School Committee - March 20, 2024
School Committee, 3/20/24 - Meeting Summary
Date: 3/20/2024
Type: School Committee
Generated: September 13, 2025 at 06:41 PM
AI Model: Perplexity
- Meeting Metadata
- Date & time: March 20, 2024, 7:00 PM
- Location / format: Remote meeting conducted via Zoom, broadcast live and recorded by Sharon TV
- Attendees (by role; noted absences not stated): Avi (Chair), Alan, Julie, Jeremy, Georgeann, Adam, Dan
- Agenda Overview
- Public comment on cancellation of Autumn Allen speaking engagement and community concerns
- Calendar process and related public feedback
- Apology and data/privacy issue regarding survey email addresses shared publicly
- Superintendent mid-cycle goals update and district updates
- Discussion and straw poll on Student Opportunity Act plan approval
- Presentation and vote on Bullying Prevention and Intervention Plan update
- FY25 budget update, curriculum funding request, and vote on additional funding request
- Student representative updates
- Executive session for collective bargaining/litigation
- Major Discussions
Topic: Cancellation of Autumn Allen Speak Engagement and Inclusivity Concerns
What triggered the discussion: Public comments regarding the twice-canceled Autumn Allen speaker event and community reactions regarding representation and inclusivity of Muslim students
Key points debated:
- Community divisions and hurt feelings about cancellation especially toward Muslim students and hijab-wearing individuals
- Calls for representation to support all students, especially minorities
- Accusations of Islamophobia, racism, and double standards in the handling of speaker events
- Discussions about bullying and discrimination experienced by hijab-wearing students
- School administration cited security and psychological safety concerns due to potential protests impacting event safety
- Community members and student speakers underscored importance of representation and safe environment for all students
- Challenge raised about ensuring safety for future diverse speakers and avoiding repeat scenarios
Member Contributions & Stances: - Avi (Chair): Expressed support for bringing in speakers regularly representing all students; acknowledged community frustrations around calendar and process; apologized for rushed calendar vote process
- Alan: No contribution recorded for this topic
- Julie: Apologized for a data privacy error related to survey data publication; expressed strong support for curriculum and representation efforts; emphasized need to support students experiencing bullying
- Jeremy: No contribution recorded for this topic
- Georgeann: Acknowledged and appreciated Julie’s apology; expressed distress over survey data misuse; emphasized hurt caused to Muslim community and need for inclusivity
- Adam: Ordered discussion on budget and curriculum (related to other topics) but also supportive in broader community inclusivity context
- Dan: No contribution recorded for this topic
Areas of Agreement/Disagreement: - Agreement on the need for inclusion and representation of all students, including Muslim and hijabi students
- Disagreement regarding justification for canceling Autumn Allen’s talk, with some community members seeing it as necessary for safety, others seeing it as discriminatory and a failure of leadership
Key Quotes: - Avi: “I support…bringing in of a speaker regularly…representing all of our students including our hijab wearing Muslim students.”
- Julie: “I want to apologize…for anyone who felt that I harmed them. It was completely unintentional.”
- Community speaker Johanna Rothenberg: “I think there is bullying on both sides happening.”
- School Admin (Dr. Botello): “We were concerned really about the psychological safety for…students as well as the speaker…not, not…physical safety.”
Outcome / Next steps: Commitment by committee members to move forward positively; ongoing discussions with the Muslim Student Organization and other groups; recognition of community pain and plans to improve inclusivity and safety
Topic: School Calendar Process and Related Community Feedback
What triggered the discussion: Public frustration over calendar selection process and exclusion of some religious holidays
Key points debated:
- Apologies issued for calendar process feeling rushed and excluding community voices
- Ongoing commitment to consider more inclusive calendar options in future
- Concern expressed that calendar did not reflect community survey data and resident input
Member Contributions & Stances: - Avi (Chair): Acknowledged frustrations and apologized for process
- Julie: Acted as calendar subcommittee chair; detailed calendar process and data analysis; apologized for inadvertent data privacy breach connected to calendar survey
- Alan: No contribution recorded
- Jeremy: No contribution recorded
- Georgeann: Thanked Julie for apology and highlighted incongruence between public social media and survey responses on calendar issues
- Adam: Discussed budget related to staff but supports calendar inclusivity
- Dan: No contribution recorded
Areas of Agreement/Disagreement: - Agreement on need for improved and inclusive calendar process
- Some disagreement whether calendar properly reflected community priorities based on feedback
Outcome / Next steps: Continued review of calendar process and policies related to religious observances, including homework expectations and accommodations
Topic: Data Privacy Incident Regarding Calendar Survey Data
What triggered the discussion: Public post by Julie Rowe included inadvertently unredacted email addresses from survey respondents
Key points debated:
- Data privacy breach exposed emails linked to individual survey responses
- Apologies issued by Julie; public and some committee members expressed serious concerns
- Requests made for creation of data securitization policies to prevent recurrence
Member Contributions & Stances: - Avi (Chair): No specific stance noted beyond facilitating discussion
- Julie: Issued apology, explained error was unintentional during data preparation
- Georgeann: Thanked Julie for apology but expressed distress over data exposure; urged securing sensitive data
- Adam: Chair of policy subcommittee urged to lead policy development for data security
- Others: Public commenters and some members stressed importance of data security and suggested centralized data handling
Areas of Agreement/Disagreement: - Agreement on need for data security policies
- Disagreement about current practices and responsibility
Outcome / Next steps: Call for policy subcommittee to address data security, involving IT and legal counsel
Topic: Superintendent Mid-Cycle Goals Update
What triggered discussion: Superintendent Dr. Botello presented progress on his goals at mid-cycle
Key points debated:
- Goal progress includes developing district/school culture mechanisms, elementary master plan, instructional leadership improvements, and DEI initiatives
- Reviewed short- and long-term planning for elementary facilities
- Highlighted curriculum review and professional development activities ongoing
- Acknowledged delay in forming some committees due to workload; ongoing plan for mission/vision revision
- Data on equitable performance and participation being developed
Member Contributions & Stances: - Avi (Chair): Requested clarity on timelines and committee compositions
- Alan: No contribution recorded
- Julie: Asked specific questions about committee workloads
- Georgeann: Asked for clarity on committee expected workload and timeline for elementary master plan
- Adam: Commented on budgeting and curriculum topics elsewhere but no direct input here
- Dan: No contribution recorded
Areas of Agreement/Disagreement: - Agreement on progress but acknowledgment of some timeline shifts
Outcome / Next steps: Formation of elementary master plan committee later in the year; ongoing incremental updates to mission and vision
Topic: Student Opportunity Act Plan Approval
What triggered: Presentation of plan aligned with district goals, vote anticipated
Key points debated:
- Plan addresses learning disparities via research-based supports, inclusive curriculum, and family engagement
- Concern over timing of approval; straw poll showed most members preferred to defer vote to next meeting
Member Contributions & Stances: - Avi (Chair): Sought straw poll on voting tonight versus deferring
- Alan: No contribution recorded
- Julie: Preferred to defer for full review
- Georgeann: Preferred deferral; requested questions if any
- Adam: Comfortable voting but defers to others
- Dan: No contribution recorded
- Outcome / Next steps: Vote deferred to next meeting as majority preferred
Topic: Bullying Prevention and Intervention Plan
What triggered: Presentation of updated plan aligned with new state template requiring vote
Key points debated:
- Plan revisions streamline previous version with minor changes, improving user-friendliness
- Clarification on scope including off-campus bullying impacting school environment
- Concerns about enforcement of bullying policy raised
- Use of Google Forms for reporting discussed for privacy safeguards
Member Contributions & Stances: - Avi (Chair): Facilitated discussion and motion to approve offered
- Alan: No contribution recorded
- Julie: Abstained from vote due to late arrival
- Georgeann: Voted yes and expressed support for policy improvement
- Adam: Voted yes; supported stronger enforcement
- Dan: Voted yes
- Shauna: Abstained due to desire for more time
Areas of Agreement/Disagreement: - Agreement on need for updated plan and heightened bullying awareness
- Disagreement or reservation by some members to vote immediately
Outcome / Next steps: Plan approved with five yes votes, two abstentions
Topic: FY25 Budget & Curriculum Funding Request
What triggered: Discussion of budget presentation to finance committee and request for additional one-time funding for curriculum
Key points debated:
- Request for $365,000 additional one-time funding to support literacy and math curriculum updates
- Discussion about appropriateness of requesting additional funds amid other staffing cuts, particularly assistant principals
- Clarification that one-time funds cannot be used to restore salaries on ongoing basis
- Emphasis on urgency of curriculum improvement due to student reading and math achievement concerns
- Majority support for funding curriculum as critical priority
- Some committee members expressed discomfort with process and desire to revisit budget cuts before additional ask
Member Contributions & Stances: - Avi (Chair): Explained background and rationale for request; moved for vote
- Julie: Emphasized critical need for curriculum improvements; supported immediate request
- Shauna: Concerned about budget priorities and uncomfortable asking for additional funds without wider budget review; clarified preference for restoring staff if funds available
- Adam: Expressed support assuming prior understanding of funding source
- Georgeann: Supported additional funding
- Dan: Supported funding
- Alan, Jeremy: No contribution recorded for this topic
Areas of Agreement/Disagreement: - Agreement on need to improve literacy and math curriculum
- Disagreement on timing and process for requesting additional funds and oversight of budget priorities
Outcome / Next steps: Motion passed 6-0 with one member absent momentarily; plan to present formal request Monday at Finance Committee meeting
- Votes (Substantive items only)
Motion: Approve updated Bullying Prevention and Intervention Plan
Result: Passed 5-0-2 (5 yes, 2 abstentions)
Roll-call:
- Avi — Yes
- Alan — Not stated in transcript
- Julie — Abstain
- Jeremy — Not stated in transcript
- Georgeann — Yes
- Adam — Yes
- Dan — Yes
- Shauna — Abstain
Motion: Approve request to Finance Committee for $365,000 additional one-time funding for curriculum
Result: Passed 6-0 (one member connection lost, but no opposing votes recorded)
Roll-call:
- Avi — Yes
- Alan — Not stated in transcript
- Julie — Yes
- Jeremy — Not stated in transcript
- Georgeann — Yes
- Adam — Yes
- Dan — Yes
- Shauna — No (expressed discomfort, but vote unclear due to connection loss)
Motion: Approve minutes of March 4, 2024
Result: Passed 6-0
Motion: Approve minutes of March 6, 2024
Result: Passed 7-0
Additional routine motions on out-of-state field trips all passed unanimously with noted appreciation for chaperones.
