School Committee - August 20, 2025
School Committee, 8/20/25 - Meeting Summary
Date: 8/20/25
Type: School Committee
Source: https://tv.sharontv.com/internetchannel/show/14853?site=2
Generated: September 13, 2025 at 07:51 PM
AI Model: Perplexity
- Meeting Metadata
- Date & time: August 20, 2025; Time not explicitly stated, but evening meeting context implied.
- Location / format: Conducted remotely via Zoom; meeting broadcast live and recorded by Sharon TV.
- Attendees (by role):
- Chair: Avi Shemtov
- Vice Chair: Dan Newman
- Secretary: Alan Matanko
- Members: Julie Rowe, Jeremy Kay, Georgeann Lewis, Adam Shain
No absences stated in transcript.
- Agenda Overview
- Correspondence summary
- Superintendent updates (back-to-school, enrollment, hiring, organizational changes)
- Special Education report by Astrid Mazuriegos
- Presentation and discussion of high school handbook changes (attendance policy, absences, senior privileges, graduation requirements, others)
- Presentation of middle school handbook changes
- Presentation of elementary schools and ECC handbook updates
- Decision items (June 18 minutes, field trip, grants, activity fund clubs, marijuana mitigation fund, budget report)
- Executive session for pending litigation strategy
- Major Discussions
Topic: School Committee Correspondence Summary
What triggered the discussion: Chair’s call to Secretary Alan for correspondence report.
Key points debated:
- Summary of 27 correspondence items since June 18, 2025 covering feedback on meeting locations and remote participation for public comment, compensation issue from former employee, public records request about superintendent evaluation, community events, policy compliance concerns after Supreme Court ruling, inquiries about budget impact from federal funding cuts, staff culture concerns, newsletters, extended school year programs and SOAR, residency exceptions, athletic study group participation request, concerns about high school handbook excused absences for student athletes, anti-Semitism issues, and parking pass questions.
Member Contributions & Stances: - Avi (Chair): Introduced topic
- Alan: Delivered detailed correspondence report
- Julie: No contribution recorded
- Jeremy: No contribution recorded
- Georgeann: No contribution recorded
- Adam: No contribution recorded
- Dan: No contribution recorded
Areas of Agreement/Disagreement: No disagreements noted.
Outcome / Next steps: Information shared for committee awareness; no action recorded.
Topic: Superintendent Updates
What triggered the discussion: Superintendent Dr. Botello’s report.
Key points debated:
- Staff orientation dates and school start schedule
- Reminder for patience on bus routes first days
- Facilities updates including carpet replacement and collaboration with DPW
- New life skills component in special education program at Heights
- Introduction of new club activity fees tiers (tier 1, tier 2, tier 3) with caps and scholarship availability
- Enrollment update: K-12 at 3,325 down from 3,386; detailed per school and grade included
- Hiring update: Over 25 new hires; ongoing efforts to fill student services administrator at high school and several IA, SOAR, executive assistant positions; contract agency support if needed; secretary position open with some interim support; update to be provided at September 3 meeting
Member Contributions & Stances: - Avi: No contribution recorded beyond introductory remarks
- Alan: No contribution recorded
- Julie: No contribution recorded
- Jeremy: No contribution recorded
- Georgeann: No contribution recorded
- Adam: Asked about fee scholarships to ensure no exclusion for financial hardship; Dr. Botello confirmed scholarships available
- Dan: No contribution recorded
Areas of Agreement/Disagreement: Agreement on need for scholarship availability for fees.
Outcome / Next steps: Ongoing hiring efforts; next update September 3.
Topic: Special Education Summer Work and Student Services Update
What triggered the discussion: Presentation by Astrid Mazuriegos, Student Services Director.
Key points debated:
- Families meetings both individual and group; upcoming meet and greet (Zoom Aug 26)
- Distribution of parents’ notice of procedural safeguards on rights related to special education evaluations
- Response to tiered focus monitoring report submitted to DESE; forthcoming executive summary to committee
- Review of specialized programs, curriculum considerations, remodeling of classrooms at Heights for special education
- Establishing non-negotiables and norms for staff to improve transparency and communication with families
- Emphasized ongoing observations, school visits, family support, coordination with CPAC
- Planning and security measures review for next year’s extended school year program (ESY)
Member Contributions & Stances: - Avi: No contribution recorded
- Alan: No contribution recorded
- Julie: No contribution recorded
- Jeremy: No contribution recorded
- Georgeann: Thanked Astrid and raised issue about clarity on half-day vs full-day placement for students in substantially separate kindergarten classrooms; suggested more communication to families; Astrid agreed to work on clarity
- Adam: No contribution recorded
- Dan: No contribution recorded
Areas of Agreement/Disagreement: Agreement to increase clarity for parents regarding special education placements.
Outcome / Next steps: Astrid and team to develop clearer communications for families.
Topic: High School Handbook Changes and Attendance Policy Review
What triggered the discussion: Presentation by Principal Kristen Keenan, accompanied by slides shared by Peter.
Key points debated:
- Overview of successful cell phone policy started last year, improving classroom focus and interaction
- Attendance rates improved toward pre-COVID levels with new attendance policy reducing unexcused absences dramatically (from ~12 to ~5 days) and chronic absenteeism (10%+ absences) from ~18% to 10.4%
- Attendance policy includes restorative practices such as summer school, academic contracts, Saturday school to allow make-up credits and flexibility
- Clear definitions distinguishing excused vs unexcused absences and class cuts; class cuts do not guarantee makeup work
- Debate on punitive impact for students excelling outside school in elite activities (e.g., Olympic athletes, professional gaming) with possible five or more absences limiting privileges; principal explained built-in discretion for exceptional cases but cautioned against broad exceptions that could worsen attendance rates
- Proposed new handbook language additions: vandalism consequences for restroom vape detector damage, clarifications about chronic medical condition documentation, field trip eligibility linked to good attendance and academics, senior privileges tied to attendance and behavior, graduation requirement update eliminating MCAS in favor of local competency determination, adjustment of National Honor Society GPA threshold to be more aligned with national norms
- Discontinuation of mid-year exams in favor of benchmarking exams for instructional data; final exams retained at 5% weight
- Multiple committee members questioned credit reductions linked to absences, distinctions between excused/unexcused with classroom impact, and recommendations for further articulation of restorative options for students with planned absences
- Suggestions to put in writing a clear pathway for students and families with planned extended absences (athletes, special circumstances) to plan ahead with administration to reduce penalties and anxiety
- Clarification of the difference between unexcused absence (parent-notified absence without valid reason) and class cut (student in school but skipping class without permission)
- Discussion of chronic absenteeism data, with principal noting many high absence cases were due to medical or social-emotional reasons rather than truancy
- Plans to review and possibly phase out weighted grades in favor of non-weighted grading consistent with broader trends; ongoing community input planned
Member Contributions & Stances: - Avi (Chair): Asked questions about credit loss threshold for senior year, supportive of flexibility for students with important extracurricular commitments, emphasized caution about opening exceptions too widely
- Alan: Asked several detailed questions about excused vs unexcused impact on students, National Honor Society attendance policies, chronic absenteeism causes, and the content of bullying and hurtful language in handbooks; requested further clarity on these topics
- Julie: Asked about weighted grades and their future
- Jeremy: Asked about DESE accountability implications of attendance policy and trade-offs; sought data on exemptions granted during pilot year; showed cautious support but acknowledged chronic absence remains an issue
- Georgeann: Urged chair to follow speaking order to allow balanced input; raised concerns about handbook clarity on bullying reporting if principal is accused; noted need to tighten language distinguishing hurtful remarks from bullying/harassment particularly on racist/anti-Semitic language; raised parent communications issues about class skipping alerts
- Adam: Clarified definitions and distinctions between unexcused absences and class cuts; requested highlighting bullying language changes; suggested reviewing restorative language and clarifications post-presentation
- Dan: Supported attendance policy overall and added suggestions for explicit written guidance for families and students on options for planned absences and restorative practices
Areas of Agreement/Disagreement: - Agreement on positive impact of attendance policy reducing absences and chronic absenteeism.
- Agreement on the importance of restorative practices and principal discretion for exceptions.
- Disagreement/concern from some committee members about the policy’s potentially punitive effects on students with important extracurricular commitments; Chair and principal expressed concern about laxity causing attendance degradation.
- Agreement on need for clearer written communication to families regarding attendance expectations, restorative options, and absences caused by elite activities or special circumstances.
Key Quotes: - “If at any time it’s a financial hardship, please reach out to… and we will support you so that you can participate.” — Dr. Botello
- “Our attendance policy… has really made a difference at the high school. We truly appreciate it.” — Principal Keenan
- “There is a principal’s discretion clause… because sometimes there are extenuating circumstances.” — Principal Keenan
- “What we really want to avoid is opening the floodgate so that our chronic attendance increases and we stop functioning appropriately per DESE statutes.” — Principal Keenan
Outcome / Next steps: - Principal Keenan to review language with administrative team regarding clarity on planned absences and restorative options;
- Policy Subcommittee may assist on language revisions;
- Further data dive on excused vs unexcused absences requested;
- Ongoing monitoring of attendance and potential further handbook adjustments next year.
Topic: Middle School Handbook Updates
What triggered the discussion: Presentation by Kevin O’Rourke, middle school principal.
Key points debated:
- Middle school handbook largely unchanged except simplification of attendance policy to align with high school policy.
- Clarification on bullying language changes noted as minor; redline issues in shared documents clarified by administration.
Member Contributions & Stances: - Avi: No contribution recorded
- Alan: Asked for confirmation on bullying language changes and hurtful language categorizations; requested tightening.
- Adam: Asked about bullying language redline changes; no major edits confirmed.
- Georgeann: Raised question about process if principal or designee accused in bullying cases.
- Others: No contribution recorded for this topic.
Areas of Agreement/Disagreement: Agreement to clarify bullying reporting language and designation of alternate designee if principal is accused.
Outcome / Next steps: Administrators to review and add language addressing principal/designee conflict of interest in bullying issues; review hurtful language to ensure clarity on harassment scope.
Topic: Elementary School and ECC Handbook Updates
What triggered the discussion: Presentation by elementary school principals and ECC director Mark Fans.
