School Committee - May 08, 2024
School Committee,5/8/24 - Meeting Summary
Date: 5/8/2024
Type: School Committee
Generated: September 13, 2025 at 06:32 PM
AI Model: Perplexity
- Meeting Metadata
- Date & time: May 8, 2024, evening (exact time not stated)
- Location / format: Remote meeting conducted via Zoom; broadcast live and recorded by Sharon TV
- Attendees (by role):
- Chair: Avi Shemtov
- Vice Chair: Dan Newman
- Secretary: Allan Motenko (acting secretary for this meeting mentioned)
- Members: Julie Rowe, Jeremy Kay, Georgeann Lewis, Adam Shain, Dan Newman
- Absences: Prisnell Dominique (not present; had a work commitment)
- Student representative: None present
- Agenda Overview (One-line bullets)
- Public records request clarification
- Discussion on public gifts policy (Policy KCD)
- Superintendent updates including athletics staffing and senior events
- Special education and student services presentation and discussion
- FY24 Q3 Financial report and budget transfers approval
- Proposal to dedicate outdoor athletic facility to Gary W. Hall
- School year 2024-2025 calendar discussion and vote
- Recognition and committee member acknowledgments
- Executive session for collective bargaining strategy with STA
- Major Discussions
Topic: Public Records Request on School Assistants Contract
- Trigger: Public comment by Judy Crosby regarding a request for the contract document between the school committee and school assistants announced on April 24, 2024
- Key points: Crosby expressed concern about the lack of a physical contract despite public announcement and requested broad search for any related documents; implied skepticism of verbal-only agreement for such a large-budget district.
- Member Contributions & Stances: No direct committee member responses recorded on this topic during the transcript.
- Areas of Agreement/Disagreement: Not recorded
- Outcome: Not stated; no direct committee comment or motion recorded.
Topic: Public Gifts Policy (Policy KCD)
- Trigger: Policy review and proposed updates presented by Adam Shain, policy subcommittee chair
- Key Points Debated:
- Comparison between current Sharon policy and Massachusetts Association of School Committees (MASC) model policy
- Discussion about whether donors can attach conditions or designate specific uses for gifts (concerns about conditional gifts and legal complexity)
- Debate over language softness vs. clarity regarding district’s discretion in use of gifts
- Threshold of $500 for School Committee approval of gifts maintained
- Policy to formally specify gifts kept in a separate account as current practice
- Consideration of impact on donor willingness to give if language perceived as restrictive
- Agreement on excluding conditional gifts legally binding donors’ intent
- Member Contributions & Stances:
- Avi Shemtov: Supported alignment with MASC language; advocated clarity and avoiding inviting conditional gifts
- Adam Shain: Explained subcommittee work and rationale for softened language; openness to MASC alignment with addition of separate fund language
- Veronica (Vice Chair): Initially pushed for softer language to not deter donors; later willing to support MASC language upon reassurance
- Shauna, Julie, Georgeann Lewis, Dan Newman: Expressed caution about language inviting conditional gift expectations; emphasized clarity and consistency with MASC policy for legal safety
- Other members: Raised questions on logistics, donor intent, and prior practice (Julie relating experience with prior donations)
- Areas of Agreement/Disagreement:
- Agreement: Need to avoid legally binding conditional gifts; acceptance that funds become district property; formalize separate fund practice
- Disagreement: Extent of softened language to allow donor intent expression without creating expectations; whether committee should explicitly request gift direction
- Outcome / Next steps: Agreement to align with MASC policy language incorporating separate fund language; voting deferred temporarily to display exact policy language; plan to revisit or vote possibly in same meeting after showing text
- Vote: Not recorded during transcript; motion considered for tabling or amendment; later agenda proceeded without final vote on policy.
Topic: Superintendent’s Updates
- Trigger: Superintendent Dr. Botello’s report
- Key points:
- Recognition of Teacher Appreciation Week and the dedication of staff
- Senior year events scheduled from May 23 through June 2 including class night, senior trip, prom, graduation
- Positive feedback on 8th grade civic showcase projects
- Presentation by SHS student Ashita Jaswal on Project ADAPT to aid 5th graders transitioning to middle school, with plans to distribute booklet via QR code
- Updates on Athletics director/assistant principal combined position posting and search process
- Football coach posting and search process including outreach to team and parents for input
- Heights Elementary principal hiring with screening and recommendations process aiming for announcement by Memorial Day week
- Member Contributions & Stances:
- Shauna praised Ashita’s presentation and utility for transitions to high school
- Other members had no recorded direct comments at this point
- Outcome: Updates noted; no motions or votes recorded.
Topic: Special Education and Student Services Update
- Trigger: Presentation by Student Services Director Jessica Murphy
- Key points:
- Rising trend in special education referrals and IEPs post-pandemic causing service challenges
- Increases in students unable to attend school due to social/emotional reasons across all levels, especially middle and high school
- Difficulties in staffing special ed and overall educational staffing statewide and nationally
- Detailed analysis of student disability categories and programs offered from early childhood through high school and post-secondary
- Instruction and staffing impacts including adding classes and personnel at ECC and elsewhere
- Mental health needs continue to grow; discussion of ESSER grant-funded positions ending and budget considerations for counselor staffing
- Positive collaboration with Sharon CPAC and upcoming events/training on revised IEP forms
- Brief discussion on MTSS framework progress mostly at elementary level; challenges at middle and high school discussed
- Member Contributions & Stances:
- Julie: Focused questions on MTSS status and plans; encouraged further detail
- Veronica: Asked about absenteeism by age and strategies addressing it
- Shauna: Follow-up on level-based referral data and clarification on whether 504 plans and D-caps trends align with IEP trends
- Dan Newman: No recorded contribution on this topic
- Areas of Agreement/Disagreement: None recorded
- Outcome: Presentation and Q&A completed; information accepted.
Topic: FY24 Q3 Financial Report and Budget Transfers
- Trigger: Presentation by Finance Director Ellen reviewing quarter 3 financials July 1, 2023 to March 30, 2024, followed by vote on budget transfers
- Key points:
- Budget of $52.4M, expenditures $33M, encumbrances $18.3M, unencumbered balance $1M (typical for this time of year)
- Explanation of budget transfers mostly driven by staffing changes, leaves, professional staff departures, supply line shifts
- Transfers mostly routine and necessary for operations
- Member Contributions & Stances:
- Veronica asked clarifying questions on unencumbered balance typicality and drivers of budget movements
- Other members had no recorded significant comments
- Areas of Agreement/Disagreement: None
- Outcome: Motion to approve budget transfers passed 6-0.
Topic: Proposal to Dedicate Sharon High School Outdoor Athletic Facility in Honor of Gary W. Hall
- Trigger: Proposal presentation and public comment period
- Key points:
- Community and veterans expressed strong support citing Hall’s contributions and impact on students and community
- Suggestion that related documentation be placed in SHS library as a resource
- Member Contributions & Stances:
- Committee members unanimously supported honoring Mr. Hall
- Outcome: Motion to approve dedication passed 6-0.
Topic: School Year 2024-2025 Calendar Discussion and Vote
- Trigger: Superintendent Dr. Botello’s recommendation based on prior discussion and stakeholder input including changes to holidays observed and early release days
- Key points debated:
- Added days off for Rosh Hashanah Day 1 and Good Friday
- Adjustment of early release days around election year and observances of Diwali, Lunar New Year, Eid
- Last day recommended as June 20 (full school day); discussion about desirability of making last day a half-day for community atmosphere and parent considerations given Juneteenth day off
- Concerns that snow days may affect last day of school, complicating scheduling of half-day
- Broader discussion on benefits of a federal holiday calendar was raised by Gwen advocating for inclusivity and long-term vision
- Member Contributions & Stances:
- Avi Shemtov: Supported making last day a half day; acknowledged tradition and openness to change
- Veronica: Appreciated compromise; raised question about final full day on June 20 and possible half-day adjustment
- Gwen: Supported federal holiday calendar; emphasized inclusion, pragmatism, and citing other districts’ experience
- Adam: Concerned about schedule implications if snow days occur; prefers flexibility rather than fixed last-day half day
- Others: Supported amended motion
- Outcome / Next steps: Motion passed 4-2 to approve calendar as proposed by Superintendent with amendment to make the last day of school a half-day (regardless of exact date).
Topic: Committee Member Acknowledgments and Announcements
- Trigger: Closing announcements
- Key points:
- Teacher Appreciation Week recognized by Julie and Veronica, thanking PTOs and teachers
- Sports achievements noted
- Veronica thanked outgoing members Wencia Oteano and Prisnell Dominique for their service, praised contributions and personal support
- Avi expressed personal gratitude to Wencia and Prisnell; recognized their positive impact on committee and district
- Member Contributions & Stances: All members thanked and joined acknowledgments
- Outcome: Informal; expressions of thanks and well wishes
Topic: Executive Session for Collective Bargaining Strategy with Sharon Teachers Association (STA)
- Trigger: Move to executive session to discuss labor negotiations
- Outcome: Motion to enter executive session passed unanimously 6-0; meeting adjourned to executive session with no return to open session.
- Votes (Substantive items only)
Motion: Approve FY24 Q3 budget transfers
Result: Passed 6-0
Roll-call:
- Avi — Yes
- Alan — Not stated in transcript (not present)
- Julie — Yes
- Jeremy — Not stated in transcript (no contribution)
- Georgeann — Not stated in transcript (no contribution)
- Adam — Yes
- Dan — Not stated in transcript (no contribution)
Motion: Approve dedication of SHS football outdoor athletic facility in honor of Gary W. Hall
Result: Passed 6-0
Roll-call:
- Avi — Yes
- Alan — Not stated in transcript
- Julie — Yes
- Jeremy — Not stated
- Georgeann — Yes
- Adam — Yes
- Dan — Not stated
Motion: Approve 2024-2025 school year calendar as recommended, with last day of school as half-day
Result: Passed 4-2
Roll-call:
- Avi — Yes
- Alan — Not stated
- Julie — Yes
- Jeremy — Not stated
- Georgeann — No
- Adam — Yes
- Dan — No
Motion: Approve minutes of April 24, 2024
Result: Passed 6-0
Roll-call consistent with quorum
Motion: Approve out-of-state overnight field trip to Puerto Rico, January 2025
Result: Passed 6-0
Roll-call consistent with quorum
Motion: Enter executive session pursuant to MGL C30A S21 A3 for collective bargaining strategy with STA
Result: Passed 6-0
Roll-call consistent with quorum
(No formal vote recorded on policy KCD this meeting.)
- Presentations Without Discussion (Brief)
- Student Ashita Jaswal presented Project ADAPT, a resource booklet to assist fifth graders transitioning to middle school with skills and stress management strategies.
- Jessica Murphy, Student Services Director, presented detailed update on special education trends, programs, staffing, and challenges post-pandemic.
- Action Items & Follow-Ups
- Policy subcommittee to provide a finalized draft of Policy KCD incorporating MASC language with separate fund language for future review/vote.