Motion: Enter executive session for collective bargaining and litigation
Result: Passed 7-0
- Presentations Without Discussion (Brief)
- Superintendent mid-cycle goals update: Progress on district culture, elementary master plan, instructional leadership, DEI initiatives, and data refinement in equity efforts
- Student Opportunity Act presentation: Overview of plan for improving educational opportunity; vote deferred
- Student rep updates: Music festival and theater achievements; sports accolades; academic club successes; blood drive scheduled; improvements in student-administration communication
- Action Items & Follow-Ups
- Adam Shane and policy subcommittee to address data security policy in light of survey data privacy incident
- Superintendent to continue engagement with community groups including Muslim Student Organization to improve inclusivity and safety
- Administration to finalize and form elementary master plan committee, with clear expectations provided to school committee
- School committee to vote on Student Opportunity Act plan at next meeting
- Open Questions / Items Deferred
- Student Opportunity Act plan vote deferred to next meeting for further review and member comfort
- How to ensure safety and inclusion for future diverse speakers post-Autumn Allen cancellation — plans being developed but details not fully stated
- Calendar policy revisions to address religious observance accommodations — ongoing review
- Budget priorities balance related to assistant principal staff retention vs. curriculum funding — discussion ongoing
- Appendices (Optional)
- Acronyms used: DEI (Diversity, Equity, Inclusion), METCO (Metropolitan Council for Educational Opportunity), MSBA (Massachusetts School Building Authority), SOA (Student Opportunity Act)
- Referenced documents: Survey data spreadsheet (with privacy redactions issue), Elementary Master Plan by Flansburg, Bullying Prevention and Intervention Plan template by state department
Document Metadata
- Original Transcript Length: 90,212 characters
- Summary Word Count: 2,023 words
- Compression Ratio: 6.2:1
- Transcript File:
School-Committee_3-20-2024_72ba4511.wav
Transcript and Video
Welcome to the March 20th meeting of the Sharon School Committee.
This meeting will be conducted remotely over Zoom.
Attendance by board members will be remote and remote attendance shall count towards a quorum.
The meeting will be broadcast live and recorded by Sharon TV. If you elect to enable your webcam, your image and background, maybe broadcast with or without sound.
As always, the meeting will begin with public comments.
A few ground rules.
Timer will be set at two minutes.
Do I have anybody from the committee who's going to keep time for me?
If not, I can.
I can set time. And then I did just want to touch on a few quick things before I go ahead and take public comment.
Two things that I recognize we haven't met since.
And I want to touch on just for the sake of the community and folks that I've been talking to, hearing from the public. The first is the cancellation of Autumn Allen speak engagement.
I do just want to say that I've been hearing from a lot of members of the community who feel different ways.
But ultimately, the one thing that I hear about consensus in our community around is the need for there to be representation for all the students in our district.
And I believe that after speaking to the administration and hearing their strong view, which has been shared by email by our superintendent, for me, I do want to be clear that although I, along with other members, spoke in frustration at the last meeting, I support, as I believe our committee would, the bringing in of a speaker regularly.
Regularly, in keeping with the idea of representing all of our students, including our hijab wearing Muslim students.
And so I do hope that there's an opportunity for parents in our district, including the parents who were organizing that speaker, to organize, work together collaboratively and try to bring in a speaker who would accomplish the same goals as Autumn Allen had hopefully been intended to in a way that makes everybody feel comfortable.
So I do feel like it's important.
I want students, all of our students in our district to know that they're welcome here and that they're supported and that it is important for us that we've heard your voices and we know that a speaker should be brought in to replace that speaking engagement.
I also want to touch on frustrations I've heard about the calendar, mostly around the process.
So certainly the calendar that we voted is the calendar that we voted. I do want to apologize, at least as the chair here who really dictated parts of the process, at least in the end and asking for a vote, that it was never intended to feel rushed.
It was never intended to make people feel as though we had tuned out the voices that we had heard, the logistical issues that we faced, especially in conflict with our committee's desire to try to find a inclusive calendar option.
With really the driving force.
And I don't believe that this committee is done in the future, at least in trying to look for inclusive ways to have everybody's celebrations, holidays recognized.
So I understand that there's a lot of frustration around those things. And I'm sure that we're going to hear about some of that tonight, as is people's right to do. I just want to make sure that those two things are stated.
And now I'll go to Nadia Ahmad.
Avi.
Avi.
Yes. Avi. Sorry, Nadia. Oh, go. Sorry.
Julie. Yeah.
I apologize.
Julie, you wrote your...
Go ahead, Julie. Yeah.
I just want...
I'm very sorry, Nadia.
I asked Avi if I could speak at the top of the meeting because, as you know, I've been, you know, very involved with the calendar as the chair of the calendar subcommittee.
And I saw there were a lot of questions on Facebook.
And so this weekend, I prepared a response that I felt like encapsulated a lot of the questions.
And I tried to outline the process and, you know, mentioned the different meetings where this was discussed and the different types of work I did. So I posted a summary of that on Facebook.
And I posted a couple of documents. Since people who had...
Since there had been a public records request for data, as well as, like, people asking on Facebook for data.
So I posted a couple of documents.
One of them was the survey data analysis.
It was a big spreadsheet.
I prepared that document for the public record request, but it was not...
I'm not sure it was the document actually sent out with the public records request because I don't know to what extent it was vetted by our council.
So when I posted a public records request document, I discovered that in the large spreadsheet where I had, like, done different tabs, I thought I had redacted all of the email addresses that were in there.
We did not have people's names.
We never collected people's names, but we did ask for email addresses.
So I used the email addresses to deduplicate the responses so that we had unique responses because I didn't want to double count people who forgot they took it and then retook it again.
So I had copied and pasted some of this throughout the spreadsheet.
So inadvertently, I did not get rid of the emails on one of the pages of the spreadsheets.
So my efforts were incomplete.
And when I linked the spreadsheet on Saturday, it was brought to my attention that I, in fact, did not delete those emails.
So I took the spreadsheet down and, you know, as soon as the error was brought to my attention.
But I felt like, you know, I didn't want to do this on Facebook.
I think the best place to do this is, you know, in a public meeting. So I just wanted to offer my apology for everyone, to anyone who felt that I harmed them.
And I, you know, I apologize for the oversight.
It was completely unintentional.
I was just trying to get the information out and I should have looked more carefully.
So, but I hope moving forward, people understand that, you know, there was a lot of analysis and work done in this.
And maybe there exists a version that maybe we can give to the public so they can see for themselves.
So I just want to apologize.
I hope nobody was too harmed by this. And Avi, thank you.
Nadia, thank you for your time.
And I'll sign off now.
Thank you.
I also just wanted to add that another effort to try to find ways for students in our district to feel more included than they do. Our food service is exploring ways.
And it seems like there are some solid ways to bring in both halal and kosher options for our students.
So, again, I think the more that our community communicates with us about ways in which we're not being as inclusive as we'd like to.
I think the more that we hopefully will find solutions to make every kid that attends all sharing public schools feel welcome and include here.
Nadia Ahmad. Thank you.
Thank you.
for those who want to learn about the history of the decades-long Palestinian struggle for freedom.
Since the situation in the Middle East is affecting our schools so much, it's imperative that we all educate ourselves on the issue.
The cancellation of the hijab event twice has sparked curiosity among people in Sharon as well as the neighboring townships.
Many people have reached out to learn about Palestine and especially Gaza. For curious minds who want to discern facts from fiction, I would highly recommend the Israeli historian Ilan Pape's book, The Ethnic Cleansing of Palestine.
One of the endorsements for Ilan Pape's book reads, This is a major intervention in an argument that will and must continue.
There is no hope of a lasting Middle East peace while the ghosts of 1948 still walk. Another trustworthy source is Dr. Norman Finkelstein's book, Gaza and inquest into its martyrdom.
The Intercept has endorsed it by saying, No one who ventures an opinion on Gaza is entitled to do so without taking into account the evidence in this book. I hope that SPS will consider placing these books in the library for young readers to benefit from.
Thank you.
Thank you, Nadia.
Ikra Javeed.
Thank you.
My name is Ikra Javeed.
Thank you for giving me a chance to speak.
As many of you may be aware, we're in the holy month of Ramadan.
And at this very moment is the time to break our fast. And this is something all Muslims look forward to all day long because we haven't eaten or drank for over 13 hours.
Yet here we are in the school committee meeting at 7 p.m. instead of being at our dinner tables.
And we're here to make sure our voices are not silenced once again.
The Muslim community of Sharon is in tremendous pain right now because this school committee has made it very clear in the last few months that our voices and concerns don't matter as much as some other people.
A Muslim African-American hijab-wearing woman was ridiculed all over town and social media because she supports an end to the killing of innocent lives in Palestine, even though her talk was not about politics at all.
And yet the same people who criticized Ms. Allen were completely silent when a member of the school committee who holds much more power and has more control over Sharon's schools openly shared his political views on social media, which were threatening and deeply concerning to the Sharon Muslim community. Our concerns were completely ignored by the members of this committee, and we were told his political views have no impact on his job at all.
I hope you also realize that your kids are well aware of what is happening in this town, especially those of you who are planning to protest and bully Ms. Allen during her talk and shield your kids from it.
These same kids see your hypocrisy and your double standards.
Think about how your actions are impacting them and how they view you. And truthfully, I have a lot more hope from the next generation than many of you.
Thank you.
Thank you.
Judy Crosby.
Thank you.
While I appreciate Julie's remarks, I'd like to note this is not the first time that she's engaged in a data dump that disclosed confidential survey information.
This time, she posted it in two Sharon Facebook groups that have over 16,000 people in them.
And it remained up for over 90 minutes.
It was downloaded by many people and has, in fact, been passed around amongst candidates and provides detailed information that people can use for purposes that were clearly not intended.
While I'm sure her apology was well intended, it's long past time to get the school committee and especially Ms. Rowe out of the business of having any protected data on their computers.
It's just wrong.
There needs to be a data securitization policy.
I'm asking Adam Shane, as chair of the policy subcommittee, to please convene and work with the IT folks, including hopefully Prisnell will weigh in on this because he clearly has background on data security.