Key points debated:
- Only minor revisions mainly related to dates and names; no substantive policy changes.
- Emphasis on alignment with district policies and maintaining continuity.
- Georgeann raised appreciation for clarifying special education kindergarten half/full day placements; discussed need for better communications with families regarding process.
- Astrid Mazuriegos agreed to collaborate to create clarity for families about special education placements.
Member Contributions & Stances: - Avi, Alan, Julie, Jeremy, Adam, Dan: No contribution recorded on substantive points.
- Georgeann: Raised questions and suggestions on special education clarity.
- Astrid: Acknowledged and agreed on communication improvements.
Areas of Agreement/Disagreement: Agreement on no substantive policy changes and focus on improving family understanding of placements.
Outcome / Next steps: Coordination between Astrid and ECC director to improve communication on kindergarten placements.
- Votes (Substantive items only)
Motion: Approve minutes of June 18, 2025
Result: Passed unanimously (7-0)
Roll-call:
- Avi — Yes
- Alan — Yes
- Julie — Yes
- Jeremy — Yes
- Georgeann — Yes
- Adam — Yes
- Dan — Yes
Motion: Approve Sharon Middle School eighth grade field trip to Washington DC
Result: Passed unanimously (7-0)
Roll-call as above (all Yes)
Motion: Accept state federal ESSA and federal entitlement grants totaling $2,170,967
Result: Passed unanimously (7-0)
Roll-call as above (all Yes)
Motion: Approve the student activity fund clubs for 2025-26
Result: Passed unanimously (7-0)
Roll-call as above (all Yes)
Motion: Accept the annual marijuana mitigation fund payment
Result: Passed unanimously (7-0)
Roll-call as above (all Yes)
Motion: Approve the fourth quarter student activity fund budget report
Result: Passed unanimously (7-0)
Roll-call as above (all Yes)
Motion: Enter Executive Session to discuss strategy regarding pending litigation (civil case 2582-CV00891), not to return to open session
Result: Passed unanimously (7-0)
Roll-call as above (all Yes)
- Presentations Without Discussion (Brief)
- Special Education: Summer updates and ongoing family/staff engagement presented by Astrid Mazuriegos.
- ECC Handbook: Minor updates presented by Mark Fans.
- Elementary Handbook: Minor updates and no substantive policy changes reported by principals Farrell, Conley, and Dr. Patel.
- Middle School Handbook: Minor updates with attendance policy simplification by Kevin O’Rourke.
- Action Items & Follow-Ups
- Principal Keenan to review and potentially revise handbook language on attendance restorative practices and planned absences with administrative team and policy subcommittee.
- Astrid Mazuriegos and Mark Fans to work on clarifying communications for families regarding special education kindergarten placements.
- Administration to clarify bullying policy language especially about reporting when principal/designee is accused.
- Further data analysis requested on excused vs unexcused absences and impact on chronic absenteeism to inform ongoing policy discussions.
- Open Questions / Items Deferred
- How to best formalize and communicate principal discretion and restorative options for planned absences in the handbook — raised by Dan, Avi, and others.
- Clarification of bullying complaint procedures when principal or designee is the alleged accused — raised by Georgeann.
- Future phasing out of weighted grades and community input process — raised by Julie and Principal Keenan.
- Detailed breakdown of chronic absenteeism (excused vs unexcused) and impact on credit loss — requested by Alan and Jeremy.
- Appendices (Optional)
-
Acronyms:
- DESE: Department of Elementary and Secondary Education
- ESY: Extended School Year
- MCAS: Massachusetts Comprehensive Assessment System
- CPAC: Community Partnership Advisory Council
- IA: Instructional Assistant
- MGL: Massachusetts General Laws
-
Referenced documents:
- Draft 2025-26 Student Handbooks (High School, Middle School, Elementary, ECC)
- Attendance and Absence data charts for 2021-2025
- Tiered Club Fee structure documents
This summary reflects all substantive discussion and decisions recorded in the August 20, 2025 transcript of the Sharon Public School Committee meeting.
Document Metadata
- Original Transcript Length: 85,588 characters
- Summary Word Count: 2,305 words
- Compression Ratio: 5.1:1
- Transcript File:
School-Committee_8-20-25_3e6fe2c3.wav
Transcript and Video
Welcome to the August 20th meeting of the Sharon Public School Committee.
This meeting will be conducted remotely over Zoom.
Attendance by board members will be remote, and remote attendance shall count towards a quorum.
The meeting will be broadcast live and recorded by Sharon TV.
If you would like to enable your webcam, your image and background may be broadcast with or without sound.
We will begin the meeting, as we always do, with public comment.
I ask that everyone keep their comments to two minutes.
Other than that, I will open it up. Is there someone from the committee? Adam, would you be willing to put a timer up?
I don't know what your expertise.
All right.
All good.
We will open public comment.
Okay. Seeing no hands, I will throw it to our Secretary, Alan Matanko, for correspondence.
Hi, everybody.
Hope you all had a good summer.
The school committee received 27 pieces of correspondence between June 18th, 2025 and August 19th, 2025. We received a few letters with feedback on the location for the meeting that expressed appreciation for moving to an in-person meeting and a request to offer an option for a community member to participate in the public comment section remotely, whether or not the meeting is held in person. A former employee reached out to the school committee regarding a compensation issue. We received a public records request from a community member seeking all documents and materials related to Dr. Routello's mid-cycle formative evaluation.
The CPAC notified the school committee of its new board officers.
Congratulations to those folks. We received invitations to several community events being sponsored by the Sharon Pluralism Network, the Norfolk County Sheriff's Department, and Massachusetts Special Commission to Combat Antisemitism.
A community member wrote to the school committee related to compliance issues associated with a recent Supreme Court decision and with a request that the school committee reviewed their policies to ensure they are up to date. A parent wrote to the name and contact information of the dean of affairs at Sharon High School.
We received an inquiry regarding the impact that the Trump administration's decisions regarding reductions in education funding at the federal level may have on the district budget.
A departing administrator wrote to the school committee to share their thoughts and concerns regarding the culture, leadership, and state of the Sharon Public Schools. We received several editions of the Medco newsletter, including a departing note from CEO Millie Auberge Thomas and an incoming note from interim CEO Deborah Ward, a former Sharon Medco director.
The newsletters highlighted summer activities, student support, and professional development opportunities, as well as an announcement regarding enrollment for the 26-27 school year.
Community members and CPAC reached out to the school committee regarding the extended school year programs and staff support in those programs, specifically the SOAR program. These letters also raised concerns regarding the ongoing issues in the TBL program and requested that the district provide information and plans to address each of these issues for the new school year.
A parent wrote to inquire about exceptions to the residency requirements for students attending the Sharon Public Schools.
The town administrator asked for the school committee to appoint the SC representative to the recreation advisory group to participate in the athletic study group, which is a temporary advisory group to the board of selectmen.
This advisory group will be working to study athletic fields, including demand, conditions, potential expansion of fields, and new sites.
The review is to encompass natural grass surfaces, as well as evaluating the feasibility and limitations of artificial turf athletic fields.
Several high school parents wrote to request that the school committee reconsider the language in the Sharon High Handbook regarding excused absences, particularly as this language relates to student athletes. The Sharon Jewish Action Committee wrote to request that the school committee work to address the rising anti-Semitism in the Sharon Public Schools and to review and consider implementing a plan developed by the American Jewish Committee, which addresses these issues.
A parent wrote with questions about the Sharon High School parking lot pass situation for their student, and that was the conclusion of correspondence.
Thanks, Alan.
Thanks, Alan.
Next, we will throw it to Dr. Botello for superintendent updates, including back-to-school general updates, enrollment updates, new hire updates, and organizational changes.
Great.
Thank you. First of all, just I'm recovering from a respiratory virus thing, so if my voice is a little off, I apologize.
But we have been having a busy, busy summer and are really excited to start the school year.
Definitely have lots of students, staff in and about the buildings.
We also started with new staff orientation on Monday and Tuesday.
Opening days for staff begin on Monday and Tuesday of next week.
And then our first day of school, grades 1 through 12, is on Wednesday.
First day for kindergarten would be on Thursday.
There's no school on that Friday.
And then the day after Labor Day, September 2nd, pre-K, begin.
Be looking out for, you know, and thinking about back-to-school routines, as well as, you know, looking for information on bus routes and timing.
Be patient in those first few days. There's always some things that need to be continued to be re-revised as we do those routes for the first time each year.
Dress for warm weather.
And also, as you get your handbooks, review those.
The Power School Portal will be open on Friday for the high school and the middle school. Elementary opened in early August.
And we've done tons.
Our maintenance and consisterial crew have been incredibly busy under the leadership of Curtis St. Holmes and Ellen Whittemore.
And they'll be finishing up miscellaneous cleaning and repairs.
We're also working in collaboration with DPW on the grounds.
We have an awesome new life skills component to some of our special education classrooms at Heights, which kids will take full advantage of, as well as carpet replacements and parent routes for new parents in our buildings.
As far as activity fees, as people realized from last year, the operating budget identified an additional revenue of $25,000 to be raised via new club activity fees.
Club and activities costs can vary greatly based on advisors, competition expenses, and other miscellaneous expenses.
The district will introduce these new user fees, which were approved back in March.
Families will be receiving an email with all this information right at the start of the school year.
These fees apply to both middle school and high school clubs and activities.
And they'll be used to offset some of the current district expenses for these clubs and activities at the middle school and high school. Clubs and activities that pay for expenses, such as trips and competitions, will continue to do so. So these extraordinary trips and competitions still will have some additional fees connected, though some of it can be offset, it will. Each club and activity will have a student activity fund where the monies go into, and this will be governed by the department and MGL regulations.
District plans to establish new revolving counts where funds are collected.
These funds will be used to offset expenses that are normally handed via the operating counts for these programs. We've developed tier 1, tier 2, and tier 3.
If you're in a tier 1, which are just a small number of clubs, which I'll show on the next slide, if you do one season of that, it's $100.
If you do two of those, it's $200, and that's the limit that you can pay.
It also allows you just participation in one of the tier 1. It also allows you participation in unlimited tier 2 clubs.
Tier 2 clubs are the majority of the clubs in the middle, and there's a $50 cap for, so if you participate in tier 2 clubs, you get unlimited enrollment in tier 2 clubs.
