um or or promotes violence in any way and so you know um we also recognize that world hijab day has become more politicized over the last year as uh situations in the middle east have unfolded and um and just want to emphasize that she's had no affiliation with world hijab day and that we're really really trying to focus our events more locally uh because of we can't control um what an organization might put out there so this is really looking for an effort to continue to expose our students to people of diverse backgrounds who represent a key component of our community and we'll look to do that with various communities as well as tying it to the curriculum in this case writing in in young adult fiction um but we really appreciate you know people who expressed uh their views uh you know i certainly try to be as is you know open-minded as biases and unbiased as possible but no one is perfect i as superintendent are trying to represent the entire community i have personal you know feelings and affiliation being someone who grew up with jewish heritage is have friends and family members in israel and and and and and certainly this is a very difficult time for many in our community um who feel you know the situation very um very significantly and are worried in in in pain and so uh we're doing our very best to kind of work that line um if there are uh folks who really are concerned um about they they're able to you know have their kids um go to another space during the time that we hope most people can take it advantage of it we're also inviting people to come in um you know kind of uh view uh ms allen if they wish um to you know see her presentation but uh i i just wanted to recognize that before we jump into the budget all right um i appreciate you sharing that here on this platform and giving the board an opportunity to speak uh shauna um dr bettella i will have to say i i am disappointed that um of all of the people that we could have brought in for the speaker that this is where we landed especially after such a large contingency of our community expressed um such disappointment in um her outward rhetoric rhetoric on social media um um there are many many other um authors writers inventors people who could have filled this role um that did not have pages and pages of shared um memes and um uh writings that are anti-israeli um and and such um i think i think this is a a big deal a bit of a very big deal and there are um many many students and families in this town who are very disappointed that we are back here um not because we don't want our students to be able to learn different points of view or to be able to learn about diversity or inclusion but by by no means is that the case the fact of the matter is right now we're we're in a very tumultuous time and this is not um a person who i think would represent what we believe in as a as a community um and i'm i'm disappointed to have received an email as a middle school parent um and have been fielding phone calls and text messages all afternoon regarding this i think we've highly missed the mark here and i hope that um you can see that and um your administration can see that when we have more students that are going to be out of a um out of a speaker opting out of a speaker than in we've got a problem um and shauna um adam yeah thank you avi and thank you dr ptello for kind of walking us through uh kind of what what's going on i think what's what's so hard in this situation what elicited you know a really strong um response from the community and in concern was um the the association of of two things right there was kind of the the speaker um and the world to job day um and we've run programs kind of for world to job day in the past and i think they've been uh very successful um in terms of raising awareness and increasing uh just really kind of being in line with the our um diversity equity inclusion goals um i think it is very unfortunate that that organization um became more politicized um and i think the you know the the linkage of uh the speaker and the um the organization i think was was like on on our part right like that this was in an event for uh for that day but this the speaker doctor or miss allen is not related um and so i think it's it's i i just want to say i i know that we um kind of deferred pulled back and looked and i appreciate that both we've clarified that uh miss allen um while has views on uh on the situation but is not looking to to come and speak about them um and also you know if there were any like i had a large concern about um that the letter um with regards to to harvard um i am not concerned with with free speech like i support free speech i think that's okay and i i take heart in the fact that um if miss allen is saying she does not support that uh or is not supporting hateful or genocidal language um even if uh that speech may be protected um and i appreciate going forward knowing that we aren't going to be associating ourselves as a district with um kind of politicized organizations um even if we're gonna uh not even but like we will continue to maintain and do our work from a diversity equity inclusion perspective give exposure um show students uh different uh people who who look like them exposure to uh to normalize differences across cultures religions etc um without being uh associated with uh politicized institution like world of job day in this case so um i think it's a really hard situation uh i just want to say i appreciate the extent that you looked into it and to all those who who are concerned you know i think it's really important to tease apart those differences and say you know politicized organization not something the speaker's associated with not something we're associated with um and uh and just move forward as best we can julie roe thanks avi um i'm just gonna kind of add to what shauna said and kind of sort of what adam said but um i i think the difference between speaking at sharon middle school and speaking like in the world is that there's no expectation that anyone has a right to speak at the middle school and i feel really strongly that if we invited a speaker who said things like autumn allen did on facebook about another group i feel like that person would not be considered to speak at our school so i i i don't think that this is a question of free speech i think they're you know we're inviting guests to speak to our kids and um um i'm disappointed that we didn't pick guests that was you know more um less inflammatory thanks joy um and i guess i'll go last um um i mean dr martello obviously we've had conversations about this for me um you know there are i think a few different levels and i feel to this decision that i feel differently about different levels so first of all you know obviously um shortly after the attacks on israel of october 7th um there were folks in this community who felt very strongly that social media comments made by me uh were offensive and hurtful and you know i was actually incredibly grateful for the opportunity given to me by that by the members of the community who felt that way to sit down to have a conversation to be able to sort of bridge that gap between us and and i and and i truly felt that there were things that i had said that they were able to explain to me why those were wrong and why i hurt them and so having gone through that with members of this community some of whom specifically um do support and are involved in bringing this speaker here i'm torn in the sense that i think that autumn allen has the right to use the platform that she has built by herself i mean she she has a very impressive story and i think that she has the right right to use that platform how she wants i also on the other hand think that there are members of our community who are bringing forward a speaker regardless of the fact that they've been told that that the speaker they're bringing um makes other members of their own community uh uncomfortable and feel hurt so for me on one level as a as a as a person who lives my life a certain way and as an israeli um i feel like autumn allen had to autumn allen's opinions and i personally haven't read anything from on a allen that i feel like would preclude me from welcoming on a mountain to my home but on the other hand i do think autumn allen has shared opinions that she should rightfully i mean she should understand that people are rightfully offended that she would share those opinions um and again i haven't seen her call for the death of israelis or justify the death of israeli children and women and and um elderly but i have seen her call for a ceasefire without ever mentioning the hostages uh i have seen a gap between october 7th and when she first began posting and these things on a personal level do offend me i think julie's last point is really the thing that most disappoints me which is i do believe that you know in a world where we rightfully i want to be clear i'm not making light of the decisions that this district or people within our community usually very much myself make around microaggressions and macroaggressions but in a world where we regularly recognize microaggressions and macroaggressions and biases i don't believe that i do believe that that there are a lot of communities who had someone like autumn allen said something offensive about she would be disinvited and for me it is it is hurtful to think that autumn allen could choose to use her platform the way she does and still be invited to speak to our children um you know right now there are other conflicts in the world that are going on that are very um severe and and in effect this community in particular um one of which being i know it's it was in the news big time at the beginning and now it sort of trails off a little bit but you know there's a conflict between ukraine and russia and i i don't believe that we would have a speaker invited who had you know made claims in favor of russia right now knowing that our community feels very sensitive so but i i i do want to just end by saying i recognize the position that you're in dr patella that i wouldn't i don't envy it i know that regardless of which decision you made there would be people disappointed and hurt um and in the end i know we'll move past this as a community um i don't think it's i don't think the sky has fallen i am disappointed i'm not angry and i and it certainly doesn't make me question uh your decision making or your position i i just it is it does hurt and i'm offended by it on some level but not i don't want to make more of that than it is so um moving forward the budget um i'm going to screen share um right so um the budget is um is is you know very much much being is building upon the conversations we had um on monday um i first of all want you know want to uh just express appreciation to community members that have put forth their um concerns and ideas staff members both in letters and i've met with numerous uh people over the last several weeks um um trying to explain the impacts of various cuts um and then the school committee's dialogue um um throughout this process um what um what i'm trying to do in this proposal is put forth a set of um um reductions that get us to the priorities number um with the the least amount of negative impact um to our schools um all of the cuts are um significant um uh you know our budget that started with um you know kind of proposal with no cuts and with a few additions um is what would have put us in you know