- Dr. Botello and team to distribute and promote Ashita Jaswal’s Project ADAPT booklet via QR codes and community channels.
- Open Questions / Items Deferred
- Final vote on updated public gifts policy (Policy KCD) deferred pending review of exact draft language.
- Appendices (Optional)
-
Acronyms used:
- IEP: Individualized Education Program
- MTSS: Multi-Tiered System of Supports
- ECC: Early Childhood Center
- DLP: Developmental Learning Program
- ESSER: Elementary and Secondary School Emergency Relief (grant funding)
- CPAC: Community Parent Advisory Council
- MCAS: Massachusetts Comprehensive Assessment System
- STA: Sharon Teachers Association
-
Referenced documents:
- FY24 Q3 financial report
- Gift Policy KCD (including MASC model policy)
- Project ADAPT booklet (not included but presented)
Document Metadata
- Original Transcript Length: 95,515 characters
- Summary Word Count: 1,945 words
- Compression Ratio: 7.0:1
- Transcript File:
School-Committee_5-8-2024_814489c5.wav
Transcript and Video
It is 7-0-1.
All right, welcome to the May 8th, 2024 meeting of the Sharon School Committee.
This meeting will be conducted remotely over Zoom. Attendance by board members will be remote, and remote attendance shall count towards a quorum.
The meeting will be broadcast live and recorded by Sharon TV. If you would like to enable your webcam, your image, and background, maybe broadcast with or without sound.
As always, our first item is public comments.
We will allow two minutes per speaker.
Is there anybody on the committee willing to keep time?
I will.
Okay, thank you, Veronica.
All right, without further ado, I see Judy Crosby's hand.
Thank you. On April 24th, at the end of the meeting, I filed a public records request.
It said, please consider this a records request for a copy of the newly approved contract between the school committee and the school assistants announced in the meeting tonight, April 24th, 2024. At the top of the 830 portion of the meeting, there was a very proud announcement by the chair and by Jeff Mahoney about the wonderful work to get this contract done.
Today, I received a response to my records request telling me there is no such document.
So here's my new records request.
You've all received it. Please consider this an updated public records request for the following.
To be clear.
To be clear.
The name assigned to the document is irrelevant to this request, as is whether the document discusses only one aspect of such employment or is intended to be a comprehensive employment agreement.
For further clarity, this request is to be read in the broadest possible terms and may include but is not limited to writings on napkins, post-it notes, toilet paper, text messages, instant messages, writings made with lipstick, blood, ink, pencil, chalk, an old-fashioned typewriter, and any other substance one can ever imagine to commit a thought to any surface, including caves. For the record, the public records law requires that a request be read broadly and that if and to the extent you have the document, you turn it over.
So do you actually expect this community to believe that you announced an agreement with one of your unions and you only have a verbal agreement for a district that has a $54 million budget?
Or are you just that afraid to let people see what you agreed to?
So I'm looking forward to receiving a response to this request.
I know there are written documents in effect that cover some or all. That's your two minutes, Crosby.
Thank you. Very much. Dan Newman.
Hi, everyone.
I see the policy on public gifts is on the agenda.
It's wonderful whenever people give gifts to our school.
Thank you to everyone who's donated to our district. Really, I love whenever I see that on the agenda.
I think all you do, too.
As I understand it, the policy discussion would be about whether to allow people to attach conditions to their gifts to our school.
Like specifying, I want this money to go to a new playground, for example.
I could see why that might be attractive.
Maybe it will incentivize people to give more gifts to the district.
That would be great.
A word of caution, though. When you allow that, you're allowing what are called conditional gifts. If you crack open a contract's textbook, half the court cases in it are about conditional gifts.
Conditional gifts are lawsuit factories.
You can imagine why.
A conditional gift reverts back to the giver. If you don't meet all the conditions, they might disagree about how you met the conditions.
Maybe you built it with the wrong materials of its playground. Maybe something changed and you can't do the project anymore.
This happens all the time with conditional gifts, which is why most districts prohibit them.
It's why we've always prohibited them. People get angry and they want their money back, right?
So even just talking about an intended purpose for a gift can push you into that conditional gift territory.
Whatever policy you adopt, please just be wary of creating conditional gifts. It's much cleaner if everybody just gives a gift without conditions to our schools. And we don't want to be in complex with our donors who are so generous with their money.
Thank you.
Thank you, everybody, who's given gifts to our district in the past.
Thank you for your time.
Seeing no further hands, I'll throw it to our secretary for correspondence.
I'm going to do that tonight for Julie.
Thank you. The school committee has received 31 pieces of correspondence between April 24th, 2024 at 9 a.m.
and May 7th, 2024 at 4 p.m.
We received many letters from parents and community members who expressed their concerns regarding the decision to combine the positions of Sharon Public Schools Athletic Director and Sharon High School Assistant Principal.
A parent wrote to volunteer to participate in the search for a new high school football coach. Several community members wrote to express their support for the Sharon Outdoor Athletic Facility naming recognition to honor Gary Hall.
The committee also received a copy of the PowerPoint presentation to support this proposal.
A parent wrote to express their concerns regarding the fees for full-day kindergarten and for the structure of the half-day kindergarten program.
The school committee received a reference request for a company that worked on a Sharon Public Schools project. A parent wrote to inquire why the district celebrates Pride Month in the schools.
We received a letter that noted the current 24-25 school year calendar includes both December 23rd and 24th as days off and that neither of those dates are federal holidays.
A parent wrote to inquire about the educational cooperative membership that was discussed at a previous meeting. In particular, this parent wanted more information on the cost savings that could be realized from this membership.
METCO provided several updates via their regular newsletters, which continue to highlight the grant, professional development, and student achievements of the METCO program.
A community member wrote to inquire about access to the environmental studies that were completed during the Sharon High School Building Project. And finally, we received the monthly newsletter of the Sharon High School Library.
Thank you.
Thanks, Veronica.
Do we have an update from a student representative?
If so, please raise your hand.
All right.
Seeing none, I will turn it over to Superintendent Dr. Botello for his update.
Great.
Let me share my screen.
Let's see. SPEAKER_UNKNOWN: Okay.
Okay.
First of all, we want to, you know, recognize Teacher Appreciation Week.
We have an extraordinary group of teachers in Sharon, and we thank them deeply for their dedication, skill, care, and service to the students and families of Sharon. And they're just an incredibly special group. I got to work with our PD committee today, and they're just so devoted to learning and service to students and just very, very proud of our teachers.
And we want to, you know, we want to, you know, give them words of thanks and, you know, thank them in any way we can.
As we mentioned last meeting, their end-year activities and field trips and events are in full swing. So, please, you know, check your individual school newsletters to stay informed. As far as our seniors, we have numerous events.
We have the, on May 23rd class night, May 24th, last day of classes on the 28th, senior class trip to Boston, prom on the 29th, field day, yearbook distribution and senior recognition night on the 30th, graduation rehearsal, and senior sunset barbecue, graciously sponsored by IPTSO on Friday the 31st, and then graduation on June 2nd. So, it's right around the corner. So, continue to support our seniors going down the homestretch.
I had the pleasure last Friday of going downstairs in the cafeteria, in the library, in the gym, as students in eighth grade presented their civic showcases.
They did really in-depth projects about numerous issues, both school-related and world-related, whether they be environmental or around social-emotional needs or various things.
It was just a great opportunity for kids to showcase their really live action work. Every group of kids that I spoke to could really speak in-depth about their project, about what they learned, and about how they wanted to help their community going forward.
In addition, I had the opportunity to meet with Ashita Jaswal, grade 11, who, on her own, is doing a civics project called Project ADAPT.
So, this is not part of our school curriculum, but it's something that really benefits our kids. And I'm going to turn it over to her right now and allow her to share her screen so she can share a little bit about her project.
But I had the opportunity to meet with her, and she, as you will see, she has done some very impressive, thoughtful work. So, Ashita, if you're able, you can share your screen and introduce yourself.
Okay, great. Thank you so much.
Hi, everyone.
My name is Ashita Jaswal.
I'm a junior at Sharon High School.
And I'm doing a project, which is to help middle school students, well, fifth graders transition to middle school.
And I helped a lot of fifth graders this year, but I also wanted to help students in other communities and students in the coming years.
So, I put everything that I did in my project in this booklet, which I wanted to share to the community.
So, I'll share that with you guys now.
Dr. Patel, I think your screen is still being shared.
Oh, let me stop sharing. Thank you.
There we go. Okay.
Okay.
Okay.
Okay, so this is my booklet for fifth graders.
This is just some background about where I got this information, which was through research and events that I did this year, as well as professionals that I've talked to.
So, I basically just put in some of the skills that students need to have in middle school.
And I gave some resources for them in this booklet.
So, I talked about how checklists and timetables can be really helpful for kids.
And I explained here why they're helpful and how it can help the students make their lives easier.
And then I also talked about meditation and stress management.
And I explained it here how students can do it.
And as well as like deep breathing.
And yoga and yoga and yoga nidra.
And so, that was just some examples and some resources that students can use.
And then this was also another skill was to maintain happiness.
And this can be done through exercise and development of hobbies.
So, I gave some hobbies over here and I explained on the bottom why these are helpful for students.
And then also a big problem in middle school is the bullying.
And so, I gave some tips to both the parents as well as the students on how they can help themselves with this challenge in middle school.
And so, here were also some frequently asked questions.
And basically, what I wanted from the community was to ask if you guys could, you know, spread awareness of this booklet.
I find it to be very helpful for kids.
And I had gotten a lot of feedback from fifth graders that I worked with this year.
And they said that this project and the skills that they developed made them feel more comfortable with the transition.
And so, if the community can help spread awareness of this booklet and share it to your friends, I will be creating a QR code and posting it around different websites in the community.
I feel like it would be very helpful for everyone.
Thank you.
Thank you so much, Ishida.
Could you unshare your screen?
Yes. Sorry.
No, thank you so much. Well, so, Ishida is an awesome kid.
Thank you so much for presenting, but also just for your contributions with thinking about what I was speaking with. Ishida, she talked about, you know, she had experiences in middle school and she thought, what could kids use and parents use in order to navigate their experience more?
And then went out and did like 12 different sessions with kids and parents in order to help them. So, Ishida is going to make a little pamphlet with a QR code.
We'll send it out in the dispatch, but we'll also ask people to promote her work as well.
Okay, so I'm going to jump back on. What's going on?
Okay.
Sorry. I see Shauna has her hand up.
Is that right, Dr. Tulloch?
Oh, yeah, sure.
I know you're looking for something. All right, go ahead, Shauna.
I just wanted to comment to say that that was an absolutely incredible presentation.
I can say as a high school teacher, I think that that would also benefit lots of kids transitioning to ninth grade from middle school.
So, phenomenal job and certainly a resource that many, many kids will benefit from.
Thank you for your hard work.
Thank you. Yeah, we learned so much from her, the work that she shared with me that we're looking to create some modules, you know, in the middle, you know, coming into middle school.
But also, yeah, it's a good idea coming into high school that reflects some of her work.