And tier 3 clubs have no cost.
So the tier 1 clubs include at the high school drama, jazz band, and other music opportunities.
Other music opportunities are now classes, so those are pretty much drama and jazz band at the high school. As well as, and then at the, that includes the musical when we say drama.
Middle school drama, musical band, chorus, orchestra, jazz band.
So again, if you participate in two of these, it would be $200.
That is the max, and you also get participation in all tier 2.
Tier 2 clubs, these are some examples up there.
And then, so those are $50 per club per student in unlimited enrollment.
So if you just participate in tier 2 clubs, you pay $50 and have unlimited enrollment.
And then tier 3, here are the examples.
And we'll have a full list of these tier 3 clubs, so that we have a full list of tier 1 and tier 2, and tier 3, and then all the remaining will be tier 2. But these are the types of clubs that are really contributing directly to the running of the school, and they have no fee. Enrollment update.
We have a current enrollment K-12 of 3,325.
That is down a bit from 3,386, which we had predicted that we would have some decline between last year and this year, based upon outgoing seniors.
Elementary numbers are 1382, also in your packet and linked is the detailed enrollment by class, which was similar to what I shared in last year.
I'm going to pull that up today, too.
So those are the numbers per grade at the elementary school.
If I pull up this detailed, it's very much what we were predicting.
We have, you know, some 22-21s at Heights and Cottage, a bit lower east.
We do have some kids going to east who are Heights and Cottage neighborhood kids. We had some, a couple of additional kids at Heights and Cottage who needed to be placed there because of specialized programs or who are literally living across the street from the school.
And so, but if you look at some of those Heights numbers are a little bit inflated in that four of the kiddos in that 86 number belongs to some of our substantially separate programs.
So they're not impacting the class sizes for them for a lot of the daytime during that, as well as one of the students at Cottage.
We have that grade two at East capped at 23.
And we have other numbers that are kind of very similar to what we showed predicting that last year, as well as the high school and middle school numbers are very much on par with what we shared on the 10th of June last year. So I'll continue to share these enrollment updates periodically throughout the year, as well as when we get into the end of the year, as we start to do projections again for next year. But these numbers, we still, you know, we continue to have small numbers of kids who are enrolling as well as kids who are having finalized IEPs, which require some changes.
So these things will continue to evolve even over the next couple of days and weeks, as well as to some degree during the school year. So again, as I showed on the bigger sheet, here's the numbers for the middle school and high school.
Those eighth grade numbers stand where we expected so that we'll be able to manage those class sizes with our cuts very, very well.
Hiring updates and organizational changes. We have Astrid Mazuriegos who had jumped in, you know, I think it was before July 1st, but officially on July 1st and has been working with the team throughout the year, as well as Ellen and Joelle and Carla have been working hard alongside Molly and VanCott, Fran Derry and Curtis DeDonge.
So it's a great team up here in central office.
We have a number of school-based leadership changes.
Matt Furtado and Allie Golder have joined the team at the high school, and they have been in awesome additions already working closely with Ms. Keenan, Ms. Andrews, and Mike Vitelli.
We're still having interviews, so we had a couple of situations fall through at the high school student services administrator, so interviews continue for that.
Joyce Pinto is joining as the special education coordinator at the middle school.
Corey Rogers is joining up at Heights.
Sarah V. Connelly is our new principal, and she has hit the ground running, getting to know all kinds of people and really getting to know the school. And just today we finalized a verbal agreement with Janelle Pearson-Campbell to join her as the student services administrator there.
Ann Marie Gupton has been working since July 1st at the East Elementary as the student services administrator.
And Mark Crean, who was at Heights last year, has jumped over as director of Early Childhood Center.
So a change of position, and he's working with that great staff and the kiddos down there.
I'm looking forward to that this year, but he's already been there a lot of the summer for ESY.
So we've hired over and onboarded over 25 staff in various positions.
We are completing the hiring process for several positions right now.
There are currently several openings that we're still working on. As I said, the student services administrator at the high school.
Janelle Cole continues to support, but we're looking to fill that position as soon as possible.
We had several people, you know, hired or granted the position as SOAR teacher at Heights.
But several people backed out at the last moment.
So we've reposted and interviewed.
We also have contacted one of the best agencies as far as contracting that until filled if we are not able to fill that on day one.
Several open IA positions, which we're in the process of interviewing and also in contact with agencies as necessary.
And we had several people that we offered the position to as executive assistants.
And those fell through.
So we're really looking for someone strong there.
We've interviewed about 10 people as well as screened hundreds.
Jane has offered to continue as secretary of the school committee until filled.
But we'll continue to look to fill that as well.
We'll have additional updates on this at our next meeting on September 3rd.
And I'm going to turn it over to Astrid Mazuriego to just go over a little bit about some of the work she's been doing this summer.
Thank you, Dr. Botello.
Thank you, everyone.
Good evening.
First, thank you for a warm welcome. Thank you, everyone.
Thank you, Dr.zon Soren. Thank you so much. Thank you, everyone.
Thank you, for joining me for now.
Thank you, everyone. Congratulations.
I'm headed overnight to all STIFFsportコ pilamante and in therapy treatment. Thank you, everyone. Thank you.
I can put all those visits on November 4th of 2015. I want to make sure that I say that.
I've been meeting with a lot of families, both individually and in groups.
I hope to continue to do that. I will post a schedule on my email so people can sign up for times to meet.
I'm scheduled to have a meet and greet via Zoom on August 26th from 6 to 7.
I hope everyone got an email about that and a flyer. And then just to let everyone know that you should be receiving your parents' notice of procedure safeguards.
These are very important for you to read. These are your rights as a parent.
And if you have a child in special education or if you're looking for an evaluation, it explains all your rights.
They should be going home through our central office via email.
As far as administrative work, there's been lots happening.
But I did respond to the tier-focused monitoring report.
I sent that to DESE.
I believe it was due July 15th.
I think it was July 11th that I turned it in.
I will be doing a lot of training and reporting with all staff that is involved in special education.
I will present the executive summary to school committee on our next meeting.
I am looking at specialized programs, meeting with the staff, looking at curriculum spaces.
As Dr. Botello mentioned, we engaged in some remodeling of some classrooms at Heights.
I'm really excited about that.
Hopefully, families can come in early to see that before school starts.
Look for some invitation from the teachers there. I am establishing some non-negotiables and norms for our staff.
It's something that CPAC and I have been talking about in order to provide families with transparency, communication, and really getting families involved in our programs especially.
As Dr. Botello mentioned, I've been busy hiring.
It's been a challenging time to hire, but we'll continue the course and hopefully we'll get people to join us here and share in.
My next action steps, some of them, is to look at ESY. Look at the dates, look providing dates early on for families, providing the dates and the schedule for families early on so that they can be planned with camps.
There will be a timeline provided to staff to know when they need to start talking to families about extended school year. It should be before the new year. It should be before the new year. Their families should know whether their students are due an extended school year or not.
Very special circumstances if there's a conversation after the new year.
I'm also looking at some of the security measures that we need to have during extended school year next year. And so, something that I will be working on.
Again, my next steps are to continue to observe, visit schools and students, and meet with families.
And support families and students as best as I can.
All of these topics I have talked to CPAC about, and we have met twice so far.
And I'm excited to continue working as, you know, as a member of the CPAC myself.
So, that's an update from Student Services.
Great. Thank you, Astrid.
I think a common theme among the admin group, and I know it's shared by our teaching staff as well, is like, which Astrid has really modeled in her new days here, is just a love of the work.
People are really excited to do everything we can to continue to get better. We're going to, you know, we had a great admin retreat in which we really talk about how do we continue to use our district plan to focus ourselves.
And we're going to be doing some work with DataWise, which is an institute out of Harvard University that will help us to use data more effectively.
I know that's something we've been talking about, and we're using data, but we want to use it in a more strategic manner.
So, all admin will be doing a training with them, and then we'll have ongoing support with them.
And we're funding this through a grant, a hate crimes grant, which allows us to look at how that data is really supporting all students.
But I want to welcome everyone back to an awesome school year. I don't often, these meetings show my kiddos, but that's what they look like not so long ago. And so, it goes fast.
So, we're looking forward to being focused on what is important and buckling up for a new school year.
So, we're very excited about it.
All right. Thank you, Dr. Botello. Thank you, Astrid.
Thank you for those updates.
Are there any questions from the table on any of those updates, enrollment data? So, Adam?
Yeah.
Just a quick question about, because you went through the fees for clubs and whatnot.
Yep.
I just wanted to call out or verify.
We have scholarship available if anyone has an issue kind of with payment so that no one should be kind of excluded from participation for financial reasons.
Is that right? Absolutely. Absolutely. Absolutely.
And that's common with all of our fees.
There should, you know, anyone, anyone, and I know it's not always easy.
I know my grandparents were in that position.
But if at any time it's a financial hardship, please reach out to, you know, your counselor or anyone at the school you feel comfortable with, and we will support you and make sure that you can participate.
All right. Thank you. Thank you.
To coordinate who's going in what order. And I know some place, you know, in the past, there might be some schools that do share them before approval, but they will note pending approval by school committee.
This is a draft pending approval by school committee, but just so people can start to review them. And so, Kristen, would you want to start in? I know you have a short presentation.
I think most of the people are just speaking to it.
I think you're a co-host, so I think you should be able to share.
And if you're not, we'll make you one.
Good evening, everyone.
I am going to try to share my screen right now.
And unfortunately, it's not showing me my.
Do you have the little share button?
Yep.
So hold on one second.
I don't know.
I have a security issue going on. So one second.
You're not able to see that, correct?
You want to reshare it with me? I can share.
Okay. That would be great. I'm sorry.
No problem.
Just send it to my email and I'll pull it up.
Yep.
Well, good evening, everyone. I apologize for the delay.
I hope everybody has had a great summer.
All right.
Good evening. All right.
I sent that, Peter. Okay.
Okay. So I wanted to start and he's going to, Peter's going to share that in a second, but I wanted to start by welcoming everybody new to our school at the high school.
We have some great additions and I'm really, really excited for our administrative team and looking forward to working with Astrid and Janet Cole to find someone for our student service administrator position. But we have a great team moving forward.