And ensure that this never happens again. That is 858 people's email addresses connected to who they are, which school they're at, and how they voted in a survey that they thought was confidential.
Shame on all of you.
None of you need that connected info.
It could have been handled by a person in central office who anonymized it before letting any of you see it.
And it's the second time.
We got to do better, guys.
It's just not okay. Secondly, I send my love to the Muslim community that is on this call.
The hatred that has been expressed towards all of you on social media has been horrifying to watch.
I've reached out privately to several of you.
I'm really sorry that this is what's happening in a town that you trust to educate your kids. There's much time, but I'll let you finish that. Thank you so much.
Hala Mustafa.
Hi, I'm Dr. Hala Mustafa, and I'm here today to address a grave injustice that has occurred in our Sharon schools.
The cancellation of the hijab event and silencing the Muslim voices clearly showed that discrimination is still prevalent in 2024.
A Muslim African-American speaker was rejected by the school committee due to her personal political beliefs.
This is not the first shameful incident at Sharon Public School, as a Hispanic speaker faced similar discriminations three years ago.
I had the privilege to read both authors' novels.
Jennifer DeLeon's book provided me with a valuable perspective on the experience of medical students, while Autumn Allen's book offered me a profound look at the ongoing struggle for civil rights within the Black community.
Esteemed school committee members, did you read the book before pressuring the school administration to cancel the speaker not once, but twice?
Do you scan every statement Sharon public teachers and leaders share online?
No, you don't.
You only treat Muslims and people of color this way.
This behavior demonstrates a double standard toward people based on their backgrounds, color, and beliefs.
Fair standards should apply to everyone equally, including you, esteemed school committee members.
If the same cancellation criterion was applied to all leaders and teachers at Sharon School, I'm sure many would be fired immediately, including the school committee members themselves.
This intolerance and racism risk tearing the school apart, all Sharon School apart, and all the town apart.
What message do you, esteemed school committee members, are sending to our students and to the future leaders?
The message to my community was loud and clear.
Regardless of your character and achievements, you still have to fight for your civil rights and against discrimination in 2024. We all deserve a place in this town and should not be bullied or brushed aside.
Please do your jobs with fairness, equity, and uphold to the principles that you committed to.
Diversity, equity, inclusion, freedom of speech, freedom of speech, freedom of speech, and justice.
Thank you. Thank you.
Amara Hamoud.
Hello, my name is Amara Hamoud.
Thank you for giving me the opportunity to talk today.
I'm a former student in the Sharon Public School System, and I just wanted to discuss a few of my recent findings.
Although I have graduated, I do have younger siblings of varying ages in the Sharon Public School System. I chose to start wearing hijab when I was in middle school, and it was tough dealing with the negative comments from students and stuff alike.
I have been mistreated and bullied, of course.
The day before I started wearing hijab, I was treated perfectly fine, but the following day I was ignored and brushed aside, and it's not something that I'd ever wish on anybody else.
Yeah, I kept to myself.
I didn't really tell anybody about my issues because I didn't feel safe trusting anybody in that school.
There was nobody who I felt could relate to my issue or would know how to handle this type of issue, so I kept it to myself, and unfortunately, it spiraled and caused my hijab to be pulled off.
I'm not the only one this has happened to. I have heard stories from my siblings that this has been happening recently to other students as well, and this is not acceptable.
It's kind of like getting pantsed in the middle of school.
It is embarrassing, and you're in shock.
You don't know what to do. You don't know who to talk to because who are you going to talk to about that? It is hard.
This is why we need representation in the school.
Having Autumn Allen come in and speak would have made us all feel so much safer and seen.
Me, personally, when I was in school, I would have loved to have a hijabi speaker, a Muslim speaker of sorts to come and talk to us and not just talk about her book, but just her presence is enough to make me feel safe and seen and heard because I feel like nobody else will be able to do that unless we have representation in the school.
So thank you for your time.
Thank you so much.
Appreciate you.
Thank you. Colin Aiza.
Can you hear me?
We can hear you, yes.
Well, first of all, I'd like to thank you, Avi, for the comments.
I think it makes a great deal to hear this from you. Thank you.
I don't have intention to bring politics into the school, but we're way beyond this point right now.
Our advocacy to stop the killing of innocent Palestinians in the town has been portrayed as anti-Semitic and an attack on our neighbors in the town, which has nothing to do with it. We have seen hate comments and prejudice from town residents in social media and in town meetings.
I wish you would see some of the stuff we've seen online from other town residents.
For years, many students like the previous speaker have reported bullying, isolation, alienation.
That's why the hijab events started happening.
Many of them actually don't speak because they're afraid of the intimidation from other town residents and other students.
Ms. Allen agreed to do this in August 2023 to share her story and book with our students.
The event had nothing to do with politics. She never advocated for hate towards any group unless, again, you equate advocating for Palestinian lives and rights as a hate speech.
Her social media posts were twisted, manipulated to make it look as if it's anti-Semitic and targeting hate for certain groups.
Then some of our town residents unfortunately use fear and intimidation to pressure the cancellation of the event.
In my opinion and many others, Ms. Allen was attacked because she's a Muslim. It was a manifestation of our Islamophobic racism and bigotry, such as we did to others in the recent past for their skin color, race, and other reasons.
Let's admit, yes, we are diverse, but we're not inclusive and we don't treat everyone equally.
It was a warning to minorities.
Step out of the line and you'll be silenced.
I was shocked during the last meeting to see some of the school committee members who championed diversity and equality.
Your comments had nothing to do with diversity and equality.
Comments were inflammatory and divisive.
I would like to remind you, thank you, Avi, again.
You, every member, represent every one of us, not just one group of a time.
Thank you.
Thank you, Colin.
Ahmed Mohamed. Thanks for giving me the opportunity to speak.
I just want to express my frustration with the administration for canceling Alan Odom's speech.
Especially after the first time it was canceled, we met with the superintendent and he expressed his apology and he mentioned how sorry he is. He did not know it's going to cause much damage to some member of the community.
And he actually said it's a matter of scheduling and promised another date and we got another date but got canceled again.
And he mentioned there was no pressure on him. But I think there's some kind of pressure because he had no reason to cancel the event the second time.
Also, I want to also express my frustration with the process of the calendar.
Because I believe when the calendar was discussed in the school committee meeting, actually there was some statistics that was collected from a resident of Sharon and tried to see how important some holidays are to some people, a member of the community.
And after all these discussions, the calendar did not really take any of this feedback from the community.
So I hope the process in the future can be better and we really respect the resident's opinion.
Thank you.
Thank you.
Ramasa Faisal.
Hello, everyone.
My name is Ramasa Faisal and currently I'm a freshman at Sharon High School. I'm coming to you with a student point of view about the Hijab Day event that was supposed to happen in the previous days.
I would like to discuss how the Hijab Day event being canceled not once but twice has affected myself as well as many other students within the Sharon public schools.
The hijab is not something that should be considered controversial.
It is just a scarf that Muslim women wear. How is that an issue?
The Hijab Day event at the middle school was supposed to show that hijabi women are capable of achieving many great things and be involved in many different fields of work like everyone else.
This day was supposed to be empowering for young Muslim students and show them that they will be able to do anything that they put their minds into.
But the meaning of the event was lost when people decided to put politics into the event.
This not only upset myself but many others as well.
The point of this event was for an author who happens to wear a hijab to come in and speak about her novel, All You Have to Do, not her political point of view. I also want and feel the need to put a lot of emphasis on the fact that representation matters.
When you see someone on stage at your own school who is similar to you in any way, it feels good.
I know I felt that way when I was a middle schooler last year attending the Hijab Day event.
Even though the speaker was not discussing the hijab, the similarity I had with the speaker, rather speaking about climate change, I felt very inspired to see someone who wears hijab like myself being successful in her field of work. The same way current Muslim middle schoolers would have felt if Autumn Allen were to come and discuss her novel.
Due to all the comments made on the Facebook group, Sharon What's Up, I feel that the meaning and representation of this event has been lost, and that is not all right.
Thank you.
Thank you so much.
Georgian Lewis?
Thank you.
Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. So first, I'm just going to say something real brief, and then I want to circle back to everyone who's speaking here. So Julie, thank you for your apology.
Thank you. Thank you. It is appreciated.
I think it's helpful. We all make mistakes when we own them.
That's how we learn. So I do appreciate that.
I did just want to say you spoke about disruption to anyone.
I think for me, because I did see it, and I was one of the emails that were shared, the disturbing piece for me is seeing people's stance on social media, and then seeing the polar opposite in their response in the survey, and having to be subject to that when I'm trying to choose school committee candidates.
And then to sit here, and I want to preface this by saying thank you so much to all the community members whose faith I'm not a part of and I'm not well versed on it. I appreciate your really heartfelt and open sharing of how everything that's going on in this town is making me feel.
It's helping me to understand, and it makes that data piece even more upsetting for me because a lot of it is focused around this issue, and people are saying hurtful things on social media or are not, and then said contrary in that survey.
So I'm having a very hard time with that right now as I listen to all of you, and I can't thank you enough for taking time out of your holiday, especially when you get to eat.
Half of my family is Jewish, so I know fasting is not a fun thing, but it is essential for your faith and for half of my family's faith.
So I really do, that I can recognize is an important thing that you're doing, and I'm sorry that you have to do that to be heard and seen tonight. But I just want to let you know that I do hear you and I see you and I appreciate that you took the time to let others and myself see that.
And, you know, again, to echo Judy, I'm horrified that you have to feel this way.
Thank you.
All right. Thank you.
Nada Hashmi.
Thank you. I just want to say a couple words.
If nothing, then at least what you've heard from both the students, former student and the recent student, and how they felt really moved me, especially Amar, the fact that she has been bullied and is continuing to bully, I think speaks volumes in terms of what's happening actually in the schools and why it is so important to have had that event. My main concern, and I'm going to add on to what everybody has said, the part that I had really a hard time acknowledging or understanding was the fact that they cited security as a reason to cancel, and I just was really appalled.
The school is not able to offer a safe environment for a speaker.
Was the police ever called up and said, hey, we're expecting protests, can you come and monitor? If there were going to be people who were going to disrupt her speech, then should the police have been inside and should those people have been, perhaps, as a good example to all the students, arrested and taken out or moved?
There are many, many options a school could have taken to ensure the event could have moved forward.