good stead to move forward so we're trying to make the best of um of this situation um and uh and i certainly um uh you know know how sensitive this this process is um and appreciate people's input um this proposal is very uh it started as an anchor to thank the julie roe when we were having discussions on monday had uh taken one of my proposals um and kind of uh provided some structure to some changes that were um trying to capture some of the feelings of the community of staff and of the school committee uh so this you know kind of started with her um her um her adjustments as an anchor uh they but they also weigh in all the members of the community as well as again um feedback from um i mean all the members of the committee as well as feedback from the community and and staff um so they start off with um um a consolidation of um the athletic director and an assistant principal into uh uh either you know it's going to either be an athletic director with some ap responsibilities or an ap for athletics because it will need to focus heavily on the athletic director uh role as did the previous position that existed like this uh we then have a consolidation of um two roles into one um assistant superintendent for curriculum and administration which is similar to a role that had existed here with liz murphy in the past um we were able to um um maintain the director of facilities position uh feeling that if we um reduce that as well as the maintenance position that would not that would put us in a really um very very challenging place to make sure we're maintaining our buildings um including our brand new larger high school um so this gives us more uh manpower and we'll look at the existing maintenance and custodial staff to work as a team to really um you know um assume you know all the responsibilities while cutting back in one maintenance role um we um then have um a reduction of 0.5 admin assistance at the high school um you know that's a position that you know um if we're able to add back to that we will but um in order to make some tough decisions um and still maintain you know a highly functioning high school um we're uh looking to reduce that and then um this next uh position it should be 0.5 but um we currently have a guidance uh secretary position that has been vacant uh due to difficulty in filling it um um and but it is a critical position um especially um as we you know cut back the admin assistant um but it's a different type of position um that is really kind of necessary to help support the um many of the um workings of our counselors and um our academic dean and so we're looking to um just fill that with a 0.5 instead of a full position um um the next position um the next position um that is um in this initial 3.12 um a situation reduced is the elementary assistant principal um with the idea that um we would have primarily one special education administrator working across two buildings and um having some teacher leaders help to support with some of the um help to support with some of the assistant principal type duties um we know that's not the same thing uh but in considering the difficulty of the budget um looking to to have that be a creative um you know solution for this year knowing that we will be looking for to reinstate that in the future um we um as we process the the the magnitude of the work of the counseling staff of the counseling staff and the dean of academics we have um uh figured out a way to include um those as not being cut positions so we would be looking to not hire a new head of counseling which is a lesser position and maintain the dean of academics position uh this proposal also as uh julie had um done in her previous iteration um was able to uh was able to maintain the coordinators um was able to maintain the coordinators um across the district but also have them as you'll see um being willing and able to take on additional roles as necessary um as we scrubbed the budget um as we scrubbed the budget even more um you know there had been real some real hesitancy uh at the building level to cut even more deeper in supplies continuing considering the cuts that we've made over the several uh years as well as a hesitancy with professional development but when we're looking at the magnitude of the of the cuts that we're dealing with this year um i i sat down with the middle school and the high school and we were able to identify um numerous more supplies and materials cuts that we could make um what the understanding is with regard to that is there are going to be probably departments that really struggle to stay within their budget and what they're going to need to do is work together as a team is if you know say the math department needs to go over 2,000 in their budget then the world language department will need to spend 2,000 less of their budget so we feel confident with collaboration that even though there will be some deficits in supplies and materials by cutting back this deeply that we can make it through the year and that the trade-off is better than additional cuts we also are looking to do you know a great majority of our professional development in house we are in the midst of starting to develop a system by which our teachers can offer workshops and courses and so we'll look to that um we will be still reimbursing for courses that they take outside which is part of our contract but doing more uh in-house and less um uh expensive um outside providers uh if we do bring in outside providers we'll be looking to um help pay with those with grants that um uh that go beyond the um existing grants that we um have uh in this proposal we're able to um reduce the initial um some of the initial instructional positions that uh had been in um uh my proposal uh so bringing back the social studies teacher at the high school uh not cutting a spanish or science teacher at the high school not cutting cutting the fourth elementary math specialist and maintaining instrumental music uh these cuts were you know things that were uh largely discussed by the committee and by the community in uh in order to minimize um instructional cuts uh that occurred um the cuts to instructional staff that we um we are needing to make in order to reach this um level is uh not we have we there was a request um in the new budget to have 1.5 additional wellness teachers to help with the 11th and 12th uh wellness we're we're in instead of filling both the 1.5 instead of filling both the 1.5 and the 1.5 just filling the 1.5 so um reducing our initial budget ask by a 0.5 wellness in doing so we expect that some kids um may get their uh PE requirements in 11th 12th grade by either a sport or some activity that we um schedule either during the day or after school the requirement for wellness in um or PE in um 11th and 12th and 12th grade is just to have an experience there it doesn't need to be a full course load so we're going to get creative about how to fill that uh responsibility so make sure that every kid gets some kind of athletics or PE um experience in 11th and 12th grade but with a a slightly smaller FTE um the middle school uh math specialists um in this release point went to budget uh would be reduced um we expect that the uh 6th uh 6th uh 6th uh math coordinator would be uh 6th uh math coordinator would be jumping in to help to provide um some intervention for kids as she already does uh to uh lessen the impact of that um as well as working with teachers um to support them in interventions that do occur um either during the classroom or after school um as well as during um their kind of advisory uh flex block um um some and Silkyo similar was to with that if needed um uh more of these supplements um and uh and again uh גent suns Common Etony so that would be steering um that you'd beéis Commission um that will be here um an employer may look for every compare with other ellef mentioned, part of maintaining the coordinators is having them support, yes, the interventions at the middle school, especially considering the cut of two specialists at the middle school.
So that's an expectation, as well as also coordinators throughout the system.
If we hit a situation where we really need an additional section taught, or if we have interventions at the elementary school that need support with, that we're maintaining all of those specialists, we should be in decent shape, but that they jump in. They already do so, the elementary coordinators both coordinate curriculum, but they also do a lot of assessment and testing for kids. They also help provide interventions, as well as model interventions that can be done by some of our specialists.
The LEAP teacher would definitely be something we include, because we don't have the enrollment to run that one of the grade-level classes.
So that's a no-brainer for next year.
Also, in line with what was discussed at the last meeting, as much as we would like to not reinstate the full-day fees, considering the magnitude of the budget gap, we're looking to reinstitute the full-day K tuition, as well as increase the ECC fee, as well as implement a tiered system of having some activity fee at the high school for clubs that really kind of operate similarly to a sport, you know, that maybe have a season, like drama, we have seasons in different productions, or they go off to competitions.
So these clubs that really operate like that, putting together some fee. Clubs like the Black Student Union or Student Council would not have a fee. We also know that, you know, in doing so, some kids already pay some fee informally in order to help support their clubs. So they would not be supporting that unless it's something extraordinary, like they're going off on an overnight or things like that. So there'd be some adjustment in money coming in, that it's already coming into support, but then a more consistent fee structure that would allow.
Some people thought that that we could raise up to $40,000 or $50,000.
I think it's better off to be more realistic with that and start with a $25,000 expectation.
With all those in mind, that gets us to an even budget for the proposal.
And then we would be looking at, when we run the new high school schedule, we don't expect there's going to be tremendous amounts of efficiencies because, as others have mentioned and I have mentioned, the expectation is that teachers will be teaching additional sections but still have a caseload limit of 100 kids or less so that they can really still have the ability to really get to know the kids and serve them well. But there is the strong possibility that we will get some efficiencies which allow us to maintain reasonable class size, but still perhaps not fill every position that we might have coming up about because of retirement or because of a resignation.
So once we run the schedule, if we find that there is, say, a social studies position, I know we have a retirement there that we might not have to fill and still maintain, you know, reasonable class size and less than 100 person limit for teachers, then we'll look to put that into the budget to help to attack some of these add backs that we strive for. We also look if we have additional teachers that either retire or that move to another state or any additional revenues, if we find that our activity fee revenue can actually bring in more money than expected, all of those things we'll be looking to, you know, tabulate over the next several weeks and even into the summer as far as, you know, people leaving.