Okay, so next.
I just want to give some updates on athletics hiring.
So, the athletic director assistant principal position has been posted and a screening committee has been formed.
Initial interviews will begin next week while continuing to accept applications until the position is filled.
The position will need to strongly focus on the athletic director portion of the role in order to ensure that our athletic program is strongly managed and supported.
Yeah, I recognize and appreciate letters of concern regarding the joint position. Certainly, it is not something that we wanted to do, but considering our budget limitations, we needed to make some difficult decisions.
But we'll certainly make sure that our athletics, you know, have a strong leader who will also take on some logical assistant principal responsibilities as well. As far as the high school football coach, the position has been posted and the screening committee has just been formed.
Individuals were actually contacted today.
Interviews will begin after the first round of athletic director interviews, either late next week or early the week of May 20th. The high school administration had met with captains and select parents recently, but, you know, we heard that there was still a lot of parents who, you know, in kids who did not get word through that small meeting.
So, they met with the entire team today to discuss upcoming interview process as well as weight room access. And in that regard, all the waiver forms for well parents and students have been sent out to athletes as well.
As far as the Heights principal hiring process, the screening committee earlier this week met with seven candidates.
The committee is comprised of six teachers, an administrative assistant, assistant principal, special education administrator, and three parents from Heights.
It also has the East Elementary Principal Reynolds, Assistant Superintendent Wittemore, and school committee member Wenteano.
The committee has recommended three candidates for further consideration.
So, the next step, so the candidates will be invited to visit with myself and other members of our leadership team and other key stakeholders next week.
Concurrently, we've already informed them when we'll begin to do some reference checks to speak to people in their districts.
Following these meetings and discussions, my intention is to invite two or all three of the finalists to spend the day in district to visit Heights Elementary School and meet with staff, students, and families in the upcoming weeks.
There will be a mechanism when they do those visits, and those will likely happen the week of May 20th, where stakeholders can share their feedback so we can really, you know, go through that and understand what various stakeholders are thinking.
And the hope is to announce the name of a new principal by Memorial Day week. Thank you.
Thank you.
Thank you.
Thank you.
Thank you.
Thank you.
Thank you. Thank you.
entire year, whether it's for a semester, whether it's for a unit. So they'll have different options to kind of get exposed to the various programs so we can really learn about them firsthand.
We're hoping to have people in all three schools do some piloting of all three programs.
So not only are we doing it throughout the district, but actually within a school, we'll have that perspective.
We also plan to set up some visits to schools already using materials as part of our consideration.
So, you know, these programs, again, highly regarded both with Curate by the department as well as ed reports.
But those mechanisms are important to consider because they do some work. But as I've learned, there are some materials that have been, you know, recommended both by both of those groups that, you know, really have some significant weaknesses.
So we're not just relying just upon kind of a simplistic score by Curate or ed reports.
We're using those as, you know, one factor in our decision, but wanting to really, you know, go through the materials, use them, and evaluate them carefully to make sure that they are the best possible materials to complement our instructional approach to reach higher levels of literacy for all students.
And I think, yeah, that is it for my general updates.
All right, moving right along, still sticking with you here, Dr. Botello.
I think we're at the FY24 Q3 update.
Okay.
Yeah, I'm going to turn that over to Ellen to review that.
Okay, thank you. Can I share my screen?
So the third quarter financial report goes from July 1st, 2023, through March 30th of 2024.
The FY24 appropriated budget at the Springtown meeting of 2023 was $52,405,604.
The FY23 Q3 expended is $33,002,982.
We have encumbered year to date, July 1st, 2023 through March 30th, 2024.
We have an amount of $18,382,477 remaining, and an unencumbered balance of $1,020,145.
As I've cautioned in previous quarter updates, this is not a projected surplus.
These funds will be used to pay substitutes, van drivers, and additional expenses related to district operations that have not already been encumbered.
The general fund expenditure report includes spending through March 30th, 2024.
The year-to-date budget report is generated from our accounting system, Munis. The original appropriation is the approved budget that school committee had voted.
Transfers include any transfers made.
The revised budget is some of the original appropriation and the transfers that have taken place.
The year-to-date expended is actual expenditures posted in Munis, our financial system, through March 30th, 2024.
The encumbrances are actual encumbrances posted in the financial system as of March 30th, 2024. The available budget, again, is the total remaining funds at the time the reports were generated.
And again, the unencumbered balance does not mean that this is a projected surplus.
So when we look at the report by location, cottage has a revised budget of $5,468,726.
Expended year-to-date is $3,327,057, with $2,106,242 encumbered, with a remaining balance of $35,426.
District-wide revised budget was $8,285,499.
We've expended fiscal year-to-date, $5,868,196.
Encumbrance remaining is $1,894,966, with a remaining balance of $522,337.
The revised budget for East Elementary is $5,831,339.
The year-to-date expended is $3,567,438.
We have an encumbrance remaining of $2,228,166, and a remaining balance of $35,735.
At Heights Elementary, the revised budget is $6,718,041.
Year-to-date expended, $4,167,929.
We have a remaining encumbrance amount of $2,478,484, with a remaining balance of $71,628.
At the high school, the revised budget is $14,519,046.
Year-to-date expended is $9,115,819.
The encumbrance remaining is $5,150,555, with a remaining balance of $252,672.
At the middle school, we have a revised budget of $10,550,507, a year-to-date expenditure of $6,345,131, an encumbrance of $4,103,029, and a remaining balance of $102,347.
Our early childhood center has a revised budget of $1,031,941.
Year-to-date expended is $611,192.
The remaining encumbrance is $420,748.
In the elementary district-wide revised budget, there was $505.
Expended was $219.
And there's an encumbrance remaining of $286.
The total revised budget matches our appropriation of $52,405,604.
Year-to-date expended, $33,002,982.
Our encumbrance remaining is $18,382,477.
And our remaining budget balance is $1,020,145.
The next pages in your packet include the detail by department.
Which brings us to the final totals.
For the original appropriation, the revised budget, the year-to-date expended, the encumbrance, and the available budget. As we move towards the close of the fiscal year, we are reviewing all open purchase orders and looking at all the line items in the budget on a weekly basis to ensure that we have all the purchase orders either closed or amended as needed, as well as ensuring that our current expenditures, excuse me, our current encumbrances will meet the projected expenditures for the end of the year.
Excellent.
Thank you.
Are there any questions from the table?
I see Veronica's hand is up. Go ahead, Veronica.
Thanks, Avi. Thank you, Ellen. And thanks, Dr. Botello.
Ellen, could you just explain how that million dollars that's unencumbered, that extra expenditures?
How typical is that for this time in the year? We've got about 90 days left, right, until you close the books on June 30th or July 1st, right? Is that typical, that number?
Is that how you look at that?
Thanks. That number is typical.
When I did the quarter two report, it was right around where I thought it would be and also doing a look back of where we were last year. So this is in line with where I had anticipated we would be this time of year, because as we look forward to the final quarter of the fiscal year, we have school all the way until halfway through June. This amount of money does, you know, is intended for, you know, salaries and payments to employees who are not encumbered.
And those would be our, the van drivers, the substitutes who are in our buildings every day, as well as additional expenditures that the district will need to make related to operations between now and June 30th.
Any other questions from the table? Yes.
All right.
I think the next item, yep, is budget transfers and then a vote to approve budget transfers.
So in your packet was also the transfers for quarter three?
Yep.
Did anybody see any transfers they have a question on?
An issue with?
Go ahead, Veronica. I didn't really have any questions, but I wonder, Ellen, would you mind sharing that page so the community could see the transfers just so that we have, they know what we're voting? Sure.
Thanks.
I think she's been helping. SPEAKER_UNKNOWN: I think she's been awake the whole time.
SPEAKER_UNKNOWN: Oh, gosh.
Have you just been awake the whole time? Thank you.
Thank you.
Thank you.
SPEAKER_UNKNOWN: Thank you.
SPEAKER_UNKNOWN: Thank you. SPEAKER_UNKNOWN: Thank you, Ellen.
I just wanted folks to get a sense of mostly that's a salary and it's a snapshot over the course of time, but it's very typical that these are part of your day-to-day working of our budget document.
So thank you for sharing that. Sure.
Ellen, can you just explain really, really briefly what the biggest driver, like behind why things move and what the biggest, you know, some of those numbers are tiny, some of those numbers are big. Sure. So as the year progresses, we have changes in staffing.
We have IAs that may have transferred programs or left the district.
We have individuals who are out on unpaid leaves of absences.
So there would be salary savings through that as well. We do have professional staff that leave the district during the year as well. And then those offsets and those savings are used to fund the substitute lines as well as other needs. There's movement between, you know, supply lines within maintenance and operations.
We've had some, some custodial staffing changes this year and some positions within maintenance that have, that have gone without being filled.
We've had some movement amongst some teachers and just program to program and just making sure that people are being, you know, paid for out of the appropriate lines and the appropriate places.
Thank you very much. Appreciate that. You're welcome.
All right.
All right. Can I get a motion to approve these budget transfers?
So moved.
Second.
Second.
All right. Shawna?
Yes.
Adam?
Yes.
Gwen?
Yes.
Julie?
Yes.
Veronica?
Yes.
And I'm a yes. Motion carries 6-0. Thank you, Ellen. Thank you, Dr. Botello.
Next up. First discussion item. We have a proposal to dedicate Sharon High School football outdoor athletic facility in honor of Mr. Gary W. Hall. This is a public comment period after which there will be a possible vote to approve the proposal to honor Gary W. Hall.
Are there any public comments?
Any members of the public who wish to comment on this proposal?
I see a handout.
I see a manual hand up. I'm going to go to the manual hand first, and I'm going to come to you, Donald William.
I see a manual hand first, and I'm going to go to the manual hand first, and I'm going to go to the manual hand first, and I'm going to go to the manual hand first. So the screen under George, please start with your first and last name.
George McCall.
Yes, Abby.
I think I've already provided enough for how I feel about this, and I promise not to take up too much time. So obviously I'm for it for all the aforementioned reasons.
Do you have any questions for me at this time?
I do not have any questions.
I will share that one of the correspondents that you had sent was in particular very moving when you shared an experience.
When you were serving and defending our country and had a moment where you credit Mr. Hall and the physical fitness regimen that he had put you through with your ability to save multiple other young men.
So that was particularly touching to me. And again, I know I thanked you last time, but we all thank you for your service.
Thank you much, sir.
Of course.
Did you have something also, sir? I don't, but Mr. Bergeron, the Veterans Administration does. Paul Bergeron, if I may.
Yes.
It's obvious that I am supporting it, but I don't know what the procedure is, nor do I know how it could be accomplished.
But I feel that if you could authorize the placement of this documentation in the Sharon High School Library so that future students and others could be aware of what a prior staff member, teacher accomplished for the community as well as the school.
I feel it's a great resource for somebody in the future to be able to access it.
Thank you.
Absolutely. So that isn't within the authority of this body, but certainly we can connect you and work with you to communicate with building administration.