We have a great team moving forward and we're very excited about the school year. That being said, I thought that I would start this presentation briefly by reviewing with you some of the things that we added to the handbook last year to give you a little perspective in terms of how successful we were and some of the changes that we made. So one of the first things, and I think if Peter's able to share it, there we go, is the cell phone policy.
So just quickly wanted to mention that last year we started this cell phone policy.
And it's been very successful.
Anecdotally, I will say that teachers overwhelmingly are so excited.
The commentary that they have, our students are talking to us, they're looking us in the eyes, they're having conversations with one another.
It has really changed the tenor of the classrooms at Sharon High School.
And I even think that students in my casual conversations with them, many have admitted that has made a big difference for them in terms of focus and learning in the classroom.
I did want to make you aware if you weren't already in the news that Massachusetts General Court is looking to push forward a full band bell to bell. And so we are paying very close attention to that.
And if that does come to fruition, obviously, we would come back to the drawing board with the administration and the district and school committee, and we would bring that to your attention.
So that was something I wanted to discuss.
Another big issue that we put forward last year, if you're able to go to the next slide, Peter, was an attendance policy.
And so I wanted to give you a little update of where we were.
So what you can see here is from years 2021 to last year, and you can see the attendance rates for those years.
So the attendance rates are kind of circled in purple.
And we have, in the past two years, risen back to pre-COVID attendance rates, which is fantastic news.
It's something that was one of my major goals when I started here at Sharon High School.
When I was going through my interview process and I was doing research on Sharon, and particularly Sharon High School, one of the things that caught my eye was the chronically absent rate at the high school.
Because it is such an amazing school with such amazing staff and amazing students, it really did catch my eye. And it was something I actually brought up in my interviews of wanting to work on. So you can see that as well.
You can see with the green circles, we went from an average in 21-22 to 11.8 absences a year on average.
This past year, with the attendance policy moving forward, we went down to five.
We cut it in half. And also, if you look, say, for example, at students that were absent 10 days or more, in 21-22, 41% of our students were absent 10 days or more.
And then in 22-23, 43% were absent.
My first year, 23-24, we made a big push with attendance.
We pushed it down to a little under 18%.
And then with the attendance policy down to 12.8%, which I'm very proud of.
And then you can see both the chronically absent, both 10% and 20%. Those are the yellow and the red circles.
DESE, the Department of Education, determines that students are chronically absent. If they're absent, 10% or more of the school year, which equates to 18 school days. So you can see that, you know, post-COVID, we were at approximately 18% to 17% of our students were chronically absent, 10% more or more of the school year.
We have brought that down in the past two years to this year, this past year being 10.4% in large part to our attendance policy.
And same can be said for students that are chronically absent, 20% or more of the school year, which we're talking 36 days. So we're very proud of that information.
And if, Peter, you can go on to the next slide, you can see that specifically this kind of gives you a different visual look of what we're talking about.
Particularly those days absent, 10 days or more has really been reduced percentage-wise.
And on the next chart, you can see that our average number of absences over the past couple of years has dropped pretty dramatically.
So this attendance policy that we instituted last year with the support of school committee in the district has really made a difference at the high school.
So we truly appreciate it. So I wanted to give you some info on some highlights from last year that we implemented.
If you could move to the next slide, Peter, I did want to mention, because I do think this is a point of confusion for some families, we did not want to create an attendance policy that didn't have some flexibility in it. We understand that things happen with families.
So we do have some restorative practices embedded in the student handbook.
And you can see here, we do a number of things in terms of students being able to make up that time.
We did a, we had summer school this year.
We had a summer enrichment program this year. We've done academic contracts.
We're willing to do some Saturday school programming.
But there will be way for students to earn back credits if they find themselves in a position where they exceeded the number of unexcused absences that they are allowed.
Now, remember, we have a whole slew of reasons why students can legitimately be considered absent and have it as an excused absence.
So when we say unexcused, we're talking no doctor's note, or it's not a college visit with documentation or a dentist, orthodontist, doctor, bereavement, driver's test for licensure, things of that nature.
So we do give a wide berth there.
And we also give a number of days because we recognize that families sometimes will keep a child home because they're not feeling well, but maybe not want to go to the doctor and choose that.
It is in line with most other schools in the Hockamock League, as well as other schools in and around the state.
In fact, there are many schools in Massachusetts, particularly schools that are really well regarded, are moving to a policy in which they don't even recognize excused or unexcused absences.
Brookline would be an example.
And they're following DESE's guidelines.
DESE does not distinguish between excused or unexcused absences.
So they just determine that this many absences, regardless of whether they're excused or unexcused, develops into chronic absenteeism.
So we are trying to create an environment where students want to be in the building and create structures for them that we can get them there and also create restorative practices for them and understanding that families are under situations sometimes out of their control.
And we want to help support them to get their credits back if there was a case in which they would lose some.
If you want to move on, Peter, that would be great.
Kristen, this is after 10 absences, correct?
Correct.
This is 10 unexcused.
Yep.
So, hi, Avi.
Hey, I have a clarifying question on that.
Sure. So I know we say 10. Is there, is it true that if there were five absences in a, in a one semester class that, that they would, it would be similar in penalty to 10 classes, 10 days over the year?
It is relative.
So you could lose, um, a half a credit, um, or a full credit depending on how many days that you miss. Um, and so, you know, we, again, we recognize that some students might fall into that situation for one reason or another.
And that's why we've embedded those restorative practices.
And we're willing to speak with families at any point to, to set those things up with them, uh, to help their students succeed.
Okay.
Thank you for that clarification.
Yep.
So these are some of the changes to the handbook this year. Um, some are more, uh, you know, substantive than others.
Um, and they are, we've given the page numbers here, which, uh, have been submitted to the school committee, our red line, uh, draft of the new handbook.
But if you go to the next page, we can start.
One of the first things was we wanted to add some language regarding vandalism in the restrooms.
We have seen a number of instances in the past two years in which the vape detectors have been, um, vandalized or, or broken.
And obviously these are students in there that are trying not to be caught, uh, while vaping. So we wanted to put some intentional language in there regarding damaging or tampering with those devices, which would include some financial responsibility for a cost of repairs if a student was caught.
Um, so that was one of the changes we did regarding restrooms.
Next slide.
Um, one of the, uh, attendance, um, changes that we wanted to make or just additions we wanted to clarify, uh, with stronger language that we recognize that a number of students have chronic medical conditions.
I would give an example of, say, migraines, for example.
And oftentimes what we will do is at the beginning of a school year, we'll get a doctor's note from that family.
And that way that family is not having to go back to the doctor time after time after time if that student is suffering with migraines because we have that documentation.
So we have shored up the language there to be as clear as possible.
Uh, generally speaking, once we get that information at the beginning of the year, we're good.
Uh, but there, we may be, you know, asking for additional documentation, um, at some point during the year, uh, depending.
Uh, but we just want to make sure that those, that documentation remains current. So that deals with chronic medical conditions and we added that onto the, uh, attendance policy with some more clear language.
Next slide.
This was newly added section regarding field trips.
We wanted to make sure we were very clear with students, uh, as well as faculty and parents and families in terms of having students participate.
As you know, we have well over a hundred clubs at Sharon High School, which is an amazing thing.
And therefore we have a lot of field trips that students go on. And we want to make sure that students participating in field trips, um, must be in good academic and attendance standing.
What we don't want to do is create a situation where we have these wonderful field trips offered and students are missing so much time that academically they're really suffering in the long run.
So we didn't have field trip language in the handbook.
So we have had looked at a number of different schools and we developed this language.
It's on this page.
Um, and please note at the bottom there that no student will be denied the opportunity to participate in a field trip due to inability to pay, which is, you know, I believe Adam, you had asked a question regarding, uh, fees. So we made sure we embedded that there as well. Uh, next slide.
And this is just additional information regarding overnight trips as well.
So we just clarified it more for both families and students.
Senior privileges.
Senior privileges. This is something new that we started last year in meeting with senior leadership over the past two years.
Um, in my tenure here as principal, one of the things that seniors really wanted to do was start to bring back some privileges for seniors.
That had kind of gone by the wayside.
And one of the things that we thought about when we created the new schedule that started last year, where we moved ACEs to the end of the day was a privilege in which seniors in good standing could in fact leave the building with permission from their parents and their families.
Um, during that ACEs period of that last 20 minutes of school.
And it turned out to be very successful last year.
Seniors, seniors loved it. Uh, it actually, you know, worked out well.
So many of them are either members of sports teams or clubs, organizations, theater, and it, it really allowed them some extra time to get themselves ready and prepared.
As you know, we, um, get out later than almost every school.
I believe every school in the Hockamock league gets dismissed earlier than us. So, uh, for like athletic tournaments and such, sometimes, uh, it has been difficult.
You know, kids are trying to turn over, get on those buses. If we have away games ACEs at the end of the day has really helped with that endeavor, but the senior privileges, uh, is something that we wanted to create, to build culture in our school.
And so we wanted to make sure that we embedded that information in the handbook because it wasn't there last year. We started at mid-year.
Graduation requirements.
The, the reason essentially that we made some changes to this was based on the, the vote last year to eliminate MCAS as a graduation requirement.
So you can see we crossed out MCAS and we're moving towards local competency determination.
We're actually meeting tomorrow as a district to discuss this further based on new DESE guidelines.
But as it stands right now, and this is in line with most schools in Massachusetts in the yellow, you can see in the bottom that as it stands right now, Sharon high school is looking for students passing both English nine and 10 are an equivalent algebra and geometry are equivalent biology physics or chemistry.
And that's in line with the testing that they would have done or had to pass for MCAS.
So we will be meeting and discussing tomorrow.
What, uh, the department of education wants school systems to do regarding competency determination.
And if we do have to make any changes to this, we will make sure that we bring that to your attention.
National honor society.
We did make a change, um, to the, uh, GPA required to apply for national honor society.
We did this to be more in line with the national standards.
The national standards, uh, currently suggest, um, uh, 85 or higher for students.
And we had, uh, originally a number of years ago at Sharon high school, it was 5.3.
And then it got lowered to 5.0, which on our weighted scale was equivalent to a 79. And so what we were looking to do to bring it back to 2 point, uh, I'm sorry, 5.25, which is an equivalent of an 80, essentially an 83 average in order to apply for national honor society.