We have always have a handful of people, this is in every district, that end up leaving during the summer because of unexpected reasons we do that. Also, as far as retirements, we will be looking to offer some type of retirement incentive.
We believe or know that most of the people who are retirement ready kind of took advantage of that, but there are a handful of people who might consider retirement with some incentives, so we will be looking to offer that and if we get some additional savings in the replacement of those folks, we'll apply this to the add backs as well.
My proposal, which we can discuss, you know, even more so later because this will not necessarily be part, specifically part of the FINGCOM, you know, process as far as being approved, but if we have additional money that comes back, I would suggest first of all having the elementary assistant principal be the first thing to be reinstated, then the high school assistant principal, then the maintenance position, unless we're going to do an assessment.
If we feel like we can do without that for a year and really do that, but I am a little concerned about especially the high school, so that would be something to look at. Then our middle school reading specialist, guidance secretary, math specialist, assistant superintendent, and district director of critical instruction, and then our wellness and admin assistance.
So that would be the order that I would generally suggest trying to use for add to the add backs. And then the bottom part of this is just giving a little information.
If the priorities or the FINGCOM with the priorities committee were to allocate above 3.12,
say to 3.75,
that would provide $328,000 more that could be applied towards our budget in some fashion.
Four would be 459, and 4.25 would be 590,000.
So this, you know, again, this is the budget proposal that I would like for us to consider, and I want to thank everyone for the process. I know it's been a difficult one. I've gone through this process before in other districts.
It's always very, very difficult.
And I think with all the people who put their minds into this and analyzed, I think, considering we're in a much better place than we could be, and at the same time, I would love to advocate for additional funding to reduce these cuts. All right.
So for the group, I'm going to ask, Dr.
Patel has asked me to take a vote on this budget and, you know, first and foremost, see if it is something, you know, rather than workshop this budget. I know that the administration has worked hard and each individual number is taken into account in these, and as well as each operating, you know, position as far as operations go. So I would just ask, first, I will entertain a motion. And if we do get a second, then we can have discussion before voting rather than having discussion before I entertain the motion.
So I would entertain a motion to approve the budget proposal Dr. Patel has just made.
So moved.
Second.
Okay.
Is there any discussion?
I see when first.
Yes.
So I am still pretty.
Do you want me to keep up the budget or take it down and put it back? I think you can take it down for now.
Yeah, that's fine. I'm still a little squeamish about the AP cut at the elementary schools.
Um, I know that we, we have mandated needs.
And so this, if it's here, that means that it is not part of part of that.
And, you know, I, I have to trust that, that you've really thought about this deeply, um, and that you think that it can work. It does still make me quite nervous, um, from a number of angles.
And I also find myself backpedaling a little bit on the activities fee.
Um, I know we pay athletic fees, so it feels like there's, you know, some sort of parity, but students get something for those fees, transportation, uniforms, tournaments.
And I guess I'm asking for clarity for these activity fees. Are we going to then start providing transportation and tournament registration fees? Because right now these kids who are, you know, in DECA, debate, history, robotics, whatever, they put their heart and their money into these clubs. And I think sharing gets to reap a lot of their glory. And I, and I really don't feel comfortable having kids simply pay for that privilege, especially when participation in these clubs are not only, you know, an expression of their passion and, um, and future pursuits, but also a really critical part of college applications.
So if you could provide some clarity on that, I think that would be helpful for me.
Yeah, I think with respect to the clubs, I think we're going to have to look at what kind of, yeah, what kind of money is being put into the clubs already and, um, and, um, making sure that, um, a core consistent, um, you know, amount from the activity fee goes into, to, to, to, to lowering that burden.
Some extraordinary stuff like, um, you know, um, you know, um, you know, um, like an overnight or things like that would, would have to be still kids would need to be, um, you know, uh, probably charged for that. But as far as like transportation to events and things like that, um, we would want that to be, uh, covered by the fee. Um, now, you know, as we analyze that further, we, you know, we have to look at like the tiers of fees and, and make sure that that, you know, if, if that, that, um, fee is substantial enough to kind of, to offset that cost, but then not take it out of the kid's pocket a second time. Um, and as far as the elementary, um, this is, yeah, we know this, that, that would be the first thing that I would add back, um, in analyzing it with, you know, Jessica Murphy and, um, and, you know, um, other members of the administration, uh, we, you know, we, we, we know that it would focus heavily, heavily on the special education.
And we even looked at, we had looked at a situation last year of, uh, when we were trying to, uh, fill the cottage role of having an elementary special education administrator kind of cover across two buildings and really could see that being, being able to be accomplished.
Uh, the fact that we're, we're also losing the assistant principal, um, you know, makes it more difficult, but we, we believe that we, um, you know, we, we believe that we, we can, we can handle that. There are schools like cottage. It's not ideal that, you know, don't have a, an assistant principal and to still have, uh, another administrator supporting will be beneficial.
It will be a hardship, but we believe in the context of, um, of all the decisions that it's, um, it's one, it would be, again, still, uh, one of the first things that I would, would, uh, look to add back. I also think we, um, I didn't mention the add backs. We should look at, you know, to what degree if we get additional funding that should be put into, um, lowering the kindergarten fee as well. So that that's another discussion to have. Um, um, Okay.
Thank you.
I mean, I, I did look and it's Veronica and you're right that activities fees is not uncommon.
There are many, many districts that charge activity fees. Um, but from my perspective, like if we're charging fees, then there must be something given.
Right. Um, and I want to make sure that that is, uh, planned out thoughtfully and that, and that we're taking a look at that. Yeah, I would be looking at the Holston is something we had again, none of us like fees and, uh, but Holston where we had a kind of a fee system as well. And I would be certainly looking, um, to Holston and other districts to look at the way that they're, uh, functioning and how they support those very things that you're talking about. So lessening the burden on what kids are doing out of pocket without a fee, but putting forth a fee that still, uh, raises money and helps cover costs that are, uh, cause some of that cost is coming out of the school budget already.
And then, and then some of it can be, uh, um, a, you know, for some of the less expensive clubs still be some, uh, moneymaker to, to help offset our budget needs.
Veronica.
Yeah. Thank you. Uh, thank you, Dr. Botello.
Um, I really do appreciate, uh, first of all, you're having incorporated so many of the, um, the input from our community and our staff in your rethinking.
Also, I wanted to thank Julie for her, uh, you know, back of, of napkin calculations, which really helped move us last time. And I also want to let the community know that the school committee, having listened to everyone's input, gone through that working process Monday night, had an opportunity to further refine our comments, to send them to you. And I see some of what I sent to you incorporated in this model. So I just want to thank you for really reaching out to all of these constituencies, all the stakeholders, and really coming down with this. Um, I, I still understand that we have this impact of, of losses that people are perceiving here, but I also want to signal my gratitude for your prioritizing your add back list. Obviously we are bound by our commitment to bring a priorities number budget to FinCom Monday night.
And from my perspective, this list, while it's painful to look at and to contemplate, I appreciate, um, that we are, you know, conducting ourselves properly and responsibly, and we're bringing this to FinCom. And then you've given us your, um, your sense of, uh, where the priority is in your, in your view to re rebuild if possible.
And we can't go forward with that understanding.
We're going forward with this understanding that we're meeting our priorities numbers. I want to thank you for that. I really don't have any questions other than to say that this was something that I knew was very difficult for all of us. And that input was, I see all of that rolled into what you have presented tonight.
Thank you.
Thank you.
Shauna.
Um, I have to say that I'm, um, very disappointed in seeing that the elementary assistant principal is cut. Um, I could say that I have the most unique role here as one of seven on this committee.
I think that's part of the reason that I got myself here and I'm proud to be here. I was an elementary school teacher.
I went to high school. I'm now a high school teacher.
I have been an administrator in the high school setting, in the out of district setting.
And for us to think that we can run two schools, two completely different demographics of schools with one assistant principal, we should be ashamed of ourselves.
We cannot do it. And we cannot do it in good faith to our students, to our teachers and to our parents.
Okay. It is not okay. And that should not be the first thing on this chopping block. Second of all, our high school, the size of our high school demands to full-time assistant principal to think that we can have an athletic director work as part athletic director and assistant principal.