I'm sure Principal Keenan and Superintendent Dr. Botello will be more than interested in having that conversation and figuring out how that can be accommodated.
Thank you, sir. Absolutely. Absolutely.
All right.
Seeing no more public comment.
Do I have a motion?
So moved.
Yep.
Just to be clear, a motion to approve the dedication of Sharon High School Football Outdoor Athletic Facility in honor of former Sharon educator, Mr. Gary W. Hall.
Second.
All right. Veronica.
Yes.
Shauna.
Yes.
Adam.
Yes.
When.
Yes.
Yes.
Julie.
Yes.
And I'm a yes. Motion carries 6-0.
Thank you all very much for your hard work on this proposal.
Thank you to the committee for honoring Mr. Hall.
Thank you. Thank you most importantly to Mr. Hall and his family for their dedication to Sharon Public Schools.
It's an honor for us to honor him.
Thank you.
All right. Next up, we have special education and student services update and discussion.
Yeah, we're going to turn it over to Jessica Murphy, who's going to present this.
Thank you, Jessica. You are welcome.
Let me just share my screen. Thank you. Thank you so much. SPEAKER_UNKNOWN: Thank you. SPEAKER_UNKNOWN: Thank you.
Hi, everybody.
Thanks for having me.
And I'm going to apologize in advance for any yelling and swearing that might go on in the background at my house, because there's some playoff something going on in the other room. So I'm not quite sure what the large adult men in my house are going to be yelling.
So I'm sorry.
So student services update.
I'm going to preface this with the vast majority, if not all of it, is related to special education, which is really the bulk of what I do. But for those of you who don't know me, I am the student services director.
I oversee counseling, nursing, and special education.
So when I sat down to look at where we're at in special education, I really felt like I had to look at the current trends and really share those with all of you.
Things I see every day still continue to astound me following the pandemic.
It's not all pandemic related, but doing this job for 20 years, it is really that line in the sand for me of this big shift in special education needs.
There was already a rise of mental health needs, as well as students with complex medical and cognitive needs coming into schools that we might not have seen 20 years ago, which is so great.
But the face of special ed is changing.
So here in Sharon, as well as nationally, we do see a high number of referrals.
They continued last year and over the past couple of years, we've seen them rise. I will share that in a later slide.
We also see a high number of students unable to attend school for a variety of reasons, but mostly due to social emotional needs that were probably already something that kids were dealing with. But then the isolation and the separation from school really exacerbated it. And there's kids that we have not been able to get back into our buildings because of it.
Students nationally are still impacted by the learning loss from the COVID-19 pandemic.
And we've seen an increase in behavioral and social emotional needs at all levels, even with our littlest, cutest little buttons of learners down at the ECC. We have seen a tremendous, and I can't emphasize this enough, a tremendous increase in students at ECC in general, compounded with students with significant needs.
Just to shed some light to it, our ECC referrals have more than tripled from pre-pandemic numbers.
So before I got here, I think our three-year average of referrals was somewhere around 30 a year.
If you average three years, we're well up into the 80s and 90s when we look at kids that are being referred.
And like other districts, both in Massachusetts and nationally, we are still having ongoing staffing difficulties district-wide, both with finding candidates and keeping candidates for whatever reason.
It's not just a Sharon thing.
It is really an education-wide issue.
One of the, an article I read, and unfortunately I couldn't go find it again when I went back to make this presentation, was in Massachusetts in, I think it was in 2019, 20 school year. There were 21,000 college-age students in teacher education prep programs, and last year there was 8,900.
So there's less people going into the field and more people leaving the field earlier than they expected.
But going back to really looking at the impact of COVID-19 and on special ed, I came across an article in EdWeek that looked at the data that really, really emphasizes that the interrupted learning time in that initial time of school shutdowns, which seems so long ago, but was only just a couple of years ago, has become what they're considering compounding debt. We haven't been able to close that gap of what was missed and the learning progress that kids should or would have made had we not had those initial shutdowns and closures and creating gaps that have made it even harder for these students to move forward.
One of the quotes that, there's two quotes this slide and the next slide that were, that really stuck out to me. Now, looking back, I think it was naive to expect to have seen large increases this year.
Referring to 2023, Lewis said, one of the authors, there's been this rush to return to normal, and I wonder if we've returned to normal too quickly and if classroom instruction has not adapted.
Meaning, we've gone from pandemic to where we thought we should be without addressing a lot of the learning need.
And it's not a criticism, it's really just an is, and we've seen that impact on special ed tremendously.
So, I can read it all out loud to you, but basically, they talked about how the manifestation of COVID as enduring health complications, it's also shown that the pandemic continues to impact students' academic progress, even three years later now after the initial onset of COVID-19.
And that achievement gains in the 2020 school year lagged pre-pandemic trends, but the youngest cohort of students.
So, we're just now getting students that were born after the initial closures because we start public school at age three.
But what I really found and really stuck out to me and I bolded it, the average student will require 4.1 months of additional schooling to catch up to pre-COVID levels of reading and 4.5 months in math. So, it's just a way to lay sort of the tablecloth, if you will, of what special ed is dealing with.
Because as the gaps widen, students' needs are increasing.
So, looking at the trajectory of referrals for special education and eligibility, they're on the rise.
And if you look at, you can't see my hand, but I'm pointing to my screen.
The ones up top from 2018-19, those were, in 2018-19, we had approximately 87, I'm sorry, 57 referrals during 19-20.
I started in July 2019, but we closed in March 13th of 2020.
We had 48 referrals.
The following year, our hybrid year, we jumped up by about 30 to approximately 72 referrals.
And these numbers are all approximate.
They're numbers I pulled out of our special ed information system.
And they might be off by some here or there, depending how things were coded when a finding was made.
But it gives you a good sense of it. In 2021, our first full year return, we jumped up to 114 referrals.
This does not include re-evaluations.
This is purely initial referrals.
Last year, we were at 146 referrals.
And this year, and this number is accurate, as of May 2nd, when I ran the number, we were at 147.
The referrals keep coming.
They won't all get finished this year.
But at the end of the year, I expect that we will be probably at about 170 referrals.
Again, that isn't all students that are eligible, but purely students that are referred for special ed eligibility.
So those are students that have been evaluated or are in the process of being evaluated right now for this 147 number.
So the numbers by year for IEPs.
And this year, Sharon worked with NASDAQ.
Each year puts together a special ed trend report for each district.
And we worked and provided a five-year set of data points that they asked for. And I'll share some of those so that we can track them. And each year, we just add, we'll add the new numbers.
So everything is based on one data point in time.
And typically, everything that we report is based on our October 1 report.
So keep in mind, the first numbers I'm sharing are earlier in the school year than the actual number as of today.
But in the 2019-20 school year, as of October 1, we had 484 students.
We've gone up by, with the exception of the 2021 school year, we've gone up by 30 kids in jumps.
And as of May 5, 2024, when I ran the number, we were at 688 IEPs.
We will not be at 688 come October 1 because we have students that move.
We have all of our graduating class, all of those numbers come out.
Students that leave and go to the tech schools.
So that number does drop drastically.
But it will be higher than 562. So when we look at the breakdown of the types of disabilities and the numbers that were percentages that we're dealing with in Sharon, we have 16.7%
of our students on IEPs have their primary disability listed as autism.
9% are listed with their primary disability as communication.
They might also have autism, but their primary identifying disability would be communication.
developmental delay is 13.1%.
And it's important to note that developmental delay is not the medical developmental delay.
It is purely for students ages 3 through 9 that are lagging behind their peers.
Once a student turns 9, they must be classified in another one of the disability categories or they're no longer eligible for special education.
The number that jumped out at me the most is our health impairments, which is what ADHD falls under.
And we're at 21.1%
of our students on IEPs fall under what we call an other health impairment.
Our specific learning disability is at 19%. And our lower disability areas are deaf and hard of hearing are at 0.3%.
A neurological impairment, 6.7%.
Multiple disabilities, 0.7%.
Intellectual impairments, 1.9%.
And our emotional impairment, again, as a primary disability is at 11.3%.
But often they don't act in silence.
So a student with emotional impairment may also have a communication impairment and a specific learning disability.
But it's really looking at what their primary disability area is. One of the things that I wanted to point out for everybody, because it is a national conversation, is that the number of students with disabilities that have autism has jumped dramatically from just shy of 5% in 2008, 2009 to 13% nationally in 22, 23. And the CDC data shows that one in about every 36 children has been identified with an autism spectrum disorder.
So in looking at our special education enrollment by school, SWD stands for students with disabilities.
One of the best resources, if you ever want to compare sharing to other districts or like districts or looking at our own data, you can find it all on DESE School Profiles.
I do have a link on it, but it's profiles.doe.mass.edu.
And it has a plethora of information.
But it's all based on our SIMS information.
So it's information that we have provided to the state that they publish in their district profile.
So again, it is typically done based on the October 1 report.
So please take some of these numbers with a grain of salt.
But at Early Childhood Center, at the time we had 56 total enrollment with 64.5% of students with disabilities.
Typically, Early Childhood Centers are a 50-50 split based on community peers, students that enroll as community peers, students without disabilities, and students that are there on their IEP.
And Cod Street School at the time of this report had 440 students enrolled with 18.2% of students with disabilities.
Cod Street School does house our DLP program.
But that number of students would not make a huge significant percentage change in the number of students with disabilities at that school.
East Elementary, at the time of the report, had 485 total enrollment with 12.7% of students with disabilities.
Again, each school does house at least one program elementary-wise.
And the LEAP program grades 2 to 5 is at least.
And that is also factored into that percentage.
Heights Elementary, at the time of this report, had 542 total enrollment and was at 17.5% of students with disabilities.
And they house two of our programs. They house our Autism SOAR program, which is a two-class K-5 program, as well as our team-based learning, TBL, which is also a two-class program, which is also K-5. Sharon Middle School houses all of our programs at that level.
Well, because it's our only middle school.
And at the time of the report, there was 807 students with 16.1% of students with disabilities.
Sharon High School had 1,132 with 14.4%
of students with disabilities.
When all is said and done, at the time of report, the district had 3,436 students totally enrolled with, excuse me, students with disabilities at 17.4%.
So looking at our out-of-district placements, they do change the two different charts.
They are from the NASDAQ report. NASDAQ breaks it out as they call out-of-outplaced students, students that are in approved day or residential programs, and they separate collaboratives from that.
As a district, we see that all as one number.
Anyone that's in a collaborative or an approved 766 school is considered an out-of-district placement.
As of May 5th, 2024, we have 55 students.
Again, that number does change.
Each year, based on graduation, moving, and kids that might come back to the district.
So based on the October 1st report from 2019-20, when we had 37 students out of district, and on October 1st, 2023, for the 23-24 school year, we had 48.
This is just a reminder of all of our programs.
The early childhood center meets the needs of all disabilities.
Children, regardless of disability, are eligible to attend there.
The SOAR program at Heights works with students with autism spectrum disorders and related disabilities.
TBL, the team-based learning program, works with mental health disorders, emotional impairments, and generally externalizing behaviors.