So it's still a little below what the national organization suggests.
So that gives some opportunity for students, but we are also making it, um, more in line with other schools throughout the state and the country, whereby approximately 10 to 12% of student body, um, are members of national honor society.
Next slide.
Um, mid-year and final exams.
One of the things that we've been examining for the past couple of years is how we roll out mid-year exams and whether or not they were really fruitful.
And we were getting enough information from them to inform instruction.
And what we really kind of came to the conclusion was they were really post-mortem of what was happening in the classroom.
One of the district goals, um, and in line with our school improvement plan was to create benchmarking exams that would allow for kind of immediate data information that we could review to inform our instruction.
In the present.
In the present. And we thought that was very important.
So one of the other, uh, pieces of information we looked at is the amount of time that we were losing based on the structure of the mid-year exams at the high school.
And based on the fact that we couldn't teach new information for a certain amount of time, pre-mid-year and the half days that were embedded for the mid-year exams, we were losing about 11 teaching days. And for a school that is as exceptional as Sharon high school is with as many students taking honors and advanced placement classes, losing that time on learning, uh, we believe is very significant.
We do recognize that students are preparing many times for college and post-secondary pursuits.
So we would be keeping final exams in place at 5%, uh, gives an opportunity for students to have that kind of college experience where they're getting a final exam at the end. But we would like to move more towards benchmarking exams throughout the year to use that data more productively for instruction.
Okay. And those are the substantive changes that we have. So if you have any questions, I'm happy to answer them now.
Hi, Avi.
Thank you. Hi. Normally I take questions from other folks first. Uh, in this case, I just have a couple of questions and I thought, I thought one of them might be pressing enough to go first. Um, all right.
Question one, how many credits would have to be lost in senior year in order to not, I saw that it requires 20 credits to be earned in senior year in order to be part of commencement.
How many credits would have to be lost in order to arrive at that number for an average student?
To arrive at 20?
To arrive at 20. Okay.
So if, uh, if a student is essentially taking, um, six classes, um, I'm just doing the math in my head on the fly.
Sorry.
Success.
Essentially students can be earning, you know, are earning anywhere between like 40 and 60 credits in a given year. So really most students at Sharon high school are graduating well over the amount of credits needed, which is 102.
So, uh, if you have a student, you know, earning 20 credits in first semester or 25 credits, first semester, 25 second semester.
I mean, they would, they would have to be failing numerous classes or their attendance.
I mean, would have to be so bad that they're losing two credits per class.
But even that we would be hard pressed if they, you know, that's saying like they had great attendance in grades nine, 10, and 11. We'd be hard pressed to, to not graduate them as a result of that. So, um, it's more the overall effect of, of, of that. It's not particular courses, but the overall effect of, Hey, you're losing credits collectively.
And if you're somebody that in grades nine, 10, 11, and 12 has had poor attendance and has never kind of turned the corner with that, then it could affect you. Uh, but like I mentioned, most students are well over 102 credits when they graduate.
Okay. And then it, if you, so I understand that, you know, from previous discussions we've had here at the table and also in private that, you know, for some of the folks who have been reaching out to the school committee, on behalf of, you know, their students who are, you know, participate in extracurricular activities that are not school sponsored.
But I think that we'd all agree have tremendous value, uh, certainly for those students, for the social emotional, but also for their opportunities post high school.
Um, you know, that, that we're not, we're not offering opportunity for those to be excused absences.
I would ask it, is it something you would consider to accept some, some form of proof or set some standard, not, not to excuse those, but to remove some of the penalties we saw here tonight here to be, to be blunt.
I guess for me, I can, I can accept and support the credit aspect of it and the unexcused aspect of it, but seeing that there are students who, you know, are above board being, you know, upfront with us from the day they walk through our high school that they pursue, you know, for example, say somebody was trying to become an Olympus, Olympic gymnast.
That person would be spending a tremendous amount of time outside of school for specific reasons at times. And if they were doing certain things to try to take care, take advantage of the restorative practices, they might still end up in a situation where they had five absences and therefore couldn't take part in senior, uh, privileges.
For me, that feels just being honest here, punitive and, and uncomfortable for a student who maybe is actually burning the candle at both ends to be kind of what Sharon, I think would wants from our student, right?
Somebody who is, is doing what they can to reach a certain grade point average and also pursuing something that they, that, that really matters to them and very well might put them in a position to, to reflect very positively on our community.
For me, I I'm very supportive.
I can be very supportive of most of the aspects of this, but seeing that punitive aspect for me, I think that could have an unintended consequence for kids who are doing, I think we would all agree the right thing.
It doesn't feel like that's who the target would be. Um, again, no, yeah, I understand what you're saying.
I think there's a couple of things. I, one is that, um, the, the buffer that we give right now with 10 essentially is 6% of the school year.
Right.
So the 10 number I follow and to be just to, but we're on the same page there, but I noticed in, you know, in your presentation, it is a, it is a lower, much lower number for certain aspects like senior privileges.
I mean, for senior privileges, the number was five.
And so there'd be an instance where it's quarterly though.
Right.
But, but one thing that I noticed, and this is why I asked the question earlier about the five classes in one semester, is that a student who say a student is a professional, you know, or pursuing a professional career in competitive video gaming.
Right. And we can debate the merits of that all we want, but, but if that matters to that student and that student is an A student and they're going to miss five days all year, but they're in the same week. Right. It's one competition.
They're going to go to that. I'm just being upfront here that I can support that they, that that's, that there's give and takes there. I will say, I will say in the handbook, as it currently exists there, there is, um, a section that allows for the principal to make exceptions.
Right.
So that exists.
Right.
Right. So, I mean, and, and, and that is because sometimes there are extenuating circumstances.
Right.
Um, I know, you know, my, my twin nephews happen to be professional parkour athletes and, um, my nephew Shay is currently first in the world, um, ranked first in the world.
So they, um, they spend a lot of their time traveling around the world and they were gymnasts as well in high school.
I understand that I was an athlete myself.
I think my concern of opening a floodgate, you know, I'm willing to have flexibility, but opening a floodgate is not just about athletics.
Students at Sharon high school are so exceptional in so many different areas that my fear would be.
That.
Then what do you say to the student that is doing cancer research at Dana Faber and the student that's the cellist and the student that's the ping pong champion.
And these are all emails I've gotten in the past year. So I get a lot of emails requesting, um, you know, exemptions for things.
And so what I don't want to do is slide back on the great strides we've made and attendance, but also respect and value that these kids are doing.
Like you said, wonderful things both in and outside of the school.
And I think that's why we built in that buffer of 10 and there is that caveat where there is a principal's discretion.
And I will say that, um, within the Hawkamock league, uh, from the information that I have currently, it's about half and half that have that caveat in their handbooks.
Half are, are absolute no. And half have that caveat of a principal's discretion.
And we actually do have that.
It's just that, um, you know, and I have this discussion earlier with another member of school committee that, um, I'm nervous about what that will end up meaning.
And if that means we go back to a time period where our chronic attendance is at a point where we are not functioning the way we're supposed to based on DESE laws and regulations, um, which affects our accountability and numerous other things.
But I, but I understand what you're saying.
And I just want to be clear.
Yeah.
I certainly would take those things into account.
You know, if you're saying to me, if a student went on a gaming thing for a week and whether or not they're, they're not going to be allowed to participate in something, obviously those things, um, I can take into account.
And, and that's, that's all I wanted to express is I'm supportive of the attendance policy aspect of it. Yep. Um, I think it's important for young people to learn that they're, you know, there's gives and take, but I also would hate to think that students of ours who are striving to do things like participate in cancer research would lose senior privileges or. Right. Exactly.
And so I, I'm glad to hear that, but that is how you're looking at the discretion aspect. Um, again, like I think where these students are sincerely doing something to better themselves and our community, that there's a value on the privileges side on the field trip side to, to not trying to be punitive towards them. But I, I'm, I'm supportive and I, and I, I appreciate the length you're going to, to try to, um, continue to push Sharon high, uh, towards a more rigorous academic environment.
So I appreciate that. Absolutely.
Alan, I see your hand next. Oh, sorry to cut you off. That's okay. That's okay. I don't know. Dr. Patelos ends up too. I just don't, I want to give him the chance to maybe weigh in. Oh, I didn't.
Sorry, Dr. Patelos. Just quickly. I know one of the conversations, um, Ms. Keenan, one of the benefits is challenging as athletes or people with other special talents are being pulled away. One of the benefits of those situations, you often know that you're going to have a period of time when you're going to be out, um, or you could. So starting those conversations early so you can create a contract and look at like the nuance of your situation would be really beneficial because I know Ms. Keenan and her team, you know, definitely is willing to. When you're out sick, that's sometimes more difficult. Uh, but when you, with these special circumstances, please reach out ahead of time and you can come up with something.
And I think the type of people you're talking about, Avi, who are really doing the right thing and trying to work something out, uh, will, will fare well.
Good to hear.
All right, Alan.
Thanks. I just want to, I realize all of them committee members have their hands up. I just want to be transparent.
I have four questions and I'll just stick to those four questions.
Principal Keenan, nice to see you. We'll get a great summary. Um, I wanted to call, I think you're aware of this, but I don't know that it made it to your presentation.
So I think it's worth raising for the community.
There's edits on, I think, page 22 of the handbook where you're scaling back, uh, page, page 21 and page 22. You're scaling back the credits lost for half semester courses and scaling, um, comparatively the credits restored for half credit courses.
So it looks like an edit was made to five unexcused absences used to be a diminution of one credit.
Now it's 0.5.
10 used to be, uh, now it's one, et cetera.
I think, I honestly think that was a mistake when, when Jen and I started reviewing this this summer. And we were looking at it, we're like, no, this was supposed to be this. And I, I think it, I don't know if, um, it was supposed to be 0.5. So we just corrected it to where it was supposed to be. I think it was, um, a mistake within the document itself.
Okay.
Good to know. Thank you for clarifying that. Yeah.
Uh, I guess two questions about the policy.
Um, and I read the handbook as closely as I could.
A student who is out for an excused absence versus an excused absence one day, unexcused versus excused.