I don't know the last time that we spent a day in the high school, but I don't think Canton High School and Sharon High School are very different than one another.
Go spend a day. We have two full-time assistant principals.
And I could tell you that if we had six, we still wouldn't have enough.
It is not fair to the team that we are trying to build at the high school. Finally, we've heard from a hundred letters.
We received over a hundred letters that finally, they have a sense of stability.
Finally, they have a sense of leadership.
Finally, they have morale.
Finally, people are staying and wanting to go there. And now we're disseminating their administrative team.
I can't understand how we can possibly do that.
I think we made it abundantly clear that yes, there are things that need to be cut. Yes, there are hard choices.
I am not a proponent of cutting people.
I get it. It is a hard choice.
If I was here and I'm not taking it personally, and I'm not putting people on it, but we need to do better.
I will not vote for this budget.
We need to have, make sure that our schools can run. If our schools are not going to be able to run, then that is going to disseminate everything that everybody wants here. We are going to have an increase of behavior.
We're going to have an increase of social, emotional, discipline referrals.
Let's look at our mental health crisis.
Sharon is not, Sharon is not, you know, what's the word, you know, special to this. Our kids are hospitalized.
Our kids are, are not thriving as they once were. Removing our assistant principals who act as, as the bridge between hospitalizations, between guidance, between families.
What are we thinking here? To remove our one and only middle school math interventionist?
We have one middle school math interventionist.
To think now that the department coordinator is going to put their time into math and seeing three grades of middle school math. I, I, I, I'm dumbfounded.
I'm sorry.
I'm very upset.
I, I don't think that this is okay for our district.
I understand that there was lots of controversy between the coordinators.
I get it. I don't want to see them go either, but we cannot let our leadership at our schools go.
Shauna.
Sorry.
No, no, you don't be sorry, but I, I just, listen, you're entitled to your, to your view. And, and I think as you pointed out the beginning of what you had to say, I think your view is uniquely qualified to speak to some, to some of what you just, or to all of what you just said in some of the most important part of this process.
What I would say is the, you're not a member of the public.
You're one of the seven. We've gone through a process. We did have a conversation of the day. I'll ask you right here as another member who has a vote tonight.
Tell me what you would cut. I'm here to, I'm here to have a conversation.
And if you can tell me what we should be doing different, I'll listen. I don't, I, the shame on you stuff, which we hear sometimes from the public, I think is a little strong, but I'm not here to chastise you for that tonight.
For me, I would just say like, you're, there's, isn't six and one. So it's either shame on you meeting all of us or shame on none of us, but like, let's do the work instead of like, so tell me what would have, or do we ask for more time? I mean, I don't know. We've been, listen, I've, I've been busting mine. Like I've been out here working my tail off over this. I know what I've put in. Tell me what we cut. We had this conversation.
We, we had a five hour meeting on Monday.
Tell me, I heard a lot of what in there you won't support.
And I respect that. Um, I have some stuff in there that I won't support.
I want to know what, what, what, what, so I mean, I thought, yeah, no, no, no. And I, and I can say that we have, we have a social studies retirement.
I think I made that clear that if we didn't rehire, we have more teachers teaching at the high schools, more sections, more classes.
I think we really need to look at the number of FTEs that we have there. I think it's a very nice to have, I think some department coordinators, department coordinators are great. They act, they have so many different facets, but I think right now, maybe we need to cut a department coordinator or two that is not going through either a program review or looking at a new curriculum.
Like Julie had mentioned last week, right? Julie had, I think it, I'm pretty sure it was Julie had said that if we're piloting a new math curriculum, then why would we get rid of a math coordinator, right? If we're piloting new English curriculum, we're not going to get rid of our ELA coordinator, right? But if right now we're not doing science or visual arts or Spanish, yes, it's unfortunate.
I don't want to cut anyone, but at the expense of a whole school running, I, I, I struggle with that. Okay. I think those are, those are good answers.
That's fair. You're saying some high school teachers, some coordinators and not rehiring a social studies teacher.
I think those are reasonable suggestions.
Veronica?
Sorry. Sorry. One more thing. I had also said last week that the fourth element, sorry, Veronica.
Sorry.
I'm very passionate.
It's maybe the Russian in me. Um, the fourth, uh, the fourth floating elementary school person, I think what the math coordinator was on there to keep. I think I made it clear that last week I would cut that person and have one at each school to maintain the middle school person.
Veronica?
Yeah.
Thank you. Thanks.
Um, uh, Shauna.
Actually, I think I was trying to clarify last time regarding our coordinators, right? To make sure that since we were adding this curricula, so I appreciate your comment there.
Look, I, I think that none of it is, none of it is, is, is good. We, we really, obviously it's a very hard thing to afford any of these. Nothing looks reasonable and, and all of it feels like a, uh, uh, you know, all of it feels like an impossibility at some level.
And so I think it is, as you say, a judgment call either way, but I want to take some heart in knowing that we are very unified in our concern about what we're bringing to FinCon, but we have this responsibility, right? So I feel like this is a process that we're in. Right.
Um, and that's all I want to say is that, you know, having been through so many of these processes over the years, we are at a place where we have an expectation and a responsibility Monday night and the, the conversation continues because there's opportunities for us to look again, but it's, it's, it's, we're in a, we're in a place right now where we have to bring this forward and we have other, um, finance folks and others in our town who will weigh in as well. And we'll have an opportunity to explain.
So I think this, I just want to, you know, as, as a person who's seen a few of these years going through, and, and this is one of your earlier newer ones, right. As a newer member, I want to give you a little bit of, um, uh, maybe hopefulness that we're at a point in a process and all of these things are still, um, important to be expressing.
And we have, of course, understanding of what is so important about the positions that you're calling out as being important.
And I completely agree with you that they are critical and I'm nervous about not having them as well. So those positions, that is a position that I feel I can share with you, but I also feel that we have a responsibility to get to a place where we can at least have this conversation at the next phase. And, um, I, that's what I wanted to say to you. I also, I wanted to make a, a little, um, clarification on a couple of Shauna's suggestions, which, you know, I, I, I agree with as far as the social studies retirement, um, what, as soon as we run the schedule, if we are able to run AP psychology, run our social studies classes and maintain the class, uh, the overall caseload limits that are contractually obligated to, we will not fill that position.
So, and we're looking to, and as far as overall high school FTEs, you know, again, we, we, um, we will be looking to see if there are any other resignations and things that we do not need to fill because we're able to maintain, um, legitimate class sizes and not jeopardize some of the classes, uh, that have low enrollment.
Uh, also looking to see if we can make, you know, come up with creative ways to make sure it's scheduled so that instead of having two sections of, you know, nine, we have a section of 18. So those things will be happen.
And if we're able to, uh, get some efficiencies as a, as it's, it's, it's part of the document, that's the first thing we'll do is we'll take that money and apply it to elementary assistant principal and then the next button.
So those things are totally, I agree with those a hundred percent.
Um, I also understand, uh, you know, the coordinator versus assistant principal, both of them would be tremendous losses. One thing I can say is this, the group of coordinators, especially the six through 12 do kind of step up and take on, um, you know, some of those, you know, whether supervision or, um, working with kids that, you know, that might be typical of assistant principal.
That was part of the reason why we felt really comfortable with Emily Burke jumping in as an interim principal last year. They're, they're a group that, uh, are both look at themselves as leaders of the departments, but also leaders of the school. And they work very closely with the Dean of academics, the principals, the assistant principals.
So, uh, I do feel in difficult budget times, um, that, um, when making difficult choices that they will step up to help fill the void. And hopefully we're able to get some greater efficiencies and fill those positions for next year, but they will help to, uh, support that void. If, if we, if it is necessary for, to maintain that cut for next year. All right.
Um, my turn.
Um, all right.
I, I, I think Dr.