And we have a K-5 program, a K-5 program, a K-5 program, a K-5 program, a K-6 program, and a K-9 program. And a K-12 program.
Bridges is a program that joins two elementary programs.
It is for students with autism spectrum disorders and related disabilities, intellectual impairments, and global delays.
Students from the DLP, which I'll talk about in one second, and SOAR feed into Bridges.
And it's run by two teachers.
And that's how it's solely at Sharon Middle School.
The LEAP program is a district-wide program.
It's for students with language-based learning needs and disabilities.
We have a 2-5 program at EAST, 6-8 at the middle school, and 9-12 at the high school.
The developmental learning program at EAST is for students with intellectual impairments and global delays.
And it's a K-5 program.
Again, it feeds into the Bridges program.
At the high school level, we have our RISE program, which is on the continuum of our autism spectrum disorder and related disability strand.
It is for students that are on an MCAS track that take the on-demand test.
We also have the Pathways program, which also works with students coming up. Both RISE and Pathways are students that come out of Bridges at the high school level.
Pathways also works with students on the autism spectrum, as well as intellectual impairments and global delays. And that is an MCAS alternative assessment program.
So it is a portfolio assessment.
The students do not sit for the on-demand MCAS test.
Our NETWORKS program is our high school mental health disorders and emotional impairment program.
And the students in that program generally have internalizing behaviors.
Because the difference between TBL and NETWORKS is really how students are experiencing their emotional impairments.
Once students have finished their chronological 12th grade year, if they need post-secondary programming, we have two programs.
And actually, we have students that come back from out of district to come to our post programs.
Post-1 are students that were on an MCAS all-typical trajectory and will likely stay with us until the day before their 22nd birthday.
Because the age of eligibility ends the day that the student turns 22. And post-2 is our MCAS track post-secondary program.
Most of the students in there have achieved diploma and we've postponed it because they are continuing to receive services through their IEP. Each program does have, it's unfortunately taken me a few years to get them all up.
But they're on the student services page.
I can show you.
There's a link to every program has a description of.
And they're all in the same format.
Oh, I've changed the letterhead on that. But it has a description, talks about how they provide service, what the staffing looks like, and entrance and exit criteria for each program.
So the instructional impacts that we've seen with the increase of students on IEPs has had a substantial impact on the service provision.
This year, we've made the recommendation based on the number at the early childhood center that we're adding another class.
It's necessary to meet the needs of the students requiring specialized program.
We are adding an education evaluator and an inclusion support teacher.
At the early childhood center, the way students get evaluated is they're evaluated.
The educational part is done by the classroom teacher.
And it was taking them out of the class so often, given the high number of referrals that we had, that we really felt like we were not giving students enough teacher time.
So we made the recommendation for that additional evaluator.
We have needed to increase OTPT and speech time due to the needs of our youngest learners.
And again, we've seen an increased need district-wide for IAs.
District-wide, the trends that we see instructionally are the mental health needs continue to grow. We are just ending our two ESSER grant-funded school adjustment counselor positions.
They'll be ending on the 30th.
And looking at how, given the budget constraints, how to best support students, we're only adding one school adjustment counselor versus the two. And it will be at the middle school with the intention that if we're working with students earlier, the need should, in theory, diminish at the high school.
I do believe that moving forward, there will still be that increased need at the high school.
But I felt that focusing with the students in grade 6 to 8 was the better way to go for students in general.
The numbers of students in our developmental learning program, the DLP, as well as SOAR, the numbers continue to rise. The number of students coming out of the early childhood center into our specialized programs is at an all-time high, which has led to an increased need for OTs.
And again, the more students, the more needs for IAs, because we want to educate students in the least restrictive environment possible.
Special ed is, one of my favorite phrases is, special ed is a service, not a place.
And so our job is to service students to the best of our ability near and with their non-disabled peers.
And lastly, on a more positive note, I want to give a huge thank you to the Sharon CPAC.
They're an incredible team of people that work really hard to support our parents district-wide, but also working with me.
I really couldn't do this without them.
They're phenomenal to work with. I am doing a presentation for them on May 14th via Zoom regarding the new IEP.
And even if you're not a parent, you're more than welcome to join.
But Massachusetts is, for the first time in 20 years, changing their IEP form.
We've been training all year on it.
Some early adopter districts use it this year, but all districts are required to use it starting in the 24-25 school year. And Sharon CPAC this year is starting their Make a Difference Award.
It's a time to recognize the compassion, support, and care shown by individuals in the school district towards meeting the needs of students with special needs.
I sent it out to all families, but it's a way for them to honor employees of the Sharon School District, people who have gone the extra mile, just as a recognition for the work that people are doing for students in our community.
I have included a link to it, and I'm more than happy to resend it out.
And on June 4th, the ceremony for elementary and early childhood is at 4 p.m.
And on June 11th, I can't remember the time off the top of my head, is the middle school and high school at Sharon High School.
And that's student services.
Thank you, Jessica. That was really important information in a relatively short time. It was a lot.
It was a lot. But it was good. No, but don't be sorry. It was all very important.
And I was going to say, I feel like that was one of the more thorough presentations we had the opportunity to see, certainly on the subject matter. So thank you very much for that.
Are there questions from the table?
Julie?
Thanks, Avi.
Hi, Jessica.
Hi, Julie. That was a lot.
I'm a lot. I'm sorry.
No, no, no. I'm really glad. I'm glad it was a lot. I actually had some more general questions that I sort of put together beforehand.
So I'm sorry I don't have anything specific on that. So I guess what I wanted to talk about was the progress on implementing the MTSS frameworks, because I think that really ties into a lot of what the presentation was about.
So can you talk about that?
Are the frameworks aligned across the district?
Do we have a plan?
Do we have a timeline? And, you know, what kind of obstacles are there?
And then later, I also wanted to ask a little bit about LEAP. But right now, I just wanted to talk about MTSS.
And could you give us a sense of where we are with that?
So yes and no. So the biggest misnomer is MTSS is not special education.
It's general education interventions in order to prevent kids needing special education.
So special education is the receiving end of it.
So I am not the person to really give you the good information about what's being done with MTSS.
I'm sorry.
I can talk a little bit about it. Yeah, sorry. Yeah, I mean, I think when you look at the challenges, you know, that are leading to referrals, as well as challenges of students who don't qualify for special education or who are still struggling, you know, due to the pandemic or just due to other natural reasons, what, you know, the, what national and state, you know, professionals would tell you to do is to develop a robust MTSS system so that you can, on an ongoing basis, not just with your students in special education, really identify where their areas of need using really concrete assessments and then looking to provide them with interventions that allow them to grow.
In these cases, I think it's, it's, it's clear that our MTSS system is impacting, you know, student learning, yet similar to throughout the state, throughout the nation, we still have, you know, an abundance of referrals.
And, and that's true of, you know, of districts that have had a long lasting MTSS system, but it certainly helps.
And we do see considerable progress in using MTSS, where kids are getting interventions and are not needing referrals, as well as, again, still having natural kids who do. So it's been most robustly enacted at the elementary level.
It's partly because we really want to make sure that we're, you know, identifying these needs at an early age.
In addition, we have a natural system and structure that we've built that allows us to, on a weekly basis, look at the ongoing assessments that are being done, whether they're in literacy or math or social emotional assessments, analyze them together during our data collaboration meetings, and then create interventions that both helped occur during wind block, as well as other times. At the high school and middle school level, we're beginning to do more analysis of assessments on an ongoing basis.
But we've also really looked at making sure that our curriculum units are well documented and that they reflect what we've talked about in universal design for learning, which really is trying to allow kids to learn things in different ways and to demonstrate their learning in different ways.
And so that kind of curriculum and instructional practice approach has been primarily what's been emphasized at the middle school and high school.
And we will be looking to, and we do have interventions using assessments where kids are provided, whether it's through some of our specialists or through classroom teachers.
But we're looking to develop even more robust systems that mimic some of the elementary systems at the high school and middle school as well, while again, really emphasizing, making sure that our curriculum and instructional practices really reflect the best of tier one, which is what we do in the classrooms in order to reach all learners.
So that's kind of where we're at again.
So it's in progress.
It's like, or we have done tier one.
We have a strong system built at the elementary level and very much in progress at middle school and high school.
But it's a way of operating more so than something that's ever final.
But it is a problem.
And what are the obstacles that we're facing right now?
Some of the obstacles you face are time.
So it's hard to carve out time at the middle school and high school level to provide additional interventions.
It's also personnel.
So certainly at the high school, we will have more folks with our new schedule that will be available to provide some intervention.
So that will be good.
But still, both the high school and middle school, again, having personnel, including additional specialists and such to provide those interventions.
Other obstacles are making sure that we, the elementary assessments that are like, the more customary reading assessments that we do at the elementary level, whether it's, you know, something like, whether it's a benchmark assessment or the DRA or other ways of assessing a kid's ability to read are much more, you know, frequently given at the elementary level.
So elementary is more prone to really being able to identify the exact skill that kids are missing, whether it's in math or in reading and being able to respond to that, where, you know, the interaction between the skill and content, you know, is a little bit more complex at the higher levels.
Okay, thanks.
And I'll let other people go. And maybe I have a chance to ask my other question later. Thank you. I appreciate it.
Yep.
Sorry.
I think you're muted. Yeah. Oh, yeah. I'm sitting here going, Veronica, you're muted.
Turns out it's me who's muted.
Go ahead, Veronica.
Thanks. Sorry about that, Avi. I took my hand down thinking you were calling me.
Jessica, thank you. That was super comprehensive.
And I just, I was stuck on one of the first things you said, and I have a quick question about it.
A high number of students unable to attend school, right, that you've observed post-COVID.
Can you have, can you give us a sense of the range of ages and where the concentration, is there a concentration around the age range of where that is true? And I'm just interested in word on the street, news from the field as to the kinds of things that are being done to address those things, because they're specific to returning to school after COVID had those long absences.
I just, I just was wanting to understand that a little bit better.
Thanks.
Yeah. So it's not new from the pandemic.
There's always been kids that have difficulty, either have school avoidance or school phobia or trauma or perceived trauma from school.
It has definitely increased.
But it is at all levels.
Probably not at ECC, because those kids are the happiest little bunch on earth.
I love walking through there every day because those kids love being there. But we have kids as young as kindergarten that really struggle to get into school and are so anxious that they either can't stay in school or go for long periods of time. But the most concentrated place that we see it is upper elementary into middle school and high school.
And high school has the biggest impact because it impacts your graduation, you know, because your classes are for stakes.
Not that middle school and elementary aren't important, but we can be more adaptive in a lot of ways. And we have a lot of kids that we go out to the house with GEO, the SRO, to try to talk to them, to have them come in. We work with outside agencies.
But in my entire career, we've filed more CRAs, which are child, it used to be called CHANS, but it's a child requiring assistance through the court system for increased absenteeism when we have no other way of doing it. But we work with consultants for certain cases.
We work on creative scheduling.