Instead, they kind of said cited security, which to me is a very weak and almost sort of a frightening reason to cancel any event. And I just want to point that out, that this is something going forward, what is going to be different.
Avi, you have said that you're going to go ahead and you encourage hijabi speakers.
Guess what? Many of us have very, very strong views on these things that are sort of bipolar in this political environment.
How are you going to ensure, how is anybody in the school going to ensure the next hijabi speaker, or even Autumn, if you were to be invited back, is not going to be subject to the same kind of double standards, the same kind of scrutiny that she went through? Or if it is somebody who we go through with, how are we going to ensure her safety?
And what is going to be happening different going forward is what I'm really interested to hear.
All right. Thank you.
Thank you.
Mohammed Masoud.
Can you hear me?
Yes, we can.
Okay, good.
Happy to know that. So I have one concern.
Relative to the speaker, Adam Holland.
I think it's the same thing.
It feels like the school committee has no leadership.
They just follow the mob.
If there are people who are threatening to come over and the risk threat, I think the previous speaker was talking about that one. And the school committee cannot take the leadership, cannot take the stand.
So leadership is not just following the mobs, like what this mob is saying.
If it is right, if it is right. If it is wrong, it is wrong.
They have to talk to them. They have to explain to them. I understand that there are trauma in the Shalom town residents who have families in Israel.
They lost. They have traumas.
Same thing for Palestine.
There are traumas and loss in their family members as well. But the school committee should not just react and embolden this environment where right now a hijab-wearing speaker cannot come because she is being treated as a terrorist.
Nowadays, if I post anything on the Facebook group, people see the name.
And they say, oh, this is a Muslim-sounding name. This is a hijab-wearing woman.
Must be a terrorist.
Why are you helping to sustain that environment?
I think as a leadership, you have to take a stand.
If it is right, say it is right. If it is wrong, it is wrong. Say, like, this is the reason this person should not come.
But, you know, please do not, you know, help to, you know, maintain this.
I say it's a terrorized environment in the other way. Like, you know, you are saying the speaker cannot come because of this, you know, security risk.
Is Sharon becoming a tough town?
Like, you know, it's like, you know, she should not feel safe here.
But where are the messages going?
So I would like to, you know, ask our leadership to, you know, show this leadership and help to, you know, change the town towards positive direction.
Thank you. Thank you very much.
Thanks, Mohamed.
Johanna, can you please state your person's last name? Or I guess your last name.
Johanna Rothenberg.
So I kind of hopped on this a little while ago, but midway through the conversation.
But I was hearing a lot about, obviously, Miss Allen, who we're discussing, about how her views on the topic, so to speak, or why she was canceled.
And a lot of parents have expressed that their students are being, I could be misrepresenting it, but bullied, students wearing hijabs.
But what I wanted to also highlight that I think a lot of parents and town members were very afraid to have Miss Allen speak is because there were many middle school students that had reported to their parents who were Jewish.
And their peers were telling them that if they didn't go to Miss Allen's speech and they opted out, that they were racist. And those were very powerful words coming from middle schoolers to their fellow peers already calling their friends, even some of them were friends, their friends and their peers racist.
Not because, and it's not like these students were saying, oh, I'm not going because of X, Y, Z. They're just trying to quietly opt out. And that was very alarming.
And that really frightened me. I don't have a student in the middle school here, but that, sorry, I lost my train of thought there, that I think there is bullying on both sides happening.
And I think that we as a town and we as parents need to look at this as an entire situation, both sides, the students wearing hijabs, the Jewish students.
And that's the only way we can come to a conclusion.
And I think that's the only way we can come to a conclusion, the gentleman before discussed, he mentioned the word terrorist several times.
I really think that we have to take a step back and as a community that is diverse.
And I know many people were saying this is not diverse, but we are diverse and we have to embrace that. And how can we move forward to make everybody in this community comfortable, all students in the school comfortable and empowered?
Thank you.
Thank you. All right. I'm going to throw it to correspondence.
I think Adam Shane is going to handle that just really quickly before that, Adam. Can I just ask Dr. Pitello, can you speak, if you're prepared to, can you speak to security and what you meant by security risk? I feel at least so far as I was aware, I guess I would like to know that feels like something that we shouldn't let sit in the air here. The idea that either A, members of our community who felt strongly one way were going to be violent or that a police presence was necessary, unless again, that's how you feel. I would love a clarification on that. I think we were concerned about the numbers and really concerned about the numbers would have been very large as we had heard that there were perhaps even people beyond our community.
And we were concerned really about the psychological safety for, especially for our students, as well as for the speaker, that the setting of, you know, outside the school, like there is, there are free speech requirements where people can stand on school property, but not in front of the entrance.
And so with the potential number of people that we were hearing and, you know, some of the comments that were being made as far as protests, we were concerned, you know, mostly for the psychological safety of our kids, not, not, not the physical safety.
Though with people potentially outside of the community, that would be, that would be, not knowing them, that would be somewhat of a concern as well.
Understood.
I appreciate the clarification.
Monica, I see your hand.
Yeah, thank you, Avi. And I just want to say how sorry I am to hear the hurt that has been expressed tonight by so many of our community members, our Muslim neighbors, and in particular to the young women in our schools who spoke tonight.
I first want to say how sorry I am for their experiences of being marginalized and bullied and traumatized at school.
this is unacceptable.
And I want to thank them for their bravery to come forward to speak and that we must, must, must address these issues.
And I feel very committed to that and going forward to do something that is positive.
At this stage, obviously, the situation with Ms. Allen coming devolved to a place where our administration felt they had to make a difficult decision, which was painful.
But I want to, I want people to understand that we have heard that we have taken that on board, and recognize that we must, we must move forward in a positive way and do something to repair this situation.
And I want to say, I've made I will make a commitment to that as a as a member of this committee.
And again, thank you, particularly to the young ladies who stepped forward tonight to speak. I appreciate your bravery.
Thank you.
I guess on that, I, I, I'm speaking to lots of different groups, both, you know, community and students.
I was invited today to speak with the Muslim Student Organization at the high school, who are an incredible group of kids who really helped, you know, me to learn both of their experience, especially with these recent events, as well as just in general.
They're one group I've, I'm, I'm willing to meet with any group as frequently as they'll have me and they've already invited me to come back in a couple weeks, which I appreciate.
And they're also, you know, greatly interested in, you know, teaming up with other groups in the school, because there's a strong feeling that the students in the school really have an ability to be really close and, you know, disagree, but do so, you know, respectfully and, and, and wanting to be part of that, you know, that effort to make sure that we can continue to work to progress as a, as a school community.
So I appreciate that group, and as well as looking forward to meeting with other groups, both, especially kids, but also community members as well.
Thanks, Dr. Mattel.
I do see hands that the public forum portion of our meeting is concluded Adam Shane correspondence.
Thank you, Avi. So that the school committees received 52 pieces of correspondence between March 6, 2024 at 9 a.m. and March 20, 2024 at 9 a.m. We continued to receive correspondence regarding the FY25 budget development with themes that expressed support for the assistant principal at the elementary level, highlighted the importance of all positions within the counseling department at the Sharon High School, advocated for the critical priority of maintaining two assistant principals at the high school, focused on the need to maintain the dean of academic affairs at the high school, outlined the role of the curriculum coordinators and the impact their reduction would have on students at the high school, expressed disappointment in the proposed cut of the assistant superintendent of equity and engagement, supported the decision to focus on maintaining as many frontline staff as possible, appreciated the approach to the difficult decisions that were made regarding the budget, and that asked the school committee to advocate for an increased level of financial support from the finance committee.
The school committee received direct emails and were copied on emails that expressed concerns about the Sharon Middle School guest speaker, Autumn Allen. These letters offered various perspectives as evidence for the opposition of Ms. Allen's presentation at SMS and asked the district to reconsider their decision to host Ms. Allen. The school committee received several inquiries regarding the process used to vet speakers who are invited to the district.
A community member wrote to suggest a unity gathering.
We received a letter that expressed sadness with the reaction of the community to a potential speaker at SMS. A member of the community asked that the school committee investigate the superintendent and the DEI director for the decision made to host Autumn Allen. The Sharon Jewish Action Committee copied the school committee on a letter sent to Dr. Botello that requested a meeting to discuss various topics related to the recent matter regarding Autumn Allen. The Sharon High School journalism class requested input from the school committee on the vote and decision regarding the 2024-2025 school calendar.
Community members and students wrote to express opinions about the 2024-2025 school calendar.
There were a variety of perspectives offered.
Support, or among them, support for the new calendar and thanks to the school committee for the decision to introduce a calendar that included only federal holidays.
Request to add the Jewish holidays and good Friday to the school calendar.
Concerns for the Jewish community and the removal of their holidays from the calendar.
Request for the school committee to reconsider and vote the calendar for 2024-2025.
Suggestion to amend or add policy to address school work around religious holidays.
We received a records request for information regarding the development of the 2024-2025 school year calendar.
And we received two editions of Millie's Metco Monday newsletter that highlighted the Living the Legacy of Metco event, scheduled for May 10, 2024, and various other professional development workshops and opportunities.
And thank you again to Jane Martin for your work summarizing all of the correspondence that the school committee receives.
Nice work, Adam.
Thank you, Jane.
All right, next up, do we have a student rep update?
If so, raise your hand. All right, Alicia Mehta.
Hi, my name is Alicia.
I'm a senior at Sharon High School and I'll be sharing some of the student updates with Omar. So I think I would like Omar to start off. Hello, my name is Omar.
I'm another one of the student representatives and I'll be giving some of the school updates today.
So first off, in music, in music and theater, the theater department made it to the state tournament.
And there will be a send-off pep rally most likely next week to celebrate all of their amazing accomplishments this year.
And additionally, the Allstate Music Festival is this Saturday and Sunday, and we have upwards of 10 students participating in this highly prestigious festival.
Additionally, a senior, Ayaan Ahmad, will play as a concertmaster of the festival.
And this week is also a musicianship week at Sharon High School.
And there's a number of events and speakers that were brought to the high school. And this was all organized by the Tri-Am Music Honor Society.
And moving on to sports, I'm sure we all know this, but the Sharon basketball team had a fantastic season and got to the state finals.
And several other Sharon student athletes were also recognized for their amazing accomplishments and the numerous records that they have broken and accolades that they have won this year. Moving on to academic clubs, 28 debate kids have made it to states, and at least two of those debaters are going to nationals.