Botello's budget, uh, from my perspective and where I sit, um, took into account a lot of what the community advocated for, uh, what the committee advocated for, what we workshopped the other day, and then certainly, um, in a few places overruled those with his educational leadership, which ultimately I believe is his job. And so for me, um, the budget itself, as far as what it prioritizes is, is not something that I find myself unable to support. For me, I do feel it's really important for me to make clear to the rest of this committee and also to the community members watching, uh, and, and furthermore, to be open and honest that, you know, for those of us that do see this and are aware of this, because it will come up again, I believe in the future. I hope it doesn't knock on wood something, you know, something, a miracle comes across, but I would like to be clear about how we arrived at a third almost of these, of this financial solution, which is the kindergarten fees. So a brief history, uh, in my first year on the school committee, I sat as a member of priorities.
I was the budget chair and Tanya Lewis and I went to the priorities and we advocated to our fellow priorities members, the voting members from select board and FinCom to, um, chip in on, uh, a quarter of the cost of kindergarten in order to reduce the kindergarten fee by 25. Uh, let me be clear. It's not the cost of kindergarten.
It's the total fees. Um, the, the district has operating had operating expenses anyhow, but so we, we decided to chip in, we would chip in $75,000.
The town would allocate $75,000.
There was $150,000.
We reduced the fee by quarter.
The following year, um, we went back, we believe that there was a, uh, very good chance. I mean, we believe there was a hundred percent likelihood.
It obviously didn't turn out that way. And we've rehashed that many times here, but we believe that an allocation, a one time out to be clear of the, of somewhere like $550,000, $600,000 covering the cost of kindergarten would then not only provide free kindergarten for this past year, which thankfully the students of our district did go to kindergarten for free this past year, but put us in line for that chapter for the chapter 70 increase covering that in perpetuity.
Now at priorities that was handled as an allocation.
So for anybody unfamiliar with what priorities does and how allocations work, to be clear, we'd ask for a one time amount of money. And instead had our budget, had our budget baseline increased by the cost of kindergarten.
So one thing that I think it's important for the people of this district of this town to understand is that what took place in that moment was that the taxpayers of this town forever paid for kindergarten.
So when we talk about the kindergarten money, we talk about the chapter 70 reimbursement, but the reality is that the taxpayer, the taxpayers of this town paid for kindergarten.
And because our allocation was not changed at, at priorities this past year, but instead we were just given the increase that the other departments are given, same percentage, the town, the taxpayers on a town level are paying for kindergarten.
Now we didn't get the chapter 70 allocation or the chapter 70 funds that the bump that we'd hoped. And because of that, we don't, we then don't have an additional money that we would have hoped to bring in. But again, I just want to be clear is it is a reasonable and accurate argument to be made by the taxpayers of this town that the taxpayers did in fact pay for kindergarten.
What we're going to now do by reinstituting the kindergarten fee is taxpayers.
So the families whose kids are going to go to kindergarten next year included paid for kindergarten in the form of their taxes.
We're then going to ask them to pay the fee to cover the thing that just increased their taxes by.
And what that is, is an unintentional, I know it is unintentional.
I do not believe anyone tried to, you know, do this in an intentional way, but it went when, when all of a sudden at the last meeting, people started grabbing that kindergarten fee and just, okay, let's use it now. Let's up it. Then let's up, let's go back. And now we're back all the way at what the kindergarten fee was prior to all of that. We have not erased some, some expenditure.
We have asked the taxpayers to take a tax increase of $600,000 and give it to us to cover a specific service that we would provide.
And we have then asked for a fee to be paid by those same taxpayers, a much smaller group of them in a much bigger dollar amount for one year for that service.
Now that philosophically obviously bothers me, but I will say that it feels like from what I see on social media and what we've heard in these meetings, what we've received by email, that whether people are aware or not of the fact that they're double spending, people are advocating for that fee going back into place. So I can accept that and I can support a situation in which that fee is in place. Again, so long as everyone is aware of what I just explained, but the piece that I will sit here and say in public, and again, I think that to get through the situation we're in right now, I can support the decision we're making, but I do want to be clear that we all need to realize we have not avoided a crisis.
We have not fixed a crisis.
We have punted and delayed a crisis until this time next year, because by reaching into the kindergarten fee or re-instituting the kindergarten fees to the value that we're seeing on the sheets and using that to cover positions, which are contractually due a raise.
So there's steps in length.
And then there's COLA that is guaranteed to those positions for the next year. We are in fact guaranteeing that next year we'll have a shortfall.
I shouldn't say guaranteeing.
It's possible in a magic land, the state funding will come down differently, et cetera. I can tell you what that state funding formula won't be. There's no world, because of how we're handling the kindergarten fees, there's no world in which the chapter 70 formula could magically be above, say, a 3% inflation rate and we could receive the funding that we'd hoped for.
And by the way, that will just never happen, right? That will just never happen because of the way we're handling the kindergarten fees now. Unless again, somehow magically we find $600,000 and erase those kindergarten fees again. We certainly can't go. I should say, I certainly, maybe another school member someday will, I certainly can't go to the Priorities Committee and ask for a one-time allocation ever again. They gave us the kindergarten money. They paid for kindergarten in perpetuity.
And then we went ahead and charged a fee to the folks who were paying that. So to be clear, we've only delayed, we've used money that will now be just added to our baseline.
That's what that fee will be. It'll just be an inconsistent amount of money that raises our baseline revenues.
But it will be outpaced by the positions that we saved. So again, like Shauna, I do not advocate for cutting positions.
I believe looking at what Dr. Patel has put in front of us, that it's the best case scenario for this year. It's the best thing we can handle. But let's just all understand that a year from now, we will have a new problem and there will be no fee to charge individuals from the public to simply fund our problem away. That isn't going to be the solution.
So I think we played a game of hot potato to some degree and passed the potato this year. And if we're doing that in order to work with administration, with building leads, to some degree with town management to try to figure out a more sustainable long term solution, then I think that, you know, again, I can support that.
But let's be clear that we need a long term solution. And what I will say without taking too much more time is, and I know that like there are people in the public that are going to find this to be very unpopular to say because they think that sitting as the chair of the school committee, my support of our administrators is somehow disingenuous.
But I will tell you it's organic and true. And anybody that's ever known me at any point in my life knows I will tell you different if I don't believe it.
I look at our superintendent and I look at our finance director and if they have any flaw when it comes to the budgeting, I hear you that their process could be different, etc. But they have any flaw when it comes to the budgeting.
It's that they find solutions for us at every turn. And I and this is not this is not a you all and not me. No, me very much at the lead of this. And I think everyone here would say so. You know, we negotiate, we care about the people sitting across from us, we sit here and we try to understand this and we hear from the public and we read the emails and every single position is made a beautiful case for and we believe you and we know you're the experts.
And so we want to do that. And then our business, our finance director, our assistant superintendent of finance and our superintendent find us a solution.
And so we we do that. And then we never have to make that hard decision.
But the day will come when when they will turn to us and there will be no solution.
And and then people and I hope it's not us will turn and point our finger back at them as though they have done something wrong, as though when they finally run out of rot to recheck under and recheck under and recheck under. It's their fault. No, the reality is we are elected to make these really hard decisions.
And as long as we're punting to buy us time to make hard decisions, then I guess I can support that.
But let's be clear, we didn't solve the problem. We found a very temporary solution.
And if somebody disagrees with that, I'm open to to hearing that maybe I'm completely wrong. But that's the math that I'm doing.
Adam?
Yeah, I think you're is really good point. And I think you're I think you're completely right.
I don't have a better solution.
But I appreciate you raising that point. And I acknowledge it. I agree with it. And I think you will.
We're getting through this year as best we can.
But the path for next year has to start immediately, right?
Like, I think we we were surprised collectively.
I think a lot of the state were were surprised in terms of the funding levels.
There are a lot of districts who are facing deficits.
Because, you know, I don't I don't think many expected the state level funding to be where it came in at. But there's no surprise for next year. And I think we know. I think we know we're in that hole. You know, for this, this budget for me, you know, I, I know, in the last meeting, I really focused on minimizing cuts to instructional positions and really felt like that was the the place to start.