We have doctors upon doctors writing home hospital tutoring notes for students with severe anxiety that can't come into school. And we're providing education that way. You know, the goal with the two ESSER school adjustment counselors was to really create, try to create comprehensive transition programs to help kids get back in.
It, given the timing, you know, the younger kids, it worked a little bit better at the middle school than the high school. Some of it is space.
And some of it is that kids are really just struggling.
Thank you for that answer.
Sean?
Yes.
Hi. Thank you.
One sec. Um, do you have, um, so I know that you had mentioned, um, and maybe I missed the slide, uh, the concentrate, uh, the breakdown of referrals, um, by level.
Do you have it? Do you have it by level or what? I just mentioned that EC.
I, I didn't do it.
I didn't do it by level.
Um, because I would have to hand account it, to be honest. Um, our, the program that we use right now, when you download the report, it comes out as a PDF. So I can't manipulate it through like a spreadsheet.
Um, ECC is a little bit different.
Um, that's tragic.
I'm sorry.
Yeah, it is. It is. It's a flaw with the system and it's a whole thing, but, um, ECC is easier to track because they come straight out of EI, um, and we, we, we just track that a little bit differently.
Right. Okay.
I was just wondering if, um, there were trends that you saw that would help.
No, you know, I mean, I, I look at it and I, I can, I don't see, like, I can tell you that we see a rise in parent requests after conferences, but that before the pandemic, that that's sort of the natural evolution of it. Um, I would say it's equally dispersed.
I think what I'm seeing that surprises me more over the last couple of years is the number of 10th, 11th and 12th graders being referred for initial evals.
Interesting.
I mean, not, not only isolated to Canton.
I mean, just sharing.
It's not, no, no, no. It's everywhere.
But we see it everywhere.
Um, thank you.
I appreciate that. You're welcome. My pleasure.
Great win.
Um, yeah, thank you. So this is more of a clarification for me. I, the, the information that you've provided for us tonight, that was, was that IEPs only, um, or was it also including 504s, D-caps?
And if it's not including these, are you seeing sort of the same trends? Are you sort of addressing it in the same, you know, is it sort of also requiring the same sort of uptick in attention and resources and focus? Um, you know, can you, yeah, no, it's a good question.
No. So the numbers I gave are solely IEPs, right?
Because, um, it is, it's a, it's a different law. It's individuals with disabilities education act. I want to clarify something.
So when people talk about kids on D-caps, that isn't a, uh, a plan that's sort of like an in-house curriculum plan. So yeah, I have no way of tracking that. Um, our, our 504s numbers have risen again.
Those are, I oversee those as well.
Um, I, I try to distinguish the both because while those happen to be students with disabilities, um, they don't require specially designed instruction.
It's accommodations only. So it's really a general education, but the numbers have risen, um, a lot for mental health issues.
Um, but yeah, those numbers have risen, but.
It muddies it when I try to explain both at the same time.
Yeah. Yeah. Okay. Thank you.
You're welcome.
Thank you so much for that. All right. If there are no more questions, um, then thank you very much for the presentation.
You're welcome.
My pleasure. Thank you for the question and answer.
Now it's for your whole presentation.
Um, all right.
Next up on the agenda, we've got policy KCD public gifts to schools.
Review and policy updates with a possible vote to approve updated policy.
Um, I see Adam Shane, our policy chair, Adam, do you have something to share? Oh, are you not a cohost?
Sorry.
No, now I muted you.
Hold on.
There you go. Thank you.
So I, so I moved, uh, I, I finally got home. Uh, so I'm back on computer and I can share, um, if you could make my other, uh, account a cohost as well. And I'll share from that computer actually.
There you go.
Um, no, it's still can't share.
I made it shareable.
So I don't know why I tried again.
Can you make the, the other account a cohost as well? Yeah. Yeah. I tried. I did that just a second ago.
Are they not? I keep saying share. I can now. Yep. Okay. I'm good now. Thank you.
All right. So we are here to look at, um, policy KCD.
Um, you can see that now on the screen. Um, so it's a short policy.
So I'll give the, the committee and the public a chance to review, uh, very quickly.
What we'll end up doing is reviewing this, the MASC policy.
Um, and then I'll share a little bit about the policy subcommittees discussion and where we ended up, and then we'll present a proposal.
So I'll just give a, a quick second for folks to scan through this. And this is the MASC policy.
Um, and so you can see there are certain similarities, uh, across both policies, both in terms of, you know, both policies being fairly explicit that gifts given to the district, um, are the property of the district, um, and can be used kind of as they please.
Um, the feeling broadly was that, um, we could be warmer, uh, kind of in our language of Sharon's policy, um, in terms of how we, uh, communicate that to the public, um, and how we can also request, um, or allow the public to submit a request if they would like a donation to be, um, kind of directed towards a certain program, um, or project.
Um, although we still want it to be clear that that would be at the discretion of the district.
Um, other differences between our policy and MASC is this threshold of kind of $500, um, that we utilize as a, a threshold to say any gifts above that, um, must be approved by the school committee.
Um, MASC doesn't do that.
They have the school committee approve any size gift. Um, and MASC also has the school committee actually direct where those gifts shall be directed, right?
So they say here, um, and expended at the discretion of the committee as provided by law. Um, so it really gives the school committee explicit, um, discretion over how to spend those funds, um, which means that if someone wants to give a $25 gift, um, and they want to utilize that in a building to buy, um, some paper or crayons or, or who knows what, um, the school committee would need to direct that that donation be used for that purpose.
Um, and the committee felt that that was, um, a little bit arduous, um, that it puts, it takes the decision out of the, the kind of primary decision makers hands, um, which are the district administrators and building leaders. Um, um, the other key difference in the MASC policy is that it just notes that the gifts, um, should be kept in a, a separate account from the general fund.
Um, and when I met with Ellen, um, this is actually our practice as well.
Um, so we do this anyways, it's not written down in our policy. Um, and so as we kind of crafted a policy to try to blend some of these, um, I included that just to be kind of put into policy what is already our practice, um, but formalized that this, um, should be held separately.
Um, so I have a kind of a, a marked up version.
Um, and so here you can see differences from the current school committee, uh, policy, um, other than small grammatical changes.
Um, I note here, this is the line I was talking about, all accepted CAF donations will be kept in account separate from the general fund.
Um, and Ellen, please correct me if I'm wrong. Um, or if I, I kind of miswrote this, but I believe this is reflective of our current practice.
Um, we retained the kind of threshold of $500.
Um, and then this is the, the primary change that we say donors may request that gifts be designated for a purpose or program.
However, once accepted gifts become the property of the Sharon public schools and may be used as the district sees fit.
The school committee, when accepting a donation may request that the donation be used in a specific manner.
So, and I add to that line, because I think if there is a donation and the school committee broadly feels that that donation should be used in a certain way, um, it allows us while accepting the donation to request that of administration, um, and perhaps have a conversation if, um, you know, that is, or is not the intention of the administration.
The one thing that we, um, did not, um, kind of have a robust discussion about, um, and there's a little different maybe than, um, kind of what, what was, uh, I don't know, different, but I think it's an open topic is that question of whether there should be the ability of a donor to explicitly direct toward the program. So the, the, the subcommittee wanted to retain kind of current practice.
We did not think, um, that we should kind of open up that potential Pandora's box, but I recognize that's something that we could discuss at the table, um, if other school committee members feel differently. Um, and the final version that, uh, you can see in, in the drive is just a clean copy.
Um, if it will come up, it won't, but it's maybe if it comes up.
Um, but yeah, so here is just the clean copy, um, of that policy that we just looked at.
Um, I would note one other change, which is just reflecting the additional mass general law reference that was found in the MESC policy.
So, uh, thank you for bearing with me. That was a longish explanation.
Um, but are there any questions or did it make sense in terms of what we were trying to do?
Um, and are people broadly aligned with the kind of proposed policy?
Yeah, Shauna.
Thanks for your work on that. Um, I guess I'm just a little bit worried about the extended language about, um, approving gifts, including cash, except, sorry, um, to being, uh, uh, the requesting where the designated purpose or program, I just worry about, um, I don't know the logistics of it and what, um, Dan Newman, um, earlier in the public comment had shared with us, um, how that could translate if say somebody donated money and it wasn't used how they wanted it to, to be used, what that would, what that would mean for us.
Yeah, good, good question.
Um, so, uh, the intention of the proposal or of the proposed policy is, is not to change the fact that the gift becomes property of the Sharon public school district.
Um, and I, and I think that was the goal of this line, right?
Um, that, uh, excuse me, however, once accepted gifts become the property of the Sharon schools and may be used as the district sees fit. So, um, we're very much not, uh, we're within this proposal, not looking to attach those conditions to a gift.
Um, and I think that's something that we would make clearer.
And if certainly if someone said we are, or would like to make a donation for a specific purpose, I think we would refer them to this policy and say, you know, once we accept that gift, the district can do as it sees fit. Um, however, I did want it to, to allow for, you know, the school committee to request that a donation be directed in a certain way. So, you know, that is the choice of the committee.
If let's say the committee only wanted to accept a gift, um, if it were to be directed to, uh, new playground material, um, then we could ask at the table and say, you know, Dr. Botello, we would like to accept this gift. We would like for this gift to be directed towards that.
Does that sound reasonable? Is this something that we can do?
Is that a good use of this money?
Um, and then if there is a strong feeling that the committee wants that money directed there, um, then either we could, uh, kind of work with Dr. Botello to, to direct it in that, uh, towards that program.
Um, or we could choose not to accept the donation.
Um, you know, there's, but, but to be very clear, I think the conditions of the gift, um, would not be allowed in this policy.
Okay.
I'm just trying to wrap my head of like the worst case scenario of like the best intentions, right?
So somebody donates $15,000 to your point, the new, the new playground, we as a committee say, yay or nay, say, we say, yay.
We propose to Dr. Botello.
Hey, Dr. Botello, we'd like to accept this donation.
We would like to appropriate the funds for the playground.
Right. And then Dr.
Botello either accepts our recommendation or not.
Is that, is that how it would kind of go or.
Yeah, I think so.
I mean, the school committee has discretion over budget.
Um, and this is, this is new budget.
So I think we can make that request and utilize that in our decision-making process of how we accept the gift.
Okay.
Thank you for your clarification.
Yeah.
When?
Um, yes.
So I, you know, I am a member of the policy subcommittee.
I think I did say in the meeting that I, um, I can, I hear the need to, or the desire to soften the language.
I do wonder if this language is opening the door more than we want to, because I think, you know, I don't actually think MASC really opens that door all, all that much, right?
Any gift of cash, regardless of gender intent will be accepted by the school committee and kept separate from the general fund.
Um, oh, sorry. This will be automatically become the property of the school district. That's the first line in that paragraph.
And then the second line says, regardless of gender intent. So yes, people may, may include, you know, a direction for where they want the money. I feel like the edit almost asks people to explicitly direct, uh, to give us an idea of where that money should go. And I feel like that is perhaps a step too far.