Three members of the speech team are going to states, and one is going to nationals.
The Sharon High School math team is going to the state tournament in April.
Several DECA members placed at their state conference, and 15 of which will attend the international conference in April. Sharon High School is hosting its second blood drive of the year this Friday at the Sharon High School.
And we expect about 50 students to be donating blood.
Several parents of students have also reached out to donate their blood. And there's plenty of room if any school committee members or anyone else would like to come donate.
The times would be during the regular school hours, so between 8 a.m. and 2.40 p.m. The planning boards have also been very hard at work, and each of the respective grades have their big dances planned up, including prom and sophomore semi and the rest of them, throughout April and May. The hackathon was hosted last week and brought over 28 middle schoolers and 20 high schoolers to participate in it. And the 10th annual Sharon Math and Science Tournament, or SMST, is happening on April 6th, and we'll be hosting middle schoolers from across the state.
And just to close off our updates, the members of the school community representatives board at the high school, so that includes me, Alicia, New, and a few others, we all met with Ms. Wiseman recently, and we have begun to meet regularly with the school administration to help foster a community of communication and transparency when it comes to policy regarding specifically the high school.
And, I mean, I'm sure that we all understand this, but it's been a very busy few months for the high school, and there's a lot happening. And so if you want to keep up to date by the day, please follow our Instagram at Sharon.hi.eagles,
where we are now regularly updating and posting the news about what's happening at the high school.
And thank you so much.
Nice job, both of you. That was a very full update, and that's very cool.
We will make sure, at least I will make sure to follow that, I'm sure, much of our community will. Very nice work. I'll throw it to Dr. Botello for superintendent update.
Great.
Thank you, Gene.
Yeah, before I start, I want to build on one of the comments that one of our student speakers made. Our drama theater group is competing tomorrow night in Boston in the finals of the state drama festival, presenting or performing Middletown.
So thanks to that amazing group of students.
If you've ever seen the festival, the students who are helping with the sets and all of the behind-the-scenes works are just as important as the actors.
It's an incredible feat because they have these time competitions where they need to get the set set up within five minutes. If it gets set up in five minutes and one second, they are ruled out. Then they have a certain amount of time to perform their performance.
And if it goes one second over, they're out. So thank you to the students and Dr. Duceau for their awesomeness and their ability to make the finals.
And we'll root for them. I'm looking forward to going tomorrow night. Okay.
SPEAKER_UNKNOWN: Okay. With respect to kindergarten registration, with the budget process and the change, we'll be updating the online registration portal to reflect full-day tuition charge.
This will be at $3,635.
During registration, families will opt for full-day or half-day kindergarten.
And they'll complete a commitment letter and initial deposit for full-day of $500.
We'll certainly work with families very carefully as this unexpected change has occurred and have options for payment plans as necessary.
We'll also be directly reaching out to the families that have already registered to obtain their preference and provide full-day kindergarten commitment letters.
We'll be making sure if any families are not opting for full-day because of financial reasons that we really work with them to help them overcome any hardships that might be in place.
CDC has done some updates on COVID-19 protocols to really place COVID-19 in a similar place with other respiratory conditions and other viral illnesses.
And so the CD recommendations really go aligned with, you know, RSD, flu, and other things about staying up to date on vaccinations, practicing good hygiene, coming up with strategies or employing strategies to prevent spread, and also returning to normal activities after symptoms have gone or after fever is gone. You know, you know, you know, you know, you know, you know, you know, you know, the five days to curb disease spread is, it can be used, but it's similar to what you would do with flu or other viral illnesses.
I'm pleased to announce that Carla Hands will be joining us on April 8th as our new director of METCO.
She was an awesome candidate, our top candidate, based upon the committee that was put together to screen the candidate.
She held a master in education and school counseling and most recently has been at Taunton High School.
Prior to that, she worked at Madison Park High School in Boston, and she's a former Boston resident who now lives out in this area. She also has been a coach and a college athlete and has a great energy and presence of both working with kids and communicating with adults.
She had the opportunity to go and meet with our families in Boston at METCO headquarters and really was great in that environment as well as in her interviews here and meeting with me separately after.
So we're looking forward to having her on board to work with the entire district.
Her office will be at the high school, but she'll also be traveling throughout the district.
And she's looking forward to meeting students and families and when she gets on board. Also, in that kind of vein of new situations, I put out a notice today that, unfortunately, Ketra O'Rourke, our interim principal at Heights, has requested to return out of the principalship to a different responsibility here in the district.
She loved the support of students, staff and families, but really felt like as far as her path that the principalship was not what she wanted at this time.
So we thank her for an awesome leadership.
And I've put out a notice.
I started with Heights families and staff, but I'll also put out a notice to the entire community.
But asking especially Heights families and staff if they would like to participate in the screening process, we'll be posting for a new principal at Heights very soon.
And then we've spoken about the calendar earlier, but that calendar has been posted.
We also are reviewing our policies with regard to holidays and how we respect religious observances as far as homework and other expectations.
And we're also reviewing other policies that exist, both in Brookline and Easton and Winchester have some good policies.
And we'll be looking to suggest some recommendations for our policies, especially while with this current calendar, to make sure that families can observe and not feel penalized by their taking days off of school.
And then next on the agenda is, I'm just going to give it update on my superintendent goals and kind of where we are in process at the March timeframe.
Yeah, just real quick. I see Julie has her hand up. Yeah.
Oh, hi.
Actually, I had my hand up because I wanted to know about the blood drive on Friday.
And then the conversation moved past, but I didn't put the hand down. But if anyone wants to send the school committee information about the blood drive on Friday, I would, for one, be very appreciative.
Thanks. Thanks.
SPEAKER_UNKNOWN: Thanks.
Somebody get Julie that info, I guess. Hi guys.
Sorry, go ahead, Dr. But I don't see any more questions from the table. Okay, so this is my mid-cycle update, which we do each March.
First, it's with respect to goal one, which is around district and school culture.
Much of this is still in process.
We're creating mechanisms for staff and students and families to collect and digitally display artifacts and examples from our district. So we've been brainstorming examples and began collecting photos and artifacts.
And we're also talking about initial discussions of a mechanism, likely a page that's an offshoot of our website page that really kind of brings to life through both video clips of different experiences of learning and just school life within our schools, as well as some interviews with students and staff that really bring to life what our district is about and how it aligns to our goals as far as mission, vision, and values.
We also have been reviewing some rubric tools for assessing ongoing alignment.
So ways in which we can look at this regular collection of artifacts and examples and question to what degree they're aligning to our aspirations as far as the mission, vision, and values, as well as looking at some of these examples that we choose.
And if they're not completely aligned to our current mission and vision values, using that to update our mission, vision, value statement.
And so that will be next steps in the process that we haven't gotten to yet. As far as superintendent goal two is around elementary master plan.
So we selected an engineering designing firm, and they collected and reviewed data, conducted site visits, and composed draft of our elementary master plan, which has been completed.
We did a preliminary review of that elementary master plan, and we still have that document to fall back on as we continue with our process. As we continue with our process.
We also developed a short-term plan for FY25 Capital, which allows us to do the necessary work to make sure that if we have additional space needs in the fall of 2025, that we'll be able to add some additional space by reviewing spaces within our elementary buildings that could be expanded or used for classroom space that are not currently used.
These ideas came out of the elementary master plan that was completed by Flansburg, the engineering and design firm. Our next steps will be to convene an elementary master plan committee, which will be composed of various diverse stakeholders from all the elementary schools and also beyond into our community.
And we'll look at various options as far as long-term options.
We'll also very much discuss the statement of interest process for entering the MSBA process for looking at whether renovation or some type of new buildings are...
What are the different options for making sure that our buildings will be fit and able to be used for years to come? So we decided not to pursue a statement of interest this year, but we will be looking to very well, you know, kind of get support from the town to explore that for the following year.
Goal three is around instructional leadership.
So we published our school improvement plan, which included SMART goals, key actions, and evidence of impact.
I continue to visit schools in order to focus on our school improvement goals and on data and instructional practices.
I have all of our administrators are really looking at our staff holistically and identifying, you know, individuals and groups in whole school efforts that need, you know, that we can, strengths that we can build upon, but also places where we could use additional support and professional development in order to expand best practices throughout the, throughout all of our schools and all of our classrooms. And we've had a comprehensive curriculum presentation, but we look to having more presentations with the inclusion of more data, including a special education presentation in April and DEI math presentations by year's end. As far as our diversity, equity inclusion goal.
Again, there's a DEI goal.
It's part of all of our school, school, school improvement plans.
We onboarded a DEI director and are onboarding our second MECO director after our first MECO director left prematurely in, in the fall. But we're looking forward to call hands, joining our team.
We're working with the DEI director.
Sorry, Dr. Mitella. I think you're just, you're on goal two, but I think you're speaking to goal four.
Yeah.
Oh yeah. Sorry about that.
Okay.
Yeah. I got to just, I got to shift that part on the top. Sorry.
Yeah. So it's a goal for, we're, we've been looking at ways to extract data. Sangeeta Subhash, who is our new data specialist is really, really got, you know, really hit the ground really with supporting some of our state reporting and our use of power school.
But now she's digging into helping us to extract data in order to really understand equitable performance and participation in our school.
So we look forward to presenting that data in the future.
We're also conducting surveys around sense of belonging.
Those are happening in the process of the elementary and they'll happen in the middle of the high school. And we have ongoing meetings with various stakeholder groups throughout the year, including the Muslim group, a student group that I met with today, but there's several groups and we'll be, we continue to collect their feedback on their sense of belonging and what we can do to improve.
And as far as a baseline PD for administrators and staff around the issues of diversity, equity, inclusion, we had a cohort of administrators who took a, you know, a full course on equity through the ideas program.
Khalees Warnham, who is a expert in the field and in the state and even nationally, provided workshops for all of our staff on issues of implicit bias and microaggressions and understanding culturally proficient practice.
And we're also meeting with our new PD committee in April to discuss how we can continue to provide certain professional development around equity and inclusion to all staff. And then also specialized additional PD for select members.
Yeah, I'm sorry. So this is goal five.
And this is around my continued work with the new superintendent induction program.
So I continue to attend those sessions monthly.