And I and that we could build back from there. And I appreciate that.
Dr. Patello, you, you, you did minimize those cuts. Dr. Patello, you. I'm a little worried about the the coordinators abilities to to fully kind of fill those gaps.
I think we we hear a lot about what they did or what they do, excuse me, in terms of the many different things that they do. But I do think those kind of interventions for math for reading, even at the middle school level are are are critical.
And I think they help us to avoid problems down the road. Right.
Particularly in elementary, but but even in middle school, you know, for everyone who we can help to to kind of do better at that point, you know, really can can help us really avoid potentially more expensive situations from a budget situation.
So I'll share I'm worried there.
So I guess one one question for me is, as you think about the coordinators replacing those specialists, where where is like we're all making compromises hard for everyone.
What is our confidence in their ability to to deliver that same level of care and level of instruction to students who need those interventions?
Let me clarify, I am not in any way saying that they would fill completely fill the the role of a specialist that we lose. That's that is not it's not what I'm saying at all. I'm saying that they will contribute to try to lessen that I also think that what we can do most to really support students to, you know, effectively learn is making sure that we have high quality and consistent instruction in the classroom.
And that's one of the things that the coordinators do, the way that you actually have effective tier two, which is, you know, supporting kids who, where the regular classroom instruction is not enough, is by making sure that you are as effective as possible in your initial delivery, so that you have a smaller number of students to do that. You also run small groups and differentiate in a way that you provide some level of tier two in your classroom.
And you also assess effectively to know where kids are struggling specifically and how to help them improve.
All of that is coordinated and supported and informed by our expert coordinators in collaboration with teachers.
So whenever I look at a multi tiered system of support, the first thing that you do is you do everything in your power to bolster your tier one and your in classroom tier two supports.
And then from there, you have a reasonable number.
So it's not filling it. It's really making difficult choices, but there will be times where they already do this and they will provide direct interventions as well. So it's an accommodation of the two.
Oh, thank you. I think it's hard. Yeah, no, I'm just trying to reconcile too, because obviously we have the coordinators now.
And so hopefully they're doing that work at present.
And so I think what I'm hearing from you is you have confidence that they will do more like to be able to do an even better job that they're doing now to help mitigate the need for additional interventions is that, you know, how are we?
I guess that's just the math that I'm trying to to work out in my head, right, is that there we have these coordinators now. So they are offering that support.
And I think you're saying we just have to do a better job at it.
Is that is that kind of the situation that we're in? Well, I think the the the work that we're doing to try to have a consistent curriculum and to try to identify best practices that really impact kids significantly is ongoing work. And so they've been doing that work, but that that works never done. And so they will continue to do that work along with, you know, pulling out the expertise of our teachers themselves and making sure that those are shared across. So, you know, it's again, it's a it's a it's a way it's weighing of of of value, knowing that we have to make some cuts this year.
And so, you know, I think the combination of what I propose, believe, is under the theory that we will get the most value. And then again, if we're able to add back through some efficiencies that we find out, then we'll continue to add back strategically.
Okay. Yeah. I mean, I know that you had you had said you can you can only push so far in terms of kind of weakening the administration broadly.
And and so I guess this this speaks to that. I'll share.
I'm also worried about the assistant superintendent or the assistant principal at that that is the number one kind of add back that was on my list as something that that was pretty important to keep.
So I'm glad it's at the top of the add backs and we'll trust your your judgment in terms of where kind of within administration we can kind of what we need to maintain as much structure as possible.
But but I do think that's critical to add back if we can. All right.
I'm going to take the vote.
Julie.
With the proviso that we return later to as soon as possible to consider the full day K funding issue, I say yes.
Veronica.
Yes.
Shauna.
No.
When.
Yes.
There's now.
Yes.
Adam.
Yes. Yes.
And I'll say, Dr. Botello sort of echoing.
What Julie said.
For me, I think we need to consider.
At least cutting back that kindergarten fee with any add backs. I'm happy that we were able to get it to a budget that you feel is sustainable here. Um.
At the number at the allocation that we were given in priorities.
Uh, so I am a yes. Uh, motion carries six one.
Um.
Thank you all for.
Your hard work here by you all. And I certainly mean the committee.
I mean, administration, uh, largely. And I also mean this community, um, including the many, many educators that I see on here. I think that we've all had a tremendous amount of conversation with, uh, educators throughout this district over the last two weeks or so. And I know speaking for myself, but I believe also my colleagues here.
That's the stuff that's really impactful on us trying to understand what folks, uh, prioritize.
Um, it's a, it's a very difficult process.
Thank you all for your role in it.
I'm moving the fees.
Okay. Um, so the fees is on that.
Let me find out.
SPEAKER_UNKNOWN: Okay. SPEAKER_UNKNOWN: Okay. SPEAKER_UNKNOWN: Okay. SPEAKER_UNKNOWN: Okay. SPEAKER_UNKNOWN: Okay. SPEAKER_UNKNOWN: Okay.
So the recommendation for fees is to, um, set the, um, early childhood center tuition up 10%.
So, um, half day tuition of 4,524 half day reduced for a discount for twins at 4,000 7187 half day for free reduced lunch that 1,500 810 and full day tuition at. 9,872 and 50 cents.
Um, and then full day kindergarten, as we discussed having that, uh, set at the, uh, FTI, FTI 22 tuition amount.
Um, and then, um, um, fees for clubs and activities, um, um, to be set, um, at $100 for, uh, level one, uh, clubs, of which will bring back the, those clubs that fit into that kind of category, uh, level two $50.
And then, uh, zero for student clubs like student council or BSU that don't really incur costs and, uh, directly serve the district in a very overt way. Uh, we also, um, uh, uh, uh, that the athletic fees, um, and the transportation fees, um, stay stable, um, as well.
All right.
Any discussion?
Any discussion?
Can we see that again, please?
Just to, it's easier if I can look at it. SPEAKER_UNKNOWN: Any discussion?
SPEAKER_UNKNOWN: Any discussion?
SPEAKER_UNKNOWN: Any discussion?
SPEAKER_UNKNOWN: Any discussion?
SPEAKER_UNKNOWN: Any discussion?
SPEAKER_UNKNOWN: Any discussion?
Thanks.
All right. Are there any questions?
Discussion?
Seeing none, I'll entertain a motion to approve fees.
So moved. Second.
SPEAKER_UNKNOWN: Second. Second.
All right. Donna?
When?
Sorry.
Sorry. Did you hear me? I can hear you.
Go ahead. Okay. Uh, yes. Okay.
Shawna?
Yes. All right.
Julie?
Yes. Veronica?
Yes.
Yes. Yes.
Yes.
Yes.
Yes.
Yes.
And I'm a yes.
Motion carries.
7-0.
Um, we're now onto the presentation for MSBA.
Uh, statement of interest for elementary school project.
I should possible vote to submit an SOI for this cycle.
Statement of interest.
All right. So the, the, the purpose of this is to summarize the MSBA program, provide an overview of the statement of interest process, um, discuss the elementary master plan and SOI for MSBA, and, and, and come up with a, and, and present a district recommendation at this point.
Um, so the Mass School Building Authority, or MSBA, is a government authority that partners with mass communities to support the design and construction of educationally appropriate, flexible, sustainable, and cost-effective public school facilities.
So this is the same program that we use to, um, work with to get, you know, um, significant partial funding for the high school. It oversees non-entitimately competitive grants for the construction and or renovation of school building facilities.
It's, uh, there's a reimbursement rate can vary from project to project and reimbursement will occur during the construction portion of the project.
There are strict guidelines for submitting and determining eligibility.
Uh, and part of the process is submitting a statement of interest to the MSBA, uh, though that is not a guarantee of admittance into the program by any means.
Uh, there are two program types, accelerated repair program and core program.
And we're really looking at the core program, um, as we, as we're looking at this project.
The statement of interest is the tool districts use to identify the deficiencies and or programmatic issues that exist in their facilities.
Districts should submit one SEOI per school for each school that they believe requires a project. And no, so I should only be filed for a facility where a district has the ability to fund, um, construction project in the next two years.