Thank you. I concur with, uh, when I think the MASC by saying, regardless of donor intent recognizes that someone can mention their intent, but it makes really clear, uh, that it's, you know, it makes even clearer that it's discretion of the committee. And I think, you know, that language is, is composed by MASC, you know, for, for, for a reason.
And as much as I, you know, I like the softened language, but I'm, I do think that it might be, could be potentially problematic.
And, and part of the reason why MASC is worded it differently.
And just to be clear that the problematic, uh, nature you think is that it may increase donations kind of with, uh, a request, or do you feel like there's a legal concern?
I think there could be some grayness that, you know, could potentially lead to a, you know, uh, a legal concern or, uh, or at least, uh, um, you know, less clarity than would be ideal with the donor.
The donor just being, you know, as much as it's a, a little bit harsher language, I think the MASC is clearer.
That's absolutely that there should be no expectation of, you know, uh, conditional, you know, donation.
Thank you, Dr.
Fertello.
Uh, Julia, I saw your hand, but it's down now.
Are you good?
Oh, I was just a quick, um, point, which is, um, not this one, the MASC one.
I just, I got confused because I think there's a comma missing.
So it's any gift of cash, regardless of donor intent will be accepted by the vote of the school committee, comma, kept separate from the general funds, comma. And okay. That's how it's supposed to read.
Okay. Okay. MASC is missing their comma.
Yeah. I just, I just read it all once and it was confusing.
Sorry. That's all. Nope. All good.
Uh, Shauna.
Shouldn't be raised. Sorry.
Okay.
Uh, Avi.
Yeah. Adam, let me, let me step back in and play chair for one second here.
Um, is there anybody who feels strong?
Strongly anybody on the committee who feels strongly in favor of not aligning with MASC on this policy?
If so, can we hear from those folks?
Otherwise I feel like I didn't hear any real argument with not aligning with MASC. In which case I would just voice my support for aligning with MASC on this policy.
Feels like the intent of the edits was to, was to get to, it seems like the same place that the attempt of MASC was.
And if people are more comfortable with the language for MASC or that MASC has, then personally, I would support that. And it felt like that was ultimately where this group was sounding like they would want to end up.
Avi, can I clarify when you say MASC to mean around kind of the, the wording of this piece of the policy around gifts, as opposed to the $500 threshold.
All right.
Okay. Be clear. Thank you. I'm a language around the gift acceptance.
All right. Adam, you can call Veronica if you want.
Either way, Veronica.
Thanks guys. I think that at our policy subcommittee meeting, I was a little bit of a voice for the softening and it's only because I guess I was concerned that, you know, mostly gifts do come in or often gifts do come in from folks at this amount with an intention.
Right.
And I didn't want someone to read the policy if they thought about giving a gift and being dissuaded from doing it. So I think, you know, and I'm willing to go with the consensus on the MASC language, but I was a voice in our meeting for that concern, right?
That as long as we caveated it, that we're not going to make a promise to do it, but we're not discouraging you from doing it. So I think that was where my thinking was. And I think that's why I was encouraging the group to consider softening.
So I think that softening thing came from me primarily, but it was because of that reason. I think a lot of times people come with a need.
They identify it to us and they're on the ground, right?
And they're saying, hey, I think that the district could use a little bit of dough to do this or that. And they wanted to come forward to say it. So if they go to a policy to read what that policy is, will they be quelled by this language to think, oh, I wouldn't be able to have, you know, my wishes at least expressed.
So I think that was where it came from.
Am I right, Adam, there?
You're interpreting what I said in the meeting that way. Yeah. So it came from me. And as long as the group, if the group is feeling like it's not going to discourage people from presuming that they have, that they can have a voice at least to make a suggestion, right, that they can attempt to meet a need, which is a nice thing, you know, for people to think, hey, I'd love to be able to add value here or do this, you know, to a program and really want to do something purposeful and directive.
I just didn't want it to feel like the policy shut the door on it. So that was where it came from. Okay.
So I think at this point, if I'm continuing my cherished role, I think we can entertain one of several motions.
We could, or I could entertain a motion to accept policy as written.
I could entertain the motion to entertain a policy with kind of light edits, if we want to kind of specify, or we can entertain a motion.
And I don't know if we actually need a motion for this, but we can direct the policy subcommittee to come back with another draft and we can re-review in our next school committee meeting.
Veronica?
Yeah, I think that, to Avi's point, I think the concern, it feels like, I felt like I was the person who maybe pushed this language to be softened.
And if people could, you know, kind of confirm for me that they don't think that my concern is that the policy as MASC, you know, has it, the language, you don't believe that it will, right? And I can be reassured that I'm happy to, in this meeting, to be expeditious about it, just accept the MASC language.
You know, I'm happy to go there. I just wanted to express to folks the reason I was pushing it, right?
Because they didn't want to quell giving. But if people are comfortable that they don't think that it will, then I'm happy to go with consensus and, you know, shift the language back to MASC.
And we can vote that tonight, as far as I'm concerned.
I would support that.
I want to ask two quick questions.
Oh, sorry.
Yeah, when? You go and then I'll jump in.
Yeah, I just, I think we're still piecing things together.
I'd like to see that on the screen before we vote something.
I can do it. So here is what, so let me ask one question and then I'll make a suggestion.
How do we feel about kind of this line that says the committee, when accepting the donation, may request the donation be used in a specific manner?
Do we feel that is necessary or we would prefer to remove it? I think the fewer words, the better.
So can I make a point?
It's redundant in the sense that the school committee, as you pointed out earlier, oversees budget. The school committee may request or actually more than request.
The school committee may direct that funds be used at any time for any purpose within with a few exceptions.
And so it's redundant in that nature.
And it also seems to, again, invite the idea to Wen's point earlier, seems to invite the idea that that would happen.
And I just, without being argumentative, just want to dispute, Veronica had said earlier, many times people make these donations.
Just in my time on school committee for three years, we voted donation acceptance many, many times and never for a purpose, never for a stated purpose, never discussing a purpose.
And those sometimes have been small amounts of money and sometimes very large amounts of money. So I do think it would be a departure from at least what I've seen.
So can I ask then, is there a desire, I mean, we can certainly incorporate MASC language.
Do we feel like there's a need?
Like, is there something distinct from the current policy, actually, that we're looking to change? The only other substantial difference would be that a line or the line noting that the funds are kept in a separate account.
I believe there was some...
I did...
Wen, do you want to go?
Yeah, no, I did hear Veronica's point about a hard close of the door.
And for me, MASC's, that little caveat of regardless of donor intent, I think for me, that softens the language enough that I think that would satisfy both needs.
But that's just my perspective.
I think that little addition does make it feel different.
Not very much, but a little different than what we currently have. So I think adding that would be fine.
But personally, I also don't feel a strong need to change this policy, besides the addition of the fund, separate fund.
Yes, similarly, I think we had a discussion at some point as to whether or not the initial, the original policy would imply that stating intent at all is against the policy, where the MASC recognizes that someone might state their intent.
It just can't be conditional.
They need to know that it's not going to be conditional.
Yeah, Julie? Thanks, Adam.
I think listening to this conversation, I might be one of the only people that actually was involved in a donation.
So about five years ago, the East PTO raised more money.
It was remarkable.
We raised more money than we expected.
And we decided to buy some standing desks and some playground equipment and some other things.
So I did have to go to the school committee to get permission for that.
But we just sort of got permission to make the purchase.
And then we just went ahead and purchased the desks and had them sent to the school.
We didn't put the money in an account or anything, to my recollection.
So in that kind of a scenario, so then the PTO turned over the money to the school to be put in an account and then who would purchase the items or whatever it is. Yeah. So my understanding is that this is just with regard to cash.
If a cash donation comes in, that's how it would be directed.
Because it says gifts including cash.
So that's in our current policy for approval.
I'm getting confused.
I'm so sorry. I'm sorry. A lot of policies, a lot of versions.
So here it notes kind of gifts will automatically become, this is the MASC policy.
Gifts will automatically become the property of the school district. So if you were giving desks, those desks would immediately become property of the school district.
And then any gift of cash would be put into a separate account.
SPEAKER_UNKNOWN: Okay.
Veronica.
Yeah, Adam, this is a little bit small.
I'm trying to view this a little bit bigger and I'm having trouble.
But there is the special account, a separate account line in this policy, MASC policy.
That's the difference, right? That the separate fund, maybe a language needs to be added to MASC.
But other than that, the MASC policy feels comfortable for folks because of that intent line. I think we were just looking to adopt kind of that line as opposed to kind of meddle with the thresholds of $500.
We also have a note around kind of permanent changes to school buildings, sites, things of that nature. But so if we just want to incorporate the MASC line, retain this, and we want that written out, my suggestion is that we table this for the moment within this meeting, jump to another agenda, and then we can come back to it. And I'll just have something on screen that folks can look at.
I mean, it's 849. How does that feel? I mean, whatever the group wants, essentially.
I'm also, yeah, I mean, I'm fine with whatever the group majority wants.
When I think you asked to see something just kind of visually, which I 100% understand and respect, would that be helpful for you?
I mean, we also, Adam, could, it's a possible vote.
It's not.
Correct. Yeah, I guess if it doesn't feel like it's something that has to, sorry, if it has to be done right away or not tonight.
And if not, maybe we can just push it.
I'm comfortable with that as well.
Okay.
That was a good discussion.
Appreciate everybody.
And Adam, I appreciate your help there.
Moving on to the school year 24-25 calendar.
District recommendations.
Discussions of options and possible vote to approve calendar changes. Dr. Botello.
Oh, you're muted.
Dr. Botello, you're muted.
Yep. Sorry about that.
So can you guys all see that?
You guys can all see that, correct? Yes.
Yes.
Okay.
So after our discussion last meeting, based on the data gathered about the SCA and resulting serious concern, especially about staffing on certain holidays that had traditionally been recognized, I'm recommending changes to the 24-25 school year calendar.
These changes also reflect a desire to make at least a positive step in recognizing additional holidays that we were working to recognize more formally in previous calendar discussions.
So what I'm recommending is that we're working to do with the day. So what I'm recommending is that we, you know, re-add days off for Rosh Hashanah Day 1 on October 3rd and Good Friday on April 18th.
So we, this is a little bit different, but it's based upon the election year. We're going to switch our 11-6 early release day with election, with 11-5, so that half the day is just open without students for elections, knowing that we'll have some people in the morning, but it will just make things easier on during a presidential election.
Switch the November 12th early release with November 1st Diwali, so that though we weren't able to, you know, manage full days off in the calendar this year, having an early release on that day. Switch the, no, this is, that part's wrong.
I'm sorry, this should be just, because actually that did not work well.
So add 129 early release day on Lunar New Year.
So that is not supposed to be switched. It's just adding an additional early release day on 129 for Lunar New Year. And then switching the March 12th early release day with March 33rd Eid.
On those early release days, we would continue to be utilized for Districtwide Professional Development Days, recognizing that some members of our staff will be observing.
Based upon these proposed changes, the last day or 180th day of school would be June 2nd, and 185th day would be, as needed for snow days, would be June 27th.