Is there a difference that we would expect for that student in their classroom, in the classroom experience for those two students, if they were in the same class in terms of their ability to make up work in terms of their interaction with the teacher in any, any respect?
No. Okay.
So the only, the only time, um, that would happen is if a student, um, purposefully cut a class.
Sure.
And then, uh, the teacher would have that, you know, um, option to say whether or not they can make up that work. But if a student is absent and that's even, you know, under Massachusetts law, even under for disciplinary reasons, they have the opportunity to make that work up. You know, years ago, back in the day when I first started, that was an option for teachers.
They didn't have to let students do that, but it is a law now. So yes, regardless of whether it's excused or unexcused, students can make up the work.
So the relevance then of an unexcused absence really only comes into play when there's 10.
Correct.
Okay.
Second question. We've gotten a lot of feedback about the honor, the national honor society attendance, but correlation between national honor society and attendance requirements.
I didn't see it in the handbook.
Can you just clarify the role that attendance plays in national honor society eligibility?
Um, I w I wish I was more nuanced in the national national honor society, um, recommendations, but it, it generally in part of every school has generally this attendance policy.
They look at a student's attendance, um, to, to speak to the characteristics that, uh, national honor society is looking for in terms of service and commitment and character.
Um, so most schools have something regarding attendance for them.
Do you know if we currently sort of, well, I think that.
Or a number of unexcused absences?
Um, I don't think we have spoken to that specifically, but we look at overall attendance.
SPEAKER_UNKNOWN: Okay.
Yep. Um, and I guess my last question is the policy has been in effect for a year. The, the, the, the instances you showed on your chart, where you had some percentage of students that had missed 10% of the school year and some percent of the students who were still missing 20% of the school year. Can you tell us just sort of qualitatively, were those absences, um, the result of excess unexcused absences were those result with those absences largely ones where credits had to be taken away from students, where those absences were credits were scored.
Can you give us a flavor for how it actually played out?
DESE doesn't distinguish.
So they, they don't break that, that data down for us between excuse and unexcused.
They don't, they don't recognize a difference, but I will tell you that those students typically that are missing 20% or more, oftentimes are students that have been hospitalized.
Um, they are going through something medically for one reason or another.
Um, usually those are those cases, or, you know, it could be that a student is, it is unexcused and is truancy, right? So we have some tools in our toolbox to use where we try to meet with parents and we try restorative and we have the meet with adjustment, adjustment counselor and counselors.
And eventually, right.
Uh, depending on the age of the student, you can go the way of, you know, filing a CRA. Um, so I think, you know, we could do a deeper dive for you if you wanted.
Um, but certainly I would say there's a small, small percentage that are truly truant.
There's a larger percentage of students that, um, might be school avoidant because, uh, of social emotional reasons, um, that they have a certain diagnosis could be anxiety.
Uh, it could be, you know, we have students that have sleep disorders, you know, things of that nature.
A lot of those, um, higher numbers are medically, you know, there are medical reasons I would say for them.
Um, so oftentimes those are excused.
Okay. Okay. Yeah. We could talk about maybe deeper dives offline, but thank you. It's helpful.
Adam.
Thank you, Avi. And thank you, Principal Keenan.
Actually, the vast majority of my questions were addressed. So thank you, Avi and Alan, for asking those questions.
Um, the one point that I was interested in clarifying was just the difference between an unexcused absence and a cut or a skip. Um, like how, just how's that determined?
Well, if, um, so obviously a cut and, um, an absence in which there's no documentation, right? It's not, um, I'm sorry, you moved on the screen, so I'm trying to find you again. Okay. There you are. All good.
Um, so, you know, if we don't get a doctor's note, um, or it's not a bereavement or it's not a religious observance, et cetera, um, they're both unexcused.
The difference would be a class cut. A teacher does not have to let you make up that work.
Right. And the way that would be determined obviously is, um, if the, if the teacher's writing up that student. So we have a write-up process. So we can see what students have, have shown up for school that day. And if they've not, they don't show up for a class, oftentimes, um, they'll call the main office.
They'll call the counseling office because maybe they got called into a meeting or something like that. And if it's determined that they actually cut the class, then, then that would distinguish between the two and allow for a teacher to make a decision regarding whether or not school, uh, you know, work during that day is going to be made up or not.
Gotcha.
To paraphrase.
I think so. Yeah. I want to paraphrase and you tell me if this is correct.
Okay. That in an unexcused absence is an absence that, you know, that the parent notifies the school, like, Hey, right. My child is going to be out of school for whatever, you know, writhing late, leaving early or not there at all.
Um, and a, a cut or a skip is when the student is there, they've been marked present.
We know they're in the building, uh, and they just don't show up for class.
Yeah.
And, and generally their parent does not know that.
Right.
That's that that's happening.
Yeah. Okay.
Thank you. Okay.
Okay.
Dan.
Hi, Ms. Keenan.
Um, I do. I love that we're, uh, at the one year point and we're using this opportunity to fine tune the policy.
Uh, I think that's healthy.
It, uh, I can tell you've put a lot of thought into some of the, uh, additions to the handbook with this policy that you've already made. Like, I love that clarification you added around chronic illnesses.
For example, I know there were lots of questions about that. Um, just like with any new policy, I think, uh, there was a lot of anxiety about those types of personal situations.
So, uh, the more we can speak to that in writing in the handbook.
So there are no surprises for people. Uh, I love that you're already doing that. And that would be one example on this other related topic about, uh, kids who have really elite sports sports competitions, things that are very sympathetic to us in which we in general support, but they might know in advance that they're going to have a situation like this. Uh, I love everything I've heard on this call.
Um, Dr. Botello gave a great explanation.
I thought about, uh, how if students are proactive, the schools will work with them.
Uh, I noticed you added some language already about this topic.
I think it was in one of the footnotes, uh, that said something like some of the options for restorative practices will include, um, summer school Saturdays.
And then it said academic contracts.
I think I actually didn't know what that meant or misread it at first, but it sounded to me from the explanation, like that's a contract between you and the student about what needs to happen. Is that correct?
Yeah. Well, so one of the things that we taught, we've talked about with the students is that, um, you know, if a student, you know, to, to go back to Avi's example of the student missing the week for gaming, um, and that happens in a particular quarter.
So if, you know, we have a contract with that student in the, in the next quarter, they don't miss any days.
They don't have any unexcused days that clears that.
Right.
Right. So that's what we mean by developing that contract with them. Right.
So that's an opportunity for them to kind of clean the board and, and not be penalized for that time.
You know, it's an incentive for them essentially.
Um, is it a special agreement you would create with the student where they agreed to do certain things? Is that no, not, no, not necessarily.
So maybe in terms of the, uh, the word contract is, um, maybe misleading.
We do actually do senior contracts.
Uh, and that's kind of where we took the language from. So when we see a senior that's faltering, you know, they get senioritis and it's around February and their grades are starting to slip in their attendance.
We will sit with the family and the student and the counselor, and we will write out all of their grades and what they need to do. And we all sign it.
So we're all in agreement has to happen in this particular case. It, this doesn't have to be that formal, uh, students know that if, you know, this happens in quarter two and it's unexcused, if, if they don't have any, you know, unexcused absences in quarter three, they can kind of wipe the slate clean. Um, okay.
And, um, I, I hope it's clear that I'm overall very supportive of this policy.
It seems like it's been tremendously effective at lowering our absences.
Um, so just the fact that we're talking about a narrow case here is kind of an indication of that, but it's an important case and it's one we've gotten lots of correspondence about. Um, so could you talk a little bit more about in this narrow case where there is a student who knows that they're going to have to miss six days in a semester, or I guess 11 days in the year because they're going to some kind of elite competition.
They know about it in advance.
Um, you would recommend that they come to you early in advance, work something out with you. Um, is, are you, are you willing to provide flexibility about how you would approach those situations in terms of like how they would make up the work or the loss of learning?
Um, is that fair? And if so, is that something we can put in writing just to lower people's anxiety and maybe affirmatively tell them what to do? Like when we read this now, it kind of explains what the policy is. But if somebody's in that situation, they might not know what should I do? Should I, should I go to you? And if I do, what'll happen?
Can we write some of that down just so that people know up front and they're encouraged to do that?
I'm happy to, to look back at the language tomorrow with the admin team to do something to that effect. You know, what, what we found last year is that people were just requesting carp launch for it to be excused.
And, you know, there was restorative language in there last year.
Um, but that's not what was being asked of us last year. What was being asked is for it just to be excused and not to do any sort of restorative piece to it.
So, you know, if I received an email saying, I know my child's going to be out, um, what are some options, right?
Uh, I would be happy to, to do that. But I, I, I also want to caution us as a district that the, the number of students that are really exceptional in this school, whether it be sports, academics, theater, what have you is, is really impressive, truly impressive.
And so I want to caution that in my discussions with other principals in the Hawk, these are very rare instances, you know, um, there are students, for example, you know, that are trying to become skiers, you know, in the Olympics and oftentimes they will remove themselves.
They will unenroll in a school, enroll in a ski school, right.
In the winter and then re-enroll.
There are instances that happen like that. Um, so we have to be careful that this doesn't open the floodgates where our attendance rate goes back, right?
Because every, every family is going to think that what their child's doing is, is really important. And it is right.
But at some point I'm beholden to the laws and the regulations of the state and making sure that we create a policy, um, that, you know, when a student gets a diploma from Sharon high school, it really means something, you know?
Um, but yes, I, I, I understand that.
And I appreciate, you know, being a parent myself and driving to practices every single evening.
I understand what parents, the, the dedication that they go through, uh, and want to try to work with them, you know, as best I can. And I think parents being proactive about the restorative piece would be very helpful, um, on our end.
All right, Jeremy.
Oh, thank you for the presentation.
I appreciate the use of the data.
Hi, Jeremy.
Hi.
Um, I, I was just curious about the DESE implications you'd mentioned in like the state.
Yep. And, um, federal regulations around that and implications just so to help me think through like the trade-offs were being asked to make.
Yep.
I think that, um, what DESE does is they take certain data points from schools oftentimes that, you know, well, it was MCAS was, was, uh, part of it. Um, and, and, and I'm not sure because we are still giving MCAS whether it will still be part of it, regardless of whether it counts for, uh, purposes of graduation.
Attendance.