Required step to be considered for the MSBA program.
Annual open submission period for both accelerated and core program, um, exists.
And the deadline for submission this year is April 12th, 2022 24.
In order to submit an SOI, cities and towns, um, must provide the following documentation.
Uh, vote of the municipal governing body, um, in this, in our, our, um, board of select authorizing and the, uh, in the, our, uh, project manager and district director.
Uh, we, uh, would, uh, go into this process unless, uh, we both have the board of the school committee, but also, uh, the select board.
So we're, you know, we, um, conducted an elementary master plan. in which Flansburg Architects really did some deep analysis.
The plan provides an independent architectural and engineering assessment of cottage east and heights and includes enrollment projections for the schools.
The results of the study proposed an elementary master plan committee to consider various options and make long-term recommendations for the future, whether that be reconfiguration, priority school, renovation, expansion.
We expect that one option for the future may be recommended in SOI to the MSBA.
With where we are in the process and the current budget challenges of the town, we are recommending that this might be too early to submit an SOA, even though we understand that when a statement of interest is submitted, it often takes multiple years to get accepted.
And please understand, when an SOI is submitted and the MSBA starts to partner, they may recommend a whole new building like they did with the high school.
They might recommend major renovations.
That's part of the process that we work with them, and they give us options with respect to that that would be supported by the MSBA.
So we recommend to follow up by the end of the year 2024 to propose next steps and timeline as it relates to MSBA, but to not submit an SOI for this April.
This will allow us more time for the master plan committee to work. It also will allow for more time with the town to get on the same page as far as this and work together to consider an SOI for the following year.
Okay.
Okay.
So your recommendation, you're looking for us to vote not to submit.
Your recommendation is to vote not to submit for this April.
Okay.
I'll entertain a motion to vote not to submit a statement of interest to the MSBA.
So moved.
Second.
Okay. This feels fairly straightforward, but is there any discussion?
Veronica? Just a point of clarification, Avi.
Dr. Botello, do you have a sense of when you'll present the recommendations to the master planning committee?
Like how, in terms of our follow-up by the end of 2024, what do you anticipate being able to follow up with all that feedback from the various agencies that you're, or groups that you're going to be soliciting feedback from?
I think between now and the end of the year, we'll convene that committee, help, you know, have them kind of really understand that SOI process as well, and to start to both gather information, to look over the master plan, to discuss the possibilities that might come out of a SOI process and decide whether or not to move to recommend SOI process for the following year.
Thank you. Yep.
All right.
Uh, Fresnel.
Yes.
Gwen.
Yes.
Adam.
Yes.
Julie.
Yes.
Shauna.
Sorry.
Yes.
You're good.
Veronica.
Yes.
And I'm a yes. I was watching the presentation thinking, uh, I'm going to vote not to this.
And then that was the recommendation.
So I appreciate it.
Um, all right, next up an update on the school lunch program.
Um, uh, Dr.
Mantella, I know I agented this and then we haven't really had an in-depth discussion about it. Is there an update?
I have a few questions and I can certainly also share with the committee.
My recent experiences eating school lunches.
Um, I should say buying school lunches and then also eating school lunches.
Um, and, and some things that I see.
Um, but I, I think a few of my questions are more just around, and I don't know if this number is in front of anyone at this, at this present moment, but I think we do, um, just need regular updates going forward on the amount of money in the cafeteria revolving account and start to develop a plan as to how that money is going to be spent.
I can tell you all that, um, I was able to go and eat lunch at the Heights Elementary cafeteria.
I plan to start eating lunch at all the cafeterias in our district regularly.
Um, and it's, uh, by the way, even for the adult price, it's a very, uh, affordable lunch option.
Uh, not that I've, not that I'm encouraging members of the public to start buying lunch at school.
Uh, but if any members of the committee want to join me, uh, I w I think it's a good experience for us to see what our children are being served.
I will tell you that, um, again, I've had conversations with in-depth conversations and multiple with each of the Boston, uh, food service director and the Franklin food service director, uh, about their programs.
And they've been incredibly insightful about what just can be made, but they've also been honest about the amount of time that that takes. I've seen the investments made in those districts and seem to be, to be perfectly honest that the investments made in those districts still do to be clear, leave us with lunch options that I think, you know, some kids will complain about and that don't always look great on the internet or, um, or, you know, even on menus.
One change that I've seen in the district, um, this year, uh, from our food service director that I really applaud. And, and I also think actually illustrates to some degree, um, that, you know, the job being done, look, it's a difficult space and I can explain at length, um, perhaps even another time, more appropriate, why this is an industry standard and that, and Sharon is, is not unique in the struggles that people do complain about.
But to be clear, the change that I saw, the first change that I saw was just in menu writing.
And I think we should all be giving a little bit more grace and leeway in the sense that there's a lot of offerings that just, you know, aren't necessarily being listed. There's not space for all that stuff. So I hear people say things like next week's lunches are chicken nuggets, pancakes. Um, the pancake meal is pancakes, chicken sausage, hash browns.
There's also fruits and vegetables, not just available, but actually required.
Um, these are, there is a, a formula.
And believe me, it's not like a simple, straightforward formula. This is, these are, this happens to be my wheelhouse and things that I do understand pretty in depth as far as proteins, carbohydrates, uh, vegetables, fruit, dairy. And even I, like when we sat down and took like a test as to how this would all go. And, and I wouldn't give up a layman service industry.
I, my answers are wrong.
Um, so the stuff that a food service director in L in public schools needs to understand is, is, is a very different, complicated formula. Uh, and I, I've come to learn from food service directors outside of our district that that's very intentional by lobbyists at the federal level who are trying to make it hard to circumvent the big box, um, food distributors.
Anyhow, cutting my Heights lunch experience.
Um, I went on, the day that I went, uh, was chicken taco day.
I will share that for me.
Uh, first of all, I thought it was tasty.
Um, that that's my opinion.
There were kids, a lot of kids there that said it was their favorite lunch on the schedule.
There were also kids there that said that it was their least favorite.
I think that sort of happens with kids.
Uh, but I, for, you know, I do want to give a shout out to the Heights cafeteria workers.
It's, I think, I think they're a little bit understaffed.
I think that's one place we could be looking at, uh, some of the revolving count. They were, they, there was one person that in my opinion, as a food service professional, uh, who manages food service, professionals.
I think there was one person doing two people's jobs. Um, she was doing it very efficiently and very front in a very friendly manner. And to watch the speed in which, uh, the kids were fed lunch was pretty impressive.
I made sure I was last in line when I came up. Um, I was given, uh, the, the portion of chips with an offering of beans and corn.
Uh, they were warm.
Uh, I mean, they were hot.
They were tasty and well seasoned.
And then there was chicken, uh, put on top as well. It was also hot. I found it to be, you know, again, I, that's not coming in raw and being cooked from raw, but it was real chicken.
It was not processed chicken.
Uh, it was tasty in my opinion. And then they sprinkled in, uh, accoutrements, if you will, uh, that were, you know, shell stable.
And I, I know Shauna and I had talked like briefly by text about, uh, school lunch. I actually enjoy the salt. I enjoy the salsa. And one girl sitting next to me actually repeatedly told me that the salsa in that lunch is her favorite thing.
I know Shauna does not like that salsa.
Um, we don't have to yuck each other's yums, but I did, uh, I found the lunch. So I, I took cucumber slices.
I took, uh, cubed pears.
Um, and, and I also, I had a chocolate milk.
I felt like the lunch was not only filling, but there was a lot of offerings.
Uh, so, you know, again, I know not everybody's child likes everything.
And I know that not every lunch matches that because I then again, went back and I did have a American chop suey, which again, for me is a nostalgic meal that I was really looking forward to. And I found it again to be tasty.
Um, the person running the Heights kitchen, you, there's a level of care that I can, that it's very obvious.
Uh, she let me know that was the first time that she had prepared it herself.
As for my opinion, I found it to be again, very tasty.
Um, I did forget to mention that there was shredded cheese on the chicken tacos.