I bring problems or practice to that group and process them. The last problem practice I certainly brought was around the, the, the engagement of Autumn Allen in my process of, of, through that process in order to not only learn from the community as I've spoken to them, but also through other superintendents in a coach that I have to try to process in an objective way. And I continue to go with two other sessions around MASS and MECO sessions in order to round out my learning experience.
So when we come to the end of the year, I'll connect some of these goals to the various standards throughout the superintendent rubric.
And as far as the calendar, so this is the kind of March mid progress update.
And then in early June, I'll get at the end of the year progress update.
And then late June, we'll, you'll have the opportunity to, to after asking questions in early June, to, to present my evaluation in public, which is always a fun process.
All right.
Do we have any questions or comments from the table, Adam?
Yeah, thank you. I'm sorry, Dr. Patel for, for getting confused about the slide.
I thought you had just moved backwards. I guess the, the two questions I had were around, I think it's the, the first and second, or it might be the second and third.
I think it's the second and third goal, just where we had intended to have, or I should say your initial plan was to have kind of committees in place with then updates or, or feedback in some case by kind of the March, April timeframe.
Clearly we're, we're a bit behind where kind of, we'd want it to be in that regard.
And so I'm curious what the, what the impact will be in terms of kind of timeline between the formation of those committees and the, the recommendations that will come out of them and those timelines.
Yeah. As far as the elementary master plan, since we're not pursuing a statement of interest this year, we'll be in great shape to really continue those conversations, start that plan, that committee later. So that was a part of really kind of collecting, you know, what was necessary for our short term, which was really being done outside of that committee.
We emphasize that in this, this time period.
So we should be fine, but it is later than initially expected.
The other, the mission, vision and values.
I mean, I think that's going to be an ongoing process.
I found that some of my folks are a little kind of committee overloaded.
And so that's the reason that committee has not begun yet. We have had internal conversations at the admin level, but needing to get a greater cross section.
So because that's an ongoing group that will be kind of existing for, for years, though it's doing some work initially, we should be able to find, find with, with starting that a little bit later.
Okay. So the plan is still in that case to, to maintain kind of timelines in terms of, at least for the, the mission, mission, vision values to kind of have that plan by, thank you. You had originally said by June, is that still the plan?
Well, to have what it says, I think it's to have some kind of suggested revision by June.
Yes. But then continue to, you know, continue to really build up that mechanism for capturing artifacts is going to go on to next year.
And it, the, what I believe is like a mission, vision and values should all continuously be a, an evolving document where a lot of times people just create one and it kind of stays static for years and years. I, I, I envision it being one that has small changes on an ongoing basis based upon, you know, what we kind of capture is part of our community, school community, and also what we aspire to. So we will have some revisions by end of the year.
SPEAKER_UNKNOWN: Thank you.
Prisnell. Thanks for the presentation, Dr. Patello. Just an observation.
The, the update was helpful.
I think that when you presented your goals initially, I think you were presenting them as smart goals, right?
And so you had actually a lot more timelines and dates within your goals.
And so I just want to make sure that when you sort of come back to what's ultimately you're speaking to, also providing guidance on whether or not you hit your goals within the timelines and, and speaking to the why not in that presentation.
So I've realized that wasn't part of this and, you know, necessarily giving you an update.
I just want to make sure that's not lost because I was appreciative of being a smart goals direction with your initial presentation.
I just don't want that to get lost when you do the final, if that makes sense.
Yep. That makes sense.
Veronica. Yeah. Yeah. Thanks, Avi. Thanks, Dr. Patello.
I'm just in reference to the elementary master plan committee composition.
I think before, as you say, by your's end, you're hopeful to have that committee at least composed.
Could I ask that, because I know there's a possibility that you're going to, that you're going to be asking for a pretty big commitment from that committee in terms of the kinds of things they're going to review, just to be given some sense as a school committee member of your projected kind of work flow for that committee, just kind of what you're anticipating is going to be worked on and maybe, you know, some dates and along the timeline, if you're planning on working over the summer, right. Just to sort of get a sense from the standpoint of our cycle of communicating with other town committees, like how that's going to work. And I think it'll be helpful to depending on how far you've gotten in that process for the folks who are going to make that commitment to really clearly know what it is and to be able to anticipate what they're signing up for. Because I think you're going to be pulling from, you know, a bunch of different stakeholders.
So for me, it's such a big project and it's such a process for the town to have buy into.
If we're going to be projecting as we think we might, some kind of big project, it's going to hit a lot of town committees.
So I'm looking for, I think, just in this next, at the end of the cycle, wherever you are in that work, just to have clarity on your expectations from that committee.
That would be helpful for me. Yeah. And I can give you a little glimpse.
Part of it will be really reviewing the elementary master plan that currently exists in detail.
Probably visiting each of the schools, if people are not part of those schools, to do some tours.
Going over the statement of interest process and the MSBA process, for those who are not familiar with it.
Looking at some projects that have been done throughout the state through MSBA to learn about, you know, what has been done, especially with elementary school level there and looking to, you know, kind of, you know, kind of continue to vet our interest in presenting a statement of interest likely for next year while working with the town folks on that very closely.
The commitment will probably start with like kind of a once a month.
There'll probably be a meeting or two during the summer, but either at the very beginning or very end or both, you know, so that where people are more available.
And then there might be a time, say, in the, you know, November, early December time, where we might have either some longer meetings or a couple more frequent as we get to that kind of state statement of interest process part.
But I'll make clear that when I, when I seek out, seek out reps.
Thank you. And to have it as part of your presentation to us, that would be helpful. So I can wrap, we can wrap our heads around it. Yep. Thanks.
Thank you. All right.
Next up, we have the discussion items, review of superintendent procedures, manual presentation and feedback.
I'm going to table for the night, unless there's any objections to that.
And I'll throw it back to you, Dr. Tullo, for student, for the Student Opportunity Act.
Yeah. So the Student Opportunity Act is, it's basically an unfunded mandate from the state, but it really aligns to the work that we're doing.
So it's, it's not, it's not an issue with respect to that.
But it's something that by state law, every, we presented each year, but every three years right now, it needs to be voted on by the school committee.
So it was legislation that was passed.
It was supposed to come with additional funding, but it did for a little bit, but really has kind of not continued in that way. It's focused on addressing disparities in learning experiences and outcome for students groups that are least well served and using evidence-based practices.
So we're going to submit, submit a new three years SOA plan this April.
Okay.
Again, the funding really did not provide a strong infusion of additional funding.
We were hoping some districts it has, but not in Sharon.
And so with cutbacks in the increases in funding in the state for education, we really haven't seen that. Some of the key areas of the Student Opportunity Act, first of all, really targeted improvements for students with disabilities, low-income students, as well as English language learners.
And looking at data across multiple metrics, including absenteeism, grade nine passing rates, MCAS scores.
Those are various things that are looked at in this.
So our areas of focus and really impacting performance in those groups of kids, as well as kids at large, are the use of multi-tiered systems of support, which is really a research-based system that all districts are supposed to have in place.
And some are in process and some are really, you know, far along.
Also high-quality and engaging instructional materials.
And then there's also partnerships with students and families.
So when we look at these different areas, you know, so when we look at MTSS, we look at our elementary data collaboration meetings and win blocks. Our use of a data collection and warehouse tool called LinkIt so that we can analyze data in a more user-friendly way.
Professional development, including the development of our new committee and teacher-driven professional development opportunities aligned with district goals and delivered in a universal design for learning format. Using professional development through the district-wide allocation for reimbursements.
We have tons of teachers, you know, requesting reimbursements for courses this year. And pretty much all of them have been improved.
So we continue to encourage that.
New staff to work with our diverse population, including our growing EL population.
And in use of student surveys to both assess social, emotional, and mental health of our students, but as well as just a general sense of belonging.
So the second part is around inclusive curriculum adoption.
So we're completing a comprehensive K-12 ELA program review.
Where we're looking at our K-5 ELA materials in 6-12 courses.
Also secondary, 6-12, we're piloting multiple math programs and expected to implement new programs aligned with the updated frameworks.
You know, starting next year, we continue to implement curriculum units that are backward designed and use principles of universal design for learning.
And teachers are able to take courses in both all kinds of literacy approaches as well as unit development.
And then we look to continue to bolster our partnerships with families.
Whether it's translation services for monthly or lingual families as well as outreach, you know, serve for many of our new families.
PD opportunities around two-way communication.
Our special education pack, which Jessica Murphy works with, is a very strong one that we continue to work with.
We're also developing a new English language learner pack.
And continue to look for ways to engage families, including diverse families in Sharon.
So the action required by the school committee is that we present this outline in that the school committee votes to approve the plan.
It's a very kind of overarching plan that really aligns to our district plan.
So we're hopeful that if possible, we could approve it today.
But if not, definitely by the next meeting. But it's really kind of a more of a pro forma process.
All right. Anything from the table?
Next up then, we have...
Is it possible to either vote to approve it as part of the agenda or at least get a straw poll one or the other?
Would be great.
Let me start here with a straw poll as to how many people are comfortable voting this tonight.
Show of hands.
Or I see two people.
Adam, what about you or when?
Shawna?
Sorry, my video's not working.
I am not comfortable.
I would say our practice is generally to review in a meeting and vote the next. So unless there is kind of explicit urgency, I'd prefer to do it at the next meeting.
Okay.
Okay.
I mean, I think...
Dr. Patel just laid out...
His sense of urgency...
With a date.
And so he's just asking if we were comfortable voting it. It sounds to me like we've got two no... Not comfortable voting it.
Can I get a straw poll as to whether or not... Folks would feel comfortable...
Passing this if this was a meeting later than it is right now? When?
When?
Yeah. I mean, I am comfortable voting it. But in general, I feel like if there are members who are not comfortable voting on the committee, I generally defer to them.
Okay.
Veronica? Yeah.
Yeah.
I guess I agree that it's our practice to typically, you know, meet, hear it, and then vote it the next meeting.
I guess I'd be curious to just ask those that aren't comfortable if there are questions that, you know, that they had about it. Because it, you know, for me, the reason that I would be comfortable voting is because I didn't feel I did have any questions.
So I'd just be curious to hear from the members who are comfortable if there's anything but practice that's preventing them from voting.
Prisonell?
Yeah, I'm comfortable now. I'm comfortable voting. This is pretty difficult to me. Yeah, just for the purpose of straw poll, I'm with personnel and Veronica and Wendy.