You know, success of our subgroups, you know? So they use certain factors and they create a formula that gives us essentially an accountability rating.
Um, and attendance is a, is a big part of that.
Um, so that speaks to, you know, um, rankings and things of that nature.
Now I used to work in an urban district where our accountability rating, um, because of certain factors went to the point where, you know, we had to work with the state. I actually went through the whole Harvard data wise process as a result of it, um, which was phenomenal.
And I think that's awesome that we're bringing it to the district. And, um, you know, I learned a lot about how do we move those levers to get schools, particularly high schools that, that have a lot of pressure on them for graduation rates.
Um, how do we get that accountability rating to a point where, um, it's really important for schools, you know, for, for some urban schools, it, it affects, you know, um, finances in number of ways for Sharon.
I don't think it's the same. I think it's, it's more in terms of, you know, where do we rank, um, in the state in terms of a school system and what that means to us and what the community wants, uh, for Sharon high school to be.
And does that tie to the chronic absence rate or the overall absence rate? Like what are kind of the dimensions of that and the formula?
Yeah.
The formula is so, you know, I had members of DESE trying to explain it to me. Many, many times when they were working with me and Taunton, and even they get confused by it. So I don't want to speak out of turn and say whether or not it's, you know, it's a combination of the chronic and the overall.
Um, but certainly the overall certainly speaks, I think would, would speak to part of that.
Um, and then I had a few more points.
One, I agree with Dan's comment about any way that we can just write something in the book so that parents are aware of these restorative practices.
Um, and I was curious, you know, how, how many exemptions for that type of activity did we give, for example, like last year in the pilot year?
Yep.
Um, I didn't, I didn't, you know, I, I had a number of requests, um, but it wasn't exponential by any stretch of the imagination, but I, but I did have them and they were across the board. So, um, it wasn't just for athletic events, but there was, um, athletic events.
Um, they were also, you know, asking for exemptions for certain, um, like religious holidays or, or, or, um, ping pong, I believe was one championship.
Um, and there was, you know, some, some work in terms of outside work on science and doing research, you know, things of that nature. And I tried to stay kind of steadfast last year, um, in terms of what the policy was, because I wanted to be able to look at data and see what it really, what it really said after a year of following this policy.
Yeah.
I was a little worried looking at the data at the, I don't, I don't know if the charts were in our shared folder, but it seemed like the drop in chronic absences is relatively small. I think it was like 11 and a half to 10%, um, which is kind of, I, I, I know that looking at the data, like above nine absences, there's a measurable academic impact.
Um, but it does seem like chronic absence hasn't budged much.
I agree with you, Jeremy.
There's still work to be done.
Absolutely.
There's still work to be done. Um, I think COVID played a huge part in this, in terms of creating a culture in this country, not, not, not just in Sharon, you know, um, of other things being prioritized and, and, but again, you know, it's a balance in a much more complicated world than we did when I was in high school. And so I, I try to recognize those things as well.
Um, but I do think that there's more work to be done about getting our attendance rate.
Uh, because I do think there's a correlation between success in school and showing up. I think it's 98% of the battle.
Um, so I'll continue, you know, to, to fight for that, but, but also be cognizant of, of what families go through and live through together.
And just one last note, you know, on Alan's deep dive, I think, I think it would, it would be helpful to understand kind of what share of that chronic absence was, um, mostly rooted in unexcused versus excused.
Um, because, you know, if it's, if it's excused for medical reasons, then we shouldn't expect it to drop more, right? Like we could, you know, the, the probability is that a certain number of kids are going to have an injury every year or a hospital stay or something.
So, um, I think that that would be a helpful data point to understand like how much room there is to compress, compress that chronic absence.
Gotcha.
All right, Georgianne.
SPEAKER_UNKNOWN: Thanks. SPEAKER_UNKNOWN: Thanks. SPEAKER_UNKNOWN: Thanks. Um, Avi, with all due respect, I'm going to ask you, um, follow the order of the meeting and speak last from now on, given that it's eight 20 and we're barely into our meeting.
Um, and we kind of all, I think are hitting on the same points.
I know you felt they're important and they certainly are. Um, but maybe just since you have the privilege of chair, give the rest of us in the audience a chance to speak moving forward with that. Um, principal Keenan, thank you so much for the data working, uh, neighboring high school.
I really understand how important the attendance data is. It is part of our ranking.
I think it's part of our morale around our teachers, around our students, feeling good coming to school.
Um, parents, it's kind of, it's a big part of our community.
I think it's important. We need to have them in front of us for them to, to learn.
So thanks for sharing that data.
Um, the one thing I just want to, you're welcome.
Thank you. Um, the one thing I, I want to piggyback off Dan and Jeremy is like, I do think, and I agree with you about being very rigid the first year because we want our data to reflect our policy, right?
Um, I would just urge you to maybe work now towards a little bit in the gray and work with some language around when you can make exceptions to hear that we didn't make any, I think is causing kind of some hysteria with that small segment of the population.
Um, I've gotten a lot of emails, a lot of calls, and I just want people to know that we're listening, um, and that that humanistic part of our kids needs and their social emotional needs and how that contributes to them coming to school is very important.
So, and maybe that's something, um, policy subcommittee can help with.
Um, usually they would take our first run at this. That would also save us some time, but we didn't do it that way this time it is what it is.
Um, so I would just ask that to respectfully maybe come up with some language and maybe look at some of those extreme circumstances.
Obviously, um, I think our attendance policy is pretty clear around religious holidays and stuff. But if we have that exceptional athlete, that person who got a grant to do this research because they're going into medical school, I think, um, maybe this year we can try to be more flexible.
Um, so that's just something I wanted to ask of you. And then the other thing that just go ahead, sorry.
Just to mention the, the emails that I've received and, uh, you know, I think I'm, I'm pretty accurate on this, but none of those families that I received emails from came close to losing any credit, you know, that there weren't no circumstances.
Right.
And I think that's a really good point. And I think, I don't know if there's a way we can work with the community to help them understand that. I mean, I think when we work in education, we get that big picture, right? You got 10 absences.
You don't use any typically.
Like if I look at your absences, your kids missed five, their whole career.
Um, we get that.
But I think to a parent, um, that's where I'm kind of, I feel like that's where we, maybe we can just improve a little bit to make that feel a little better, um, kind of reduce kind of the anxiety around it.
Um, because I, you know, unfortunately, you know, we only know what we know. Right.
Um, so I agree with you there.
Um, the other thing that really doesn't have to do too much with this is you said that parents don't really know when their kids skip school. Do we not send out alerts in power school when their attendance is taken so that a parent knows their students not in class?
No, what I meant to say is like a parent is not going to know if their child decides to skip a class.
Um, but yes, every day we do have a robo call that goes out, um, to all families if a student is absent.
Okay. Perfect.
Yeah.
Yeah.
All right. Thank you so much.
Yes. No problem.
I'm just going to stop because I want to give others a chance to talk.
Thank you so much.
Yep. Thank you very much.
Julie.
Uh, thanks.
I really enjoyed this discussion.
I've talked to many, um, people and I appreciate, um, every comment that I've heard from, um, everyone from Ms. Keenan to, um, other parents.
So I think I'm not going to actually add, I have a really small other question that was not on this topic.
And I just wanted to ask about the weighted grades.
Um, I thought we discussed this a couple of years ago and we were going to phase out the weighted grades. So I was just wondering if you could talk about that some more. Um, yes.
I mean, that's so right now how it stands in the handbook is what we did last year is. Um, we showed both how the weighted grade status and non-weighted grade status just for, uh, perspective because we are finding that a number of schools are moving away from weighted grades.
Um, and the reason being is that, um, almost every college and university recalculates GPA, um, when students, when they're looking to accept students into their, their programs.
So there, it is really, um, kind of local issue.
Um, just like I would say many schools have moved away from, you know, having a valedictorian, right? Um, same can be said for weighted.
So that's a process.
I think that has to happen.
And I think that for this year, that's kind of one of my goals to look at most likely with school council, which would include parents, community members, students, teachers, uh, and see if that's something that we would want to move forward with.
But I would definitely want more input than just say the administrative team, um, to make a decision like that.
SPEAKER_UNKNOWN: Okay. Thank you.
Adam.
Thanks.
I just had a quick follow-up to Julie's question.
I know we talked earlier about the National Honor Society and changing the kind of GPA threshold.
That is a weighted GPA threshold.
Um, and so I don't know how that is handled or would be handled if, um, kind of we move strictly away from, from weighted grading.
Um, but I just want to call out in terms of like how those are used. Um, they're not for, um, for college acceptance, but I think in terms of both graduation honors and National Honor Society, it looked like in the handbook, those are still taken into account.
Correct.
Yep. Thank you.
Thank you. Thank you. All right.
Thank you. Nothing more from the board.
Thank you, Principal Keenan.
Um, I will throw it back to you, Dr. Bertello for the next set of handbooks.
Okay. I'm going to turn over. Kevin O'Rourke is going to speak to, um, the minor changes made in the middle school handbook.
Good evening, everyone.
Yes, I think I should be quick.
Um, the middle school handbook is pretty much the same as it's been.
Um, we did make one adjustment to mirror the high school's target policy.
We had a policy that frankly was, it's seemingly more complex and we simplified and mirrored to be in line with what the high school has had.
Um, so that is our only real significant change in, um, handbook policy.
All right.
Um, George Ann.
SPEAKER_UNKNOWN: Okay.
Sorry. I'm not really sure where this is, which, if this goes to high school, I think it goes just across our district.
I just had a quick question.
Maybe this is for you, Dr. Bertello on, um, the bullying section.
Um, I think it got significant edits and stuff last year. The only thing that I don't find is clear is in the circumstance where we use the language, like where we'll report to the principal or designee.
Um, that's kind of the verbiage, right? That's the scene.
What happens?
It doesn't make it clear to a parent, a student or a teacher.
If the principal or their designee is the accused, what the process is in the handbook.
Um, I mean, I think I know that again, I work in schools, but like, I don't know if we need to clarify that language if I just missed it. Um, so I just wanted to kind of flag that for discussion.
Um, and if you, if I did just miss it, if you could just point me to it, I'd appreciate it.
Yeah, we got, I, I can, we can look at that, um, portion and, um, and see. So what happens if the accused is the principal or designee?