Fortunately, we've had just a few snow days in the last couple of years, and hopefully that will remain the same. I would have recommended a change in the start date, but due to the late timing and families having already made end-of-the-year summer plans, I did not.
But that would be something that, you know, we're looking for consideration in the future.
Veronica? Veronica?
Yeah, thanks, Dr. Botello.
I was very desirous of you bringing forward a recommendation after our discussion last time, so I really appreciate the time and thought you put into it in particular to gather the complete picture from the STA and our staff with respect to the viable school days, in particular in the traditional holidays of the first day Rosh Hashanah and Good Friday.
For people to note, Yom Kippur this year is on a weekend day, so that's why that date isn't being discussed.
I also really appreciate your thoughtfulness around the other observance days, and it feels kind of elegant to come up with using some of our half-day dates to bring that about.
I was a little bit worried about, because just the way the dates fall, the last day being June 20th on this calendar, barring any snow days, and the fact that there's a day off on Juneteenth, which is a Thursday, and June 20th is a Friday.
I just wanted to put out there to the group, do we think that the last day, it's not a half-day, right, on the 20th in your calendar, Dr. Botello, it's a full day of school on Friday, the 20th of June. And I guess I was just a little bit, I was thinking ahead to being a parent and having Juneteenth off, and then having one day left, and it's a full day, whether that makes any difference to folks or not. But it did feel a little bit like it might be a little bit nicer if it was a half-day, and it would still count as a day. But that was my only comment on the calendar that you've proposed, other than to thank you for putting the time into it and to proposing this, which is an elegant solution, and also attending to our consensus last time with respect to keeping that start date after Labor Day for this calendar year.
So thank you. I could say, I would certainly support if that was an amendment that was proposed, having a half-day on the last day.
I think the traditional uses of that last day to really kind of wrap things up and develop community can be very well done in a half-day.
We haven't traditionally done that here in Sharon, but certainly tons of other districts do, so I'm not opposed to that.
I just thought that the group, if the group could chime in on that tonight before we voted, I would appreciate that. That's what struck me when I looked at the dates.
Thanks.
Gwen?
Yeah, so that's not where I was going to go.
But I do want to thank you, Dr. Patella, for offering this compromise to try to work in some of these days.
I think about a comment that Avi made about how no one had advocated for a federal calendar.
And I think to his point that that's on me. I certainly have implied it, and I've talked about it in lots of the meetings. But I think that's right. I've never fully put together a presentation of sorts for this table about why I think the federal calendar is the one that sort of solves...
Well, that takes into consideration a multitude of factors.
And I know that as we've continued to discuss this calendar over many months, it's abundantly clear that each person has a unique matrix of considerations.
It is a very complex question.
But I think for me, in weighing the considerations of pragmatism as well as inclusivity, I do think a federal holiday calendar is the fairest option.
That also takes into account the heat in the schools in June, that there's a lot of learning loss that occurs at the end of the year, minimizing the need for child care coverage for working parents for all of these different days, the general day-to-day continuity of education, and the upholding of secularism in our schools that has been called for very often in sort of correspondence with school committee.
And, you know, when we talk about adding holidays, we still...
We're not adding all the holidays. That's impossible. We're not adding all the holidays. But I noticed that the holidays that we're bantering about, you know, none of them are representing our Russian Orthodox community or Hispanic Latino community, for example, because they don't have the numbers.
And I think in this case, for me, pragmatism directly precludes inclusion.
You know, last meeting, Julie asked me to address the absentee problem as a matter of practicality.
And I guess I don't know that we know for certain that high absenteeism will be a problem.
Like, behavioral science has shown us that the variance between what people say they will do in any given scenario and just like the expected outcome and what they actually do, there's often quite a dramatic difference.
And decision-making is complex and not necessarily hypothetical.
We're, you know, we're not the first district to consider a federal holiday calendar.
There are others that have come before us.
Easton did it.
Norton has done it. Concord.
Andover. And when their committees proposed the change, there was a lot of pushback, too. Lots of concerns about anticipation.
The schools would be understaffed and under attended.
But in the end, when they tried it, when they went to implement this, you know, those fears just didn't come to fruition.
These districts have maintained a federal holiday calendar for years. And I just think I know change is hard.
You know, change takes time and leap of faith and courage and flexibility and open-mindedness to the possibility that, you know, that things can be different.
And I do understand that people are maybe not ready for that.
I just wish we would give it a chance.
That's all I got to say.
Absolutely. Adam, I see your hand is raised.
Yeah, I just had a kind of quick reaction to what Veronica had proposed in terms of the last day.
I just want to ensure, you know, if we do end up having a snow day or two, then obviously that Friday won't be the last day of school. So I don't know that we would want to designate that Friday as a half day and then end up having, you know, Juneteenth a half day and then a full day of school on the following Monday or something of that nature.
So I don't have a solution to propose there.
But just a word of concern about designating.
Maybe designate it for the last day if we want. But I don't know that I would index it to the Friday directly.
Well, we can certainly entertain a motion.
If somebody has the appetite to propose making the last day of school, regardless of which date that ends up a half day, they're welcome to make that motion.
If somebody wants to propose supporting the recommended calendar, somebody wants to propose something else.
Now will be the time.
Well, I would like to make a motion that we support Dr. Patello's proposed calendar with the amendment that whatever winds up being our last day of school could be a half day of school.
Second.
Veronica?
Yes.
When?
I'm sorry.
Can you say that one more time, Dee?
Sure.
I'm proposing that we accept Dr. Patello's proposed calendar with the amendment to that.
Whatever the last day of school winds up being, it will be a half day of school.
No.
Donna?
No.
Julie?
Yes.
SPEAKER_UNKNOWN: Yes. SPEAKER_UNKNOWN: Adam? SPEAKER_UNKNOWN: Yes. And I am a yes.
Motion carries. 4 to 2. Thank you, Dr. Patello. Next up, decision items. I need a motion to approve the minutes from 42424. So moved.
Second.
Second.
Shauna?
SPEAKER_UNKNOWN: Yes. Yes.
Yes.
Veronica?
Yes.
Yes.
Yes. Yes. Yes.
SPEAKER_UNKNOWN: Yes. Motion carries 6-0.
SPEAKER_UNKNOWN: Yes. SPEAKER_UNKNOWN: Yes. SPEAKER_UNKNOWN: Veronica? SPEAKER_UNKNOWN: Yes. Yes.
Yes.
SPEAKER_UNKNOWN: Yes. Yes.
Yes.
Yes.
Yes.
Yes.
Adam?
Yes.
Yes.
Yes.
Motion carries 6-0. I need a motion to approve the out-of-state field, out-of-state overnight field trip for Sharon High School students to Puerto Rico, January 2025. Only if I can go.
That was going to make that. So moved.
Second.
All right.
When?
Oh, when?
SPEAKER_UNKNOWN: Yes. SPEAKER_UNKNOWN: Oh. Donna?
Yes.
Veronica?
Yes.
Veronica?
Yes.
Julie?
Yes.
Adam?
Yes.
Yes.
I am a yes. Motion carries 6-0. Are there any announcements?
Yes.
Julie?
SPEAKER_UNKNOWN: Oh, I just wanted to have a couple of quick announcements. This week is Teacher Appreciation Week. This week and last week, the PTOs have been doing a great job of providing snacks and food.
And so I want to thank our teachers and thank our PTOs for taking care of them.
And I just wanted to point out that last Friday was the Sharon High School Girls Varsity Lacrosse Senior Night. The girls actually won, which was really exciting for them. So I just wanted to give kudos to them and also the parents who stepped up to be coaches this year, Aisling Ladird and Sarah Barbera.
And finally, I saw that last week's Hakama Sports.com
Player of the Week was actually two players, the boys doubles for tennis, Isaac Chen and Sava Kasev.
And I'm sorry if I said your name wrong, but congratulations.
It looks like it's a wonderful thing.
So congratulations to everyone.
Thanks, Julie. Veronica?
Yeah, thanks, Avi.
I also wanted to echo Julie's sentiments around teacher appreciation and thank the teachers in this moment of being public together for all the hard work that you've done. I know that PTOs always go beyond the call to provide, but every day of every week you guys deliver for us. So thank you very much.
And I also wanted to point out that tonight's the last school committee meeting of this committee and there will be turnover.
There's certainly, you know, we have no idea what the compliment of the committee will be in two weeks' time, but I wanted to take the opportunity to thank Wencia Oteano and Prisonel Dominique for making this past three years really, I think, particularly grand and I think in many ways wonderful compliment of folks working together.
And we're going to miss very much.
And we're going to miss very much you guys. I may or may not be here in two weeks, but I know you certainly won't be when and Prisonel won't be. So I just want to thank you both for your service and for serving with us. Thank you.
Thanks, Veronica.
Second.
Second.
Second.
Seeing no more announcements, you stole my thunder a bit. And given that you're part of the possibilities, I felt like that wasn't where I saw it coming from. But I did want to say something just, you know, it's unfortunate.
Prisnell couldn't be here for this meeting. He had a work thing. And so it's unfortunate that we, our last meeting with Prisnell didn't actually have Prisnell, but certainly all the kind words you said about Prisnell are very true. Wen, since you are here, I wanted to thank you as well. And I think, I think I have the opportunity to speak from a unique perspective in that you were a great committee member to all of us. You were an incredible vice chair and a support to me personally.
You know, you're brilliant.
You worked so hard for the kids of this district. And you were, I'm sure other members feel this way. But for me personally, I'd be remiss if I didn't say that at the hardest times as the chair of this committee, having you as the vice chair and as a support, as a sounding board, as somebody who I knew was always going to be doing the right thing for this district.
It wasn't, there were times you agreed with me and pushed me to fight for what I believed in. There were times you did not agree with me and set me straight.
And every time, regardless of which way that was, I appreciated it. More than you know, more than this district probably is going to ever really know what you did for them. And so I appreciate you tremendously.
This committee will take a long time for us to get back to where we are when you want it. And so thank you very much for everything that you did for the kids of this district and the people of this town and the people of this committee.
And with that said, you're going to make me cry. I just want to say it's been an honor. It has been to serve everyone to work with you all and good luck. All right.
Just moving us into executive session, pursuant to MGLC 30A S21 A3 to discuss strategy with respect to collective bargaining or litigation with the STA. If an open meeting may have a detrimental effect on the bargaining or litigation position of the Sharon School Committee and the chair so declares not to return to open session. Can I get a motion? So moved.
Second.
When?
SPEAKER_UNKNOWN: Yes. Shauna.
SPEAKER_UNKNOWN: Yes. SPEAKER_UNKNOWN: Adam. Yes.
Veronica.
Veronica.
Yes.
Julie.
Yes.
SPEAKER_UNKNOWN: Naima. SPEAKER_UNKNOWN: Yes. SPEAKER_UNKNOWN: Motion carries 6-0. Take care everyone.
And I will see this committee in executive session.
Thank you for your time. No, no, no. No, no, no, no, no. No, no. No, no, no, no. session