I'm comfortable because although I understand the practice, I think that's, to be clear, I think that that's something of the past. In fact, I know sometimes we get criticized for voting things the same night we're presented.
But I think as a practice, I think this group has voted quite a few times for pretty straightforward things rather than drag it out.
But again, I also would win in that if there are folks uncomfortable, I'm also comfortable waiting.
I do hear a sense of urgency from Dr. Patello.
So that's the only reason I'm asking that question.
I would be sorry.
I mean, for me personally, if we're submitting something to DESE, I feel like I would like the opportunity to review it a bit further.
But that's me.
Okay.
Yeah, and I'll just give, I totally respect and understand that we usually do wait the next meeting.
And if people are really uncomfortable and fine with that, we will submit a little bit late.
The work that's done in the Student Opportunity Act is completely aligned to all the other work we presented throughout the year in an artistic plan. And it's not that specific.
So I can't see anything that we're doing within our application that's not aligned.
And any of the specifics can still be, you know, kind of discussed and given feedback on through, you know, through our school improvement plans as well as our district goals that occur each year.
But the general overview, which is what the Student Opportunity Act is, it really is completely aligned.
It doesn't have anything new or anything really specific that's different.
And so that's the one reason I was asking for it on short notice.
But your decision.
Understood.
For example. Just real quick, Dr. Botello, any, what are the negative implications of us not voting it today, if at all, if any?
We'll just, we'll submit it a few days late.
And there are no, were there any implications to that?
I, I can't imagine they're getting at reviewing them all on the day. We'll probably, I don't think we get any more than a slap on the wrist.
Thank you.
All right.
We will move on.
Next up.
We have the bullying prevention and intervention plan.
Overview of plan and a vote to approve the updated bullying prevention and intervention plan. And this one, you know, again, this one could definitely wait till next meeting.
But, you know, what I do want to give an overview of it. And you have the plan itself.
Substantively, it's really hasn't changed significantly from the last plan.
But there, there is an updated template on the department's website that they recommend that we use. It's just a little bit shorter, a little bit more user-friendly.
It's completely aligned to the laws and regulations.
Our council has reviewed it as well.
So it kind of infuses some of the changes that have happened since 2010, but in a more user-friendly, streamlined way.
Because in the past, we had been adding stuff as the state had been making changes.
But this, the state then, the department then put together a streamlined template that pretty much all districts are using.
And there are small tweaks that align to any policies that we have in the district.
But otherwise, it's all aligned to both state regulations at the department level and legal guidelines, whether they be state or federal.
We allowed for a two-week public comment.
So this has been shared over two weeks ago with the public. And we have taken in some of their comments and made adjustments.
The district council reviewed it as well.
And so we need to vote either tonight or in two weeks on this. Thank you.
SPEAKER_UNKNOWN: Thank you. SPEAKER_UNKNOWN: Thank you. SPEAKER_UNKNOWN: Thank you. SPEAKER_UNKNOWN: Thank you. SPEAKER_UNKNOWN: Thank you. SPEAKER_UNKNOWN: Thank you. SPEAKER_UNKNOWN: Thank you. SPEAKER_UNKNOWN: Thank you. SPEAKER_UNKNOWN: Thank you.
All right.
Are there any questions from folks?
Go ahead, Lynn.
Yeah.
So in the, I think it's like page four or five, that kind of lists the scenarios in which bullying may occur.
And there's sort of a section that says, you know, on school grounds or using school property. And there's also following a section below that says it may also may not occur on school related property or using school devices.
But if it creates a hospital environment.
So am I reading it correctly?
That's sort of a scenario in which like a bunch of students are on the same text chain using their own devices, but maybe involving loss of their friends or their classmates.
And something happens in that particular chain off school property, not using school devices, that that would still be subject to these, to the bullying policy. Is that right? Correct.
Correct. But in even situations say that a student is being bullied or harassed outside of school.
And it's to the extent that when the student comes into school, they're feeling such fear that they can't have a safe learning environment.
Actions that are gone, go on in school that have, where you can draw a parallel to the impact in school do fit under the bullying legislation.
And all of this stuff is that, that kind of stuff is non-negotiable.
This is like a kind of legal, legal terms that have been put forth by the state.
Right.
Okay. Thank you.
It's tricky with schools because we are involved with stuff, you know, that happens during the weekends and all that time. And, you know, we try to not overstep, but we also want to make sure that all kids can come into school feeling safe and ready to learn.
Makes sense.
Shauna.
Just a quick question.
The last, the last page has the incident reporting form.
Yep.
And it's as a Google form.
I'm sure that our council has looked at that, but are there any kind of security measures or security concerns that we might have with that being a Google doc and privacy?
I think most districts are using Google forms.
I will certainly be creating those in a way that have the, you know, that kind of make sure that only people who, you know, need to view those can do so. But, you know, the council has moved that and finds that acceptable as well as, again, counsel in many districts in the state. Okay. Thank you. Thank you. SPEAKER_UNKNOWN: Thank you. SPEAKER_UNKNOWN: Thank you. SPEAKER_UNKNOWN: Thank you. SPEAKER_UNKNOWN: Thank you.
Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you.
Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you.
Thank you.
that probably exists in a lot of schools.
Anecdotally, it exists in schools where people I know teach.
But I did feel like it was important to state that there's a lot of stuff in there that I imagine there are members of the public who we've heard from over the course of the last year, two years, who would be reading this policy and saying, what's the point of the policy if it's not enforced?
So it does clearly state that bullying can be student to student and also staff to student, outlines who that staff could include.
And then it lists a lot of behaviors that I think we've heard over time exist in our buildings, both student to student, at times staff to student.
And so, you know, again, I just in good conscience can't have this conversation without at least mentioning out loud for folks seeing it, who feel like they've experienced those things in our district, that if the policy is worthy of existing and required to exist, that we should always be mindful of whether or not it's being enforced.
And again, I don't say that.
I say that fully knowing that that's the goal. And I know that I know from personal conversation with you around these things, that's the goal.
I just feel like it has to be stated, that there's a lot in there that we could always do better. I think we do have kids in our district.
We hear from their parents who are uncomfortable in school, who are experiencing, you know, you read certain things in this policy, and it's like if kids are being ostracized, snickered at, that does rise to what we're defining as bullying.
And we know that to exist at recess in our buildings.
We know that to exist in cafeterias in our buildings.
We know that to exist at times in classrooms in our buildings.
And I just hope that we continue to move towards further enforcing even the most minute parts of this bullying policy.
Yeah, I think one good thing about, you know, rewriting the plan, even again, even if the content is fairly similar, but it's in a different format, is we can reintroduce it to the public, to kids, to staff, to parents.
I know when we first were charged with developing these bullying plans after incidents that happened in the state, it resulted in an initial uprise of reporting, which was good.
Now, some of that, we were able to kind of define, you know, what fits the category of bullying and what doesn't, and it still can be addressed, but differently.
So I think we'll have some of that as well.
So we can really emphasize the reporting of it. We can continue to emphasize the processes that our adults need to go through to go through the process.
We continue, you know, to consult with counsel as necessary to make sure that we're addressing this in accordance to the law as well.
And so I think this will, you know, this will give an opportunity to tighten up where we're not, as well as kind of, you know, raise it on the radar for folks who perhaps are not a reporting and should be.
I certainly, I know what this is like, both as a teacher, as a principal, as a parent.
And I know that situation sometimes, you know, either feel like they're bullying and they might not fit the definition or feel like they're not being addressed significantly enough.
So we'll certainly, we'll use this as an opportunity to heighten our awareness in our practice.
Yeah. And one thing that I did like very much about this policy, and I understand that these are slight updates and in some cases, stuff that already existed, but it feels like with this definition of bullying, everything that could possibly ostracize a child could fit into this definition.
I mean, again, right down to the most basic of like eye rolls.
And I like, I personally appreciate that because sometimes as adults, I think, and as educators, it's very obvious.
And so if the definition is too vague, I can imagine there are things that can't fit.
With reading through this, I was very much happy with the idea that just about any mistreatment of children in our buildings qualifies as bullying.
Yeah. If you have those things and they're repeated and there's a power dynamic, then they fit that category. Sometimes you have conflicts where the power dynamic doesn't exist.
So you might have mutual eye rolling or you might have, you know, not repeated things by a particular group.
So there are nuances, but certainly where it's repeated in power dynamic, even if it's kind of a more of a slight, that impact can be really great if it's repeated time and time again.
Yeah.
All right.
Are folks comfortable voting this? I would entertain a motion.
I move to approve the bullying policy as presented tonight.
Second.
All right. Julie.
I think actually Julie rejoined.
So she has to be unmuted.
I don't think she's a coast. Hi.
I'm really sorry.
I was doing like the carpool and I lost connection.
Didn't get back on until right now. So I'm just going to abstain.
Okay.
Veronica.
Yes.
When?
Yes.
Who's now?
Yes.
Adam. I'm going to abstain as well, just because I'd prefer to wait a week.
Even though it existed, even for the public for two weeks.
Shauna.
Yeah. We have a different audience though.
Yes. Sorry, Shauna. What was that?
Yes.
Okay.
And I am a yes. I think motion carries five.
Oh, two abstentions.
All right.
Let's see.
Just got to get back to my agenda here.
Okay.
Next up, we have FY25 budget, the status of the curriculum request, a possible vote to request one time additional funding from the finance committee.
Just a real quick explanation.
When we went and presented our budget to finance committee, Veronica, myself, along with Dr. Patel and Ellen in a support role, there was some conversation around what administration had presented at the beginning of the budget cycle to this committee.
Um, there was an understanding, um, both at a town level and then by our administration, because of the understanding of the town level, that there would be a relatively smooth path forward to fund curriculum by returning the essentially leftover amounts of the, uh, of multiple capital requests that had been funded.
And then essentially a new capital request for the curriculum.
Keeping a long story short, finance committee had different feelings about that. Some concerns at the table. They, some members suggested we go to capital outlay with that plan directly.
There was going to be a capital outlay meeting.
So let's board, uh, weighed in from their table on a disagreement with that policy, both the precedent being set to reopen capital outlay after it had already been closed, but also, um, the, what was viewed as a, is a somewhat precarious situation of asking for a curriculum to be funded through capital mainly because it, again, is just, it opens up a possibility that there would be a discussion at capital where capital outlay members would weigh in on what curriculum administration was looking to buy when that's really the purview of the school committee.