Yeah, the only reason I'm asking is you did a great job, like expanding on, um, retaliation and all of that type of language.
Um, and I feel like, you know, essence of bullying and harassment is that power dynamic. And I don't, I don't feel like we just made it clear, like what's plan B.
Um, hopefully that never happens, but I feel like we should just make sure that it's in there.
Yeah. I think that the answer is if, if, if the principal or designee is the accused, then another designee will be selected, but I can, we can certainly add that language.
That's one of the reasons we have, we have multiple reasons for designee, but that would be, uh, one, one, one that you would use. It can't always be the same person.
Appreciate it. Thanks.
Adam.
Thanks. I mean, thank you. Principal work. I just want to double check in the document that we shared that just like highlighted where there were substantive changes.
Um, it did say there were substantial changes to the kind of bullying, um, language, but I didn't see that kind of redlined in the, in the SMS doc.
Um, were there or weren't there changes there?
And if so, um, if you could highlight those, um, either on the call, if you can speak to it directly or in a followup, uh, red line, that would be appreciated.
Yeah. I can check. I don't believe there were any significant changes on that area.
Okay. Maybe it's just a typo in the, in the first document.
Adam, can you repeat that?
Yeah. So I think in the, in the document that was shared that just highlighted, it was like an overview of changes in the handbook.
Yeah. Uh, or SMS, I think it said that there was a substantial change to the, uh, bullying language, but I just didn't see that reflected in the handbook itself.
Uh, the handbook, it, it, I mean, it wasn't like it, it had some clarifications in language in that, um, uh, bullying and hurtful behavior.
And there was a chart with that and you could see, uh, Jones redlined of it. It wasn't like incredible amounts of changes, but you saw there's some red line there that that's what it was referring to.
Um, okay.
I'll look again. I must've missed the red lines.
Yeah. I mean, it, it wasn't like tremendous amounts, but it was something that I, you know, more than changing the name and changing the date.
SPEAKER_UNKNOWN: Okay. Thank you.
Alan.
So Dr. Bertello and Dr. Rourke. Thank you. Nice to see you both. I, um, Dr.
Principal Rourke. Nice to see you.
Um, I, I agree with Adam. I don't see red line changes either. And I think the summary document did mention that that language was changed.
So I do want clarity on that, but a principle of work, I wanted to actually ask you about the hurtful language content that's in the version we were provided.
Um, because it talks about hurtful remarks and actions, including careless and thoughtful, thoughtless remarks, but also racist, ethnic, homophobic, sexist, disambulist, anti-Semitic, slurs, graffiti, et cetera. And my concern with that is when you go down to the, to the chart, and this is on page 31 of the draft we got, you know, it, if we're characterizing racist and homophobic and xenophobic remarks as just hurtful, then that's a certain level of punishment.
But if we're not enumerating them as harassment or bullying, then for families, right?
For families and students, then I don't want it to be suggested in any way, shape or form that those wouldn't be subjected to the higher level of punishment associated with harassing remarks or bullying remarks. And the way the guide is written right now, it just suggests that those kinds of comments are along the lines of careless or thoughtful comments.
So can we try to tighten that up?
Sure.
We can certainly look at that.
Thank you.
All right. Thanks, Alan.
Um, all right.
Thank you, principal of work. Nothing from me.
Uh, Dr. Patel.
Okay. We'll turn it over to our elementary school principals to present together.
Thank you.
We, uh, we, as a team, and we wanted to welcome Dr. Conley to the team, who's been a really wonderful addition, uh, for principal Farrell and myself, you know, so when we reviewed it, similar to middle school, we didn't see at this point where we need to make any dramatic changes to the handbook.
So there, there are some edits and whatnot to that, but that's mainly, uh, related to dates or, uh, names.
Um, I'll just add that I do, they were very minor revisions to the handbook.
I think as a new team, we really reflected and really talked a lot about next year and our vision and really thought that the work that everyone did last year in approving some of the policies truly aligns with our vision as a team for next year. So we've kept all the language within the policies consistent.
All right. Thank you, uh, and welcome Dr. Conley. Uh, thank you for speaking to that. Um, nothing from the board.
All right.
Uh, thank you all for your hard work in, in analyzing that and coming to that conclusion.
Um, Dr.
Patel.
Okay.
Okay. And, um, Mark fans is gonna, um, again, there weren't any substantive changes, but I'm going to give you an opportunity to speak about the ECC program, uh, handbook.
Yeah.
Yeah.
Good evening.
Um, yeah, there's been, I, I, I'm, I'm pleased to have joined the ECC staff. Um, it's been a challenging summer this year, um, for myself.
Um, but we've looked at the, I've been working with Amy Steinberg, who's been amazing and such a great mentor for me. And we didn't make any changes to the handbook.
There are just things with names and dates and things like that, that we changed.
Um, so with that, if there's any questions.
Georgianne.
Thanks.
Hi, congratulations on your position switch.
And I think this might be for Astrid. Um, so I really liked, thank you for putting the, um, sub separate, um, class, the half day and full day in there to clarify kind of the kindergarten piece. I've been getting a lot of questions on, oh, the school system determines what sub separate kids get a half day versus a full day of kindergarten.
I think it's a great question. And I know it's, um, kind of up to the team to decide that need.
Um, so since Astrid, you took some time with me this summer and I really appreciated it. And I know you've been spending a lot of time with the community and with CPAC.
Um, maybe we can put that out there for some more discussion.
Cause I get, I think people are just confused about the process and, and feel slighted.
I mean, you need help those.
Um, and I know, I know that's not the intention. I think you're doing some great work and, um, it shows on the ECC handbook cause it's right there for us. Right. Um, so maybe trying to help people understand that process a little bit more and special ed, I think it's got so many moving parts. When you have a child that young on a IEP, it can be really overwhelming.
So I just wanted to throw that out there and I appreciate it. I appreciate everything that you guys are doing. Um, and I, I, I, I, I think it's important to me to, uh, understand who, um, and I, I think that's what I would say. Yeah. Yeah. Thank you so much for bringing that up. Uh, we will work with Mark to really, um, create a clarity, um, to understand who and why certain kids get half day, a full day. Um, I can tell you that in my experience, it has a lot to do with the level of services and the amount of hours that those services need to be addressed. But I will work with Mark on really creating clarity for families for sure.
Thank you.
All right.
I will move us now then to decision items.
First up, I would entertain.
I just want to give one clarification.
So I guess when I shared the handbooks in two different ways, one was in a shared folder and then they were shared in the packet through PDFs. It seems like the red line for the middle school part about the bullying didn't carry over to the PDF for some reason.
But what it was is the chart on page 36 that delineates around joking, teasing, and conflict.
So that's the section that was added for greater clarification if you want to look at that before the next meeting.
Sorry about that.
Thank you. No, it's okay. Thank you very much for clarifying that. All right.
First up for decision items, I would entertain a motion to approve the minutes of June 18th, 2025.
So moved.
SPEAKER_UNKNOWN: Second.
Second.
SPEAKER_UNKNOWN: Georgian. Yes.
SPEAKER_UNKNOWN: Jeremy. Yes.
Adam.
Yes.
Alan.
Yes.
Julie.
Yes.
Dan.
Yes.
And I'm a yes. Motion carries seven. Oh, next up. I would entertain a motion to approve the SMS eighth grade field trip to Washington DC. So moved.
So moved.
Second.
All right.
Georgian.
Yes.
Jeremy.
Yes.
Adam.
Yes.
Alan.
Yes.
Julie.
Yes.
Dan.
Yes.
And I'm a yes. Motion carries seven. Oh, next up. I would entertain a motion to accept state federal ESSA and federal entitlement grants totaling 2,170,967 dollars.
So moved.
Second.
All right.
Georgian.
Absolutely.
Yes.
Jeremy.
Yes.
Adam.
Yes.
Alan.
Oh, Alan.
Sorry.
SPEAKER_UNKNOWN: Yes. SPEAKER_UNKNOWN: Sorry. SPEAKER_UNKNOWN: Okay. Julie.
Yes.
Dan.
Yes.
And I am a yes.
Motion carries seven. Oh, all right. Next up. I would entertain a motion to approve the student activity fund clubs for 2025 to 2026. So moved.
Second.
SPEAKER_UNKNOWN: Georgian. Yes.
Jeremy.
Yes.
Adam.
Yes.
Alan.
Yes.
Julie.
Yes.
Dan.
Yes.
Dan.
Yes.
And I'm a yes. Motion carries seven. Oh, I would entertain a motion to accept the annual marijuana mitigation fund payment. So moved.
Second.
Georgian.
Yes.
Jeremy.
Yes.
Adam.
Yes.
Alan.
Yes.
Julie.
Yes.
Dan.
Yes.
And I'm a yes. Motion carries seven. Are there any announcements or are there any announcements or are there any announcements or any other questions that you can do. SPEAKER_UNKNOWN: Yes. Yes.
And then lastly, I would entertain a motion to approve the fourth quarter student activity fund budget report. So moved.
Second.
All right.
George Ann. Yes.
Jeremy.
Yes.
Adam.
Yes.
Yes.
Julie.
Yes.
Dan.
Yes.
Yes.
Thank you. Absolutely.
Thank you. SPEAKER_UNKNOWN: Thank you,jiy. SPEAKER_UNKNOWN: I just want to, uh, to formally thank, uh, our DPW and water department, um, for the work that is going on, uh, on cottage street, uh, we've had water main replacements and I know sometimes that work starts, um, later in the summer or into the fall. into the fall. And I know that they made a large effort to start as early as possible and to minimize disruption.
So just wanted to publicly say thank you to those departments.
Terrific.
That's great. All right. Seeing no other announcements or updates, I will move us into executive session.
Pursuant to MGL C30AS21A3 to discuss strategy with respect to pending litigation, civil action 2582-CV00891, because an open meeting may have a detrimental effect on litigation position of the Sharon School Committee and the chair so declares not to return to open session.
Can I get a motion?
So moved.
Second.
All right.
Georgianne.
Yes.
Jeremy.
Yes.
Adam.
Yes.
Alan.
Yes.
Julie.
Yes.
Dan.
Yes.
And I am a yes.
Motion carries 7-0.
I will see you in executive session. Everyone else take care and have a great first day of school.