There was also shredded cheese on the, um, American chop suey.
Um, they're putting just so people get a picture of, you know, it's, it is a cat, a school lunch cafeteria.
These food service professionals are making, are assembling this food in real time.
And so your child can ask, like there were children that said they didn't want beans and corn.
Some asked for it on the side and were accommodated.
Um, same thing, like no cheese. Yes. Cheese.
Uh, I think that they were doing what I consider to be a best practice as far as allergies, uh, you know, proper, proper use of utensils so that it wasn't something that would really concern me if I was allergic to dairy or whatnot.
And then, um, you know, again, fruits, vegetables were all available in the plenished. They were available, uh, you know, in sour cream, salsa, cheese dip on the taco day. Uh, today there were other things offered on the side. There was a wheat bread roll as well.
That was, you know, again, I don't want to use the word fresh. It may have been a frozen product that's then thawed and, or even reheated, but it wasn't a stale product.
I think it's something any one of you would be happy to have picked up at the grocery store.
So I don't think that every meal is probably like those two. I think there are things that we still need to improve in the district that, you know, there are menu day, there are days where I read the menu. And I think that's not necessarily, but I do think that especially the taco, uh, the chicken nacho day is for me.
And again, these are all opinions, but I do think I bring a little bit of an expert opinion to this is it felt to me to be what we should be looking for in a school lunch.
It was real food and it was approachable for kids.
And so I think for me, I left thinking like that same meal with a vegetable swapped out and over rice is very easily attainable.
Um, um, and there's certainly a lot of equipment there. I don't know that we're using all of it because of, because of the amount of staff.
Um, but again, the people standing in front of me were people who were very capable, who cared, um, and took a lot of pride in getting that lunch out. Uh, and so again, those two lunches that I ate, I'm, I would be very proud to serve my children.
We can keep an eye on it. I'm curious to see what, especially the middle school and high school look like.
Uh, because, you know, I'm, I'm totally open to the idea that there are shortcomings and I'm open to a lot of ideas around improvement because I think that Molly, our food service director is. He's somebody who experienced firsthand when I was invited to come and speak last year and as part of a, uh, a day and, and to eat with them and to, and Dr. Patel spoke as well. And we had, uh, it, there was an energy coming out of that department that I feel like is far from resistant to change is actually looking for support, um, and, and wants to continue to change things.
Um, Chef Irvin, who was brought on last year, cooked for us that day. I, I believe, uh, that he, and to be clear, us was all the workers in the food service director as well. So it was certainly, they weren't asked to cook lunch for Dr. Patel and I, um, but it was, you know, so, and there were ideas that he was sharing.
I know just so, and I'm not a patient person, but I, I do think that after eating what, what was served this week, I personally did not think that those meals were anything less than I would find acceptable.
So I'm looking forward to continuing.
I'm looking forward to have conversations at this table more regularly. And also with the food service director, uh, I think again, her energy is palpable.
And I think that there are, are, you know, a lot of good people in that department who have the same goals as we do. So I think we can continue to invest in that.
Some, we're fortunate it's after a hard budget cycle, at least there's a department that we've got some funds that we can certainly loosen up the purse strings on and start trying to have a little bit more staff, provide them a little better quality ingredients.
ingredients. But to be clear in the end, I don't know that we're going to find a better lunch than the chicken tacos.
Uh, you know, cause I think that a balance, like a, that, that meal, I think is probably an ideal thing. And again, most of the kids did tell me it was their favorite lunch. So that's my food service, uh, like lunch update.
Um, and next time I think we will, when we're not spending most of our time bogged down in the budget stuff, have some numbers available to talk about also.
So thank you all for, for listening to that.
Um, next up, we have some decision items. I need a motion to approve the minutes of February 28th, 2024.
So moved.
Second.
All right. When?
Yes.
Oh, you said there's no.
Yep.
Yes.
Yes.
Julie.
Yes.
Donna.
I don't, I, I have to be honest.
I missed it. My kids just came home from practice.
What, what are we voting?
Oh, we're sorry. We're voting the minutes of February 28th, 2024.
Oh, yes.
Veronica.
Yes. And I'm a yes.
Motion carries seven. Oh, we do not yet have the minutes ready to approve for March 4th. So I will table that. Uh, I need a motion to approve the recommended budget transfers of FY 24. Key to. Do.
Do.
So moved.
Second.
There's no.
Yes.
Wayne.
Yes.
Julie.
Yes.
Donna.
Veronica.
Veronica.
Yes.
Adam.
Yeah.
Sorry, Sean. I don't, I don't know if I caught yours.
Abstain.
Sorry.
Right. And I am a yes.
Motion carries six. Oh, with one abstention.
Um, announcements.
I'll start off, which I rarely do.
Uh, Sharon boys basketball team did win while we were working on the budget here tonight. And, uh, they won by 11 points.
And so they will move on, uh, to the elite eight where, which will be hosted actually. So that was due to an upset.
We elsewhere.
Uh, lemon, sir, had, had been upset. And so Sharon will host a game at the Dudley Devenport gymnasium on Sunday at one o'clock.
All right.
Uh, Judy Crosby.
Thanks.
I, I wanted to note that, um, the Sharon high school theater company of which Meg is the director, won a slot, um, to advance to the semifinals, um, in the mass education theater guild, um, contest with their production of Middletown.
And they will be performing this Saturday at Sharon.
In high school, Sharon is hosting the semifinals.
Um, I was disappointed not to see the superintendent or any school committee member.
Thanks for that announcement.
Uh, congratulations to them.
Veronica.
Thanks, Avi. Um, I also wanted to, um, remind folks that, uh, this is SpongeBob the musical this weekend, Thursday, Friday, and Sunday tickets are selling fast and no tickets will be sold at the door. So get them online at Sharon, MS.
Dot book ticks.
Dot net.
And, um, I also wanted to give a shout out to, uh, our, uh, wrestling team to particular, uh, folks in mind. And this is coming virtue of, uh, our friends at Sharon TV who have been covering all these sports, Megan, we, we be coming in first place and Samantha Rabkin coming in second place in the wrestling 2024, New England tournament in Providence last weekend. And two additional shout outs should go to coach Sonas and coach Lucy.
Great things happening.
Sharon. All right. Um, move us into executive session for the public. It's unlikely that we will return to open session afterwards, but there is a small possibility.
Um, hopefully depending on the outcome of a discussion, um, pursuant to MGLC 30 AS 21 a three to discuss strategy with respect to collective bargaining or litigation with the STA. If an open meeting may have a detrimental effect on the bargaining or litigation position of the Sharon school committee and the chairs.
So declares possible in session, I would entertain a motion.
So moved.
Second.
Right. Shauna.
Yes.
When.
Yes. Yes.
Adam.
Yes.
There's now.
Yes.
Julie.
Yes.
Veronica.
Yes.
And I am a yes.
Motion carry.
Seven.
Oh, see y'all an exec.
All right.
Um, so we're back to vote our calendar for next year.
Uh, I propose a calendar that begins after labor day.
Does takes federal holidays.
Only with the exception of, um, there will be a half day. I mean, multiple half days. So I don't know that I need to mention that, but the day before Thanksgiving, and there will be the Monday before Christmas as a day off.
Um, just for logistical reasons. That would be the, uh, the only day that school would be that week. So, but with the exception of those, it will be federal holidays only.
I will entertain a motion to approve.
So moved.
Second.
All right.
Uh, Julie.
Yes.
Adam.
Nope.
There's no, no.
Shauna.
Yes.
Veronica.
Yes.
When.
Yes.
And I'm a yes.
Motion carries, uh, motion carries five, two.
And that calendar is approved.
Um, I know it'll be drawn up in the next day or so, and we'll be available.
Uh, I would entertain a motion to adjourn.
So moved.
Second.
All right. Adam.
Yes.
Shauna.
Yes.
Veronica.
Yes.
Julie.
Yes.
When.
Yes.
No.
Yes.
And I'm a yes. Motion carries seven. Oh, have a nice night. Thank you all for your hard work.