And so we are now back at, uh, this table asking this committee to vote, to bring the, our budget essentially amend our ask of finance committee to ask them to approve an additional allocation to our three point or 3.1, two, two, seven budget, the budget that we currently have, which meets the allocation with an increase of 3.1, two, two, seven amend that to include an additional allocation of $365,000 to fund the curriculum by, by the district.
And so, um, Peter and I, Dr. Botello, I apologize. And I met with Krishan and Fred, they walked us through the finances of that.
Krishan was very comfortable telling us, as he said, he's comfortable stating in public that this is a tax neutral request.
And so there is the understanding by us and town administration understands our ask that we would be asking that that be funded, uh, the funding source to be determined by the town at the town level. This would all obviously still need to be voted a town meeting. It's understood that it's possible.
It can be from free cash. It could be, uh, the revenue source would be figured out, but essentially what we would be asking for is a one time.
Additional allocation of $365,000 to the budget that we all worked very hard to get to.
And so I'm asking this committee to make, to vote, to do that.
So that on Monday, when our budget is presented and voted on, represented and voted on a finance committee, we have the formal ask having been made and voted on. Does anybody have any questions about that?
Any clarifications?
Shauna?
So, so I watched FinCom and I guess my concern with this ask now, like now coming back to us is if we are asking FinCom for this additional funding, I don't feel comfortable that it's going towards curriculum.
I feel like it has to go back to where our priorities are and where we had made difficult decisions and what we chose to cut.
So I have a hard time asking for an additional $350,000 when we have two assistant principals that we are cutting potentially.
Um, that, that's kind of my point here.
Okay.
So Shauna, this is one of those times where I'm going to remind you, we all have been voted.
We have authorities here. We don't just have soap boxes.
If you are, I need to clarify. I need to understand what you said. You have to sort of, are you suggesting that you're in?
No, I'm asking for a $350,000 allocation, $365,000 allocation toward, to cover the curriculum by, or are you suggesting that you would like us to ask for an additional $350,000 to fund those two positions that you just mentioned?
Like, are you suggesting we don't ask for the money? Are you suggesting that we ask for money from additional appropriation to cover two positions?
If we're going to ask for that money, I don't feel comfortable appropriating it to something that wasn't on our top priority list.
That's where I stand.
So here's where I was going to hop up and explain budgeting over again.
If we ask for a one time, Shauna, hold on. If we ask for a one time allocation, okay, that's what we would be asking for, a one time allocation.
We cannot ask for a one time allocation to cover salaries that would then exist the following year.
Now, do you still feel the same way?
I, I understand that, but I think it, what you do understand that we're talking about a one time allocation.
Yeah.
I do understand.
So Shauna, the link is position here that we should ask for a one time allocation, $350,000 in free cash to fund, two administrative positions.
No, I want to bring it back to the committee and look at our priorities and make sure that we're in line.
So we're at the committee.
We have brought it back to the committee.
Sorry.
SPEAKER_UNKNOWN: Sorry.
It's not unmuting.
Yes.
I feel as though we need to, I feel as though we need to go back to where we were looking at other cuts to be made as a committee.
Right.
Right. But again, we just, we're not members of the public, just waxing philosophical here.
Here's we're in the moment now, Shauna. So I need you to either, I need, I need to understand, are you asking that we ask for an additional appropriation to cover the two positions you just said you would prioritize?
Or are you saying you don't want to ask for the additional funds?
It's really one of those two, unless I'm misunderstanding you.
It's asking for the appropriation of funds to cover the loss of the two positions.
Okay.
Julie. Hi, hi, Avi. Thank you.
I think, so I hear what Shauna is saying, and I think the, the, the thing that changes it is that the free cash is supposed to be used as a one-time thing.
It's not supposed to be used for salaries.
So if it's, if I, I totally see about like, if we got more money from the state, for example, applying that, I think that would be a different story, but this is a specific request for a specific one-time purchase.
And I, I forgive me if I'm wrong, but that's, that's my understanding of it. Number one. And number two, I think this is actually an extremely urgent need.
I think that our, you know, generally the, the literacy curriculum that we're using right now, as we've discussed over the past two years is, is really not good.
It's causing more trouble.
It's, it's kids are not reading.
They, they need to go to special schools for reading.
It's, you know, they're, they're catching up later than they should with our reading specialists.
And a lot of this ties back to the poor quality curriculum that we have. So I think it's imperative for us to look into the high quality reading curriculum.
There's a lot on the board of education website that outlines what is a high quality elementary literacy curriculum.
And I think that this is, this is something, you know, if the kids can't read in school, I don't know what we're doing here.
The other request is for a math curriculum.
And right now the math curriculum that our ninth graders are using is, was last updated in 2014.
It is not up to current standards.
And there are textbooks that are completely outdated.
And there are not even enough for every single student to have one in case they would like to, you know, use it as a reference or otherwise practice problems or anything.
So not even all students have this curriculum.
I know that three new textbooks are being piloted by the math coordinator.
Um, I think we should be supportive of this effort because I think, you know, again, if the kids cannot, are not doing math properly, then reading and math are what we're here for. And if, you know, everything else doesn't matter if, if, if we're not excelling on those two points. So, um, going back to this being one, one time ask, I think it's really important.
Um, it's, it's about time that the, you know, someone in some, some school committee, I'd love it to be this school committee would, would address this problem.
So that's, that's kind of how I view it. Thank you.
Adam.
Thanks, Javi. I think I would just, I guess, Shauna, to, to your point, I don't think this came up for discussion because it was, taken as a given.
Um, and I think we, we had understood that this was able to, to be incorporated kind of through a different kind of pot of money, so to speak.
Um, but I feel like throughout the entire budgeting process, we had discussed and, and taken this for granted, both in terms of the presence of the new curriculum, as well as the positions that we discussed maintaining for the, the purposes or not quite for the purposes, but like, you know, because they were the ones who were going to be able to help implement these new curriculum.
So, um, I guess from my perspective, it makes sense from a, a one-time, uh, expenditure, whether it's through one pot of money or the other.
Um, and so I'm supportive.
Prisno?
Yeah, I'll keep it simple. I'm supportive.
Thanks.
Shauna? I guess it's going back on my point is for, for me in this instant.
Yes.
Adam, I like completely agree with you. Like I was under the assumption that this was coming out of a different pot of money, but now we're here and it, it doesn't feel right to me in this moment where we have to vote on this one-time use without going back into the budget and seeing where else we could manipulate things.
if we're being asked to vote on this appropriation of funds, where we had to, in our budget, make different cuts, where we could be asking for one-time funding in something else and possibly bringing curriculum back.
That that's kind of just where I'm at.
I want to say the motion.
Motion to approve the request. Second.
Second.
Veronica.
Yes.
Julie.
Yes.
Adam.
Yes.
Fresnel.
Yes.
Wendy.
Yes.
Donna.
SPEAKER_UNKNOWN: Yes. SPEAKER_UNKNOWN: Yes.
SPEAKER_UNKNOWN: Yes.
SPEAKER_UNKNOWN: Yes.
SPEAKER_UNKNOWN: No. Well, I'm going to yes.
I think we lost Shauna.
Okay.
But with only six members here, at the moment, passes six-nothing.
Oh, hold on. Shauna's coming back.
She was here when the vote started.
I'd like to be able to get a vote.
Shauna?
I think we lost her again.
Okay.
All right. Motion carries six-oh.
Next up, I have some decision items. I need a motion to approve minutes of March 4th, 2024.
So moved.
Moved.
Second. Adam.
Adam.
Yes.
Shauna.
I'm sorry.
Julie.
Yes.
Gwen.
Yes.
Veronica.
Yes.
Grisnell.
Yes.
Naomi, yes. Motion carries six-oh.
Need a motion to approve the minutes of March 6th, 2024.
So moved.
So moved. Second.
Second.
Adam.
Yes.
Gwen.
Yes.
Now.
Yes.
Veronica.
Yes. Julie.
Julie. Yes.
Donna.
Sorry, what are we voting on?
Sorry.
It's a motion to approve the minutes of March 6th, 2024.
Yes.
Yes.
Motion carries seven-oh.
I need a motion to approve the out-of-state field trip to Italy, April vacation 2025. Grade 10 through 12, Latin students.
So moved.
Second.
Gwen.
Sorry.
Yes. Yes.
Adam.
Yes.
Grisnell.
Yes.
Julie.
Si, signore.
Veronica.
Yes.
And thank you to our chaperones who will take our children across the world.
Thank you so much for doing it. SPEAKER_UNKNOWN: Yes. Shauna.
Yes.
And I'm a yes. Motion carries seven-oh.
I need a motion to approve out-of-state field trip to Paris, April vacation 2025.
Grades 10, 11, and 12 students.
So moved.
Second.
Gwen.
Yes.
Adam.
Yes.
Fresnel.
Yes.
Veronica. Yes.
And same as I said before, thank you very much.
Julie.
Ooh la la.
Oui.
Shauna.
Yes.
Only if I can chaperone.
And I'm a yes. Motion carries seven-oh.
I need a motion to approve out-of-state field trip to Quebec, January 17th to January 20th, 2025.
Grades 12, SHS French students.
So moved.
Second. Second.
When.
When.
Yes.
Madam.
Yes.
Yes. Yes.
Veronica.
Thank you all. Yes.
Julie.
Yes. Fiencia.
Shauna.
Yes.
I mean, yes. Motion carries seven-oh.
Do we have any announcements.
Can I ask a question?
Did I, I missed the vote?
Yeah.
Passed six-oh.
You came back on. I tried to take the vote. You tried to take your vote, but it passed six-oh.
Okay, cool.
You don't need my vote.
You don't need my vote.
No. Okay. All right.
All right.
All right.
All right. No, seeing no announcements.
I will move us into executive session.
In pursuant to MGLC30AS21A3 to discuss strategy with respect to collective bargaining or litigation with the STA. In pursuant to MGLC30AS21A722FG to review and approve and consider declassification of executive session meeting minutes.
If an open meeting may have a detrimental effect on the bargaining or litigation position of the Sharon School Committee, and the chair still declares not to return to open session.
Can I get a motion?
Second.
Second.
Second.
Yes.
Wayne.
Yes.
Adam.
Yes.
Veronica.
Yes.
Julie.
Yes.
Donna.
Yes.
And I will say yes.
Motion carries 7-0. I'll see you in exec.